li

ha

mpu

Accepted 9 April 2013Available online 25 April 2013

Keywords:Multilocus genotypingGiardiatpi

information on the genetic diversity and the dynamics of transmission of G. duodenalis. The present study

among different individuals (Buret, 2008).Knowing the genetic diversity of Giardia is an essential compo-

nent in enhancing our understanding on the taxonomy, epidemiol-ogy and population genetics of this parasite. Therefore, molecularcharacterization and in the recent years, multilocus genotyping

man (Sprong et al., 2009). Besides, both assemblages A and B arealso capable of infecting animals. The subdivision into AIAIII hasprovided greater insights on the dynamic of transmission of theseassemblages. Sub-assemblage AII has been regarded as anthropo-notic whereas AI and AIII are predominant in livestock and wildlife,respectively (Feng and Xiao, 2011; Nolan et al., 2010; Sprong et al.,2009; Thompson et al., 2000).

In Malaysia, giardiasis is an endemic disease and is associatedwith malnutrition among children in the rural areas resulting instunting, wasting and vitamin A deciency (Al-Mekhla et al.,

Corresponding author at: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine,University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tel.: +60 3 7949 4746; fax:+60 3 7949 4754.

Infection, Genetics and Evolution 17 (2013) 269276

Contents lists available at

Infection, Genetic

.e lsE-mail address: alsharaby9@yahoo.com (M.A.K. Mahdy).Giardia duodenalis (syn. G. intestinalis; Giardia lamblia) is a a-gellate enteric parasite that infects the intestinal tract of humansand a wide variety of other mammals through ingestion of infec-tive cysts (van der Giessen et al., 2006). It is a major cause ofnon-viral/bacterial diarrhea affecting both developed and develop-ing countries and more frequently encountered in areas with sub-standard environment, poor hygienic practices and inadequatewater treatment system (Daly et al., 2010; Robertson et al.,2009). G. duodenalis infections are most often asymptomatic. Forsymptomatic cases, the degree of symptoms and severity varies

surveillance, contamination source-tracking, and unveiling zoo-notic potential, dynamic transmission, and relationship of geno-types and hosts (Feng and Xiao, 2011). Molecular analysesrevealed that G. duodenalis isolated from humans and animals isa species complex with at least 8 distinct assemblages designatedas A to H, which demonstrate similarity in morphologic character-istics but are phenotypically and genotypically heterogeneous(Plutzer et al., 2010). Of these, only assemblages A and B can causeinfection in humans with the exception of a small fraction of caseswhere animal host specic assemblages CF were reported in hu-bggdhMalaysia

1. Introduction1567-1348/$ - see front matter 2013 Elsevier B.V. Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2013.04.013was conducted to identify G. duodenalis assemblages and sub-assemblages based on multilocus analysisof the glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh), beta-giardin (bg) and triose phosphate isomerase (tpi) genes. Fae-cal specimens were collected from 484 Orang Asli children with a mean age of 7 years and examinedusing light microscopy. Specimens positive for Giardia were subjected to PCR analysis of the three genesand subsequent sequencing in both directions. Sequences were edited and analysed by phylogeneticanalysis. G. duodenalis was detected in 17% (84 of 484) of the examined specimens. Among them, 71 weresuccessfully sequenced using at least one locus. Genotyping results showed that 30 (42%) of the isolatesbelonged to assemblage A, 32 (45%) belonged to assemblage B, while discordant genotype results wereobserved in 9 specimens. Mixed infections were detected in 43 specimens using a tpi-based assemblagespecic protocol. At the sub-assemblages level, isolates belonged to assemblage A were AII. High nucle-otide variation found in isolates of assemblage B made subtyping difcult to achieve. The nding ofassemblage B and the anthroponotic genotype AII implicates human-to-human transmission as the mostpossible mode of transmission among Malaysian aborigines. The high polymorphism found in isolates ofassemblage B warrants a more dening tool to discriminate assemblage B at the sub-assemblage level.

2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

(MLG) have become the prevailing tool used for genotyping andsubtyping of G. duodenalis. This has in turn facilitated in outbreakReceived 18 December 2012Received in revised form 6 April 2013

Giardia duodenalis is considered the most common intestinal parasite in humans worldwide. In Malaysia,many studies have been conducted on the epidemiology of giardiasis. However, there is a scarcity ofMultilocus genotyping of Giardia duodena

Choy Seow Huey a, Mohammed A.K. Mahdy a,b,, HesYvonne A.L. Lim a, Rohela Mahmud a, Johari Surin a

aDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala LubDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Sanaa University, Sanaa, Yemen

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:

a b s t r a c t

journal homepage: wwwll rights reserved.s in Malaysia

m M. Al-Mekhla a,b, Nabil A. Nasr a,

r, Malaysia

SciVerse ScienceDirect

s and Evolution

evier .com/locate /meegid

collection. Single sample was collected from each participant.

s anUpon receipt, the samples were transferred to the Department ofParasitology, University of Malaya, preserved in 2.5% potassiumdichromate and stored in cold room (4 C) until further analysis.

2.2. Microscopy

The faecal samples were concentrated based on formal-ethertechnique. Briey, a small amount of stool samples (pea size)was emulsied with 7 ml of 10% formalin and sieved through adouble-layered gauze and collected in a beaker. The suspensionwas transferred into 15 ml conical centrifuge tube and topped upwith three ml of diethyl ether. The centrifuge tube with the sus-pension was capped and mixed by shaking before centrifugingfor 5 min at 2500 rpm. The top three layers (ether, debris and for-malin water) were removed and the sediment was examined bylight microscope under x100 and x400 magnication for the pres-ence of Giardia cysts and other intestinal parasites after stainingwith iodine.

