1 welcome remarks from the ibp mr. vivek ramkumar international advocacy and obi director, ibp

1

Welcome Remarks from the IBP

Mr. Vivek Ramkumar International Advocacy and OBI Director,

IBP

2

Welcome Remarks from the GIFT

Mr. Juan Pablo GuerreroNetwork Director, GIFT

3

Keynote Address from the DBM Philippines

Mr. Florencio AbadSecretary, DBM

4

Open Government Partnership and the FOWG: Introduction and Overview

of Progress

SESSION 1:

Fiscal Openness Working Group Open Government ParternshipAsia Pacfic Workshop - September 2015

Juan Pablo [email protected]

#FiscalTransparency

Overview

1Objectives of the workshop

1Open Government Partnership

1Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency

2What fiscal transparency commitments did countries make in their OGP National Action Plans?

3Some notable commitments and practices

4What steps to increase fiscal transparency should countries include in their NAP?

Fiscal Openness Working Group - OGP

7

The main objectives of the workshop are:

Provide a platform for peer-to-peer exchange & learning on the process to advance fiscal transparency Learn about an incredible source of knowledge & evidence findings: Open Budget Survey 2015Offer efficient & coordinated access to international good practices, tools, norms, assessments, and technical expertise on fiscal transparency & public participationMotivate additional governments to become champions of fiscal transparency & participationDefine a GIFT regional work plan for the Asia Pacific Area


8

Open Government Partnership (2011-15)

Voluntary, multi-stakeholder international initiative

Aims to secure concrete commitments on promoting transparency, empower citizens, fight corruption, and harness new technologies to strengthen governance

65 countries today (8 in 2011): governments & civil society work together to develop & implement open government reforms, supported by an international forum for dialogue & sharing ideas & experience


9

OGP Structure & Conditions

1. OGP Steering Committee 2. Annual Conference 3. Support Unit 4. Independent Reporting Mechanism

To become member a country must:

1. Endorse OGP declaration; 2. Make concrete commitments as part of country National Action Plan (beyond current practice); 3. Develop NAP through a multi-stakeholder process (active engagement of citizens & civil society); 4. Commit to a self-assessment and independent reporting on progress; 5. Contribute to open government in other countries (sharing practices, expertise, technical assistance, technologies)


10

OGP Eligibility Criteria – 4 key dimensions

Fiscal transparency: Timely publication of essential budget documents (budget proposal + Audit report)

Right to Access to Information: ATI law, RI constitutional provision or draft initiative under consideration

Disclosures related to elected public officials: Rules that require disclosure of income & assets for elected and senior public officials

Citizen engagement: citizen participation in policymaking & governance (civil rights & liberties)

OGP countries in the region: Australia, Indonesia, Mongolia, New Zealand, the Philippines, South Korea


11

Action Network: Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency(OGP-Fiscal Openness Working Group)

Advance and institutionalize significant & sustainable improvements in fiscal transparency, participation and accountability in countries around the world, by working on global norms, incentives, peer-learning, and technical assistance.

Funding comes from the World Bank, The Hewlett Foundation & Omidyar Network.


12

GIFT work streamsFlexible framework for a network devoted to action & impact

Global norms on fiscal transparency (FT) & open budget o High-level principles on FT, public participation (PP) & accountability

(UN General Assembly, 2012) & working on a Convention on FT & PP o Harmonization of norms & global standards (IMF, OECD, PEFA,

OBI/IBP)o Principles on public participation in fiscal policies & advance the right

to participate in budget processes

Incentives for FT & finding evidences of impact o 8 country case studies about public participation o Think-pieces on incentives for TF o Impacts of FT: review of evidence o Transparency on revenues & taxes o Country FT commitments in OGP (analysis)


13

Streams of work of GIFT (2)

Technical assistance & peer learningOGP Fiscal Openness Working Group for enhancing & implementing commitmentsSupport processes for TF in specific countries (TA & peer-to-peer exchanges)Engage countries in principles & standard discussions/making

Technologies & open dataUse of technologies for information disclosure & proactive disseminationOpen formats for budget data with BOOST (World Bank-Open Knowledge)Community of practice: discussions, networks, webinars, blogs, videos, experiences, exchanges…


