1 quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter...

Google

05 – Judy Chu – DAI 523 Information Design I – Design and Industry Department College of Liberal & Creative Arts – San Francisco State University – California, USA – October 2012Information Design: Proportions 17x22 Mailer – Android 2012

SOURCES:Android, Android Academy, Android Central, comScore, International Data Corporation, Lookout Mobile Security, Tech Jini, [x]cube LABS

1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter

united states smartphone adoptions in the end

Back in August of 2011, Android-powered smartphone devices have reached almost 50% of the worldwide market share, climbing at a rapid rate since it’s first release five years ago on November of 2007. At at end of Q1 in 2012, Android has more than double the amount of Apple’s iOS market shares in the world, manufacturing and shipping out various devices supporting the Android platform.

In the United States, Linux-powered smartphone devices are rare and uncommon, thus not included in the domestic market share. Symbian-powered devices, mainly Nokia, announced its migration from Symbian to Windows early of 2011, causing the Symbian market to diminish with each quarter since, as seen in Q2 of the United States smartphone OS market share.

Closing off Q2 of 2012, Android continues to dominate the world market, grabbing 15% more of the market shares than in Q1. Although most of the big platforms shown above are losing their world shares, Windows have significantly increased their market shares by half since Q1, closing the gap with Nokia’s Symbian and Blackberry’s RIM. After the release of the iPhone 5 late of September, how will the international market share fare?

In Q2 of 2012, users of Blackberry’s RIM devices are shifting towards either Android or iOS. Android and iOS market share increased by about 1% and 5% respectively since Q1. Android has been able to hold on to more than half the domestic market share since the beginning of the year with the help of popular Samsung devices such as the S2 and the S3, however there may be significant changes Q3 with the release of the iPhone 5.

Android59.0%

Android51.0%

iOS30.7%

iOS32.4%

Android68.1%

Android51.6%

iOS23.1%

iOS16.9%

Symbian6.8%

Symbian4.4%

Research inMotion (RIM)6.4%

Research in Motion (RIM)4.4%

Linux2.3%

Linux2.3%

Windows3.5%

Win2.2%



Windows3.9%

Sym-bian 1.4%

Sym-bian 0.9%

Windows3.8%

Operating system market share: 3-month average ending April 30, 2012 Smartphone adoptions and Android platform versions

Android iOS

MicrosoftRIM

Feature Phone – Smartphone30.8%

Smartphone – Smartphone27.1%

Smartphone – Smartphone16.8%


Smarphone – Smartphone4.80%


Smartphone – Smartphone 1.50%

Feature Phone – Smart-phone2.40%

Jelly Beanv. 4.11.8%

7.1%

2.7%

65.0%

23.7%

1.9%

55.8%

19.1%

5.2%

0.6%

0.3%

12.9%

3.4%

Honeycombv. 3.1 – 3.2

Gingerbreadv. 2.3 – 2.3.7

Froyov. 2.2

Éclairv. 2.1Donut v.1.60.4%

Cupcake v.1.50.1%

Ice CreamSandwichv. 4.0.3 – 4.0.4

!

As the technical era continues to advance throughout the upcoming years, mobile phone subscribers have put a halt to the manufacturing of feature phones and increase the manufacturing of smartphones at a rapid paste. Adoption rates from feature to smartphones have increased significantly from 38% to 47.5% since April of 2011. According to comScore, 3 out of 5 first time smartphone subscribers chose an Android device while 1 out of 4 chose an iOS device.Despite taking about 4-5 years before gaining momentum, Android has been consistently making new releases to their software, averaging about two version releases a year starting in 2009. A charming featuer about Android is that Android names their software alphabetically and by desert. The codenames started at Cupcake (C) after releasing two previous versions, 1.0 (beta) and 1.1 (known as Petite Four). By naming their software in this manner, it will be more likely for its customers to remember the Android brand.