2.3. Molecular analysis

DNA was extracted directly from samples positive for Giardiacyst using PowerSoilDNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc.,Carlsbad, California) following the manufacturers instructions.2010, 2005). The prevalence of human Giardia infection varies be-tween 0.2% and 29.2% (Lim et al., 2008; Noor Azian et al., 2007).Most of the epidemiological studies detected Giardia on the basisof microscopic examination without employing molecular ap-proach. Data on genotypes of G. duodenalis up to the assemblage le-vel remains scarce. In a previous genotyping study using SSU rRNAlocus, one specimen was identied as assemblage A in 42 speci-mens and the rest were assemblage B (Mahdy et al., 2009). In astudy on immunocompromised patients, assemblage A was identi-ed in four of the microcopy-positive Giardia specimens using tpigene (Lim et al., 2011). Assemblage A was also isolated from envi-ronmental samples including recreational lake water and waterbodies in a zoo (Lim et al., 2009a,b). In addition, genotyping studywas conducted on animals and assemblages A and E were detectedamong goats (Lim et al., 2013). However, subtyping of assemblagesA and B in the previous studies was not conducted which limit ourunderstanding on the transmission dynamics and the source ofinfection of giardiasis in this country. Thus, the present studywas aimed to identify G. duodenalis assemblages and sub-assem-blages based on multiloci genes which included gdh, bg and tpigenes to attain better understanding of the genetic diversity andtransmission of giardiasis in Malaysia. The study also aimed atdetermining the occurrence of mixed infections using primers tar-geting tpi gene specic for assemblages A and B.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Source of samples

A total of 484 children (51% males, 49% females) with the meanage of 7 years were involved in the present study. The sample col-lection was conducted from April to September 2011 in 13 OrangAsli villages located in Lipis district, Pahang state, PeninsularMalaysia. The study protocol was approved by The Medical EthicsCommittee of University of Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia under the MEC Ref. No.: 788.74. Informed consents wereobtained from the participants parents or guardians prior to the

270 C.S. Huey et al. / Infection, GeneticElution step was accomplished by adding reduced volume of solu-tion C6 (10 mM Tris) to obtain a nal volume of 50 ll and the DNAwas stored in freezer under 20 C.A partial sequence of gdh gene (432-bp) was amplied usingsemi-nested PCR as described by Read et al. (2004). For primaryPCR, the forward primer GDHeF (50-TCA ACG TYA AYC GYG GYTTCC GT-30) and the reverse primer GDHiR (50-GTT RTC CTT GCACAT CTC C-30) were used. In the secondary PCR, the forward primerGDHiF (50-CAG TAC AAC TCY GCT CTC GG-30) and the reverse primerGDHiR were used. Primary and secondary PCR reactions were per-formed in a 50 ll PCRmastermix comprising 0.5 lMof each primer(Bioneer Q-Oligos, Korea), 2.5 U of HotStarTaq Plus DNA Polymer-ase (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany),1 PCR buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Ger-many), 200 lM of dNTP (Fermentas, Ontario, Canada), 1.5 mMMgCl2 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (SigmaAl-drich, USA) and 0.4 mg/ml BSA (NewEnglandBiolabs, Ipswich, USA).2 ll of DNA templatewere used in both amplications thatwere runin the MyCycler thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) under thefollowing conditions: Initial activation at 95 C for 5 min, 1 cycle at94 C for 2 min, 56 C for 1 min and 72 C for 2 min, followed by 55amplication cycles at 94 C for 30 s, 56 C for 20 s, 72 C for 45 s,and a nal extension at 72 C for 7 min. For secondary PCR, the num-ber of cycles was reduced to 33.

A partial sequence of tpi (530-bp) was amplied using nested-PCR protocol according to Sulaiman et al. (2003). Primary PCR wasrun using forward primer AL3543 (50-AAA TIA TGC CTG CTC GTC G-30) and reverse primer AL3546 (50-CAA ACC TTI TCC GCA AAC C-30).For secondary PCR, forward primer AL3544 (50-CCC TTC ATC GGIGGT AAC TT-30) and reverse primer AL3545 (50-GTG GCC ACC ACICCC GTG CC-30) were used. Primary and secondary PCRs were per-formed in a 50 ll PCR mix comprising 0.2 lM of each primer (Bio-neer Q-Oligos, Korea), 1 U of HotStarTaq Plus DNA Polymerase(Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 1 PCR buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Ger-many), 200 lM dNTP (Fermentas, Ontario, Canada), 1.5 mM MgCl2(Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and 0.2 mg/ml BSA (New England Bio-labs, Ipswich, USA). 2 ll of DNA template were used and the pre-pared master mix was incubated in the MyCycler thermal cycler(Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) under the following conditions: Initialhot start at 95 C for 5 min, 35 amplication cycles at 94 C for45 s, 50 C for 45 s (58 C for secondary PCR), 72 C for 60 s and anal extension at 72 C for 10 min.

In addition, the rst PCR product of the reaction described bySulaiman et al. (2003) underwent further amplication using aset of separate A (Geurden et al., 2007) and B (Geurden et al.,2009) assemblage-specic primers. Presence of mixed infectionwas detected by visualizing the occurrence of bands in the agarosegel at 332 bp for assemblage A amplied using primers AssAF (50-CGC CGT ACA CCT GTC-30) and AssAR (50-AGC AAT GAC AAC CTCCTT CC-30) and at 400 bp for assemblage B amplied using primersAssBF (50-GTT GTT GTT GCT CCC TCC TTT -30) and AssBR (50-CCGGCT CAT AGG CAA TTA CA-30). The PCR reaction mix consisted of0.2 lM (0.4 lM for assemblage B) of each primer (Bioneer Q-Oli-gos, Korea), 1.25 U of HotStarTaq Plus DNA Polymerase (Qiagen,Hilden, Germany), 1 PCR buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany),200 lM dNTP (Fermentas, Ontario, Canada), 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Qia-gen, Hilden, Germany) and 0.1 mg/ml BSA (New England Biolabs,Ipswich, USA) to a nal volume of 25 ll. 1 ll of DNA templatewas added for assemblage A and 2 ll was added for assemblageB for the PCR amplications following the cycle parameter: Initialhot start at 95 C for 5 min, initial denaturation at 94 C for 10 min,and 35 amplication cycles at 94 C for 45 s, 64 C for 45 s (62 Cfor secondary PCR) and 72 C for 45 s.

