1. why we need to monitor our elected representatives (er’s) steady decline in the quality of...

15
1

Upload: warren-holten

Post on 15-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

1

Page 2: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s)

• Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades.• Growing frustration amongst citizens.• Elections – the only time when citizens get a ‘real’ say.• Looking at the growing deficiency in governance and the increasing

needs of the citizens. We believe there is a need for a continuous dialogue with the ER’s and have developed a report card on the Performance of the ER’s which can form the basis of such a Dialogue.

2

Page 3: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

The Constitution as a Basis for monitoring of Elected Representatives

• ERs derive their powers for functioning through the

Constitution

• They are mandated to Attend Sessions, Raise people’s Issues,

Debate, Participate in Discussions and Pass legislations.

• The Constitution defines their powers and rules of

functioning, hence only the Constitution can provide the

parameters for their monitoring.

3

Page 4: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

Parameters for Rating MLAsParameter Marks

Present1(Attendance, No. & Quality of Questions, Usage of Area Development Fund)

52

Past 2(Education qualification, PAN Card, Criminal cases)

8

Perception (through an citizen survey of 22,580 people for their perception on their MLA’s accessibility/availability, performance, corruption, and satisfaction with quality of life, services provided by government)

40

Negative for new FIR cases after 2009 election 3

Minus 5

Negative for pending Charge Sheet 3 Minus 5

Total 100

4

RTI Data Source: 1 Vidhan Bhavan and City & Suburban Collector Offices; 2 Election

Commission of India’s Website; 3 Mumbai Police.

Page 5: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

5

Page 6: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

Reasons for major shifts in ranks from year 2013 to 2014

Party MLA Name2013 2014

Reasons Score Rank Score RankBJP Yogesh Sagar 73.76 1 70.54 1 INC Amin Patel 72.17 2 70.27 2 INC Madhukar Chavan 70.45 3 69.12 3 INC Jagannath Shetty 68.03 6 67.01 4 MNS Bala Nandgaonkar 65.99 9 65.39 5 MNS Mangesh Sangle 61.05 20 65.15 6 Attendance, Other MLA movementNCP Nawab Malik 60.26 22 64.88 7 Questions askedINC Ashok Jadhav 68.04 5 64.04 8 SS Subhash Desai 66.29 7 62.88 9 INC Rajhans Singh 64.52 13 62.01 10 INC Ramesh Thakur 68.86 4 61.52 11 Overall perceptionINC Kalidas Kolambkar 63.61 15 61.35 12 INC Krishnakumar Hegde 62.29 17 60.68 13 INC Aslam Shaikh 62.63 16 60.34 14 SS Ravindra Waikar 66 8 60.27 15 Questions asked; Overall PerceptionSS Prakash Sawant 56.83 27 59.98 16 Attendance; Questions askedNCP Milind Kamble 57.35 25 59.32 17 Attendance; Questions askedINC Baldev Khosa 49.87 30 59.26 18 Attendance; Quality of questions askedINC Ziyauddin Sidikki 65.3 11 59.01 19 Other MLA movementMNS Shishir Shinde 56.88 26 58.77 20 SS Vinod Ghosalkar 64.86 12 58.75 21 Overall perceptionINC Annie Shekhar 62.22 18 56.36 22 MNS Nitin Sardesai 58.55 24 55.48 23

BJP Sardar Singh 65.98 10 55.12 24Attendance; Questions asked; Overall Perception

SP Abu Azmi 50.34 29 54.35 25 BJP Mangal Lodha 63.82 14 54.25 26 Questions askedINC Chandrakant Handore 49.61 31 53.88 27 BJP Gopal Shetty 61.15 19 53.26 28 Overall perception

MNS Pravin Darekar 60.59 21 52.38 29 Question asked; Overall PerceptionMNS Ramchandra Kadam 59.93 23 46.55 30 Attendance; Questions askedINC Kripashankar Singh 44.05 32 46.43 31 BJP Prakash Maheta 55.36 28 44.93 32

Page 7: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

7

Page 8: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

8

• 50% MLAs have criminal cases.

• 15 MLAs had criminal cases before (2009) elections.

• New FIRs/Charge sheets filed against 10 MLAs, 3 of whom had no cases registered against them in their 2009 affidavits.