international smartphone os market share android platform versions

united states smartphone os market share

OCTOBERAndroid Inc. founded in

Palo Alto, CA by Andy Rubin, Rich Miner, Nick Sears and Chris White

MAYAndroid v. 2.2 (Froyo) released – based on Linux kernel 2.6.32

NOVEMBERAndroid overtakes Symbian and becomes the #1 OS in Asia

DECEMBERAndroid v. 2.3

(Gingerbread) released – based on Linux

kernel 2.6.35

NOVEMBERAndroid v. 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) released – based on Linux kernel 3.0.1

OCTOBER500,000 Apps are

available on the Android Market

MARCHAndroid Market changes

to Google Play

JUNEAndroid activates 1 million devices a day

SEPTEMBERGoogle Play reaches 25 million app downloads

JULYAndroid v. 4.1 (Jelly

Bean) released – based on Linux kernel 3.0.31

evolution

JULYGoogle buys Android Inc. for $50 million

NOVEMBER The Open Handset Alliance announces the creation of Android

SEPTEMBERFirst Android device

released: HTC Dream (G1), featuring Android v. 1.0

NOVEMBER Android Beta & its

Software Development Kit (SDK) is released

OCTOBERAndroid Market opens

OCTOBERAndroid announces Open Source Project

FEBRUARYAndroid v. 1.1 (Petite Four) released

APRILAndroid v. 1.5

(Cupcake) released – based on Linux

kernel 2.6.27

SEPTEMBERAndroid v. 1.6 (Donut) released – based on Linux kernel 2.6.29

2003

2004

2010

2011

2012

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009OCTOBER

Android v. 2.0 (Éclair) released – based on

Linux kernel 2.6.29

FEBRUARYFirst tablet released using Android v. 3.1: Motorola Xoom

FEBRUARYAndroid v. 3.0

(Honeycomb) released – based on Linux

kernel 2.6.36

android history

Which Doctor is

most popular with the viewers?

900 Episodes

100 Episodes

a history of doctor who in terms of ratings

the plot of doctor who

doctor who vocabulary

Doctor Who is both the longest – running sci-fi program of all time and a British institution The show’s popularity in the UK can be compared to the popularity of Star Wars in America. The show is reaching the fifty year mark in 2013 and it is arguably more popular than ever. It has already gained cult status in America, Canada, and Australia. The main reason the show has been able to stay alive for so long is because it is constantly reinventing itself. It’s conceit is to essentially change the actor who plays the the main character, the Doctor, every few years – and with that actor change, the show can sometimes gain a new aesthetic as well. Of course over those fifty years, the show hasn’t maintained the level of success it currently has now. Let’s take a look at how the show has fared over the years.

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

eACH DOCTOR’S AVERAGE VIEWERSHIP

IN RELATION TO THEIR EPISODE COUNT

Doctor Who is the kind of show with a language of it’s own. Here are some words that are commonly used in the show in order for you to gain a little more perspective on this British icon.

Regeneration: Regeneration is really the reason Doctor Who has stayed on the air for so long. Regeneration is the process the Doctor goes through every time the actor is changed; it’s his way of cheating death. Every time the Doctor regenerates, he changes his appearance and some variations in his personality, but overall, the basic personality traits of the Doctor stay in tact. The Doctor has regenerated 10 times and is meant to be over 1200 years old.

TARDIS: Stands for Time And Relative Dimensions in Space. The TARDIS is essentially the Doctor’s spaceship. Throughout the entirety of the show, his spaceship has been disguised as a 1960S, British blue police box. One thing to remember about the TARDIS is that it is bigger on the inside. Because the show deals with dimensions in time and space, the TARDIS is an infinite spaceship within the confines of a tiny police box.

Time Lord: The Doctor looks like a human, but he is actually part of an alien race from the planet Galifrey and they are known as Time Lords. Time Lords have two hearts and the ability to regenerate.

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

ChristopherEccleston

ColinBaker

DavidTennantJon Pertwee

MattSmith

PatrickTroughton

PeterDavison

SylvesterMcCoy

Tom Baker

William Hartnell

The show premiered in 1963 to an average of 6 million viewers with William Hartnell as the Doctor.

Patrick Troughtontook over in 1966 until 1969.

The show switched to color television in 1970 with Jon Pertwee as the 3rd Doctor from 1970-1974.