A partial sequence of bg gene (511-bp) was amplied usingPCR protocols described by Caccio et al. (2002) and Lalle et al.(2005). The primers for primary PCR were G7 (50-AAG CCC GACGAC CTC ACC CGC AGT GC-30) and G759 (50-GAG GCC GCC CTG

0 0

d Evolution 17 (2013) 269276GAT CTT CGA GAC GAC-3 ). For secondary PCR, BG511F (5 -GAACGA ACG AGA TCG AGG TCC G-30) and BG511R (50-CTC GAC GAGCT TCG TGT T-30) were used. The PCR master mix consisted of

0.4 lMof each primer (Bioneer Q-Oligos, Korea), 2.5 U HotStarTaq

Plus DNA Polymerase (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 1 PCR buffer(Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and 200 lM dNTP (Fermentas, Ontario,Canada) in a total volume of 50 ll. 2 ll of DNA template wereadded and the mixture was run in the MyCycler thermal cycler(Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) under the following conditions: Initialhot start at 95 C for 5 min, initial denaturation at 95 C for15 min, followed by 35 amplication cycles at 95 C for 30 s,65 C for 30 s (55 C for secondary PCR), 72 C for 60 s, and a nalextension at 72 C for 7 min.

In all the PCR reactions, a Giardia-positive DNA specimenand distilled water were used as positive and negative control.The PCR products were analyzed using 2% agarose gel (Vivantis)electrophoresis stained with SYBR Safe DNA (Invitrogen, Auck-land, New Zealand).

2.4. DNA sequencing and sequences analysis

Successfully amplied PCR products with the nested-PCR foreach locus (except for tpi assemblage-specic PCR) were sequencedin both directions using Applied Biosystems 3730 xl DNA Analyzer(Applied Biosystems, USA). The chromatograms and sequences gen-erated from this studywere viewed and assembled using BioEdit Se-quence Alignment Editor Programme (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu).Preliminary similarity comparison of the consensus sequence withthe sequences in GenBank database was made using Basic LocalAlignment Search Tool (BLAST) (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Theisolate sequences were genotyped into assemblage and sub-assem-blageusingmultiple alignments implementedbyClustalW(Thomp-son et al., 1994) with previously dened reference sequencesretrieved from GenBank database. Phylogenetic analysis was per-formed in MEGA 5 (www.megasoftware.net) using neighbour-join-ing (NJ) algorithms with evolutionary distances calculated byKimura-2parametermethod (Kimura, 1980) and1000bootstrap va-lue. Sequences fromthis studyweredeposited in theGenBankunderaccession numbers KC313907- KC313948.

3. Results

3.1. Identication of G. duodenalis assemblages and mixedassemblages

From a total of 484 participants, 84 (17.0%) were found in-fected with Giardia using microscopy. The 84 microscopy-posi-

Table 1The distribution of assemblages A and B based on the different loci and mixedinfection.

Genes Assemblages n (%)

A B A + B Total

tpi 34 (58) 25 (42) 59gdh 7 (18) 31 (82) 38b-giardin 18 (64) 10 (36) 28MLGsa 3 (27) 8 (73) 11tpi-Mixedb 1 (2) 23 (34) 43 (64) 67

a Multilocus genotypes (isolates with the same assemblage identied using tpiand gdh and b-giardin).

b tpi-based PCR used assemblage-specic primers to identify the mixed infection.

Table 2The distribution of assemblages A and B based on the different loci and mixed infection.

Isolate tpi gdh bg tpi-Mixed Isolate tpi gdh bg tpi-Mixed

TB11.6 A (A2) A (A2) A (A2) A + B SM1.2 B B A + B

SE8.4 B A + B

C.S. Huey et al. / Infection, Genetics and Evolution 17 (2013) 269276 271TG2.5 A (A2) A (A2) A (A3) BTG13.2 A(A2) A (A2) A (A3) BTB13.3 A (A2) A (A2) A + BSB14.1 A (A2) A (A2) ST15.1 A (A2) A (A2) A + BKK16.4 A (A2) A (A2) KK16.5 A (A2) A (A2) A + BTB7.3 A (A2) A (A2) A + BSE10.1 A (A2) A (A3) BSE17.1 A (A2) A (A2) ATB15.3 A (A2) A (A2) A + BTG9.2 A (A2) A (A2) A + BPD1.1 A (A2) A (A3) A + BPD11.2 A (A2) A (A2) A + BSE29.3 A (A2) A (A2) KK11.3 A (A2) A + BKM4.1 A (A2) TB3.3 A (A2) A + BTB13.2 A (A2) A + B

SE25.2 A (A2) A + BKK1.6 A (A2) A + BCK1.2 A (A2) BCK10.2 A (A2) A + BSB1.1 A (A2) A + BSE25.4 A A + BST10.3 A (A2) BTB12.3 A (A2) KK7.5 A (A3) SE29.4 A (A2) KM15.1 B B B BTB2.3 B B B BTB4.1 B B B A + BTB5.1 B B B A + BCK20.2 B B B A + BSE7.1 B B B A + BSE12.1 B B B BSE24.2 B B B BKN7.4 B B A + BSE27.6 B BSE27.7 B BKK2.3 B A + BKK2.5 B A + BKM7.3 B KM8.1 B KM15.2 B BST13.2 B BST20.3 B BKM8.4 B CK1.4 B A + BSB4.1 B ST8.1 A (A2) B A (A2) BKN7.2 A (A2) B BSM6.2 A (A2) B A + BKM3.2 A (A2) B BKM12.3 A (A2) B A + BTB11.2 A (A2) B A + BSB15.1 A (A2) B A + BPD20.1 B B A (A3) A + BSE18.4 A B A + BKK6.1 A + BCK20.1 A + BST1.3 BST3.2 BST21.1 BKM13.2 B B A + BTB9.2 B B A + BCK7.1 B B A + BSE13.1 B B BTB15.1 B B A + BSE9.3 B B A + BKN6.4 B A + BTB9.1 B A + BUM3.1 B A + BTB2.5 BSE13.2 B

assemblage A at tpi and bg genes and as assemblage B at gdhgene. The specimen PD20.1 was identied as assemblage B attpi and gdh genes and as assemblage A at bg gene. Seven speci-