14

GIFT Lead Stewards

In charge of the executive guidance of the network and working closely to the Network Director and the Coordination Team


15


GIFT General Stewards

In charge of the definition of the strategic guidelines and the GIFT principles & to promote FT in their organizations and within their institutional environments

16

High Level Principles on Fiscal Transparency, Participation & AccountabilityUnited Nations General Assembly – Dec. 2012

Preamble, plus 2 parts:o Access to Fiscal Information (principles 1-4)o The Governance of Fiscal Policy (principles 5-10)

Framed by 2 fundamental rights principles:o A public right to fiscal information (from UDHR Art. 19)o A right to participate directly in fiscal policy design and

implementation (from ICCPR Art. 25)

Fiscal Transparency & Public Participation

17

I. High Level Principles on Fiscal Transparency•Access to Fiscal Information

1.Right to seek, receive and impart information on fiscal policies

2.Governments should publish clear and measureable objectives for aggregate fiscal policy

3.Presentation of high quality financial and non-financial information on past, present & forecast

4.Governments should communicate the objectives they are pursuing and the outputs they are producing


18

II. High Level Principles on Fiscal Transparency•Governance of Fiscal Policy

5.All transactions should have their basis in law

6.Government sector clearly defined, & relationships with private sector disclosed

7.Roles and responsibilities clearly assigned between the legislature, the executive & the judiciary

8.No government revenue without the approval of the legislature

5.The Supreme Audit Institution should have statutory independence & the appropriate resources


19

III. High Level Principles on Fiscal Transparency• A new fundamental civil right

10.Citizens should have the right and they, and all non-state actors, should have effective opportunities to participate directly in public debate and discussion over the design and implementation of fiscal policies.


20

What types of FT commitments do OGP countries make?

•Most commitments under H-L Principle 3: High quality financial & non-financial information on past, present, & forecast fiscal activities, performance, fiscal risks, & public assets & liabilities….’ Focus is on flows rather than stocks

•Many commitments on public participation (HLP10)

•Few commitments on legislative oversight (HLP8); on macro-fiscal policy (HLP2); or on a citizen right to fiscal information (HLP1)

•For further details of FT commitments see

http://bit.ly/1Od71s3 or http://bit.ly/1NvfcOx

21

Fiscal Transparency in OGP Countries

http://bit.ly/1Od71s3

http://bit.ly/1Od71s3

http://bit.ly/1NvfcOx



http://fiscaltransparency.net/2014/02/comparing-ogp-country-commitments-on-fiscal-transparency/

GIFT identified FT commitments within NAPs

•Commitments were coded by GIFT as FT commitments where they related to any aspect of taxation, borrowing, spending, investment and management of public resources, including delivery of public services

•Covers policy design, implementation, review

•Includes: any public participation in fiscal policy

•Excludes: general references to public participation, or RTI, or open data that do not specifically refer to FT

22


Overview of FT commitments in NAPs

•A total of 360 FT commitments identified, in 43 out of the 45 NAPs for which IRM reports published = 38% of all commitments in these NAPs

•The definition of a commitment varies widely within and across NAPs, however, reducing the comparability of data on commitments

•There is a very wide range in the proportion of fiscal transparency commitments to total commitments in NAPs, from 0% (Chile, Romania) to 100% (Guatemala); the average share is 34%

23


Implementation of FT commitments

24

Fiscal Transparency in OGP Countries, & theImplementation of OGP Commitments:

An Analysis

Notable country FT reforms

•Of those countries with more than 5 FT commitments, notable progress in implementation of FT commitments was made by:

• Croatia – 12 out of 16 commitments completed or substantially completed

• Mexico – 12 out of 17• Brazil – 10 out of 10• Indonesia – 10 out of 11• Moldova – 8 out of 14• The Philippines – 8 out of 16

25


Country Implementation of FT by Level of Ambition:

High Implementation

DenmarkItalySpainUKUSA

Brazil Croatia IndonesiaMexico Moldova PhilippinesAlbania Azerbaijan BulgariaColombia El Salvador HondurasJordan Dominican Rep.

