1 status of implementation of municipal solid waste (management & handling) rules, 2000 in...
TRANSCRIPT
11
Status Of Implementation Status Of Implementation Of Municipal Solid Waste Of Municipal Solid Waste
(Management & Handling) (Management & Handling) Rules, 2000 In Class-i Cities Rules, 2000 In Class-i Cities
Of India Of India As On 31/12/2003.As On 31/12/2003.
22
PRESENTATION BYPRESENTATION BY P. U. ASNANIP. U. ASNANI
URBAN ENVIRONMENT INFRASTRUCTURE REPRESENTATIVE, URBAN ENVIRONMENT INFRASTRUCTURE REPRESENTATIVE, INDIAINDIA
US~AEP/US-AIDUS~AEP/US-AID
Education for a Sustainable FutureEducation for a Sustainable FutureCEECEE
AhmedabadAhmedabad1818THTH JANUARY, 2005 JANUARY, 2005
33
MANDATORY MANDATORY DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONS
CONTAINED IN THE CONTAINED IN THE MSWM RULES MSWM RULES
44
PROHIBIT PROHIBIT LITTERING OF LITTERING OF WASTE ON THE WASTE ON THE
STREETSSTREETSi.e. i.e.
STORAGE OF WASTE STORAGE OF WASTE
AT SOURCEAT SOURCE
55
66
PRIMARY PRIMARY COLLECTION OF COLLECTION OF
WASTE FROM WASTE FROM THE DOORSTEPTHE DOORSTEP
77
88
99
1010
1111
DAILY DAILY STREET STREET
SWEEPINGSWEEPING
1212
1313
ABOLITION OF ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE OPEN WASTE
STORAGE STORAGE SITESSITES
1414
1515
TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION OF WASTE IN OF WASTE IN
COVERED COVERED VEHICLESVEHICLES
1616
1717
1818
PROCESSING OF PROCESSING OF WASTE BY WASTE BY
COMPOSTING OR COMPOSTING OR POWER POWER
GENERATIONGENERATION
1919
2020
2121
2222
2323
2424
DISPOSAL OF NON-DISPOSAL OF NON-BIODEGRADABLES BIODEGRADABLES
ONLY AT THE ONLY AT THE SANITARY SANITARY
LANDFILL SITESLANDFILL SITES
2525
2626
2727
2828
STATUS OF STATUS OF COMPLIANCECOMPLIANCE
2929
STORAGE OF STORAGE OF WASTE AT WASTE AT
SOURCE IN SOURCE IN INDIAINDIA
3030
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2004106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2004
STORAGE OF WASTE AT SOURCESTORAGE OF WASTE AT SOURCE
PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE OF OF
COMPLIANCECOMPLIANCE
NO. NO. OF OF
CITIESCITIES
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE 50% OR MORE50% OR MORE
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50% BELOW 50%
100%100% 88
5050 7878
BETWEEN 75 & BETWEEN 75 & 100%100% 1212
BETWEEN 50 & BETWEEN 50 & 75%75% 3030
BETWEEN 25% BETWEEN 25% & 50%& 50% 2525
BETWEEN 10% BETWEEN 10% & 25%& 25% 2525
BETWEEN 0% BETWEEN 0% & 10%& 10% 44
ONLY 0%ONLY 0% 1212
NANA 1212
TOTALTOTAL 128128
3131
STATUS OF STORAGE OF WASTE AT SOURCE IN INDIA
100
95
90
8380
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
3027 26 25
20
1512
5 42
10
0 NA0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
8 1 1 1 6 3 5 2 9 1 13 1 9 2 1 2 1 9 11 4 1 9 2 1 1 12 12
NO. OF CITIES
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
3232
STORAGE OF WASTE AT SOURCESTORAGE OF WASTE AT SOURCECONSTRAINTSCONSTRAINTS
Lack of public awareness, motivation, Lack of public awareness, motivation, educationeducation Lack of civic sense, bad habits of the people to Lack of civic sense, bad habits of the people to
litter litter Non cooperation from households, trade and Non cooperation from households, trade and
commercecommerce Lack of powers to levy spot finesLack of powers to levy spot fines Lack of stringent panel provisionLack of stringent panel provision Lack of litter bins in the cityLack of litter bins in the city Long distance between 2 community binsLong distance between 2 community bins Resistance to change in attitudeResistance to change in attitude Lack of fundsLack of funds