3.3. Subtyping of G. duodenalis assemblage B

At tpi gene, 16 sequences representing 23 isolates which wereidentied as assemblage B, were multiple aligned with 5 referencessequence representing BIV, BIV-like, BIII and BIII-like and analysedfor BIV/BIII specic substitutions according to Wielinga andThompson (2007). The 16 representative sequences had heteroge-neous nucleotides at positions dening the sub-assemblages, mak-ing proposing specic sub-assemblages for assemblage B isolatesnot possible (Table 3). Phylogenetic analysis conrmed the mono-phyletic group of assemblage B (bootstrap = 99%). The Neighbor-Joining formed tree sub-clusters of assemblage B. However, sub-clustering was not supported by bootstrap values (Fig. 1).

At gdh gene, 15 sequences representing 30 isolates had high

Fig. 1. Phylogram of G. duodenalis genotypes constructed by neighbour-joininganalysis, based on the nucleotide sequences of tpi retrieved from this studycompared with reference sequences of known assemblages from Genbank. Boot-strap values obtained from 1000 replicates are indicated on branches in percentage.

s anmens (KN7.2, SM6.2, KM3.2, KM12.3, TB11.2, SB15.1 and SE18.4)were found to harbour assemblage A at tpi gene and assemblageB at gdh gene. The tpi-mixed protocol showed that 6 of the 9specimens harboured mixed assemblages A and B (Tables 2).

The tpi-based PCR protocol for mixed infection using assem-blage-specic primers was conducted on the 84 Giardia-positivespecimens. Of these, 67 specimens showed amplicons for G.duodenalis assemblages; 43 specimens had mixed infectionswith assemblages A and B, 23 specimens had single infectionwith assemblage B and one case was identied as assemblageA (Table 1 and 2). The specicity of this protocol was conrmedby sequencing selected cases representing assemblages A and B.When the chromatogram was scrutinized at the positions wherenucleotide polymorphism could differentiate assemblage A andB, double peaks were observed in 14 of the mixed isolates.

3.2. Subtyping of G. duodenalis Assemblage A

Based on analysis targeting tpi gene, 34 of the assemblage A iso-lates (Table 2) were classied as subtype A2 based on the phyloge-netic analysis (Fig. 1) and the substitution pattern (Table 3). Theneighbor-Joining tree placed the four representative sequences(TB11.2, KK16.4, TB13.2 and SM6.2) in one cluster with AII se-quence references with high bootstrap support.

At gdh gene, all sequences of the assemblage A showed com-plete homologous to the reference sequence of subtype A2(Accession No. L40510) except for isolate ST10.3 where substitu-tion at two positions were observed (AG at position 341 and CT at position 485) (Table 4, Fig. 2). Subtype A2 based on tpi orgdh belongs to sub-assemblage AII (Caccio et al., 2008; Fengand Xiao, 2011).

At bg gene, 18 isolates were identied as assemblage A. Twelvewere distinguished as A2 from A1 at position 606 (CT) and fromA3 at positions 460 (CT) and 468 (TC). Three were typed as A3and the remaining 3 isolates have the subtype similar to A3 but dif-ferent by one position at 460 (CT/Y). Phylogenetic analysis dem-onstrated that six isolates were typed as A3 (100% bootstraptive specimens were analyzed at three loci (tpi, gdh, and bg) anda set of assemblage-specic PCRs was used to detect mixedinfection. PCR amplicons from 78 specimens using at least oneof the molecular markers were amplied and subsequently se-quences were generated for 71 specimens. The alignment analy-sis of the sequences obtained from tpi, gdh, and bg genes withreference sequences from the GenBank database identiedassemblages A and B in 30 (42%) and 32 (45%) specimens,respectively. Discordant genotype results were noted in 9 (13%)specimens. At tpi gene, PCR amplicons were produced from70% of the examined specimens (59/84). Among them, assem-blages A and B were found in 34 (58%) and 25 (42%) specimens,respectively. At gdh gene, 38 (45%) specimens were positive withassemblage B being more frequently observed compared toassemblage A (31 vs 7). PCR analysis of bg gene had the lowestdetection rate [33% (28/84)]. The distribution of assemblage Aand B for bg gene was 18 (64%) and 10 (36%), respectively. MLGswere successful in 11 specimens, which were identied asAssemblages A and B, in 3 and 8 specimens, respectively (Ta-ble 1). As mentioned above assemblage discordant results wereobserved in 9 specimens. One isolates (ST8.1) was identied as

272 C.S. Huey et al. / Infection, Geneticvalue) while the remaining 12 isolates were grouped as A2(Fig. 3). It should also be noted that subtypes A2 and A3 belongto sub-assemblage AII (Caccio et al., 2008; Feng and Xiao, 2011).d Evolution 17 (2013) 269276nucleotide variations, limiting the classication of assemblage Bto sub-assemblages (Table 4). Similar to tpi gene, phylogenetic

ed f

from

cs anTable 3Multiple alignments of tpi sequences from this study with reference sequences obtain

Isolates GenBank accession no. Nucleotide position

Assemblage A 129 399AI L02120 T CAII (A2) JH U57897 C TAII (A2) TB11.6a KC313923 C T

C.S. Huey et al. / Infection, Genetianalysis formed a monophyletic group for assemblage B (Fig. 2).Similar results were observed in bg gene (Table 5, Fig. 3).