Tom Baker is, to this date, the show’s longest running Doctor from 1974-1981.

Peter Davison brought the show into the 80s as the 5th Doctor from 1982-1984.

Colin Baker played the 6th Doctor when ratings began to drop. He played the Doctor from 1984-1986.

Sylvester McCoy por-trayed the 7th Doctor from 1987-1989 before show was inevitably cancelled in 1989 due to low ratings.

For a one-off, American-made TV movie in 1996, Paul McGann played the 8th Doctor.

Christopher Eccleston brought back the show 2005 into the modern age for only one season.

One of the most popular Doctors, David Tennant debuted to fairly average standards in 2006.

Doctor Who’s highest rated year, ironically only had 3 episodes. The peak is likely due to David Tennant’s last episode in 2009-2010.

Matt Smith began his reigns as the 11th Doctor in 2010 and is the current Doctor as of 2012.

*Data taken from a 2009 issue of Doctor Who Magazine.*22,000 fans were polled.*David Tennant was the Doctor at the time the poll was taken, potentially skewing results. *Poll does not include current Doctor, Matt Smith.

PAUL MCGANN

Average Ratings(In Millions)

*The show originally began with the format of roughly 30 episode seasons with a 25 minute run-time per episode.*In 2005,, the show changed it’s format to 45 minute episodes in a 13 episode season.

Stella Cunanan | DAI 523: Information Design | Fall 2012

SOURCES: http://guide.doctorwhonews.net/info.php?detail=cast&rank=1 http://guide.doctorwhonews.net/info.php?detail=cast&rank=2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Doctor_Who_serialshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Whohttp://www.themindrobber.co.uk/ratings.htmlhttp://www.examiner.com/article/david-wins-best-doctor-doctor-who-magazine-pollhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/tvandradioblog/2007/apr/18/isdavidtennantthebestdoct

25.64%

24.73%

11.39%

9.84%

9.66%

5.71%

4.69%

3.88%2.87% 1.6%

Average Ratings of Each Doctor (In Millions)

Now that you have familiarized yourself with some of the vernacular of Doctor Who, you can gain some insight on what the show is about. The show follows the (now) 1200 year old Time Lord as he travels through time and space in his TARDIS with a companion – generally a human who serves to keep the Doctor grounded along their travels. Each episode var-ies widely – the Doctor and his companion could go back to 1800s France in one episode or go to the end of the universe in another. In some cases, he travels to both to the future and the past within the same episode. Gen-erally in every episode, he fights some form of alien. His greatest known enemies are the Daleks and the Cybermen, who have been fighting the Doctor since the show began. Along with the more science – related as-pects of the show, the show really delves into the human condition, ethical values, and romantic drama. The show is filled with action, adventure, drama, romance, and even comedy. While it is generally known as a sci-fi show, it’s no surprise that it’s gaining wide-spread popularity because it is truly a show that everyone can enjoy.

http://www.starpulse.com/news/Emily_AsherPerrin/2010/11/04/how_many_times_can_the_doctor_really_rhttp://www.scififx.com/2011/11/doctor-who-movie/http://www.nerdist.com/2010/12/doctor-who-for-newbies-the-eighth-doctor-the-wilderness-years-2/http://docohobigfinish.blogspot.com/2011/05/complete-seventh-doctor-adventures-so.htmlhttp://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m03m7myPR11qdchwo.jpghttp://iaith.tapetrade.net/doctorwho/doctor4.htmlhttp://brightcomedy.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/off-the-topic-chameleon-circuit/http://thesnufkin.blogspot.com/2011/07/best-of-doctor-who-sixth-doctor.htmlhttp://chalbo.blogspot.com/2012/03/dw50-countdown-second-doctor-part-two.htmlhttp://tto.libsyn.com/tim-s-take-on-episode-9-the-ninth-doctor-http://www.virginmedia.com/tvradio/top-tv-shows/doctor-who/where-are-they-now.php?ssid=3http://daleksrus.wikia.com/wiki/File:The_Third_Doctor.jpghttp://static.tumblr.com/zaqdpqi/IfJm7lbkq/dr.-who-tardis-2005-prop.jpeg

