1 sferics and tweeks prepared by ryan said and morris cohen stanford university, stanford, ca ihy...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
221 views
TRANSCRIPT
1
Sferics and Tweeks
Prepared by Ryan Said and Morris CohenStanford University, Stanford, CA
IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global
AWESOME Network
2
Lightning
• Different types of lightning: +CG, -CG, IC
• Current forms a large electric field antenna, radiating radio waves
• Large component in VLF range
2
3
Sferic in Earth-Ionosphere Waveguide
• Shape of sferics, tweeks vary by ionosphere and ground profile
• Tweeks more common at night, where ionosphere reflects more energy (lower electron collision rate at higher altitude)
3
4
Tweek Atmospheric
Modal cutoffIonospheric reflections
4
5
Ray Model
• Ionosphere enables long-range propagation of emitted radio pulse
• Guided radio pulse called a “Radio Atmospheric,” or “Sferic”
• Sferic with many visible reflections forms a “Tweek Atmospheric”
• Hop arrival times related to ionospheric reflection height
• Arrive later during nighttime (higher and stronger reflection at night than during day)
• See [Nagano 2007] for dependence of arrival time with height5
6
Modal Model
• Modal analysis: each mode dictates waveguide velocity, attenuation rate
• Discrete modes are functions of frequency, boundary reflections
• Solve by requiring phase consistency between: F1, F3
• Each mode has a cutoff frequency fc
• Below this frequency, attenuation is very high
• Nighttime ionosphere: fc ~ 1.8 kHz for the first mode (m=1)
• Based on actual ionospheric profiles, can calculate high attenuation below 5 kHz 6
7
TE and TM Modes
• Sferic consists of a combination of TE (Transverse Electric) and TM (Transverse Magnetic) modes
• Vertical lightning channel preferentially excites TM modes
• Horizontal loop antennas measure Hy (from TM) and Hx (from TE)
• Tweeks contain more Hx than early part of sferics
7
8
Tweek Atmospheric
• Many Ionospheric reflections visible• Ray model: individual impulses• Modal model: summation of modes• Many modal cutoff frequencies visible
Modal cutoffIonospheric reflections
8
9
Tweek Atmospheric
1st mode cutoff
Ground Wave
Ray Hops
9
z
yx
10
Long-Range Sferic
• High attenuation below 5 kHz (especially during daytime)
• No tweeks at long range: too much attenuation
• “Slow Tail” from QTEM mode
• Waveguide dispersion:• Lower frequencies
travel slower than higher frequencies
• Lower frequency components seen to arrive later
Slow Tail
Slow Tail
Dispersion
10
11
Long-Range Sferic
• Time-domain: short impulse (top panel)• Frequency-domain: smooth, mostly single mode (bottom panel)• Minimum attenuation near 13 kHz 11
12
Lightning characteristics
+ + ++ +
++ ++
++ ++ + +
+++
- -- - -- -- ----
-
+ +++++ +
+
Return stroke peak current (i.e., kA)
+ + ++ +
+ ++
++ ++ + +
++
----
-
+ +
Total charge moment (I.e., C•km)
13
Sferic Characteristics
• VLF peak– Mostly TM Modes– 8-12 kHz peak
energy
• ELF peak– Delayed– TEM mode– Associated with
sprites– <1kHz energy
VLF Peak ELF “Tail”
14
Peak Current
+ + ++ +
++ ++
++ +
+ + ++++
- -- - -
- -- -
----
+ ++
++
+ +
+
Return stroke peak current (i.e., kA)
Peak current is proportional to VLF peak for a given propagation path
VLF Peak
15
Total Charge Moment
Total ELF energy is proportional to total charge transfer
ELF energy attenuates more in Earth-ionosphere waveguide
ELF Energy
+ + ++ +
+ ++
++ ++ + +
++
----
-
+ +
Total charge moment (I.e., C•km)
Reising [1998]
16
Determining Azimuth
Single Frequency:
EW
NSIncident wave S
Φ
NS ~ S*cos(Φ)EW ~ S*sin(Φ)
If same constant of proportionality:
EW/NS = tan(Φ)Φ = tan-1(EW/NS)
dffEWfNS
dffEWfNSfNS
fEW
u
l
u
l
f
f
f
f
22
221
|)(||)(|
|)(||)(|)(
)(tan
Band of frequencies: use a Band of frequencies: use a weighted averageweighted average
Wood and Inan [2002]
17
Determining Azimuth cont’d
For each frequency, compare magnitude from NS and EW antenna to calculate azimuth, then average over frequency:
Short FFT
22
221
|)(||)(|
|)(||)(|)(
)(tan
Nkf
EWNkf
NS
Nkf
EWNkf
NS
Nkf
NS
Nkf
EW
ssf
Nf
f
Nfk
ssf
Nf
f
Nfk
s
s
s
u
s
l
s
u
s
l
Calculated azimuth
18
Future Work
• Use methods in previous references to monitor ionosphere during various conditions (night/day, summer/winter, low-/mid-/high-latitude)– As a side effect, can monitor strike locations
(especially when Tweeks are visible, see [Nagano 2007])
18
19
References: Theoretical and Background
• Budden, K. G., “The wave-guide mode theory of wave propagation” Logos Press, 1961
– Overview of theoretical framework for waveguide propagation• Budden, K. G. “The Propagation of Radio Waves” Cambridge University
Press, 1985– Detailed methodologies for calculating electromagnetic propagation
characteristics• Galejs, J. “Terrestrial propagation of long electromagnetic waves”
Pergamon Press New York, 1972 – Calculation of earth-ionosphere waveguide propagation
• Rakov, V. A. & Uman, M. A. “Lightning - Physics and Effects” Cambridge University Press, 2003, 698
– Overview of the lightning strike, including models for electromagnetic radiation from lightning (little emphasis on waveguide propagation)
• Uman, M. A. “The Lightning Discharge” Dover Publications, Inc., 2001 – Overview of lightning processes
19
20
References: Calculations
• Wait, J. R. & Spies, K. P. “Characteristics of the Earth-Ionosphere Waveguide for VLF Radio Waves” National Bureau of Standards, 1964 – Numerical evaluation of waveguide propagation based on assumed
ionospheric profiles• Nagano, I.; Yagitani, S.; Ozaki, M.; Nakamura, Y. & Miyamura, K.
“Estimation of lightning location from single station observations of sferics” Electronics and Communications in Japan, 2007, 90, 22-29 – Calculation of propagation distance and ionospheric height based on
tweek measurements• Ohya, H. et al., “Using tweek atmospherics to measure the
response of the low-middle latitude D-region ionosphere to a magnetic storm,” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2006, 697-709– Ionospheric diagnostics based on tweek measurements
20