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the rststudy of giardiasis using multi-locus genotyping (MLG) in Malay-sia. In this study, the prevalence of giardiasis in the Orang Aslicommunities was 17.0%. This is comparable with a recent study

Assemblage B 39 45 91 100 109BIV Ad 19 AF069560 A T T C GBIV GS/M L02116 . . . . .BIV-Like 7115 AY368167 . . . . .BIII 2434 AY368165 G . C . .BIII-Like 2436 AY368153 G C . . .

CK7.1, SE8.4, TB5.1 KC313907 . . . . .SE24.2, KN7.4,TB4.1 KC313908 . . . . .TB2.3 KC313909 G C C . .TB15.1 KC313910 G C C . .KM13.2 KC313911 G C . . .CK20.2 KC313912 G . C . .TB9.2 KC313913 G C . . .SE9.3 KC313914 . . . . .SE13.1 KC313915 . . . . .UM3.1 KC313916 . C . . .KN6.4 KC313917 . . . . .SE12.1, 27.6, TB9.1, SE7.1 KC313918 . . C . .KK2.3 KC313919 G C C . .SE27.7 KC313920 . . C . .SM1.2 KC313921 G . C . .KM15.1 KC313922 . . . t .

Numbers in bold represent nucleotide substitutions from the start of the gene, which diindicate nucleotides identity. Nucleotides in small letter indicate substitution not in the

a Representative sequence of isolates identied as A2 (Listed in Table 2). Accession nu

Table 4Multiple alignments of gdh sequences from this study with reference sequences obtained

Isolates GenBank accessionno.

Nu

Assemblage A 23AI (Prtland1) M84604 CAII (A2) L40510 CAII (A2) TB11.6,TG2.5,TG13.2, TB13.3, SB14.1, T15.1 KC313924 ?

ST10.3 KC313925 ?

Assemblage B 30BIII (BAH-12) AF069059 CBIV (Ad-7) L40508 T

SM1.2 KC313926 TCK1.4 KC313927 TKM7.3,TB11.2,KM8.1, SM6.2 KC313928 TKM15.2,ST8.1,KM15.1, ST13.2,KM8.4,ST20.3,TB2.3

KC313929 T

SE13.1 KC313930 TKM3.2 KC313931 TTB15.1, SB15.1 KC313932 TSE12.1, TB4.1 KC313933 TTB5.1, SE7.1 KC313934 TKM13.2,CK7.1,TB9.2, SE24.2,SE18.4 KC313935 TPD20.1, KN7.4 KC313936 .CK20.2 KC313937 .KM12.3 KC313938 .

Numbers in bold represent nucleotide substitutions from the start of the gene, which diindicate nucleotides identity. Question mark (?) indicates missing nucleotides. Accessiorom GenBank, representing sub-assemblages of assemblages A and B.

the start of the gene

d Evolution 17 (2013) 269276 273conducted by Anuar et al. (2012) in Orang Asli communities inSelangor state, which showed an overall prevalence of giardiasisat 20.0% (n = 500).

Amplications of the three PCR assays (tpi, gdh, and bg) wereperformed differently at different loci. Of the 84 Giardiamicroscop-ically-positive specimens, only 11 isolates were able to be ampli-ed at three loci. The tpi locus achieved the highest percentageof amplicons produced (70%), followed by gdh (45%) and bg(33%). Similar occurrences were also reported in previous studies

121 162 165 168 210 216 247 271 280 297 354 402 429 438 483G G T T A C A C A A G A A T A. . . . . . . . . . . . G . .. . . . G . . . . . . . . . .. . C C G . . . . . . . G . A. . . . . T . . . . . . . . G. . . . . . . . . . . . G . .. . . . G . . . . . . . G . .. . . . G . . . . . . . . . .. . . . G . . t . . . . G . .. . . . G . . t g . . . G . .. . . C G . . . . G . g G . G. . . C G . . . . . . . G . .. . . C G . . . . . . . G . .. . . C . . . . . . . . G . G. . . C G . . . . . . . G . .. . . C G . . . . . . g G . .. . . C G . . . . . . . G . .. . . C G . . . . . . . G . .. . C C G . . . . . . . G . .. . C C . . g . . . . . G . .a . C C G . . . . . a . G . .

fferentiate between subtypes according to Weilinga and Thompson (2007). Dots (.)subtypes-dening positions.mbers in bold are reference sequences from the GenBank.

from GenBank, representing sub-assemblages of assemblages A and B.

cleotide position from the start of the gene

7 246 341 485 603 621C A C T CC . . C T? . . C T? G T C T

9 357 360 429 447 519 540 561 570 576 582 597 612T G T T C C C C G G C G. . C C . T T . . . . A. . . C T . . . . . . .. . . . T . . . . . . .. . C C T . . . . . . .. . C C . . . . . . . .

C . C T . . . . . . .C . C C T . . . . . . .C . C C . . . . . . . .C . C C . T . . . . . .C . C C . . . . . . . AC . C C . T . . . . . A. . C C . T . . . . . .C . . C . . . . . . . .. . . C . . . . . . . .

fferentiate between subtypes according to Weilinga and Thompson (2007). Dots (.)n numbers in bold are reference sequences from the GenBank.