THE POPULARITY OF

IMAGE SOURCES:

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

● ●

●

United States314,505,000

14%

Thailand65,479,45357% Vietnam

87,840,00055%

Russia143,200,0004%

BrazilPOP. 193,946,886

10%

Congo DR69,575,000

13%

Mexico112,336,53825%

Indonesia237,641,326

55%

Iran75,149,669

20%

Ethiopia84,320,98733%

Egypt82,638,000

37%

Nigeria166,629,000

80%

Pakistan180,837,000100%

Turkey74,724,269

43%Japan127,520,000151%

Germany81,844,000

102%

Philippines92,337,852127%

A COUNTRY’S POPULATION VS. AREA

7,500,000

5,000,000

1,000,000

10,000

● ●Country Area [SQ M]

Madeleine Lucero-SimmonsInfographics

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

● ●

●India1,210,193,422

164%

Bangladesh152,518,015472%

China1,347,350,00063%

-10 -20 -30 -40 50 -40 -30 -20 -10

100 Yards - 300 Feet

●●OvercapacityPopulation

X Football Fields[SQ M]

What if every person in a country’s population was given the area of a football field?When it comes to graphing a country’s population, the size of the country is not always considered. By using a unit most people comprehend and can visualize, this project tries to display how much area of a country would be taken up if each person in the population had their own football field. The 20 countries with the highest populations were recorded along with the area in square miles of said country. Of those 20 countries, 7 wouldn’t be able to house the entire population in this given situation. One must also take into account the fact that not every single part of a country is habitable. For instance, two-thirds of Russia and half of China are uninhabitable. While this is shocking once first heard, those countries have large amounts of mountainous terrain and harsh weather conditions, that range from flooding to snow stroms. With so many different variables affecting a persons living conditions, this project tries to show that if we were given the space, the world’s population would have to reorganize itself.

sources:http://flowingdata.com/http://factsanddetails.com/http://home.netcom.com/~runar/geogr.htmhttp://www.worldatlas.com/aatlas/populations/ctyareal.html

Percent of country covered by the square miles if each person in the country’s population had a football field

Federer vs. Sampras

12.08.1971

WASHINGTON, D.C., USA

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, USA

6’1” (185 CM)

170 POUNDS (77 KG)

RIGHT-HANDED

1988

08.08.1981

BASEL, SWITZERLAND

BOTTMINGEN, SWITZERLAND

6’1” (185 CM)

187 LBS (85 KG)

RIGHT-HANDED

1998

ROGER PETE

DAI 523 - Information Design 1Pino TroguAssignment 03: ProportionsLuke MarsdenOctober 2012

REFERENCESATP Profile Pete Sampras: http://www.atpworldtour.com/Tennis/Players/Sa/P/Pete-Sampras.aspx

ATP Profile Roger Federer: http://www.atpworldtour.com/Tennis/Players/Top-Players/Roger-Federer.aspx

Sampras & Federer Title Race: http://thesis.armina.info/node/133

In sport, there is always raging debate as to who is the greatest of all time (GOAT) with many people naming several of the top players as contenders. What is even more difficult to discern is on what basis someone can be judged the greatest of all time. Within the sport of tennis there are many heavyweights who are often referred to from Rod Laver to Bjorn Borg, however, when considering the greatest of all time, two names seem to rise above the rest - Roger Federer and Pete Sampras.

Both men have the honor of taking the top two spots of individuals with the most Grand Slam titles earned. Having been born 10 years apart with their careers exhibiting so many similarities, a comparison between the two is a startling one. With a 10 year gap between their rather similar careers, each man can claim to be the best of their era, however, who is the greatest of all time and on what basis?

