1. reuse of wastewater of the textile industry after physicochemical & membrane

Upload: lemanuougmail

Post on 09-Apr-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 1. Reuse of wastewater of the textile industry after physicochemical & membrane

    1/6

    Desalination 149 (2002) 169174

    Reuse of wastewater of the textile industry after its treatmentwith a combination of physico-chemical treatment

    and membrane technologies

    A. Bes-Pi*

    , J.A. Mendoza-Roca, M.I. Alcaina-Miranda, A. Iborra-Clar,M.I. Iborra-Clar

    Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering, Universidad Politcnica of Valencia,

    Camino de Vera s/n, 46071 Valencia, Spain

    email: [email protected]

    Received 1 February 2002; accepted 15 February 2002

    Abstract

    This work is focused on the treatment of a textile plant wastewater. The industry mainly manufactures socks,stockings and panties, and the water is treated in order to be reused. The wastewater was characterized and jar-tests experiments were carried out with different coagulants and flocculants, at different concentrations and pHin order to obtain clarified water that can be treated by means of ultrafiltration (UF) or nanofiltration (NF). Thecombination of the physico-chemical treatment and the nanofiltration leads to a COD removal of almost 100%.

    Keywords: Wastewater; Reuse; Textile industry; Membrane

    1. Introduction

    Due to the high water consumption in the

    textile industry it is essential to study its reuse.Many processes have been studied to treattextile wastewaters [14]. However, theirapplication in an industrial plant becomes

    *Corresponding author

    Presented at the International Congress on Membranes and Membrane Processes (ICOM), Toulouse, France,

    July 712, 2002

    0011-9164/02/$ See front matter 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved

    difficult due to the operation problems and tothe costs. Biological treatment by activatedsludge offers high efficiencies in COD removal,

    but does not eliminate completely the colour ofthe water and frequently operation problemslike bulking appear. The use of flotation insteadof sedimentation to separate the treatedwastewater from the activated sludge solvesthis problem, but it increases the depurationcosts and it makes complicated the plant

  • 8/8/2019 1. Reuse of wastewater of the textile industry after physicochemical & membrane

    2/6

    170 A. Bes-Pi et al. / Desalination 149 (2002) 169174

    operation. Chemical oxidation by ozone, or acombination of UV-radiation and ozone andH2O2, have great interest but their costs are stillvery high.

    The applications of membrane technologiesin textile industries are not yet very common.Until now the reported applications are focusedon the recovery of sizing agents from thedesizing effluents and on the recovery of theindigo from the dyeing effluents byultrafiltration [5,6].

    Jar-tests allow the evaluation of a treatmentto reduce dissolved, suspended, colloidal andnonsettleable matter from water by chemicalcoagulation-flocculation followed by gravitysettling [7]. Thus, these tests are a valuable toolin wastewater treatment [8].

    The use of membranes in combination with physico-chemicals processes is very interestingto produce water to be reused from the globaleffluent of the industry. The factors that limittheir application are the management of themembranes retentates streams due to their highconductivities and the durability of themembranes due to fouling and concentration

    polarisation [9,10].This work is focused in the evaluation of the

    final effluent quality.

    2. Objectives

    The objectives of this work are thefollowing:

    Evaluation of the physico-chemical

    treatment with jar-tests for textilewastewater from a plant that mainlymanufactures socks, stockings and panties.

    Optimisation of pH and coagulant andflocculant concentration in the jar-tests.

    Determination of the water quality aftertreating the wastewater with a combinationof physico-chemical treatment andmembrane technologies (ultrafiltration ornanofiltration).

    3. Material and methods

    This study was carried out in three steps.The first step consisted of the characterizationof the wastewater samples. The analysed

    parameters were the pH, conductivity,suspended solids, COD, temperature andturbidity. In the second step a physico-chemicaltreatment was applied to wastewater in order toreduce COD and turbidity. Finally,ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF)experiments were performed in differentlaboratory plants to improve the quality of the

    physico-chemical treated wastewater.

