1 uncertainty in lca from economic input output models chris hendrickson francis mcmichael carnegie...

15
1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

Upload: cleopatra-stephens

Post on 14-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

1

Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models

Chris Hendrickson

Francis McMichael

Carnegie Mellon

Page 2: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

2

Uncertainty in LCA

• Uncertainty exists for all LCA data: mass flows, emissions, impacts, weights and change effects, e.g.– Proprietary data problems– Boundary problems: Lenzen (2000, JIE) finds

truncation errors on the order of 50% for Australian LCA.

Page 3: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

3

Uncertainty Implications

• Consistency and reproducibility of results (e.g. paper vs. plastic cups).

• Certainty of conclusions and usefulness of LCA.

• Numbers of significant digits.

Page 4: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

4

EIO-LCA Uncertainty Sources

• Survey Errors: sampling and reporting errors – depends on companies and census agencies.

• Old Data: IO tables are typically 2 to 7 years old. Last US benchmark: 1997 released 12/2002.

• Incomplete Data: reports from only some sectors or plants (e.g. tri sector and threshold limits). Note: similarity to boundary problem in conventional LCA!

Page 5: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

5

EIO-LCA Uncertainty (cont)

• Missing data: Census data missing many topics, such as habitat destruction. Non-monetary uses also not represented, e.g. congestion effects from truck services.

• Aggregation: Sectors too large for detailed analysis on specific products. (Often need a hybrid approach, combining EIO-LCA and process models).

• Imports: EIO treats imports as similar to domestic production.

• Model form: Linearity of EIO, lack of substitution

Page 6: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

6

Uncertainty (Pacca 2003)

Sources of problems Temporal constraint

Data

Methodological constraint

Economic boundary

Imported goods

Indirect outcomes

Constant technology

Constant returns to scale

No substitution effect

Old data

Collection

Interpretation

Inaccuracy

Incomplete data

Missing data

Other assumptions

Intra-sectoral resolution

National averages

Inventory method

Price based flows

Page 7: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

7

Mitigating Factors and Approaches

• Parameter stability over time

• Positive Correlations

• More and better data

• Simulation analyses

• User adjustments

Page 8: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

8

Parameter Stability Over Time

• Using 1961 final demand from IO tables 1939-1961 found similar intermediate outputs (Carter, 1970).

• Intermediate use relatively constant (Ma, 2003)

Page 9: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

9

Intermediate Use 1972-1997

Total Intermediate Use Percentages

1972 1987 1992 1997

Manufacturing 49% 41% 39% 35%

Natural Resources 11% 9% 8% 9%

Trade 16% 19% 20% 27%

Services 22% 29% 31% 28%

Miscellaneous 2% 2% 2% 2%

Infrastructure 22% 24% 25% 26%

Page 10: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

10

Positive Correlations

• Deciding on the best of two designs may be more certain than overall impact due to positive correlations. The designs may share many elements in common, and these elements would be positively correlated. If the element is bad, it is bad for both. If good, it is good for both.

• Numerical analysis of effect – Cano (2000).

Page 11: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

11

More and Better Data

• Mixed picture for more and better data.

• No water use data since 1980s in US.

• No workfiles for 1997 benchmark released.

• Better industrial environmental management systems.

• More international co-operation and public data.

Page 12: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

12

Simulation

• Computationally straightforward to simulate effects of uncertain EIO and impact vectors to develop confidence intervals on results.– Information to identify underlying distributions

and variability often not available.– Missing information must be assumed – note

truncation problem.

Page 13: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

13

User Adjustments

• Many adjustments possible due to known aggregation or emissions problems– Hybrid models including EIO and process models.– Parameter adjustments to reflect non-linearities.– Disaggregating individual EIO sectors.

• Bayesian methods applicable here – adjusting estimates based on expectations.

• Multiple approaches: EIO-LCA and Conventional LCA.

Page 14: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

14

Conclusions

• Uncertainty is a major concern for LCA.

• Several mitigation approaches possible and should be applied:– Simulation– Hybrid models and alternative approaches– Bayesian parameter adjustments– Disaggregation

Page 15: 1 Uncertainty in LCA from Economic Input Output Models Chris Hendrickson Francis McMichael Carnegie Mellon

15

References

• Cano-Ruiz, Alexandro Jose, (2000). “Decision Support Tools for Environmentally Conscious Chemical Process Design,” unpublished PhD Dissertation, MIT.

• Lenzen, Manfred, (2000). “Errors in Conventional and Input-Output-based Life-Cycle Inventories,” J. of Industrial Ecology, 4(4), pp. 127-148.

• Pacca, S., (2003). “Global Warming Effect Applied to Electricity Generation Technologies,” PhD Thesis, UC Berkeley.