1. systems requirement review presentation joe appel todd beeby julie douglas konrad habina katie...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
1
2
Systems Requirement Review PresentationJoe Appel
Todd BeebyJulie Douglas
Konrad HabinaKatie Irgens
Jon Linsenmann
David LynchDustin Truesdell
3
Overview
• Mission Statement• Market, Customers, & Competitors• Design Mission• Design Requirements• New Technologies• Sizing Code• Summary & Next Steps
4
Mission Statement
• Design an Environmentally Responsible Aircraft (ERA) that lowers noise, minimizes emissions, and reduces fuel burn
• Utilize new technology to develop a competitive medium-size aircraft that meets the demands of transportation for continental market
• Deliver a business plan focusing on capitalizing on growing markets
• Submit final design to NASA ERA College Student Challenge
5
NASA ERA College Student Challenge
1 NASA ERA Goals
Large twin aisle reference configuration = Boeing 777-200LR
6
Market• Growth in twin aisle market– Fastest growing market segment (4.4% annually)– Airplane seat count upgauging
2 Boeing Market Outlook
7
Market• Geographic Regions:– Asia Pacific– US Domestic– Europe
2 Boeing Market Outlook3 Airbus Market Forecast
8
Market• Geographic Regions:– Asia Pacific– US Domestic
3 Airbus Market Forecast
9
Customers
• Low cost carriers– Point to point model– Shorter distance, larger
passenger capacity
Examples– SpiceJet, Spring Airlines,
JetBlue, EasyJet
4 Point to Point: Asia Pacific
10
Competitors• Designing an airplane with similar
capabilities as the Boeing 757-200• Competitors
– Other aircraft (A321-200, A320NEO, 757, 737)
– High speed rail for short distances
3 Airbus Market Forecast6 757-200 5 High Speed Rail
11
City Pairs
Tokyo to Mumbai is 3700 nmi7 Geographical Map of Asia
12
Runway LengthsAirport Runway Length (ft)
Beijing Capital International Airport 12,468Haneda 9,843
Hong Kong International Airport 12,467Suvarnabhumi Airport 13,123
Singapore Changi 13,123Guangzhou Baiyun International Aiport 12,467
Narita International Aiport 13,123Soekarno-Hatta International Airport 12,007
Incheon International Airport 13,123Shanghai Pudong International Airport 13,123
Kuala Lumpur International Airport 13,530Mumbai International Airport 11,302
Delhi International Airport 14,534Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport 11,154
Ninoy Aquina International Airport 12,261Taipeo Taoyuan International Airport 12,008
Shenzhen Bao’an International Airport 11,155Chengdu Shuangliu 11,811Kunming Wujiaba 11,155
Kansai International 13,123Gimpo International 11,811Hangzhou Xiaoshan 11,811Jeju International 9843
Ho Chi Minh International 12,468
Shortest Runway: 9843 feet
13
Design Mission
• Tokyo - Mumbai
01
2
4 5
76
4’ 5’
8 9Taxi & takeoff
Clim
bCruise Climb
No rangedescent
Loiter (30 min)
Land
Clim
b
No rangedescent
Land
Attempt to Land
Loiter (30 min)
6800 ft Range: 3700 nmi 4950 ft Fuel Reserves
W1/W0 0.970W2/W1 0.979W3/W2 0.773W4/W3 0.995W5/W4 0.995
W5’/W4’ 0.970W6/W5’ 0.979W7/W6 0.986W8/W7 0.988W9/W8 0.995
3
W9/W0 0.673Wf/W0 0.330
32000 ft
14
Design Requirements
• Market Driven Requirements– Similar two class configuration seating capacity to • Boeing 757-200 [200 pax.]• Boeing 737-900ER [177 pax.]• Airbus A321NEO [185 pax.]
