10 compaction & finishing.ppt
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
1/43
1
Optimal Load Time
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
2/43
2
Optimum Load Time
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
3/43
CE403Construction Methodology
Compaction &
Finishing
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
4/43
4
The Compaction Process
Increasing density of a
soil by mechanicallyforcing the soil particles
closer together,
expelling air in the void
spaces of the soil.Can be accomplished in
a few hours.
Soil
H2O
Air
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
5/43
5
The Consolidation Process
Increasing density of
cohesive soilsresulting from theexpulsion of waterfrom the void
spaces in the soil.May take as long as
months, or years.
Soil
H2O
Air
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
6/43
6
The Compaction Process
Improved Characteristic of Soil:
Increased Bearing Strength Reduced Compressibility
Improved Volume-Change Characteristics
Reduced Permeability
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
7/437
Factors Affecting The Degree of
Compaction
The Soils Physical & Chemical Properties
The Soils Moisture Content The Compaction Method
The Thickness of the Soil Layer (Lift)
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
8/438
The Four Basic
Compaction Forces
Stat ic Weigh t (Pressure)
Manipulat ion (Kneading) Most Effective on Plastic Soils
Impact
Low Frequency for Plastic Soils (10 Hz)
Vibrat ion Higher Frequency (80 Hz)
Effective on cohesionless soils ~ Sand & Gravel
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
9/439
Optimum Moisture Content
Very Important Factor
~ the moisture at which maximum density can occur. Proctor Test: ASTM & AASHTO
Standard Proctor Test
ASTM D 698, AASHTO T-99
Modified Proctor Test
ASTM D 1557, AASHTO T-180
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
10/4310
Proctor Compaction Tests
Test Details Standard Modified
Diameter of Mold 4" or 102 mm 4" or 102 mm5" cut to 4.59" 5" cut to 4.59"
127 mm cut to 117 mm 127 mm cut to 117 mm
Number of Layers 3 5
Blows per Layer 25 25
5.5 lb 10 lb
2.5 kg 4.5 kg
2" 2"
51 mm 51 mm
12" 18"305 mm 457 mm
1/30 ft3 1/30 ft3
0.94 l 0.94 l
12,400 ft-lb/ft3 56,200 ft-lb/ft3
592 kJ/m3 2,693 kJ/m3
Volume of Sample
Compactive Effort
Height of Sample
Weight of Hammer
Diameter of Hammer
Height of Hammer Drop
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
11/4311
Modified Proctor
Standard Proctor
Zero Air Voids
Line Of
Optimums
Water Content (% Dry Weight)
DryDensitylb/cuft
Typical Compaction Test
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
12/4315
ModifiedProctor TestResults forVarious Soils
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
13/4316
Compaction Specifications
From90 to 95% of the maximum densi ty asdetermined by either the Standard o rModi f ied Procto r Test.
For Example: 95% of Standard Procto r for Embankments,
Dams, and Backfi l ls.
90% of Mod if ied Proc tor for f loor slabs on-grade.
95% (to 100% ) for pavementswith high wheelloads.
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
14/4317
Modified Proctor
Standard Proctor
Zero Air Voids
Line Of
Optimums
Water Content (% Dry Weight)
DryDensitylb/cuft
Typical Compaction Test
100% of Standard
Proctor
95% of Standard
Proctor
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
15/4318
Types of Compaction Equipment
Tamping Foot Rollers
Grid/Mesh Rollers Vibratory Compactors
Steel Wheel/Smooth Drum Rollers
Rubber Tired/Pneumatic Rollers Segmented Pad Rollers
Rammers/Tampers
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
16/4319
Vibratory
Compactors
Hand-
Operated
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
17/4320
Smooth & Padded Rollers
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
18/43
21
Pneumatic/Tired Compactor
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
19/43
22
Vibratory
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
20/43
23
Water Trucks
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
21/43
25
Equipment
Selection
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
22/43
26
Number of Passes
Number of Pass Effect
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
23/43
27
Number of Passes
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
24/43
28
Estimating Compactor Production
P = Number of Passes Required
W = Width Compacted per Pass, ft
S = Compactor Speed, mi/h
L = Compacted Thickness, Lift, inE = Job Efficiency
P
ExLxSxWx16.3(CCY/h)Production
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
25/43
29
Job Management
Lifts should be kept as thin as possible for the
most efficient compaction.
Typical Lift Specifications
5-8 for Rollers, except for Vibros & Pneums
12 for Heavy Pneumatic Rollers.
8 to 48 for Vibratory Rollers.
7 for Vibratory Rollers compacting Rock.
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
26/43
Grading & Finishing
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
27/43
31
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
28/43
32
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
29/43
34
Typical Roadway Components
PAVEMENT
BASE
SUB BASE
SUBGRADE
Compacted or Stabilized
Traffic LanesShoulder Shoulder
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
30/43
35
Blade Positions
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
31/43
36
Articulated Grader Positions
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
32/43
37
Estimating Production
Efficiency
1
miSection,forSpeedAve.
miLength,SectionPassesofNo.
hTime,
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
33/43
39
Grading Example
15.0 miles of gravel road requires reshaping & leveling.
Six passes of a motor grader will be required.
Job efficiency is 0.80
Based on operator skill, machine characteristics and
job characteristics, you estimate two passes at 4 mi/h,
two passes at 5 mi/h, and two passes at 6 mi/h for this
job.
h23.10.80
1
mph6.0
15.02
mph5.0
m15.02
mph4.0
m15.02hTime,
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
34/43
Output per work-hour defines
40
3%
82%
3%
12% 1. Construction productivity
2. Multi-factor productivity3. Labor productivity
4. Partial-factor productivity
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
35/43
A _______ must be preceded by at
least two queue nodes
41
88%
6%
0%
6% 1. Normal element
2. Arc Element3. Counter element
4. Combi element
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
36/43
Moisture content is the ratio of
42
9%
78%
9%
3% 1. Mass of Solids to Mass of Water
2. Mass of Water in the total volume of a soil3. Mass of Water to Mass of Solids
4. Mass of Water to Total Mass of Soil
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
37/43
Given the following mass diagram, the total
volume cut for section B in 103
BCY is?
43
B
26%
7%
22%
44% 1. 75
2. 1303. 200
4. 100
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
38/43
Which of the following machinery does notutilize a swing-depth factor in its production
estimates?
44
6%
35%
59%
0% 1. Hydraulic Excavator
2. Shovels
3. Drag lines
4. Back hoes
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
39/43
Based on the following illustration, what isthe equation for the overturning moment of a
crane?
45
6%
35%
9%
50% 1. Lm(rm-f)
2. Lm(rm)3. Lm(rm-s)
4. Lm(rm-b)
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
40/43
Rolling Resistance is due to
46
80%
3%
0%
17% 1. Tire penetration into the traveling surface
2. Tire flexing3. Vehicle Weight
4. All of the above
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
41/43
Which of the following is an advantage ofusing a scraper versus an articulated dump
truck?
47
20%
77%
3%
0% 1. Better fuel efficiency
2. Longer tire life3. Faster maneuver and dump times
4. Better in poor underfoot conditions
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
42/43
Consider the following standard proctor. The soil has a currentmoisture content of 4%. Specifications require minimumcompacted density of at least 98% of maximum dry density.
How much does the moisture content need to be increased?
48
4%
15%
54%
27% 1. 7%
2. 3%3. 15.7%
4. 18%
-
8/10/2019 10 Compaction & Finishing.ppt
43/43