3333
SEGREGATION SEGREGATION OF OF
RECYCLABLE RECYCLABLE WASTE AT WASTE AT SOURCESOURCE
3434
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
SEGREGATION OF RECYCLABLE WASTESEGREGATION OF RECYCLABLE WASTE
PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCECOMPLIANCE
NO. OF NO. OF CITIESCITIES
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE 50% OR MORE50% OR MORE
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50% BELOW 50%
100%100% 22
4444 8484
BETWEEN 75 & BETWEEN 75 & 100%100% 1313
BETWEEN 50 & BETWEEN 50 & 75%75% 2929
BETWEEN 25% & BETWEEN 25% & 50%50% 2323
BETWEEN 10% & BETWEEN 10% & 25%25% 2222
BETWEEN 0% & BETWEEN 0% & 10%10% 55
ONLY 0%ONLY 0% 2525
NANA 99
TOTALTOTAL 128128
3535
STATUS OF SEGREGATION OF RECYCLABLE WASTE AT SOURCE
100
95
90
80
75
70
60
5045
40
31 30
25
20 1915
10
5
02
NA0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2 1 1 6 5 5 5 19 1 5 1 6 10 8 1 2 11 2 3 25 9
NO OF CITIES
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
3636
SEGREGATION OF RECYCLABLE WASTE AT SOURCESEGREGATION OF RECYCLABLE WASTE AT SOURCECONSTRAINTSCONSTRAINTS
Lack of wide publicity through electronic and print Lack of wide publicity through electronic and print mediamedia Lack of public awareness, motivation, poor response Lack of public awareness, motivation, poor response from the citizensfrom the citizens Inadequate response from rag-pickersInadequate response from rag-pickers Difficult to educate slum dwellersDifficult to educate slum dwellers Citizens not willing to spend for separate bin for Citizens not willing to spend for separate bin for recyclablesrecyclables Lack of sufficient knowledge on benefits of segregationLack of sufficient knowledge on benefits of segregation Lack of finances to create awarenessLack of finances to create awareness People not cooperating, Negative attitude of the people. People not cooperating, Negative attitude of the people. Lack of effective legal remedyLack of effective legal remedy Lack of facilitiesLack of facilities
3737
PRIMARY PRIMARY COLLECTION COLLECTION
OF WASTE OF WASTE FROM THE FROM THE DOORSTEPDOORSTEP
3838
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
PRIMARY COLLECTION FROM THE DOORSTEPPRIMARY COLLECTION FROM THE DOORSTEP
PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCECOMPLIANCE
NO. OF NO. OF CITIESCITIES
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE 50% OR MORE50% OR MORE
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50% BELOW 50%
100%100% 88
4242 8686
BETWEEN 75 & BETWEEN 75 & 100%100% 1515
BETWEEN 50 & BETWEEN 50 & 75%75% 1919
BETWEEN 25% & BETWEEN 25% & 50%50% 3131
BETWEEN 10% & BETWEEN 10% & 25%25% 1717
BETWEEN 0% & BETWEEN 0% & 10%10% 77
ONLY 0%ONLY 0% 2121
NANA 1010
TOTALTOTAL 128128
3939
STATUS OF PRIMARY COLLECTION OF WASTE FROM THE DOORSTEP
10095
90
8380
7570 69 67
60
50
4035
3027 25
2015
105
2 0 NA0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
8 2 3 1 5 4 2 1 1 8 7 11 2 9 2 7 7 3 7 6 1 21 10
NO OF CITIES
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
4040
COLLECTION OF WASTE FROM THE COLLECTION OF WASTE FROM THE DOORSTEPSDOORSTEPS
CONSTRAINTSCONSTRAINTS