MLAs with criminal cases before elections and with new cases after elections

Page 9: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

9

MLA Name Party From Affidavit

(2009) New FIR From

RTI 2010New FIR From

RTI 2011 New FIR From

RTI 2012 New FIR From

RTI 2013

Bala Dagdu Nandgaonkar MNSFIR 5 1 Charge sheet 3 1

Aslam Ramzanli Shaikh INCFIR 1 1 (NC) Charge sheet 1

Ashok Jadhav INC

FIR 1 Charge sheet 1 Withdrawal 1

Gopal Shetty BJPFIR 9 Charge sheet 8

Ravindra Dattaram Waikar SSFIR 3 2 Charge sheet 3 1

Shishir Kurshanrao Shinde MNSFIR 8 (1 NC) 1 1Charge sheet 7 (1 NC) 1 1

Vinod Ramchandra Ghosalkar SSFIR 5 Charge sheet 5

Abu Asim Azmi SPFIR 9 1 Charge sheet 6

Mangal Prabhat Lodha BJPFIR 5 Charge sheet 5

Nitin Sardesai MNSFIR 2 Charge sheet 2

Prakash Manchhubhai Maheta BJP FIR 7

Prakash (Bala) Vasant Sawant SSFIR 1 Charge sheet 1

Ramchandra Shivaji Kadam MNSFIR 2 1 2 3 1Charge sheet 2 1 1 1

Subhash Rajaram Desai SSFIR 8 Charge sheet 8

Pravin Darekar MNSFIR 10 1 1 Charge sheet 10 1

Sardar Tarasingh BJP

FIR 1 1Charge sheet 1 1Withdrawal 1

Mangesh Sangle MNSFIR 1 Charge sheet 1

Kripashankar Singh INCFIR 2 Charge sheet

Number of FIR/Chargesheet as per (2009) affidavit and RTI’s in subsequent years

Page 10: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

10

Page 11: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

11

Party Top threeTotal

questions

MNS Bala Nandgaonkar 4933

MNS Mangesh Sangle 4020

SS Subhash Desai 3099

Party Bottom threeTotal

questions

INC Baldev Khosa 64

INC Annie Shekhar 62

INC Chandrakant Handore 23

Note: Budget session 2014 has only three questions, which have been shown along with monsoon session 2014.

Page 12: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

12

Party Top three Average (in %) INC Madhukar Chavan 99 SS Ravindra Waikar 98 INC Ashok Jadhav 97

Party Top three Average (in %) INC Chandrakant Handore 72 BJP Prakash Maheta 71 INC Kripashankar Singh 58

Page 13: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

Party MLA name

2011 2012 2013 2014Average

ScoreScore Rank Score Rank Score Rank Score RankBJP Yogesh Sagar 71.16 4 72.51 1 73.76 1 70.54 1 71.99INC Madhukar Chavan 67.82 7 71.01 4 70.45 3 69.12 3 69.6INC Amin Patel 62.53 10 71.25 3 72.17 2 70.27 2 69.06INC Jagannath Shetty 71.46 2 69 5 68.03 6 67.01 4 68.87MNS Mangesh Sangle 75.43 1 72.15 2 61.05 20 65.15 6 68.45SS Subhash Desai 68.33 6 66.53 8 66.29 7 62.88 9 66.01INC Ramesh Thakur 62.17 12 68.59 6 68.86 4 61.52 11 65.29MNS Bala Nandgaonkar 61.96 14 66.98 7 65.99 9 65.39 5 65.08NCP Nawab Malik 69.27 5 64.07 14 60.26 22 64.88 7 64.62INC Kalidas Kolambkar 65.88 8 66.47 9 63.61 15 61.35 12 64.33BJP Sardar Singh 71.22 3 63.91 15 65.98 10 55.12 24 64.06INC Ashok Jadhav 62.07 13 61.5 22 68.04 5 64.04 8 63.91SS Vinod Ghosalkar 61.39 15 66.37 10 64.86 12 58.75 21 62.84SS Ravindra Waikar 60.58 17 62.35 20 66 8 60.27 15 62.3INC Rajhans Singh 56.63 25 64.23 13 64.52 13 62.01 10 61.85NCP Milind Kamble 64.46 9 65.23 11 57.35 25 59.32 17 61.59INC Krishnakumar Hegde 59.03 20 62.59 18 62.29 17 60.68 13 61.15BJP Mangal Lodha 62.47 11 63.52 16 63.82 14 54.25 26 61.02INC Aslam Shaikh 54.71 29 64.62 12 62.63 16 60.34 14 60.57INC Annie Shekhar 58.76 21 61.39 23 62.22 18 56.36 22 59.68SS Prakash Sawant 60.61 16 59.16 27 56.83 27 59.98 16 59.14INC Ziyauddin Sidikki 54.9 28 57.11 30 65.3 11 59.01 19 59.08BJP Gopal Shetty 58.73 22 60.52 25 61.15 19 53.26 28 58.41MNS Pravin Darekar 59.33 19 60.54 24 60.59 21 52.38 29 58.21MNS Nitin Sardesai 59.59 18 57.36 29 58.55 24 55.48 23 57.74MNS Shishir Shinde 52.18 31 62.51 19 56.88 26 58.77 20 57.59INC Baldev Khosa 55.13 27 63.2 17 49.87 30 59.26 18 56.86MNS Ramchandra Kadam 52.97 30 62.1 21 59.93 23 46.55 30 55.39SP Abu Azmi 56.13 26 60.08 26 50.34 29 54.35 25 55.23INC Chandrakant Handore 57.27 24 53.73 32 49.61 31 53.88 27 53.63INC Kripashankar Singh 58.09 23 58.93 28 44.05 32 46.43 31 51.88BJP Prakash Maheta 47.01 32 55.33 31 55.36 28 44.93 32 50.66

Movement of Rank & Score (in %) from 2011 to 2014

Page 14: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

14

• Probity: Mangesh Sangle, who got the first rank in the 2011 report card, dropped to 20th in 2013 because of low attendance and a new charge sheet, then recovered to the 6th position due to improved attendance and consistency in his other parameters.

• Multiple Parameters: Sardar Tara Singh’s rank has gone down from 3rd in 2011 to 15th in 2012 due to a new charge sheet, then recovered to 10th in 2013 due to increase in overall perception and quality of questions and is now down to 24th due to drop in attendance, questions asked and overall perception. Bala Nandgaonkar who has asked 4933 questions (12% of total) has never been in top three as asking questions is just one aspect of the gradation system but there are many more parameters such as quality of questions, attendance, criminal record, perception, etc.

• Consistency: Yogesh Sagar has remained in the top four in all years and Numero Uno for the last three years due to his consistent scores in all parameters. Similarly his party colleague, Prakash Maheta has remained in the bottom five in all the years.

Observations

Page 15: 1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration

15

Questions

THANK YOU