1 u.s. technical advisory group meeting recap of the april morocco pc 283 meeting victor toy, cih,...
TRANSCRIPT
1
U.S. Technical Advisory Group MeetingRecap of the April Morocco PC 283 Meeting
Victor Toy, CIH, CSPChair, US TAG to PC 283
March 25, 2014
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 2
Agenda
Opening Remarks (Tim Fisher, Vic Toy)
New members (Jim Howe)
Morocco Meeting Review (Kathy Seabrook, Thea Dunmire, Todd Hohn, Vic Toy)
Next Steps (Vic Toy)
Administrative items (Vic Toy)
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 3
Meeting Objectives
Overall Objective: The purpose of this meeting is to give the U.S.
TAG Attendees a recap of the London Meeting and to start planning
for review and action on Committee Draft
1. Review and impressions from the Morocco PC 283 Meeting
2. High level insights on WD1 and U.S. comments
3. Strategies and plans for TAG activities
Updated WD1 text not yet available
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 4
Summary of the PC 283 meeting in Morocco
• Objective: Processing WD comments into a Committee Draft• 1300 comments, 230 Pages; 49 page PoC annex • 85 Delegates in attendance, 33 of which attended for 1st time• PC Membership: 45 P Mem (+2), 15 Observers, 12 liaisons (+6)• May 1st ISO/DEC Directives: 2 month CD review period, one 9 mo
extension, a now “optional” FDIS stage• Development of a draft scope and purpose• “Guidelines for use” oriented towards interpretation of requirements• WG1 divided into 5 workgroups only one of which completed its task• Work extended to a July 1 deadline with ballot for a CD • Plans for an August 1 release of a CD• Delay will “push” next PC meeting to November
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 5
Status and subsequent plans
Text in WD1 has for the most parts been revised, some parts are still subject to change
The Annex has not been fully addressed yet
PC 283 Task groups are continuing their work via correspondence (or physical meetings) if necessary to
complete their standards text and
the text for the guidance annex
1st July - The completed texts will be assembled into a full draft by the WG Convener and Secretary
The full draft will be edited by the WG Convener with the assistance of the TG Leaders
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 6
Approximate breakdown of the number of comments against clauses in WG1/N22
Total no. of comments in WG1/N22 = 1295, on 227 pages
Risk def.
Improvement
Leadership
Risk Management
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 7
Casablanca Resolutions
Resolution 1/2014 To circulate a Committee Draft of ISO 45001 for comment and ballot,
following preparation of the text by ISO/PC 283/WG1
Resolution 2/2014 Amend the Design Specification of ISO 45001 to be consistent with:
The Committee Draft of ISO 45001, and The results of the ballot on “OHS” versus “OSH” (see PC283/N88)
Circulate the amended Design Specification for review and confirmation at the next plenary meeting
Resolution 3/2014 To thank the host of the meeting, IMANOR, and it’s sponsor INCVT for
the excellent meeting facilities provided and for its wonderful hospitality
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 8
International Organizational Relationships
PC 28345 Member countries15 Observing countries12 Liaison Members TAG to PC 283
91 Organizational Members
ISO 45001Occupational Health &
Safety Management Systems
Delegates/”Experts”
“Mirror Committees”
U.S.
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 9
Timeline (key dates) – 3 Years (N68)
Terms
New Work Item Proposal (NP)
Working Draft (WD) – First draft developed by the Project Committee and experts
Committee Draft (CD) –First public draft for circulation to public for comments
Draft International Standard (DIS)
Final Draft International Standard (FDIS)
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 10
Timeline (key dates) – 3 Years (N68)
10/21/13: Initial PC 283 Meeting to develop WD1
02/28/14: Comments due on WD1
04/04/14: PC Meeting drafts “Committee Draft 1 (CD1)” (now Jul 1)
06 /2014: CD1 released for comment/ballot (now Aug 1)
11 /2014: PC Meeting drafts “Draft International Standard (DIS)”
01 /2015: DIS released for translation
06 /2015: DIS Ballot
11 /2015: PC Meeting drafts “Final DIS (FDIS)”
01 /2016: Final draft of FDIS ISO processing
07 /2016: FDIS Balloting
09 /2016: Publication of ISO 45001
Next slide
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 11
Work plan following the Morocco meeting
15 July - The full draft will be circulated to the members of WG 1 for a Yes/ No ballot on whether it is adequate to go forward as the CD text
1st August – CD ballot starts 1st October – CD ballot closes Next PC meeting – end of November
2 mo. Comment (TAG Effort)
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 12
Reminder of Some of the Major issues so far
Terms and definitions (e.g. “issues”, “workplace”, “risks”) The concept of “positive risks” or opportunities Management system vs. program orientation Feed back and crisp relationships between sections of 45001 Employee / worker participation What stage assessments (i.e. risks) are conducted Flow and understanding of the planning section from assessment
to prioritization to objectives to system issues Supplier / outsource management (including procurement and
contractor management)
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 13
and the major challenges
Major issues related to requirements Definition of what a management system is Objective of the OSHMS (compliance vs. conformance) Application of the HLS Speaking small (SMEs) Depth or requirements or need for strong ANNEX
Major issues related to development and final product Diversity of input HLS “fit” Input by “experts” Need for basic vs. mature OHSMS concepts Language and translation
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 14
Strategies for pushing the US position
Educate, deliberate and advocate In general, “give and take” Assure concepts are included in annex if not standards language Open door for future documents
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 16
General Overview
Of the 1295 comments submitted…• 266 (20%) are on Section 6, • One third of those (80) are in the definitions of risk and hazard
Comments include: Feedback (choices) on terminology Proposals to adjust structure of the section to improve flow Proposals to transfer content to other sections Suggestions for changes to wording Draft content for guidance on specific topics
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 17
Section 6 Comment disposition
Delineation of comments processed:
• Terminology: 66• Structure & Flow: 17• Text detail: 156• Editorial: 19• Annex: 8
TOTAL: 266 (258 addressed: 8 remaining) – but a few deferred comments need to be revisited. Work not yet started on annex
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 18
Comments overview & hot topics
Overall Structure of Section :• Suggestion to move OHS risk assessment from Sec 6 to 8• Suggestion to move Comp Obligations from Sec 6 to 4 (Context)• General concern about overall flow – especially Section 6.1
Terminology and requirements:• “opportunities” • “compliance obligations” / “legal and other requirements”• “objectives” – are these improvement or performance objectives?
