1 thomas b fischer, dimensions and context the dimensions and context of transport decision making...
TRANSCRIPT
1 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
The Dimensions and Context of Transport Decision Making
15 March 2010
Thomas B FischerDepartment of Civic Design
Contents• Introduction
• Hypothesis and approach
• The ‘structuredness’ of different types of transport decision making and associated acting strategies (context)
• How does decision making work?
• Contingency model of organisational decision making
• Towards the development of a situation-driven approach for the selection of indicators
• Some dimensions characterising decision making situations
• Survey Percentage of documents that use an indicator (for different tiers) Why do you think indicators were used for climate change, air pollution,
noise pollution, and habitat loss?
• Conclusions
2 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
Introduction
• Aim is to empirically test theoretical thinking on situation specific indicator selection (based on survey).
3 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
Hypothesis and approach
• A good understanding of the dimensions and context of transport decision making can support the choice of environmental indicators.
• An analytical rather than descriptive approach is taken and recommendations are given on how the transport decision making situation might help to prescribe the choice of specific environmental indicators.
4 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
The ‘structuredness’ of different types of transport
decision making and associated acting strategies
5 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
Types of policy problems
+ Consensus on knowledge -
moderately structured
(consensus of goals)
problem
particulate matter
Advocate
structured problem
road maintenance
Problem Solver
moderately structured
(consensus on means)
problem
abortion, euthanasia
Mediator
unstructured problem
climate change
Problem recogniser
Policy
?
PlanSEA: Sreening, scoping
impact assessment, Consultation / participation
Monitoring / follow up
ProgrammeSEA: Sreening, scoping
impact assessment, Consultation / participation
Monitoring / follow up
Knowledge (technical context)
Conflicts
Degree of communication(role of planner)
The ‘structuredness’ of different types of transport
decision making and associated acting strategies
• similar suggestions also made in the environmental indicator literature.
• Lehtonen (2009), referring to the energy sector connected the purpose of indicators with the stage of policy making. For first three policy stages ( ‘emergence of the
problem’, ‘legitimisation’ and ‘mobilisation of the public for action’), he suggested that the role of indicators would be of a discursive nature. At the following two stages ‘formation of an official plan of action’ and ‘implementation of the plan’, he suggested that whether the role of indicators is more of an instrumental/rational or ‘political’ nature depends on whether there is overall consensus (the former) or controversy (the latter).
6 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
How does decision making work?
• Rational model Indicators with decision making function
• Bounded rational model More ad-hoc indicator usage
• Garbage can model four independent streams:problems, solutions, participants, and choice opportunities
Effective role of indicators? – only genric measurement?
• Political or coalition approach• Communicative planning
7 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
Contingency model of organisational decision
making
8 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
Means uncertainty
Ends
uncertainty
Computationrationalcrisp
Judgementbounded rationalfuzzier
Inspirationgarbage canfuzziest
Bargainingcoalitionfuzzier
Towards the development of a situation-driven approach for the selection of indicators
• Approaches: Theory driven Data drive Politically driven
9 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
10 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
Stra
t-e
gic P
lan
s (ta
ctical)
Pro
gra
mm
es
Roa
d
Rail
Wate
r
Air
Mo
de
s a
nd
ge
og
-ra
ph
ica
l bo
un
da
ries
Dec
ision
Ma
kin
g T
ier
NG
Os
Privatein
stitution
s
Scie
ntific
comm
unity
Th
e p
ub
lic
Fo
rmal
req
uire
-m
en
ts
La
w
Gu
id-
an
ce
Sp
atia
l sc
aleo
f imp
ac
tsIntern
atio
na
l/
glo
bal
Reg
ion
al
Lo
cal
Inter-m
od
al
Pro
jects
Po
licy
cy
cle
Use
rs /
sta
ke
ho
lders
Inve
stors
Fre
ight a
nd
pa
sseng
er
asso
ciation
s
1 A
ge
nd
asettin
g2
Ô P
olicy
Õ
form
ula
tion
(assessmen
t)3
De
cision
ma
king4
Imp
lem
-e
nta
tion
5 a
na
lysis and
eva
lua
tion
Natio
nal
(ava
ilab
lein
stru
me
nts
)
Situ
atio
ns
pe
cific
ind
ica
tors
= ca
teg
ories
= system
ic
Ô laye
rs
Õ
= crite
ria
CO
2
Tota
lla
nd tak
eN
MV
-O
Cn
oise
Tim
e
Lo
ngm
ed
ium
short
Ad
min
-istrative
un
its
Fu
nctio
n-al u
nits
Le
ve
lo
fa
gg
-re
g-atio
n
pro
fessions
Some dimensions characterising decision making situations
• Survey on 21 transport policies, plans, programmes and projects were presented, using five situational factors, including: the decision making tier the stage of the decision making cycle the administrative level the instruments transport modes
• indicators for four environmental issues were considered; climate change, air pollution, noise pollution and habitats loss.
11 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
Towards the development of a situation-driven approach for the selection of indicators
Percentage of documents that use an indicator (for
different tiers)
12 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
Why do you think indicators were used for climate change, air
pollution, noise pollution, and habitat loss?
13 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context
Conclusions
• Only the decision tier appeared to play a clear role in indicator selection.
• The more geographically limited impacts of noise and air pollution were more frequently considered at programme and project levels than at policy and plan levels of decision making.
• However, this wasn’t the only factor able to explain the choice of indicators and there appeared to be an overlap with other factors.
• It was suggested that these may include in particular the political dimension, as climate change was an issue consistently considered at all levels.
14 Thomas B Fischer, dimensions and context