s an274 C.S. Huey et al. / Infection, Genetic(David et al., 2011; Lalle et al., 2009). Discordant genotyping re-sults at the three loci (tpi, gdh, and bg) have been observed in 9 iso-lates (13%) in this study, which is in agreement with previousreports (Caccio et al., 2008; Sprong et al., 2009; Thompson et al.,2009; Yang et al., 2010a). An analysis of sequences from four ge-netic loci (tpi, gdh, bg and rDNA) has been conducted on 61 humanisolates and 29 animal isolates of G. duodenalis (Caccio et al., 2008).In this study, incongruent assignment of ve human isolates andone macaque isolates to G. duodenalis assemblages was reported(Caccio et al., 2008). Yang et al. (2010) genotyped 124 human iso-lates of G. duodenalis at gdh and rDNA genes, and reported incon-gruent genotyping results in ve isolates, where three isolateswere classied as assemblage A at rDNA gene and assemblage Bat gdh gene, and two isolates were classied as assemblage B atrDNA gene and assemblage A at gdh gene. Inconsistency in geno-typing results of G. duodenalis has also been reported among dogsand cats isolates, where 7 isolates (3 dogs and 4 cats) were classi-ed as assemblage D at rDNA gene, and as assemblage B (3 iso-lates), assemblage C (3 isolates) and assemblage E (1 isolate) atgdh gene. One dog isolate was classied as assemblage C at rDNAand assemblage B at gdh gene (Read et al., 2004). Thompsonet al. (2009) genotyped G. duodenalis isolated from 70 cayotes atrDNA and gdh, and reported four incongruent genotyping results.

Fig. 2. Phylogram of G. duodenalis genotypes constructed by neighbour-joininganalysis, based on the nucleotide sequences of gdh retrieved from this studycompared with reference sequences of known assemblages from Genbank. Boot-strap values obtained from 1000 replicates are indicated on branches in percentage.d Evolution 17 (2013) 269276The implication of this inconsistency has provoked questionsabout the strength and validity of genotyping relying on single lo-cus and hence, the true picture of Giardia diversity has a highchance of being masked by the data generated from analysis usingsingle marker (Feng and Xiao, 2011). Although the underlyingmechanisms remain uncertain, Caccio and Ryan (2008) have re-viewed a number of factors that could contribute to the incongru-ent assignment of assemblages by different makers. These factorsinclude meiotic recombination, which suggests the potential ofsexual reproduction in Giardia, introgression that involves backcrossing of hybrids with parental species and retention of ancestralpolymorphism that could lead to presence of identical alleles ingenetically distinct groups. Another contributing factor whichwould be discussed further in this context is the occurrence ofmixed infections. With the use of the assemblage-specic assays,high prevalence (64%) of mixed infections was detected and furtherproven the biasness of using a standard PCR assay alone as themost plentiful assemblage would be amplied in preference (Wiel-inga and Thompson, 2007). Thus, the feature of mixed infectionscould be applied in the present study to explain the discordantgenotype results.

The isolates with assemblage A were all identied as A2, whichbelongs to sub-assemblage AII. This is similar with other studies

Fig. 3. Phylogram of G. duodenalis genotypes constructed by neighbour-joininganalysis, based on the nucleotide sequences of bg retrieved from this studycompared with reference sequences of known assemblages from Genbank. Boot-strap values obtained from 1000 replicates are indicated on branches in percentage.

ed f

50

10

ichdashare

cs anwhere AII was the predominant sub-assemblage in human (Bonho-mme et al., 2011; Hussein et al., 2009; Lebbad et al., 2011). Sub-assemblage AI which was absent from this study was reported tohave preference to cause infection in livestock or companion ani-mals as opposed to AII which was found mainly in human casesthan animals (Sprong et al., 2009). The isolation of anthroponoticassemblages and sub-assemblages (B and AII) in this study impli-cates human as a potential source of the infection. In accordancewith our ndings, previous studies conducted in Orang Asli com-munities in Malaysia found that the presence of other family mem-bers infected with G. duodenalis was either the only or the mainrisk factor for giardiasis (Norhayati et al., 1998; Anuar et al.,2012). However, the postulation of human-to-human transmissionis limited by the fact that animals were not included for analysis inthis study.

On the other hand, sub-assemblages were not able to assign toisolates belonged to assemblage B due to high degree of nucleo-tides variation which was not uncommon among other molecularstudies (Bonhomme et al., 2011; Caccio et al., 2008; Lalle et al.,

Table 5Multiple alignments of bg sequences from this study with reference sequences obtain

Isolates Genbank accession no.

Assemblage A 4AI-A1 Portland 1 X85958 CAII-A2 KC8 AY072723 .AII-A3 AY072724 .A2 KK16.4a KC313945 .A3 KK7.5, TG2.5 KC313946 .A3 SE10.1 KC313947 .A3 PD20.1, PD1.1, TG13.2 KC313948 .

Assemblage B 2B AY072727 C

SB4.1, SE7.1 KC313939 TTB2.3 KC313940 TSE9.3 KC313941 .TB4.1 KC313942 YSE24.2 KC313943 .TB5.1, CK20.2, SE12.1 KC313944 .

Numbers in bold represent nucleotide substitutions from the start of the gene, whindicate nucleotides identity. Question mark (?) indicates missing nucleotides. The

a Representative sequence of isolates identied as A2. Accession numbers in bold

C.S. Huey et al. / Infection, Geneti2009; Lebbad et al., 2011; Levecke et al., 2009). This phenomenonled us back to the focus of mixed infection, which is known to takeplace at both the inter- and at the intra-assemblage levels (Caccioand Ryan, 2008). Mixed infection can happen when a host ingestsGiardia cysts of different genetic proles or subsequent infection ofan infected host by genetically different Giardia cysts. This is espe-cially common in areas where giardiasis is endemic (Caccio andRyan, 2008; Lebbad et al., 2011; Sprong et al., 2009). Therefore,mixed subtype infections (intra-assemblage level) can stand as afactor that causes the high heterogeneity. Besides, high polymor-phism in assemblage B can also be attributed to intra-assemblagerecombination and allelic sequence heterozygosity (ASH). In orderto resolve the question whether the mixed genotype is due tomixed infections or ASH, Ankarklev et al. (2012) had conductedan investigation on single Giardia trophozoite and cyst. The resultbased on molecular analysis positively exhibited the occurrenceof ASH at single cell level. However, high numbers of mixed sub-genotypes infections (demonstrated by variable sequence pat-terns) were also observed in different cysts isolated from the samesample indicating that mixed infection is also playing a role for thehigh heterogeneity.