Low Implementation

Canada Israel South Korea SwedenGeorgia GreeceUkraine MacedoniaParaguay SlovakiaSouth Africa Czech Rep. Estonia Norway

Armenia GuatemalaMontenegro TanzaniaLatvia PeruUruguay Kenya

Low Ambition High Ambition

26


Some notable OGP commitments

•GFMIS reforms in the Philippines, Liberia, Honduras, Dominican Rep.

•Commitments to strengthen procurement in many countries, those for which the IRMs reported reasonable implementation progress include Brazil, Mexico, Paraguay, Uruguay

•EITI commitments in a number of countries e.g. Indonesia, The Philippines, Colombia, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, USA

•The Philippines: commitment to engage citizens in public audits

•Honduras: update and disseminate the PEFA assessment

•Indonesia: publish local services delivery-level budgets in health & education

•Transparency of external assistance from the donor side, including conforming with the IATI standard: Canada, Denmark, Spain, Sweden, UK & USA

27


Some innovative commitments

•DR: publish data on public complaints at the level of individual agencies

•Slovakia: making the NAP a legally binding document (responsible institutions take actions or explain the lack of action)

•Macedonia: create a portal for citizen feedback on public services

•Mexico: an open & interactive geo-referencing platform allows citizens to track public resource allocation

•Peru: improve mechanisms for public consultation on budget preparation, approval, implementation & reporting

•The Philippines: institutionalize social audits; create a People’s Budget interactive web site

28


What steps to increase FT should countries include in their (next) NAPs?

•First, OGP members should publish documents already produced within government:

• 9 countries produce a Pre-Budget Statement but do not publish it including AR, CL, DR, SV, PE

• 3 countries produce but do not publish in-year budget reports including Costa Rica

• 7 countries produce but do not publish a mid-year report• 3 countries and 1 country respectively produce but do not

publish a year-end report and an audit report

29


Steps to improve fiscal transparency (2)

•Other reports not currently produced, but which would take relatively effort, are a Citizens’ Budget (not published in 27 OGP members), and a mid-year report (not produced in 18 OGP members)

•OGP members that have gone backwards on fiscal transparency in recent years should give priority to decisively reversing this trend

•Countries should also give early priority to:• Strengthening legislative oversight• Strengthening SAI independence and resourcing• Introducing social auditing• Consulting the public more during budget preparation• Opening up legislative committee budget hearings to the public

30


Recommended consultation practices

•Designation of a lead agency responsible for each commitment

•Publication of the names of specific CSOs who are working with government on each commitment

•Countries need to follow much more closely the OGP process requirements for public consultation in the design & implementation of their NAPs

•Engage in a process: go beyond traditional civil society consultation models towards institutionalising systematic, on-going & meaningful dialogue with non-government actors and the public

31


In conclusion

GIFT stands ready to assist countries with the design & implementation of fiscal transparency initiatives, whether they

are current members of OGP or are non-members.

[email protected]

32


Selected references

Fiscal Transparency in OGP Countries, and the Implementation of OGP Commitments: An Analysis. GIFT Background Paper for the FOWG Meeting in San Jose, 18 November 2014.

Fiscal Openness Working Group 2014 Work Plan:

www.fiscaltransparency.net/fowg/

GIFT Expanded High Level Principles:

http://www.fiscaltransparency.net/eng/principles.php

OGP By The Numbers: What the IRM Data Tell Us About OGP Results. IRM Technical Paper1, Joseph Foti.

http://www.opengovpartnership.org/sites/default/files/attachments/Technical%20paper%201_final.pdf

33

Fiscal Transparency in OGP Countries, & theImplementation of OGP Commitments:

An Analysis

@FiscalTransEngage with us

fiscaltransparency.net

35

Experiences and challenges on fiscal transparency and

the role of the international community

Indonesia

36



Cambodia

37



Vietnam

38



India

39



Sri Lanka

40

Open Forum

41

End of Session 1

1 welcome remarks from the ibp mr. vivek ramkumar international advocacy and obi director, ibp

Documents

group ogp

ogp declaration

ogp eligibility criteria

ogp structure conditions1

ogp steering committee

ogp national action

giftspeakerfiscal openness

technologiesfiscal openness