1 supplemental regulations to 34 cfr part 300 assistance to states for the education of children...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300
Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities –
Final Regulations (73 FR 73006)
2
Part B Supplemental - Background
Final regulations (34 CFR Part 300) for the IDEA of 2004 were published on August 14, 2006
Those regulations identified certain issues for which additional regulatory changes might be necessary
3
Part B Supplemental - BackgroundAn NPRM (73 FR 27690) published on
May 13, 2008 sought comment on the following areas –
Parental revocation of consent to continued special education and related services (§§300.9 and 300.300)
An SEA or LEA’s obligation to make positive efforts to employ qualified individuals with disabilities (§300.177)
4
Part B Supplemental – Background
Representation of parents by non-attorneys in due process hearings (§300.512)
State monitoring, technical assistance, and enforcement of the Part B program (§§300.600, 300.602, 300.606)
The allocation of funds, under sections 611 and 619 of the Act, to LEAs that are not serving any children with disabilities (§§300.705, 300.815, 300.816, 300.817)
5
Part B Supplemental - Background
Approximately 740 comments were received in response to the NPRM
SEAs, LEAs, professional associations, advocacy organizations, parents and individuals submitted comments
§§300.300 and 300.512 received the most comments
6
§300.177(b) – Positive Efforts to Employ Individuals with Disabilities
Implements section 606 of the Act
Each recipient of assistance under Part B of the Act must make positive efforts to employ, and advance in employment, qualified individuals with disabilities in programs assisted under Part B of the Act.
7
§300.177(b) – Positive Efforts to Employ Individuals with Disabilities “Positive Efforts”
Not defined because appropriate positive efforts will vary depending on the needs of the State or public agency
Positive efforts could include Employment fair targeted at individuals with
disabilities Vacancy announcements to organizations for
individuals with disabilities Making individuals with disabilities aware of
promotional opportunities
8
§300.600 – Monitoring and Enforcement §300.600(a)(2) – The State must
make determinations annually about the performance of each LEA using the categories in §300.603(b)(1)
§300.600(a)(3) – clarifies enforcement mechanisms
§300.600(a)(4) – requires States to annually report on the performance of the SEA and each LEA
9
§300.600 – Monitoring and Enforcement
§300.600(e) – puts the one year correction timeline into regulation Most States have demonstrated that
noncompliance can be corrected within one year of identification
States that can’t correct may enter into a compliance agreement
Will not stratify types of noncompliance
10
§300.602 – Targets and Reporting
§300.602(b)(1)(i)(A) – annual public reporting must occur as soon as practicable but no later than 120 days following the SEA’s APR submission
11
§300.602 – Targets and Reporting
Timeline alleviates any uncertainty about when public reporting must be completed
Change from the NPRM proposed timeline of 60 days Allows for more accurate analysis of
LEA data, thereby improving the quality of reporting
12
§300.602 – Targets and Reporting
§300.602(b)(1)(i)(B) – implements section 616(b)(2)(C)(ii)(I) of the Act NPRM required SPP, APR and annual public
reporting to be posted on “State’s Web site”
Final regulations clarify that these documents must be on the “SEA’s Web site”
Posting historical documents is left to each State to decide
13
§300.606 – Notification of Enforcement Actions
Requires an SEA, at a minimum, to post on its Web site and distribute to the media and through public agencies the notice that the Secretary is proposing to take or is taking an enforcement action pursuant to §300.604
14
§300.606 – Notification of Enforcement Actions
Does not require an SEA to report to the public on enforcement actions taken against LEAs although an SEA may choose, and the Department encourages States, to do so
15
§300.705 – Subgrants to States (611)
Prompted by a 2004 OIG report §300.705(a) – Clarifies that States are
required to make a subgrant under section 611(f) of the Act to eligible LEAs, including public charter schools that operate as LEAs, even if an LEA is not serving any children with disabilities
Regulation becomes effective with the funds that become available on July 1, 2009
16
§300.705 – Subgrants to States (611) Will ensure that LEAs have Part B
funds available if they are needed to conduct child find activities or to serve children with disabilities who subsequently enroll or are identified during the year