In conclusion, MLG was conducted to analyze the genetic diver-sity of Giardia infections in Orang Asli communities in Malaysia.While assemblages A and B have almost equal frequency of infec-tions, more than half of the isolates were mixed infections. Thepresence of assemblage B and sub-assemblage AII in the samplessuggest that the mode of transmission of giardiasis in Malaysiamay be human-to-human. Nevertheless, the role of animals inthe dynamic of transmission needs to be further investigatedinvolving multilocus genotyping of parasites from animals andhumans.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Orang Asli children and their parents fortheir voluntary involvements and would like to acknowledge thenancial support from UMRG grants RG302-11HTM and RG439/12HTM, and the student grant (PV063- 2012A).

References

Al-Mekhla, H.M., Azlin, M., Nor Aini, U., Shaik, A., Saiah, A., Fatmah, M.S., Ismail,M.G., Ahmad Firdaus, M.S., Aisah, M.Y., Rozlida, A.R., Norhayati, M., 2005.Giardiasis as a predictor of childhood malnutrition in Orang Asli children inMalaysia. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 99, 686691.

rom GenBank, representing sub-assemblages of A and assemblages B.

460 468 606 729C T C A. . T GT C T A. . T ?T C T ?Y C T ?. C T ?

228 354 378 438 540 564A C C C G T. T . . A .

. . . A .. . . . A .. T . . A .. T . . . .. T . . A .

differentiate between subtypes according to Wielinga and Thompson (2007). Dots() indicates deletion.reference sequences from the GenBank.

d Evolution 17 (2013) 269276 275Al-Mekhla, H.M., Surin, J., Sallam, A.A., Abdullah, A.W., Mahdy, M.A.K., 2010.Giardiasis and poor vitamin A status among aboriginal school children in ruralMalaysia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 83, 523527.

Ankarklev, J., Svard, S.G., Lebbad, M., 2012. Allelic sequence heterozygosity in singleGiardia parasites. BMC Microbiol. 12, 65.

Anuar, T.K., Al-Mekhla, H.M., Abdul Ghani, M.K., Osman, E., Mohd Yasin, A., Nordin,A., Nor Azreen, S., Md Salleh, F., Ghazali, N., Bernadus, M., Moktar, N., 2012.Giardiasis among different tribes of Orang Asli in Malaysia: highlighting thepresence of other family members infected with Giardia intestinalis as a mainrisk factor. Parasitol. Int. J. Parasitol. 42, 871880.

Bonhomme, J., Goff, L.L., Lemee, V., Gargala, G., Ballet, J.-J., Favennec, L., 2011.Limitations of tpi and bg genes sub-genotyping for characterization of humanGiardia duodenalis isolates. Parasitol. Int. 60, 327330.

Buret, A.G., 2008. Pathophysiology of enteric infections with Giardia duodenalius.Parasite 15, 261265.

Caccio, S.M., Ryan, U., 2008. Molecular epidemiology of giardiasis. Mol. Biochem.Parasitol. 160, 7580.

Caccio, S.M., De Giacomo, M., Pozio, E., 2002. Sequence analysis of the beta-giardingene and development of a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragmentlength polymorphism assay to genotype Giardia duodenalis cysts from humanfaecal samples. Int. J. Parasitol. 32, 10231030.

Caccio, S.M., Beck, R., Lalle, M., Marinculic, A., Pozio, E., 2008. Multilocus genotypingof Giardia duodenalis reveals striking differences between assemblages A and B.Int. J. Parasitol. 38, 15231531.

Daly, E.R., Roy, S.J., Blaney, D.D., Manning, J.S., Hill, V.R., Xiao, L., Stull, J.W., 2010.Outbreak of giardiasis associated with a community drinking-water source.Epidemiol. Infect. 138, 491500.

David, E.B., Coradi, S.T., Oliveira-Sequeira, T.C.G., Ribolla, P.E.M., Katagiri, S.,Guimaraes, S., 2011. Diagnosis of Giardia infections by PCR-based methods inchildren of an endemic area. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins 17, 209215.

Feng, Y.Y., Xiao, L.H., 2011. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology ofGiardia Species and giardiasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 24, 110.

Geurden, T., Geldhof, P., Levecke, B., Martens, C., Berkvens, D., Casaert, S.,Vercruysse, J., Claerebout, E., 2007. Mixed Giardia duodenalis assemblage Aand E infections in calves. Int. J. Parasitol. 38, 259264.

Geurden, T., Levecke, B., Caccio, S.M., Visser, A., De Groote, G., Casaert, S., Vercruysse,J., Claerebout, E., 2009. Multilocus genotyping of Cryptosporidium and Giardia innon-outbreak related cases of diarrhoea in human patients in Belgium.Parasitology 136, 11611168.

Hussein, A.I.A., Yamaguchi, T., Nakamoto, K., Iseki, M., Tokoro, M., 2009. Multiple-subgenotype infections of Giardia intestinalis detected in Palestinian clinicalcases using a subcloning approach. Parasitol. Int. 58, 258262.

Kimura, M., 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of basesubstitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol.16, 111120.

Lalle, M., Pozio, E., Capelli, G., Bruschi, F., Crotti, D., Caccio, S.M., 2005. Geneticheterogeneity at the beta-giardin locus among human and animal isolates ofGiardia duodenalis and identication of potentially zoonotic subgenotypes. Int. J.Parasitol. 35, 207213.

Lalle, M., Bruschi, F., Castagna, B., Campa, M., Pozio, E., Caccio, S.M., 2009. Highgenetic polymorphism among Giardia duodenalis isolates from Sahrawichildren. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 103, 834838.

Lebbad, M., Petersson, I., Karlsson, L., Botero-Kleiven, S., Andersson, J.O.,Svenungsson, B., Svard, S.G., 2011. Multilocus genotyping of human giardiaisolates suggests limited zoonotic transmission and association betweenassemblage B and atulence in children. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 5 (8), e1262.