    3.1. Jar-tests

    Physico-chemical experiments were carriedout in a multiple stirrer Jar-Test apparatus fromSELECTA. Tests were performed using DK-FER 20 from ACIDEKA S.A., FeCl3 andAl2(SO4)3 as coagulants and an anionicflocculant from NALCO. The procedureconsisted in introducing 900 mL of the samplein the jars, the coagulant was added and rapidlymixed (180 rpm) during 3 minutes. Then thespeed was reduced (30 rpm) and the flocculantwas introduced into the jars for an additionaltime of 15 minutes. After that, the paddles werewithdrawn so that the particles could settle. Theinfluence of pH, coagulant and flocculantconcentrations were studied. The coagulantconcentration range was varied between 50 and200 mg/L, and the flocculant concentration

    between 0.5 and 2 mg/L. Finally, the pH values

    were adjusted to 8.0, 8.5, 9.0 and 9.5. The pHof the samples was changed by the addition ofHCl 0.1 N and NaOH 0.1 and 0.5 N.

    3.2. Experiments with membranes

    Experiments with membranes were carriedout using two different laboratory plants ofultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF). Theconfiguration of the plants were very similar.

  • 8/8/2019 1. Reuse of wastewater of the textile industry after physicochemical & membrane

    3/6

    A. Bes-Pi et al. / Desalination 149 (2002) 169174 171

    Fig. 1. Scheme of the NF laboratory plant.

    In Fig. 1 a scheme of the NF laboratoryplant can be observed.

    The tested UF and NF membranes arepresented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

    Table 1Tested UF membranes

    Membrane reference Cut-off (kD)

    10 BIOMAX of MILLIPORE 5

    IRIS 3065 of TECHSEP 40IRIS 3028 of TECHSEP 100

    Table 2Tested NF membranes

    Membrane NaCl MgSO4 Permeabilityreference R(%) R(%) (m

    3/m

    2dMPa)

    Dow NF-45 50 95 0.0219Dow NF-70 80 95 0.2309

    Table 3

    Wastewater characterization

    Parameter Feedwater

    T (C) 18

    pH 7.50Conductivity (mS/cm) 2.06

    S.S. (mg/L) 82.6COD (mg/L) 1640

    Turbidity (NTU) 15.65

    NF module is plane with an effectivemembrane area of 0.009 m2, the operatingconditions were 400 L/h of feed flow rate, 1MPa of transmembrane pressure and 20C. Theoperating conditions in UF process were feedtransmembrane pressure of 0.15 MPa, feed flowrate of 0.04 m3/h and temperature of 20C.

    The operating time of the plants was 6hours. Permeate fluxes J(L/m2h) and soluteretentions R(%) were determined during theexperiments.

    9

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    810

    12

    11

    VALVE

    FEED PUMP

    SPEED CONTROL

    0 THERMOMETER

    1 FILTER SYSTEM

    2 SECURITY VALVE

    1 MANOMETER

    2 REGULATION VALVE

    3 PERMEATE STREAM

    4 STIRRING

    5 FEED TANK

    6 AUXILIARY TANK

    1

  • 8/8/2019 1. Reuse of wastewater of the textile industry after physicochemical & membrane

    4/6

    172 A. Bes-Pi et al. / Desalination 149 (2002) 169174

    4. Results

    Table 3 shows the average values of thetextile wastewater measured parameters. Incomparison with municipal wastewater, CODand conductivity values are quite important andhave to be substantially lowered to producewater with enough quality to be reused. Thesevalues are typical for textile effluents.

    In order to reuse the water in rinseprocesses, it is necessary a negligible COD anda conductivity lower than 1 mS/cm.

    Fig. 2 shows the variation of COD andturbidity values of the clarified water after jar-tests using DK-FER 20. As it can be seen, the

    best result (51.5% COD removal and 68%turbidity removal) was obtained at pH 9.5, butas the increase in the removal efficiency wasnot significant at pH higher than 8.5, this valuewas considered as the optimum. In alkalinemedium, the addition of DK-FER 20 drove tothe formation of positively charged metalhydroxy complexes, that specifically adsorbonto colloids, explaining the observed

    behaviour.In Fig. 3, it can be observed that increasing

    the coagulant concentration, results in alowering of the COD and turbidity. Coagulantconcentration higher than 200 mg/L hardlyimproved the COD removal efficiency.

    Fig. 4 shows the effect of adding both 200mg/L of DK-FER 20 and an anionic flocculant(NALCO). The best results were achieved with1 mg/L of flocculant. At higher flocculantconcentrations, COD and turbidity increased.