$43,280,489

762

222

64

14

286

31

$73,691,177

868

194

76

17

298

41

WimbledonAustralian Open US OpenFrench Open

4 - 2 1 - 0

ATP MastersSeries Canada

ATP MastersSeriesCincinnati

ATP MastersSeriesHamburg

ATP MastersSeries IndianWells

ATP MastersSeries Madrid

ATP MastersSeries Miami

ATP WorldTour Masters1000Cincinnati

ATP WorldTour Masters1000 Madrid

AustralianOpen

Bangkok BarclaysATP WorldTour Finals

Basel

Doha

Dubai

Halle

Rotterdam

TennisMasters Cup

US Open

Vienna

Wimbledon

Federer

Antwerp

ATP MastersSeriesCincinnati

ATP MastersSeries IndianWells

ATP MastersSeries Miami

ATP MastersSeries Paris

ATP Tour WorldChampionship

ATP TourWorldChampionship

AustralianOpen

Basel

Grand SlamCup

Hong Kong

Indianapolis

Los Angeles

Lyon

Memphis

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

San Jose

Sydney

Tokyo Outdoor

US Open

Wimbledon

SamprasClay Grass Carpet Hard

TITLES WON BY COURT SURFACE

London / Queen’s Club

BORN

PLACE OF BIRTH

HOMETOWN

HEIGHT

WEIGHT

STYLETURNED PROFESSIONAL

Total prize money

Career wins

Career losses

Total CAREER titles

Grand slam titles

Total WEEKS ranked world no.1

Longest match winning streak

KING OF THE SURFACEWhen comparing the performance of the two players on the various tennis surfaces, there are also noticeable differences. Both have had success in winning titles on hard courts (at events like the Australian Open) and on grass courts (e.g. at Wimbledon) unlike the vast differences in carpet and clay court performances.

Carpet is not widely used in tennis often being reserved for smaller tournaments such as the ATP Tour Championships, amongst others, which Sampras has been seen to have greater success on than Federer.

Meanwhile, clay is a prominently featured court surface as it is used at the French Open. Often considered by those within the game as the most difficult surface to master, Federer has clearly had greater success on the clay court than Sampras who has won fewer tournaments on clay and can not claim to ever winning a French Open like many of the greats.

WHO IS THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME?It is difficult to compare the two given both came from different eras as they only faced each other once in different peaks of their career and faced substantially different competitive environments from each other. However, on nearly every performance criteria, Federer has surpassed Sampras.

Ultimately, Federer holds more titles, reached his success in a far shorter timeframe and has consistently reached more finals than Sampras. He can also lay claim to achievements Sampras cannot such as winning the French Open. Clay is considered the ultimate test of a player’s ability, something Sampras was not able to turn into Grand Slam glory.

There’s no denying that Sampras was an exceptional player and is one of the games’ greatest, however, Federer is more deserving of the title of the greatest of all time based on his performance against that of Sampras.

QUICKEST RISE TO THE TOPAs shown, Federer leads Sampras in the number of Grand Slam titles earned which are considered the top achievements within the sport. Federer currently leads with 17 to Sampras’ 14 titles equaling him at the 2009 French Open, a tournament neither man had previously won.

In addition to number of titles, it is also worth observing how long it took each player to earn their titles. Sampras took 12 years to earn his 14 titles as his wins were mostly spread out. Meanwhile, Federer has acquired his 17 titles in just 9 years, 3 whole years ahead of Sampras. Staggeringly, Federer had won 16 of those in 7 years which averages to more than two per year.

ONLY MATCH MEETING2001 Wimbledon, EnglandGrass, Round 16 Federer 7(7) 5 6 6(0) 7 Sampras 6(5) 7 4 7(2) 5

GRAND SLAM WimbledonAustralian Open US OpenFrench Open

7 - 7 5 - 5

TITLES EARNED

Peter Sampras vs Roger Federer: http://www.tennis28.com/studies/Federer_Sampras.htmlTennis Records & Statistics: http://www.tennis-x.com/stats/tennisrecords.php

Federer Breaks Sampras Record: http://www.nytimes.com/

Federer & Sampras: 10 Years of Separation: http://straightsets.blogs.nytimes.com/

2nd Round

1st Round

Final

Semi-Final

Quarter-Final

4th Round

3rd Round

2nd Round

1st Round

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15WN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAUWN USFRAU WN USFRAU WN USFRAU WN USFRAU WN USFRAU WN USFRAU