System Risks vs. OHS Risks • clear distinction required in section 6 consistent with Annex SL
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 19
Comments overview & hot topics
Annex topics (not complete list as this is work in progress)
(Risk) ‘criteria’ Guidance on compliance obligations Analysis of near misses/incidents Residual/unmitigated risk Risk gap analysis/assessment Human factors Limited time projects/operations Multi-employer work sites
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 20
Section 6 Terminology – Risk
• Majority of comments appear to favor separating general (management system) risks from “OHS risks”
• Some favor making the OHS risk definition a note to the Annex SL risk definition (U.S. comment)
• A few prefer purely to use Annex SL• Choice of 3.09A close to U.S. preference (an estimate of vs.
combination)
3.09A - OH&S risk - combination of the likelihood of an occurrence of a hazardous event or exposure(s), and the severity of injury or illness ill-health that may be caused by the event or exposures
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 21
Section 6 Terminology – Hazard
3.09B1 most popular, followed by B2 (the U.S. preference) which said “condition, set of circumstances, or inherent property that can cause injury, ill health/illness or death
3.09B1 (before) - Hazard - source, situation or act with a potential for harm in terms of human injury or ill-health/illness, or a combination of these
3.09B1 (after) - Hazard - source, situation or act with a potential to cause human injury or ill health
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 22
Section 6 Terminology – Misc
Opportunity - should not be defined but guidance is necessary to explain the concept as follows: assure the OH&S management system can achieve its intended outcomes prevent, or reduce, undesired effects achieve continual improvement
Deferred to TG5 (Terminology) “Compliance obligations” vs. “Legal and other requirements” “Objectives”
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 23
Overall Structure of Section
Suggestion to move OHS risk assessment from Section 6 to 8• Keep main discussion in 6, with focus in 8 remaining on
application of controls (arising from RA) – but noting the feedback loop to 6.
Suggestion to move Compliance Obligations from 6 to 4 (Context)• Keep main discussion in 6, with existing mention reference in 4
General concern about overall flow – especially Section 6.1• Agreement to reposition “Compliance obligations” section• Majority in TG2 favor position early in Section 6 before HAZID
&RA• Minority strongly favor position after HAZID & RA• Referred to plenary resulting in no change
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 24
U.S. Section 6 Comments
Not Accepted 7
Accepted 16
Annex 9
Deferred 2
total 34
General responses
Accepted• Section 6 organization and flow• Feedback from other sections into planning• Management of Change• Meaningful employee participation• Multiemployer worksite (to annex)• Review of management system (to annex)
Not Accepted• Specific system improvement language• Identification of system issues• Clarification of risk assessment in section 6 vs 8
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 26
III. Next Steps
• PC 283 TGs complete standards language and annex• Vote to move to CD (delegates)
• U.S. TAG begins work on review and comments• Distribute CD• TAG Member Review and comment (at least 2 weeks)• TAG Meeting(s) to address U.S. comments
• 1 week Face to face meeting possibly around week 3-4• Consolidation of U.S. TAG comment resolutions (who?)
• Final Review by Telecon of major issues (if possible)• US TAG committee vote on CD
• Comments and vote submitted to BSI
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 27
IV. Administrative items
a) TAG organization / working groups
a) Facilitators/”Edit” team
b) OHS vs OSH Ballot
Presentation TitleDate or Event Slide 28
US TAG to PC 283 Organizational Structure
Executive Committee Vic Toy, Chair
Kathy Seabrook, Vice Chair
SecretariatTim Fisher
Membership Jim Howe
Procedures(Adhoc) Kathy
Sebrook
WG1TBD
WG2TBD
WG4TBD
Terms & Def TBD
PC 283 Delegates/ExpertsVic Toy
Kathy SeabrookThea Dunmire
Todd Hohn (obsever)
WG3TBD