1 what is canada doing about lossy compression? peter r.g. bak, ph.d. project director, diagnostic...
TRANSCRIPT
1
What is Canada doing about Lossy Compression?
Peter R.G. Bak, Ph.D.
Project Director, Diagnostic Imaging and Laboratory Architecture
Canada Health Infoway
15 February, 2006
3Lossy Compression in Canada
Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) have endorsed the use of lossy compression “in principle”
CAR intends to fully endorse lossy compression as a standard of practice by end of 2006
• Confirm that lossy compression does not impact visual quality through clinical
evaluation
• Develop practice/ratio guidelines to assist radiologists/health authorities with
implementation
4Context: The Motivation for Compression
Canada has initiated the deployment of a pan-Canadian interoperable Electronic Health Record solution (EHRs)
• Canada Health Infoway (Infoway) is an independent, not for profit corporation
responsible for developing the architecture of the EHRs
A core component of a patient’s health record is the diagnostic imaging result: medical images, radiology reports and evidence documents
• Canada is moving aggressively towards a fully filmless medical imaging environment
– we want to print less than 2% of our exams
5Context: The Motivation for CompressionCanada performs about 35,000,000 exams annually
• This equates to about 3.5PB of storage annually
• We have an aging population – expect an increase in exam volume and CT utilization
Canadian healthcare facilities are widely dispersed across a large geography
• Over 540 facilities (<100 beds) in rural Canada
• Network connectivity is limited – most rural areas have 1mbps connectivity
Canadian Radiologists and Specialists are centered in the larger metropolitan cities
• The challenge is getting images from rural facilities to metropolitan centres in a timely
manner
6Context: The Motivation for CompressionStorage Costs
• Storage costs are coming down but the storage volume is going up
• We expect consumption increase will offset price decrease
• Storage costs are significant (~$50M)… but not significant enough to drive change!
• Storage “Total Cost of Ownership” is far more significant…enough to drive change!
– Infoway is completing an economic assessment that indicates significant cost savings…yet to be
completed and published!
Network Costs
• Increasing bandwidth to rural areas is practical up to 5mbps (more or less)
• Increasing bandwidth to rural areas at rates of 100mbps is not going to happen in the foreseeable
future
Compression will have a positive impact on quality of care and cost
7Challenging the Status Quo
Lossy compression does NOT degrade image quality and can be used safely in daily practice!
8The Canadian Approach to Driving Change
Commissioned 2 independent reviews of the literature
• To assess the degree of research conducted in the evaluation of lossy compression
• To determine whether a consensus of opinion exists among those who have evaluated
the effect of lossy compression on diagnostic image quality
• Conclusion
– Lossy compression is a clinically acceptable option for the compression of medical images
– The extent of allowable lossy compression ratio is dependent on the modality of the image
and the nature of the imaged pathology and anatomy
9The Canadian Approach to Driving Change
Commissioned 2 independent legal reviews
• To assess the legal risk of adopting lossy compression
• Conclusion
– If the professional body adopts lossy compression as a standard of practice, and
– If institutions deem the use of lossy compression provides economic and practical
operational benefits as well as contributes to better quality care,
– Then: the exposure to legal risk is no greater than with current practice.
– The key presumption, however, is that the use of lossy compression does not impact the
visual quality of an image
10The Canadian Approach to Driving Change
Commissioned 1 regulatory review
• To assess regulatory constraints in Canada, USA, EU and Australia
• Conclusion
– No statements preventing or endorsing the use of irreversible compression
Commissioned an economic analysis
• To assess the financial benefit to Canada in using lossy compression
• Conclusion
– Potential storage cost savings of C$100 million annually
11The Canadian Approach to Driving Change
Commissioned clinical evaluation
• To assess the impact of lossy compression on visual quality
• To develop guidelines for use of lossy compression within Canada
• In Progress…completion targeted for end 2006
12The Canadian Approach to Driving Change
Evaluation Project Scope:
• Evaluate the impact of JPEG and JPEG 2000 lossy compression at “safe” compression ratios
– Large matrix images 25:1
– Small matrix images 10;1
Evaluation Project Protocol:
• Diagnostic accuracy with ROC analysis
• Original Revealed First Choice Just Noticeable Difference
• 27 different sessions, with 3 reviewers for each
• 81 radiologists from all across Canada
• Sample size for each session will be 60 to 80 images.
• 5 modalities: CR/DR, CT, US, MR, NM
• 7 radiological areas: Angio, Body, Breast, Chest, MSK, Neuro, Pediatrics)
13The Canadian Approach to Driving Change
Solicited Regional Health Authority Administrations
• To declare the use of lossy compression a matter of public policy and resource
allocation
• In Progress
– Fraser Health Authority (largest HA in Canada) has made such a declaration
– In discussion with Provincial Health Ministries
14Conclusion
We expect CAR to formally endorse lossy compression as a standard of practice by year end
We expect most Provincial health ministries to declare the use of lossy compression as a matter of public policy and resource allocation by end of 2007
We will declare DICOM JPEG, JPEG2000 and JPIP as pan-Canadian standards
• Canada has a Standards Collaboration Process for declaring standards for the pan-
Canadian EHR
We will implement a reference system to serve as:
• An open source test harness
• A standards compliance tool