1 service quality toronto dominion. p4 sept/oct -2003services marketing – professor v....
TRANSCRIPT
1
Service Quality
Toronto Dominion
P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
2
An Illustration
P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
3
Federal Express
• How do you create dissatisfaction? Consider Fedex– calls
•abandonment (1)– pick-up
•miss package (10)– transport and delivery
•lost (10), damaged (10), etc.– invoice
•adjustment (1)– customer service
•complaint reopened (5)
P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
4
Federal Express (contd.)
Calls CallsCallsPick-
up
Transport&
Delivery
•Abandoned calls (1)
•Missed pick-up (10)
•Lost (10)•Damaged (10)•Wrong late (5)•Overgoods (lost & found) (5)•Right day late (1)•Missing proof of delivery (1)•International (composite index)
•Adjustment (1) •Complaint reopened (5)•Traces (not answered) (1)
12
IndexQuality Service factor) ng x weightis(occurence
P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
5
Operational Efficiency and Customer Satisfaction
P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
6
Service Quality
• Service Quality– expectation (expected service)– performance (perceived service)
• SERVQUAL– Dimensions:
• Tangibles, • Reliability, • Responsiveness, • Assurance, and, • Empathy.
P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
7
A Conceptual Model of Service Quality
P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
8
Consumer Expectations Revisited
• Almost all the SERVQUAL type instruments focus on consumer’s making a point estimate of quality, satisfaction, etc.,
• What if– consumer has a prior distribution about the average quality
of a brand?– consumer care not just about the outcome (on average), but
also about the distribution of possible outcomes?– consumer updates beliefs over time?
• Implications– It is not necessary to exceed expectations (reducing
variance in quality alone can raise future preference)– If customer expects bad quality and receives it, he/she will
not reduce preference for that brand (matching expectations reduces risk!)
– Given two equally priced options, customers will not necessarily choose the one with the higher expected quality
P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
9
Commerce Bank: Service Quality Does Not Mean Automation
P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
10
Service Quality & Organizational Performance
• An Application of Service Quality Methodology– Gerrad & Cunningham, “Bank Service Quality: A
Comparison between a Publicly Quoted and Govt. Bank in Singapore,” Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 2001.
• Oliva & Sterman, “Cutting Corners and Working Overtime,” Management Science, 2001.
– Characteristics of service = inseparability, intangibility and labor intensity
– Rising Financial Pressures on Performance implies Focus on Driving Productivity
– Consequence = Employees Drop Time Spent on Consumers at Expense of Service Quality
– Result = Rework, Reduced Loyalty, High Turnover– Data: NatWest Bank, U.K.