8 Boeing 737-900ER3 Airbus Market Forecast
15
Design Requirements
• Improved Specifications (compared to Boeing 757-200)
• Extended Range to 4000 nmi• Improved Cruise Efficiency• Increased Payload, Takeoff Weight, and Landing Weight
6 Boeing 757-200
16
Design Requirements
• ERA driven requirements (compared to Boeing 777-200LR)– 75 % cut in emissions– 42 dB reduction in noise– 50% reduction in fuel burn– 50% reduction in field length
• Summarized in Compliance Matrix
17
Design Requirements
Compliance Matrix
18
New Technologies
• Noise reduction:– Chevron Nozzles, Variable Nozzles, Scarf Inlet Active Noise Control, Forward
Swept Fans, Swept/Leaned Stators, Soft Vanes, Over-the-Rotor Metal Foam
• Geared turbofan (GTF):– Ultra high bypass ratio engines to reduce fuel consumption, reduce engine
maintenance, and reduce noise by up to 10 dB
10 Scarf Inlet 9 Chevron Nozzles 11 Geared Turbofan
19
Example Fuel Savings
12 New Technology Fuel Savings
20
Sizing Code Chart
noyes
Geometry(eg S, b, etc.)
Empty Weight Prediction (We)
Set Wφ = (Wφ)calc
Description of Aircraft
Fuel Weight Prediction (Wfuel)
Calculated Gross Weight (Wφ)calc
Performance, Costs, Enviro Impacts
Inputs: , ,
Wφ = (Wφ)calc
21
Sizing Code
Approach:• Empty Weight Fraction – Raymer Table 6.1
]
• Fuel Weight Fraction• Cruise: Breguet Range Equation and Endurance Equation
• All others: Historical Fractions (Raymer Table 3.2)
𝑊 𝑖
𝑊 𝑖− 1
=exp[ −𝐸𝐶𝐿 /𝐷 ]𝑊 𝑖
𝑊 𝑖− 1
=exp¿¿
22
Sizing Code
Calibration:
Boeing 757-200Passengers: 200Range: 2655 nmiCruise Mach Number: 0.8Max Take-off Weight (MTOW): 255000 lbOperating Weight Empty (OWE): 136940 lbFuel Weight: 74510 lb
13 Boeing 757-200
23
Sizing Code
Calibration:• Original Drag Prediction
• Nicolai Fig 5.3 for Subsonic a/c:
• Adjusted to make
• Results: Parameter Value Units Error
W0 (MTOW) 256370.48 lb 0.54%
We (MEW) 132324.24 lb -3.37%
Wf 80046.24 lb 7.43%
24
Sizing Code
Early Aircraft Predictions:• Used 757-200 sizing code (similar aircraft)
• Adjusted range, MTOW, thrust, Mach #, passengers
• Based on “threshold” values from compliance matrix
Parameter Value Units Change
W0 (MTOW) 258692.93 lb +0.91%
We (MEW) 132004.16 lb -0.24%
Wf 81288.77 lb +1.55%
25
Sizing Code
Next:• Convert entirely to MATLAB
• Same output as with Excel
• Implement the next level of complexity• Component weights• Aerodynamics (drag breakdown)• Propulsion (thrust, fuel consumption)• Future technology factors
26
Summary & Next Steps
• Summary– Mission statement– Market & Customers– Design Mission– Design Requirements– New Technologies– Sizing Code
• Next Steps– In depth analysis of technologies (cost and benefits)– Increase complexity and accuracy of sizing code– Formulate customer, regulatory and design requirements and begin
preliminary aircraft performance analysis.
27
28
References1. http://aero.larc.nasa.gov/era_univ/competitions_univ_era.htm2. “Current Market Outlook 2010-2029,” Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Market Analysis, Seattle, WA, Nov. 2010.3. Leahy, John. “Airbus Global Market Forecast 2010-2029,” Airbus.
Toulouse, Dec. 2010.4. www.guidetothailand.com5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:China_high
speed_rail_network.png6. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/10/google-founders-pick-up-
another-big-plane/7. “Geographical Map of Asia,” Sep. 2010.
[http://www.voyagesphotosmanu.com/geographical_map_asia.html. Accessed 1/22/11.]
29
References8. Tinseth, Randy, “Sharks and Jets,” Boeing Commercial Airlines, Seattle
WA, August 2010.[http://boeingblogs.com/randy/archives/2010/08/sharks_and_jets.html. Accessed 1/22/11.]
9.http://memagazine.asme.org/articles/2006/november/Put_Nozzle.cfm 10. http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/RT/2004/RT/RTL-abbott.html11. http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/print.main?
id=406523512. Nickol, C. L. (2007). Hybrid Wing Body Configuration System Studies. 13. www.boeing.com/companyoffices/gallery