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Year 15AU FR WN US

Year 14AU FR WN US

Year 13AU FR WN US

Year 12AU FR WN US

Year 11AU FR WN US

Year 10AU FR WN US

Year 9AU FR WN US

Year 8AU FR WN US

Year 7AU FR WN US

Year 6AU FR WN US

Year 5AU FR WN US

Year 4AU FR WN US

Year 3AU FR WN US

Year 2AU FR WN US

Year 1AU FR WN US

Final

Semi-Final

Quarter-Final

4th Round

3rd Round

2nd Round

1st Round

Final

Semi-Final

Quarter-Final

4th Round

3rd Round

2nd Round

1st Round

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

PERFORMANCE AT GRAND SLAMS DURING THEIR CAREER

Year 15AU FR WN US

Year 14AU FR WN US

Year 13AU FR WN US

Year 12AU FR WN US

Year 11AU FR WN US

Year 10AU FR WN US

Year 9AU FR WN US

Year 8AU FR WN US

Year 7AU FR WN US

Year 6AU FR WN US

Year 5AU FR WN US

Year 4AU FR WN US

Year 3AU FR WN US

Year 2AU FR WN US

Year 1AU FR WN US

PERFORMANCE AT GRAND SLAMS DURING THEIR CAREER

FINAL ENCOUNTERSAs can be seen to the right, on a tournament-by-tournament basis, it can be seen that Federer reached more finals and more consistently than Sampras. Both men won all but a few of the finals they participated in, but on the whole, Federer reached the later stages of tournaments on more occasions than Sampras did.

TITLES WON BY COURT SURFACE

The Land ofOpportunity

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Earnings proportion of total foreign-born population 1999 – 2009

Percentage of foreign-born residents in each state in 2009

EuropeMigrants originating from Europe accounts for 18percent of the foreign-born population that earnsover 75,000 U.S. dollars per year. 64.8 percentare in a ‘white-collar’ occupation.

EUrope18%

ASia51.4%

LatinAmerica20.9%

other9.7%

White-collar occupation (64.8%)

Blue-collar occupation (35.2%)

Occupation proportion ofEuropean-born migrants

AsiaMigrants originating from Asia accounts for51.4 percent of the foreign-born populationthat earns over 75,000 U.S. dollars per year. 69.7percent are in a ‘white-collar’ occupation.



Occupation proportion ofAsian-born migrants

Latin AmericaMigrants originating from Latin America accountsfor 20.9 percent of the foreign-born populationthat earns over 75,000 U.S. dollars per year. 28.5percent are in a ‘white-collar’ occupation.



Occupation proportion ofLatin American-born migrants

Other areasMigrants originating from other areas of the Worldaccounts for 9.7 percent of the foreign-bornpopulation that earns over 75,000 U.S. dollars peryear. 59 percent are in a ‘white-collar’ occupation.

White-collar occupation (59%)

Blue-collar occupation (41%)

Occupation proportion of migrantsborn in other areas of the World

75,000 U.S. dollars and greater Less than 75,000 U.S. dollars

Scale

NJ5%

IL5%

NY11%

FL9%

TX10%

CA26%

Thousands of migrants arrive in the United States every year seeking a more prosperous future.They come from all walks of life; from neighboring countries to continents oceans apart; everyone arrives with dreams and a common goal.

Some migrants who come to the United States are escaping hardship in their countries of origin, and some relocate for personal benefit. The majority of migrants come to find employment. 81 percent of migrants live above the poverty level earning a median personal income of 32,932 U.S. dollars.

With various business and technological industry booms, some people are migrating to the United States for higher income attainment. These people tend to be those from developed countries or at a high educational level. The United States Census

Bureau gathers foreign-born workers earning 75,000 U.S. dollars or more into one category and this will be the focus of the infographic.

The United States Census Bureau also categorizes the occupations that foreign-born workers have, which will be further refined into white-collar (which includes: management, and sales and office occupations) and blue-collar (which includes: service occupations, primary industries, contruction, production, and transportation).