States may have to revise policies and procedures for distributing Part B funds, but the benefits outweigh any potential administrative burden
17
§300.705 – Subgrants to States (611)
§300.705(b)(2)(iv) – requires base payment adjustment in subsequent year if LEA serves children with disabilities
§300.705(c) – allows, but does not require, States to reallocate or retain Part B funds not obligated by an LEA that is not serving any children with disabilities
18
§300.815, 816, 817 – Subgrants to States (619)
§300.815 parallels §300.705(a) §300.816(b)(iv) parallels §300.705(b)
(2)(iv) §300.817 parallels §300.705(c)
19
§300.512 –Hearing Rights
Parties may be accompanied or advised by counsel or by individuals with special knowledge or training with respect to the problems of children with disabilities at a due process hearing, however State law determines whether or not parties have the right to be represented by non-attorneys during a due process hearing
20
§300.512 –Hearing Rights
“Given that the Act is silent regarding the representational role of non-attorneys in IDEA due process hearings, the issue of whether non-attorneys may ‘represent’ parties to a due process hearing is a matter that is left, by the statute, to each State to decide.” (Final Regulations – 73 FR 73017)
21
§300.300 –Parental Consent
The Bottom Line –
A parent has the right to unilaterally withdraw a child with a disability from continued special education and related services and a public agency may not challenge that parent’s decision using Part B dispute resolution procedures
22
§300.300 –Parental ConsentAssociated Regulations
New §300.300(b)(3)(i) and (ii) – combines current §300.300(b)(3) and (b)(4) A public agency may not use the
procedures in Subpart E if a parent fails to respond or refuses to provide consent to the initial provision of services
A public agency will not be considered to be in violation of its obligation to make FAPE available and is neither required to convene an IEP Team meeting or develop an IEP in these circumstances
23
§300.300 –Parental Consent
New §300.300(b)(4) – If, at any time subsequent to the initial provision of special education and related services, the parent of a child revokes consent in writing for the continued provision of special education and related services the public agency -
24
§300.300 –Parental Consent
(i) May not continue to provide special education and related services to that child, but must provide prior written notice in accordance with §300.503 before ceasing the provision of special education and related services;
25
§300.300 –Parental Consent
(ii) May not use the procedures in subpart E of this part (including the mediation procedures under §300.506 or the due process procedures under §§300.507 through 300.516) in order to obtain agreement or a ruling that the services may be provided to the child;
26
§300.300 –Parental Consent
(iii) Will not be considered to be in violation of the requirement to make FAPE available to the child because of the failure to provide the child with further special education and related services; and
27
§300.300 –Parental Consent
(iv) Is not required to convene an IEP Team meeting or develop an IEP under §§ 300.320 and 300.324 for the child for further provision of special education and related services.
28
§300.300 –Parental ConsentRationale -The Act provides parents with the
authority to consent to the initial provision of special education and related services, therefore parents also should have the authority to revoke that consent, thereby ending the provision of special education and related services to that child
(NPRM - 73 FR 27691)
29
§300.300 –Parental Consent
While the change reverses the longstanding interpretation of the Department, it provides consistency with “the IDEA’s emphasis on the role of parents in protecting their child’s rights and the Department’s goal of enhancing parent involvement and choice in their child’s education”
(NPRM - 73 FR 27691)
30
§300.300 –Parental ConsentChanges from NPRM in response to
comments received Revocation must be in writing The public agency must provide
prior written notice in accordance with §300.503 before ceasing the provision of special education and related services.
31
§300.9 – Definition of Consent
Clarifies that, while a parent may revoke consent for the continued provision of special education and related services, the public agency is not required to amend the child’s education records to remove any references to the child’s receipt of special education and related services because of the revocation of consent.