Lack of awareness and lack of motivationLack of awareness and lack of motivation Non availability of primary collection Non availability of primary collection vehicle and equipmentsvehicle and equipments Lack of financial ResourcesLack of financial Resources Difficulty in motivating slum dwellersDifficulty in motivating slum dwellers Insufficient response from Citizens Insufficient response from Citizens Lack of manpowerLack of manpower Non – availability of ContainerizedNon – availability of Containerized
4141
DAILY DAILY STREET STREET
SWEEPINGSWEEPING
4242
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
DAILY STREET SWEEPINGDAILY STREET SWEEPING
PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCECOMPLIANCE
NO. OF NO. OF CITIESCITIES
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE 50% OR MORE50% OR MORE
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50% BELOW 50%
100%100% 3535
101101 2727
BETWEEN 75 & BETWEEN 75 & 100%100% 3333
BETWEEN 50 & BETWEEN 50 & 75%75% 3333
BETWEEN 25% & BETWEEN 25% & 50%50% 1111
BETWEEN 10% & BETWEEN 10% & 25%25% 33
BETWEEN 0% & BETWEEN 0% & 10%10% 00
ONLY 0%ONLY 0% 11
NANA 1212
TOTALTOTAL 128128
4343
STATUS OF DAILY STREET SWEEPING
10095
9085
80 7975
7067 65
60
5045
4035
3025
20 18
10
0 NA0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
35 1 17 1 13 1 4 5 1 2 7 14 1 6 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 12
NO OF CITIES
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
4444
DAILY SWEEPING OF STREETSDAILY SWEEPING OF STREETSCONSTRAINTSCONSTRAINTS
Shortage of Manpower Shortage of Manpower Excessive leave and absenteeism of Excessive leave and absenteeism of
Sanitary WorkersSanitary Workers No works on Sundays and Public No works on Sundays and Public
holidaysholidays Kuchha roadsKuchha roads Lack of Financial ResourcesLack of Financial Resources
4545
ABOLITION OF OPEN ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE STORAGE WASTE STORAGE
DEPOT/PROVISION OF DEPOT/PROVISION OF CLOSED CONTAINERCLOSED CONTAINER
4646
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE STORAGE SITE (INTRODUCING CLOSED ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE STORAGE SITE (INTRODUCING CLOSED CONTAINERS OR OTHER DEVICES)CONTAINERS OR OTHER DEVICES)
PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCECOMPLIANCE
NO. OF NO. OF CITIESCITIES
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE 50% OR MORE50% OR MORE
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50% BELOW 50%
100%100% 55
3838 9090
BETWEEN 75 & BETWEEN 75 & 100%100% 1010
BETWEEN 50 & BETWEEN 50 & 75%75% 2323
BETWEEN 25% & BETWEEN 25% & 50%50% 1212
BETWEEN 10% & BETWEEN 10% & 25%25% 2020
BETWEEN 0% & BETWEEN 0% & 10%10% 11
ONLY 0%ONLY 0% 4343
NANA 1414
TOTALTOTAL 128128
4747
STATUS OF ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE STORAGE DEPOT/PROVISION OF CLOSED CONTAINER
10095
90
8075
70
60 58
5045
42
35 3330
2520
1512
50
10
NA0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
5 1 3 5 1 4 6 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 7 6 4 1 9 1 43 14
NO OF CITIES
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
4848
ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE STORAGE DEPOTSSTORAGE DEPOTS
CONSTRAINTSCONSTRAINTS
Shortage of ContainersShortage of Containers Lack of Financial ResourcesLack of Financial Resources Lack of Planning of Waste Storage Lack of Planning of Waste Storage
DepotsDepots Inaccessible Areas/Narrow lanes – Inaccessible Areas/Narrow lanes –