Although the amount of foreign-born white collar and blue collar workers generally increases each year, it is shown that is it drastically affected by local and global economic situations. The majority of foreign-born workers earning 75,000 U.S. dollars or more are from Asia with 69.7 percent in white-collar jobs.

U.S. Census Bureau, 2012, Current Population Survey Data on Foreign-Born Population, Annual data tables 1999 to 2009, U.S. Department of Commerce. Accessed online: 8 October 2012. http://1.usa.gov/SWxiZzU.S. Census Bureau, 2012, Population: Native and Foreign-born Populations 2009. Accessed online: 8 October 2012. http://1.usa.gov/SSWV1LU.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2011, The 2009 HHS Poverty Guidelines, published 23 January 2009. Accessed online: 8 October 2012. http://1.usa.gov/RmSxECWikipedia contributors, 2012, Personal income in the United States, Wikipedia. Accessed online: 8 October 2012. http://bit.ly/TpwVr2

HENRY NGO 14 DAI523-01

1%

5%

10%

26%

Sources:http://moneyland.time.comhttp://www.wineinstitute.org http://www.ttb.gov/Christina Davidson

DAI 523 - Trogu

Americans LoveWine

Change−150 −100 −50 0 50 100 150 200 250

Change−25 −20 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Argentina971400

Australia530000

Brazil355000

China 929000

France 2892000 Germany 2020500

Italy 2450000

Netherlands

Portugal447700

Romania509700

Russia 1150000

South Africa346000

Spain 1060000

United Kingdom1320000

United States 2912041

Wine production and consumption continues to rise in the United States. The United States each year becomes a bigger producer of wine. California especially produces most of the wine made in the United states, as shown in the graph below. The graphs show how the United states is a serious competitor in wine production, and even consumption, ranking above France in total wine consumption for the first time in 2010.

100

2010 marked the first time ever that more wine was consumed in the U.S. than in France

U.S. vs CaliforniaWine Production

0

100

200

500

600

700

800

400

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

in millions of gallons

Year

Still Wine State Production change between 2008 and 2010

California 605619613

Florida1920638

Kentucky2196055

Michigan1540149

New Jersey1507311 New York

25183355Ohio1568378

Oregon5479553

Vermont3356568

Washington24656796

World Wide Consumptionchange between 2007 and 2010

California produces an average of 90 percent of total United States wine production.

U.S. Wine Consumption

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

300

400

500

600

700

800

Year

Gallons

347000

Awards Won

Academy Awards

Golden Globe

Grammys

Dana LuiDAI 523-Info Design

Fall 2012 -- Pino TroguSan Francisco State University

Sources:http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/series/Pixar.phphttp://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=bearandthebow.htmhttp://www.fanpop.com/spots/pixar/images

23

5

2

United StatesGross

ForeignGross

Toy Story1995

A Bug’s Life1998

The Incredibles2004

Up2009

Toy Story 21999

Cars2006

toy Story 32010

Monsters Inc2001

Ratatouille2007

cars 22011

Finding nemo2003

WALL-E2008

Brave2012

192M

163M

246M 256M

340M

261M244M

206M224M

293M

415M

191M

234M

30M45M

94M90M 92M

150M

180M 175M200M 200M

185M

115M

70MBudget

527M

462M

362M

1B

Revenue & Budget Per Movie (Millions)

Located in Emeryville, California, Pixar Animation Studio is known for their animated films. Pixar started out as a part of Lucasfilm until 1986 when they began to become funded by Steve Jobs of Apple Inc. In 1995, Jobs was able to get the Disney Company to work alongside Pixar as they worked on their first big animation film, Toy Story. By 2006, The Walt Disney Company bought Pixar for $7.4 billion. Since then, Pixar has created 13 major films.

363M

485M

516M

560M

731M

533M

620M633M

868M

F e a t u r e F i l m s

COLOR BLINDNESS

Who is more Color Blind?

Justin PangilinanProject 3DAI 523.02 Information Design 1 Instructor: Pino TroguDesign and IndustrySan Francisco State University

5% 8%

Percentage of Different types of Color Blindness

People affected bycolorblindess (Millions)

Color Blindness in Different Countries

ARE YOUCOLORBLIND?