Levecke, B., Geldhof, P., Claerebout, E., Dorny, P., Vercammen, F., Caccio, S.M.,Vercruysse, J., Geurden, T., 2009. Molecular characterisation of Giardiaduodenalis in captive non-human primates reveals mixed assemblage A and Binfections and novel polymorphisms. Int. J. Parasitol. 39, 15951601.

Lim, Y.A.L., Ahmad, R.A., Smith, H.V., 2008. Current status and future trends inCryptosporidium and Giardia epidemiology in Malaysia. J. Water Health 6, 239254.

Lim, Y.A.L., Lai, M.M., Mahdy, M.A.K., Mat Naim, H.R., Smith, H.V., 2009a. Moleculardetection of Giardia contamination in water bodies in a zoo. Environ. Res. 109,857859.

Lim, Y.A.L., Ramasame, S.D., Mahdy, M.A.K., Sulaiman, W.Y., Smith, H.V., 2009b.Detection and molecular characterization of Giardia isolated from recreational

Nolan, M.J., Jex, A.R., Pangasa, A., Young, N.D., Campbell, A.J., Stevens, M., Gasser,R.B., 2010. Analysis of nucleotide variation within the triose-phosphateisomerase gene of Giardia duodenalis from sheep and its zoonoticimplications. Electrophoresis 31, 287298.

Noor Azian, M.Y., San, Y.M., Gan, C.C., Yusri, M.Y., Nurulsyamzawaty, Y., Zuhaizam,A.H., Maslawaty, M.N., Norparina, I., Vythilingam, I., 2007. Prevalence ofintestinal protozoa in an aborigine community in Pahang. Malaysia Trop.Biomed. 24, 5562.

Norhayati, M., Penggaben, M., Oothuman, P., Fatmah, M.S., 1998. Prevalence andsome risk factors of Giardia duodenalis infection in a rural community inMalaysia. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 29, 735738.

Plutzer, J., Ongerth, J., Karanis, P., 2010. Giardia taxonomy, phylogeny andepidemiology: facts and open questions. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 213, 321333.

Read, C.M., Monis, P.T., Thompson, R.C., 2004. Discrimination of all genotypes ofGiardia duodenalis at the glutamate dehydrogenase locus using PCR-RFLP. Infect.Genet. Evol. 4, 125130.

Robertson, L., Gjerde, B., Hansen, E.F., Stachurska-Hagen, T., 2009. A watercontamination incident in Oslo, Norway during October 2007; a basis fordiscussion of boil-water notices and the potential for post-treatmentcontamination of drinking water supplies. J. Water Health 7, 5566.

Sprong, H., Caccio, S.M., van der Giessen, J.W., 2009. Identication of zoonoticgenotypes of Giardia duodenalis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3, e558.

Sulaiman, I.M., Fayer, R., Bern, C., Gilman, R.H., Trout, J.M., Schantz, P.M., Das, P., Lal,A.A., Xiao, L., 2003. Triosephosphate isomerase gene characterization andpotential zoonotic transmission of Giardia duodenalis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9,14441452.

Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., Gibson, T.J., 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving thesensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequenceweighting, position-specic gap penalties and weight matrix choice. NucleicAcids Res. 22, 46734680.

Thompson, R.C., Hopkins, R.M., Homan, W.L., 2000. Nomenclature and geneticgroupings of Giardia infecting mammals. Parasitol. Today 16, 210213.

Thompson, R.C., Colwell, D.D., Shury, T., Appelbee, A.J., Read, C., Njiru, Z., Olson, M.E.,2009. The molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium and Giardia infections incoyotes from Alberta, Canada, and observations on some cohabiting parasites.

276 C.S. Huey et al. / Infection, Genetics and Evolution 17 (2013) 269276lake water in Malaysia. Parasitol. Res. 106, 289291.Lim, Y.A.L., Iqbal, A., Surin, J., Sim, B.L., Jex, A.R., Nolan, M.J., Smith, H.V., Gasser, R.B.,

2011. First genetic classication of Cryptosporidium and Giardia from HIV/AIDSpatients in Malaysia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 11, 968974.

Lim, Y.A.L., Mahdy, M.A.K., Tan, T.K., Goh, X.T., Jex, A.R., Nolan, M.J., Sharma, R.S.,Gasser, R.B., 2013. First molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis fromgoats in Malaysia. Mol. Cell. Probes 27, 2831.

Mahdy, M.A.K., Surin, J., Mohd-Adnan, A., Wan, K.L., Lim, Y.A.L., 2009. Molecularcharacterization of Giardia duodenalis isolated from Semai Pahang Orang Asli(Peninsular Malaysia aborigines). Parasitology 136, 12371241.Vet. Parasitol. 159, 167170.van der Giessen, J.W., de Vries, A., Roos, M., Wielinga, P., Kortbeek, L.M., Mank, T.G.,

2006. Genotyping of Giardia in Dutch patients and animals: a phylogeneticanalysis of human and animal isolates. Int. J. Parasitol. 36, 849858.

Wielinga, C.M., Thompson, R.C., 2007. Comparative evaluation of Giardia duodenalissequence data. Parasitology 134, 17951821.

Yang, R., Lee, J., Ng, J., Ryan, U., 2010. High prevalence Giardia duodenalis assemblageB and potentially zoonotic subtypes in sporadic human cases in WesternAustralia. Int. J. Parasitol. 40, 293297.

Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in Malaysia1 Introduction2 Materials and methods2.1 Source of samples2.2 Microscopy2.3 Molecular analysis2.4 DNA sequencing and sequences analysis

3 Results3.1 Identification of G. duodenalis assemblages and mixed assemblages3.2 Subtyping of G. duodenalis Assemblage A3.3 Subtyping of G. duodenalis assemblage B

4 DiscussionAcknowledgmentsReferences