difficult to put containersdifficult to put containers
4949
TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION OF WASTE IN OF WASTE IN
COVERED COVERED VEHICLESVEHICLES
5050
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
TRANSPORTATIONTRANSPORTATION
PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCECOMPLIANCE
NO. OF NO. OF CITIESCITIES
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE 50% OR MORE50% OR MORE
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50% BELOW 50%
100%100% 2727
6969 5959
BETWEEN 75 & BETWEEN 75 & 100%100% 1818
BETWEEN 50 & BETWEEN 50 & 75%75% 2424
BETWEEN 25% & BETWEEN 25% & 50%50% 88
BETWEEN 10% & BETWEEN 10% & 25%25% 1010
BETWEEN 0% & BETWEEN 0% & 10%10% 00
ONLY 0%ONLY 0% 3030
NANA 1111
TOTALTOTAL 128128
5151
STATUS OF TRANSPORTATION OF WASTE IN COVERED VEHICLES
100 98
90 88
80
72 7066
60
50
4035
2520
1512 10
0 NA0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
27 1 6 1 10 1 3 1 8 11 5 1 2 4 2 1 3 30 11
NO OF CITIES
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
5252
TRANSPORTATION OF WASTE IN TRANSPORTATION OF WASTE IN COVERED VEHICLESCOVERED VEHICLES
CONSTRAINTSCONSTRAINTS
Lack of Financial resources to Lack of Financial resources to purchase covered vehiclespurchase covered vehicles Insufficient vehiclesInsufficient vehicles Old vehicles difficult to replace Old vehicles difficult to replace Lack of exposure to new Lack of exposure to new technologiestechnologies
5353
PROCESSING PROCESSING OF WASTEOF WASTE
5454
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
PROCESSING OF WASTEPROCESSING OF WASTE
PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCECOMPLIANCE
NO. OF NO. OF CITIESCITIES
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE 50% OR MORE50% OR MORE
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50% BELOW 50%
100%100% 44
1010 118118
BETWEEN 75 & BETWEEN 75 & 100%100% 22
BETWEEN 50 & BETWEEN 50 & 75%75% 44
BETWEEN 25% & BETWEEN 25% & 50%50% 55
BETWEEN 10% & BETWEEN 10% & 25%25% 77
BETWEEN 0% & BETWEEN 0% & 10%10% 55
ONLY 0%ONLY 0% 9595
NANA 66
TOTALTOTAL 128128
5555
STATUS OF PROCESSING OF WASTE
100
80
66
50
40
30
20
15
10
20
5
NA0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
4 2 1 3 1 4 2 1 4 4 1 95 6
NO OF CITIES
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
5656
PROCESSING OF WASTEPROCESSING OF WASTECONSTRAINTSCONSTRAINTS
Lack of Financial ResourcesLack of Financial Resources Lack of Technical know how Lack of Technical know how Difficult to find appropriate technology for Difficult to find appropriate technology for treatment of waste treatment of waste Lack of skilled Manpower Lack of skilled Manpower Nonavailability of appropriate land/ Land Nonavailability of appropriate land/ Land acquisition –Time consuming acquisition –Time consuming Low quality of Municipal wasteLow quality of Municipal waste Insufficient organic matterInsufficient organic matter Lack of Basic facilities to setup Treatment Lack of Basic facilities to setup Treatment PlantsPlants
5757
DISPOSAL OF DISPOSAL OF WASTE AT THE WASTE AT THE ENGINEERED ENGINEERED
LANDFILLLANDFILL
5858
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY LANDFILLSCONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY LANDFILLS
PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCECOMPLIANCE
NO. OF NO. OF CITIESCITIES
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE 50% OR MORE50% OR MORE
COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50% BELOW 50%
100%100% 00
11 127127
BETWEEN 75 & BETWEEN 75 & 100%100% 11
BETWEEN 50 & BETWEEN 50 & 75%75% 00
BETWEEN 25% & BETWEEN 25% & 50%50% 22
BETWEEN 10% & BETWEEN 10% & 25%25% 11
BETWEEN 0% & BETWEEN 0% & 10%10% 11
ONLY 0%ONLY 0% 116116
NANA 77
TOTALTOTAL 128128
5959
STATUS OF DESPOSAL OF WASTE AT THE ENGINEERED LANDFILL
90
30
20
2 0 NA0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 1 1 116 7
NO OF CITIES
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
6060
DISPOSAL OF WASTE AT THE ENGINEERED DISPOSAL OF WASTE AT THE ENGINEERED LANDFILLLANDFILL
CONSTRAINTSCONSTRAINTS
Lack of Financial ResourcesLack of Financial Resources Lack of Financial Support Lack of Financial Support Landfill Technologies very expensive and Landfill Technologies very expensive and unaffordableunaffordable Lack of Technical StaffLack of Technical Staff Lack of Technical know how for scientific Lack of Technical know how for scientific disposal of disposal of waste waste Nonavailability of appropriate landNonavailability of appropriate land Delay in clearance of disposal sitesDelay in clearance of disposal sites Acquisition of landAcquisition of land
6161
OBTAINING OBTAINING AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZATION
FROM STATE FROM STATE PCBsPCBs
6262
AUTHORIZATION FROM STATE PCBsAUTHORIZATION FROM STATE PCBs
STATUSSTATUS NO. OF NO. OF CITIESCITIES
AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZATION OBTAINEDOBTAINED 3333
APPLIEDAPPLIED 4141
NOT MOVEDNOT MOVED 3939
NANA 1515
TOTALTOTAL 128128
6363
STATUS OF OBTAINING AUTHORIZATION FROM STATE PCBs
33
4240
15
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
YES APPLIED NO NA
WHETHER STATE PCB AUTHORIZATION
NO
OF
CIT
IES
6464
STATUS OF AREA OF STATUS OF AREA OF THE LANDFILL SITES THE LANDFILL SITES AVAILABLE IN ACRESAVAILABLE IN ACRES
6565
STATUS OF AREA OF THE LANDFILL AVAILABLE IN ACRESSTATUS OF AREA OF THE LANDFILL AVAILABLE IN ACRES
S. S. NO.NO. CITYCITY
POPULATION POPULATION (2001) IN (2001) IN LAKHSLAKHS
Land required for Land required for treatment & treatment &
disposal @ of 18 disposal @ of 18 acres/1 Lakh acres/1 Lakh populationpopulation
Area of the Area of the land availableland available
ShortfalShortfall or l or
excess excess in landin land
11 PunePune 25.40025.400 457.200457.20043.00043.000
--414.20414.20
00
22 SuratSurat 24.33024.330 437.940437.940 500.000500.000 62.06062.060
33 NagpurNagpur 21.00021.000 378.000378.00055.00055.000
--323.00323.00
00
44 IndoreIndore 16.25016.250 292.500292.500136.000136.000
--156.50156.50
00
55 VadodaraVadodara 14.92414.924 268.632268.6329.0009.000
--259.63259.63
22
66 AgraAgra 12.59012.590 226.620226.62021.25021.250
--205.37205.37
00
77 NashikNashik 10.64010.640 191.520191.52072.00072.000
--119.52119.52
00
88Kalyan-Kalyan-
DombivliDombivli 10.61410.614 191.057191.05731.25031.250
--159.80159.80
77
99 RajkotRajkot 10.20010.200 183.600183.600100.000100.000
--83.60083.600
6666
CONSOLIDATED CONSOLIDATED PICTURE OF PICTURE OF
COMPLIANCECOMPLIANCE
6767
Disposal-SLFProcessing
of wasteTransportationStorage
DepotStreet
Sweeping
Primary
collectionSegregation
of recycables
Storage
at source
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
ITEMS TO COMPLY
PERC
EN
TA
GE O
F C
OM
PLIA
NC
E
41%33% 38%
72%
29%
52%
9% 1.4%
6868
WAY WAY FORWARD………….FORWARD………….