1 transfer pricing dr. haider shah. 2 learning objectives? o to have an overview of transfer pricing...
TRANSCRIPT
2
Learning Objectives?
o To have an overview of transfer pricing system
o To understand TP’s effects on divisional performance
o To have an overview of international TP
3
Transfer Pricing
Transfer pricing refers to the pricing of goods and services within a multi-divisional organization. Goods from the production division may be sold to the marketing division, or goods from a parent company may be sold to a foreign subsidiary.
Production centre
components
Co. AAssembly centre
Co. B
Assembly centre
Co. C
£10
£10Assembly centre
Co. A
£6
Receiving Division
Supplying Division
Receiving Divisions
4
Transfer Pricing
A transfer price is the price one subunit chargesfor a product or service supplied to another
subunit of the same organization.
Intermediate products are the productstransferred between subunits of an organization.
5
Transfer Pricing- objectivesTransfer pricing should help achievea company’s strategies and goals by
–intentionally moving profits between divisions
– promoting goal congruence & a sustained high level of management effort
- providing information for: making good economic decisions evaluating the managerial and economic performance of the divisions.- ensuring that divisional autonomy is not undermined.
6
Transfer-Pricing Methods
Market-based transfer prices
Cost-based transfer prices Marginal cost Full cost Cost plus markup
7
Example: Oslo & Bergen
Expected sales of the final product Net selling price (£) Quantity sold Units
100 1 000 90 2 000 80 3 000 70 4 000 60 5 000 50 6 000
Oslo = Supplying division (No external market for the intermediate product)Bergen = Receiving division (converts intermediate to final product)
8
The costs of each division are: Oslo
Bergen (£) (£)
Variable cost per unit 11 7
Fixed costs attributable to the products 60 000 90 000
The transfer price of the intermediate product hasbeen set at £35 based on a full cost plus mark-up.
12© 2000 Colin Drury
£35 TPOslo Bergen Company
£23 TP
(Full cost without mark-up)
4000 units
£11 TP
(MC price)
5000 units
13© 2000 Colin Drury
1. Adopt a dual rate TP system Based on two transfer prices Full cost plus a mark-up for Supplying Division MC of transfers for Receiving division Profit on inter-group trading removed by an accounting adjustment.
Resolving transfer pricing conflicts
2. Transfer at MC plus a lump sum fee
Supplying division to cover its fixed costs and earn a profit through the fixed fee charged for the period.
Receiving division to consider full cost of providing intermediate products/services
Not widely used because:1. Use of two TP ’s causes confusion2. Seen as artificial3. Divisions protected from competition4. Reported inter-divisional profits can be misleading
14
Domestic TP Recommendations
Use standard costs for cost-based TPs
Competitive market for the intermediate product
No market / imperfect market for the intermediate product
Use MC + lumpsum(negotiated)
15
Comparison of Methods
Achieves Goal Congruence
Market Price: Yes, if markets competitive
Cost-Based: Often, but not always
Negotiated: Yes
16
Comparison of Methods
Useful for Evaluating Subunit Performance
Market Price: Yes, if markets competitive
Cost-Based: Difficult, unless transferprice exceeds full cost
Negotiated: Yes
17
Comparison of Methods
Motivates Management Effort
Market Price: Yes
Cost-Based: Yes, if based on budgetedcosts; less incentive ifbased on actual cost
Negotiated: Yes
19
Comparison of Methods
Other Factors
Market Price: No market may exist
Cost-Based: Useful for determiningfull-cost; easy to implement
Negotiated: Bargaining takes time andmay need to be reviewed
Common transfer pricing problems
20
1. Performance problems
2. Interpersonal disputes
3.
4. Demand fluctuation
5. Product pricing
21
International Transfer-Pricing
Where divisions are located in different countries taxation implications become important
TP has the potential to ensure that most of the profits on inter-divisional transfers are allocated to the low taxation country.
22
International transfer pricing
Motivation is to use highest possible TP so receiving division will have high costs and low profits whereas supplying division will have high revenues and high profits.
TP can also have an impact on ___________and dividend repatriations.
Fiscal authorities react by anti-avoidance legislation e.g. OECD guidelines based on Arm ’s Length pricing principle.
Supplying Division
Country A (Tax rate = 25%)
Receiving Division
Country B (Tax rate = 40%)
24
The parties to a transaction are independent and on an equal footing.
If they had done a transaction with a non-related organisation, they would have charged same price.
Arm ’s Length Principle
25
References & further Reading
Drury. C. Textbook, chapter 21
Ken Garrett (1992), Transfer pricing explained Parts one and two , Accountancy , September/October
Emmanuel, Clive R. (1999), "Income Shifting and International Transfer Pricing: A Three-Country Example"Abacus, 35 (3), pp 252-266
Elliott, J. and Emmanuel, C. (2000), International Transfer Pricing: Searching for Patterns, European Management Journal , Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 216–222