    This was due to the excess of flocculant, thatremained as colloidal matter in water,contributing to the COD and turbidity of theclarified water.

    Thus, the experiments show that theoptimum operating conditions for the physico-chemically treatment of the textile wastewaterare: pH = 8.5, CDK-FER 20 = 200 mg/L, CNalco = 1mg/L.

    Experiments with the other coagulants didnot improve the efficiencies obtained with DK-FER 20.

    Fig. 2. Influence of wastewater pH on COD andturbidity of treated water using 200 mg/L of DK-FER20.

    Fig. 3. Influence of DK-FER concentration on CODand turbidity of treated water.

    900780

    850 865

    0

    320

    640

    960

    1280

    1600

    0,5 1 1,5 2

    NALCO floculant concentration (mg/L)

    COD

    (mg/L)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    Turbidity(NTU)

    COD (mg/L)

    Turbidity (NTU)

    Fig. 4. Influence of NALCO concentration on CODand turbidity of treated water.

    0

    400

    800

    1200

    1600

    2000

    8 8,5 9 9,5pH

    COD

    (mg/L)

    0

    25

    50

    75

    100

    125

    Turbidity(NTU)

    COD (mg/L)

    Turbidity (NTU)

    750

    800

    850

    900

    950

    1000

    50 100 150 200

    DK-FER coagulant (mg/L)

    COD

    (mg/L)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    Turbidity(NTU)

    COD (mg/L)

    Turbidity (NTU)

  • 8/8/2019 1. Reuse of wastewater of the textile industry after physicochemical & membrane

    5/6

    A. Bes-Pi et al. / Desalination 149 (2002) 169174 173

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

    Time (minutes)

    Jv(L/m2h)

    kD-100

    kD-40

    kD-5

    Fig. 5. Permeate fluxes of UF membranes with theoperating time.

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

    Time (minutes)

    Jv(L/m2h)

    NF-45

    NF-70

    Fig. 6. Permeate fluxes of NF membranes with the

    operating time.

    Table 4Analysis of the feed and permeate streams in the different membrane experiments

    Parameter Feedwater UF membranes NF membranes

    100 kD 40 kD 5 kD NF-45 NF-70

    COD (mg/L) 780 760 800 665

  • 8/8/2019 1. Reuse of wastewater of the textile industry after physicochemical & membrane

    6/6

    174 A. Bes-Pi et al. / Desalination 149 (2002) 169174

    None of the membranes used in UF testsreduced significantly the COD of the physico-chemically treated water. However, the

    permeates of NF membranes can be reused inthe industry due to their low COD andconductivity.

    Prior to an industrial operation, themembrane durability and the retentate streammanagement have to be studied in a NF pilot

    plant with higher membrane surface.

    References

    [1] U. Altinbas et al., Treatability study of wastewater

    from textile industry, Envir. Technol., 16 (1995)389394.

    [2] J.M. Coloma, Optimizacin de las depuradorasfsico-qumicas, Revista de Qumica Textil, 137

    (1998) 3140.[3] D. Orhon et al., A scientific approach to

    wastewater recovery and reuse in the textileindustry, Water Sci. Technol., 43(11) (2001)

    223230.

    [4] I.A. Balcioglu and I. Arslan, Partial oxidation ofreactive dyestuffs and synthetic textile dye-bath

    by the O3 and O3/H2O2 processes, Water Sci.Technol., 43(2) (2001) 221228.

    [5] M. Cresp, Aplicacin de los Procesos deMembrana en la Industria Textil in Apuntes delCurso de Membranas y Medio Ambiente,Universidad Politcnica de Catalua, Barcelona,

    1992.[6] ASTM. Standard practice for coagulation-

    flocculation jar test of water, American Societyfor Testing and Materials, 1995.

    [7] R. Marn, Jar-test en el tratamiento de aguas: una

    valiosa herramienta. Tecnologa del agua, 181(1998) 2532.[8] O.O. Hart, G.R. Groves, C.A. Buckley, and B.

    Southworth, A guide for the planning, design andimplementation of wastewater treatment plants in

    the textile industry. Part one: Closed looptreatment / Recycle system for textile sizing /desizing effluents. Pretoria, 1983.

    [9] G. Belfort, (Ed.), Synthetic Membrane Proceses.

    Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1984.[10] M. Mulder, Basic Principles of Membrane

    Technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.