Presented on the right, is a bar graph that shows numbers (in millions) of those who are colorblind in different countries. The bar graph shows eight countries were the high numbers of those who are color blind is located in Britain. Studies shown that within ethnicities, those who are Caucasian are more likely to be color blind than those who are different race.

The circle chart on the right explains the percentage of color blindness within gender. In relation to color blindness within gender, about 8% of males have some form of color blindness, whereas, women have about 5%. In most cases, genetics are a huge factor with the percentage of males because of the mother passing the recessive chromosome to the male child.

Within the three categories of color blindness, there are several different sub-categories within them depending on the severity of the color blindness. The exploded circle chart on the right presents the percentage of each sub-category and the bottom of the chart provides a small description of each color deficient

Color Blindness also known, as color vision deficiency is a visual disorder where those who are colorblind, perceive and visualize a limited color spectrum than those with normal vision. Although the term, “colorblind” is misleading, many believe that if a person is color blind, they cannot see color but that is not true. Almost all that are color vision deficient can see color. Color blindness is caused when there is a malfunction in the eye. Inside the eye, there are three different photo pigments inside the cones – red, green and blue. When mixed together, the absorption of the three different types of cones creates our color vision. When one of the three cones does not work properly, the absorption of the person’s color vision changes.

The Ishihara color blind test was created by Shinobu Ishihara who is a Japanese ophthalmologist. Shinobu first invented the color test in a military medical school where he had to create a test to screen potential military men who where color deficient. The Ishihara test consist of 38 plates filled with different colored dots that are molded into hidden numbers or shapes. Some plates have different patterns were normal vision individuals can see them whereas there are some patterns that those who are color blind can only see. Today it is one of the widely used test to distinguish if the individual is red-green color blind. Below is a sample of Schelindas test where you can identify and see if you are color blind. Below each image has an answer.

Those who have normal vision see #42. Those who are red colorblind see #2. Those who are mild-red colorblind see #4

Those who have normal vision see #8. Those who are red-green color blind see #3


Those who have normal vision see #7. Those who are colorblind cannot see the number.

Extremly rare form of color blindness were the individual can only see only black, white and limited shades of grey.

Severe form of color blindness were the red photo- pigment are missing. Individuals suffering from Protanopia see red, dark.

Different form of red-green color blind, where the green photo-pigments are missing. Affects the green hue spectrum.


Those who have normal vision see #26. Those who are red colorblind see #6. Those who are milding red colorblind see #2

Those who have normal vision see #74. Those who red-green colorblind see #21

Those who have normal vision see #73. Those who are colorblind cannot see the number clearly.

Sourceshttp://www.rightdiagnosis.com/d/deuteranopia/stats-country.htm

http://www.rightdiagnosis.com/r/red_green_color_blindness/stats-country.htmhttp://www.colblindor.com/2007/04/17/deuteranopia-red-green-color-blindness/

http://wearecolorblind.com/article/a-quick-introduction-to-color-blindness/http://www.colblindor.com/2010/03/09/types-of-color-blindness/

http://www.howstuffworks.com/environmental/life/human-biology/colorblindness1.htmhttp://www.colour-blindness.com/colour-blindness-tests/ishihara-colour-test-plates/

Deuteranomaly

Protanopia

Deuteranopia

Protanomaly

Achromatopsia

Protanopia

Deuteranopia

Tritanopia

Protanomaly

Deuteranomaly

TritanomalyVery rare form of blue colorblind, where the blue photo-pigment is absent. Affects the blue hue spectrum.

Mild form of red-green color blindness were the red photo pigment are nearly absent.. Affects the red hue spectrum.

The most common form of colorblindness were the green photo pigsments nearly absent. Affects the red-green hue spectrum.

Rare form of color blindness where the blue-yellow photo pigments are altered. Affects the blue-yellow hue spectrum.

0%

1.01%

1.27%

0%

1.08%

4.63%

0%

9

1.7

1.8

8

7.8

1.3

4.2

3.8

1 quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter...

Documents