1 public employees benefits board june 22, 2004 seatac holiday inn
TRANSCRIPT
1
Public Employees Benefits Board
June 22, 2004
SeaTac Holiday Inn
2
2005 Medical Procurement Overview and Results
June 22, 2004
Richard Onizuka, Health Care Policy
3
Summary of 2005 Medical Procurement
• Health Care Environment
• Purchasing Strategy
• Key Facts From PEBB Procurement• Procurement Results
4
Health Care Environment
• Hewitt Associates and Aon Consulting forecast that managed care plans will ask for 2005 premium increases in the range of 12.5% - 14.4%
• Marketplace moving towards:• Higher enrollee premiums & point of service
costs• Choice of lower premium plan designs• New tools, information and plan designs to help
employees be better health care consumers
5
Health Care Environment
• Trends in health care spending are moderating in all service categories
• Prescription drugs typically showing the largest trend reduction
• Utilization growth is slowing
6
2005 Purchasing Strategy
Build long-term partnerships with carriers to help us realize PEBB’s vision of providing affordable, quality health care.
7
2005 Purchasing Strategy
• Quality and Access integral to purchasing, but cost continued to be a purchasing priority
• “Benchmark Rate” for Non-Medicare
• Non-Medicare and Medicare bids actuarially reviewed and negotiated in comparison with the overall program
8
Key Facts --PEBB Procurement
• Unlike last year, financial statements to the OIC reflect all Bidders made a profit on PEBB business in 2003
• Insufficient data for 2004 conclusions
• Similar to the national health care market environment, PEBB trends and utilization appear to be moderating
9
Procurement Results• Bids from all 6 current carriers
• Regence bid under Regence BlueShield license, rather than current RegenceCare license
• All carriers were notified of preliminary contract awards for 2005
• No service area reductions and one carrier expanded into a partial county
10
PEBB 2005 MCO Service AreasWHITE = FULL MCO COVERAGE
RED = NO MCO COVERAGE PURPLE = PARTIAL MCO COVERAGE
Garfield
Pend OreilleCHP,GHC/OPT(Partial)
SpokaneCHP,GHC,OPT
Walla WallaCHP,GHC, OPT
Asotin
Columbia GHC, OPT
StevensCHP,GHC/OPT (Partial)
WhitmanGHC,OPT
FerryCHP
LincolnCHP,GHC/OPT (Partial)
FranklinCHP,GHC, OPT
AdamsCHP
DouglasCHP
GrantCHP
BentonCHP,GHC, OPT
YakimaCHP,GHC, OPT
KlickitatCHP
ChelanCHP
San JuanGHC, OPT
WhatcomCHP, GHC, OPT Okanogan
CHP
SkagitCHP, GHC, OPT, RBS
KittitasGHC, OPT
SnohomishCHP, GHC, OPT, PC, RBS
LewisCHP, GHC, OPT, PC, Kaiser (partial)
PierceCHP, GHC, OPT, PC, RBS
SkamaniaCHP,Kaiser (Partial)
ClallamRBS
Island GHC, OPT, CHP
ClarkKaiser, PC
CowlitzCHP, Kaiser
Thurston CHP, GHC, OPT, PC
KitsapCHP, GHC,OPT
MasonCHP, GHC, OPT, RBS,PC (partial)
Wahkiakum
Kaiser ((Partial)
PacificRBS, CHP (partial)
JeffersonRBS
Grays Harbor CHP, RBS, GHC/OPT/ PC (Partial)
23,313 RegenceCare members will need to choose a new plan (Regence BlueShield includes all RegenceCare service areas & providers)
CHP as Partial in Pacific new for 2005, 2 Counties with no MCO (815 members) & 1 County with partial coverage (approximately 299 members)
KingGHC, OPT, PC, RBS, CHP
11
Procurement Results
Premium Increases, Active Non-Medicare:
• Budget Assumption 15.0%
• Procurement Results 11.1%– UMP= 13.2%, UMP Neighborhood=14%– MCOs=9.5%
12
Procurement Results2005 Active Non-Medicare
Employee Contributions
Plan Name
2005 First Tier Emp
Contrib.
Emp Contrib. Change from
2004
2005 Projected % of Employee
Enrollment Subscriber Sub. & Spouse
Sub. & Child(ren) Full Family
CHPW 57$ 16$ 3% 57$ 123$ 99$ 166$ Group Health Coop. 20$ (23)$ 30% 20$ 51$ 36$ 66$ Kaiser Foundation 37$ 5$ 2% 37$ 84$ 65$ 112$ Options Health Care 48$ (13)$ 5% 48$ 107$ 85$ 143$ PacifiCare 108$ 28$ 8% 108$ 226$ 189$ 307$ Regence 102$ 21$ 7% 102$ 214$ 178$ 290$
Uniform Medical Plan 33$ 4$ 44% 33$ 76$ 58$ 101$ UMP Neighborhood 25$ 6$ 1% 25$ 59$ 43$ 78$
Average Employee Contribution 75$ Budgeted Avg EC. 79$
Variance (4)$
Resulting Employee ContributionBy Family Tier
13
Procurement ResultsIncrease in Average Employee
Contributions
$13 $14 $14
$27
$37
$72$79 $75
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
CY 1998 CY 1999 CY 2000 CY 2001 CY 2002 CY 2003 CY 2004 CY 2005
Year
Avg
Em
ploy
ee C
ontr
ibut
ion
14
Procurement Results
Premium Increases, Medicare Retirees:
• Budget Assumption 21.5%• Procurement Results (UMP & MCOs) 21.8%
– UMP= 31.5%– MCOs= 11.4%
15
Procurement Results2005 Estimated
Medicare Retiree Contribution
Plan Name2004 First Tier Retiree Pays
2005 Estimated First Tier Retiree
Pays
Retiree Pays Increase from
2004
2005 Projected Percent of
Retiree Enrollment
CHPW 208$ $ 211 3$ 1%
Group Health Coop. 137$ 152$ 15$ 28%
Kaiser Foundation 104$ 111$ 8$ 3%
Options Health Care 212$ 210$ (2)$ 1%
PacifiCare 140$ 174$ 34$ 10%
Regence 241$ 307$ 66$ 2%
Uniform Medical Plan 126$ 183$ 57$ 55%
16
Procurement ResultsIncrease in Medicare Retiree Subsidies
$41.26 $43.16
$62.48$69.98
$85.84$92.74
$102.35
$116.19
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
CY1998
CY1999
CY2000
CY2001
CY2002
CY2003
CY2004
CY2005
Year
Su
bsi
dy
Per
Ret
iree
Per
Mon
th
17
FUTUREDIRECTIONS
18
Board Vote on 2005 Employee Contributions
Plan Name 2005 First Tier
Emp Contrib. Subscriber Sub. & Spouse
Sub. & Child(ren) Full Family
CHPW 57$ 57$ 123$ 99$ 166$ Group Health Coop. 20$ 20$ 51$ 36$ 66$ Kaiser Foundation 37$ 37$ 84$ 65$ 112$ Options Health Care 48$ 48$ 107$ 85$ 143$ PacifiCare 108$ 108$ 226$ 189$ 307$ Regence 102$ 102$ 214$ 178$ 290$
Uniform Medical Plan 33$ 33$ 76$ 58$ 101$ UMP Neighborhood 25$ 25$ 59$ 43$ 78$
Average Employee Contribution 75$
Resulting Employee ContributionBy Family Tier
19
Board Vote on 2005 Retiree Subsidy
Plan Name2004 First Tier Retiree Pays
2005 Estimated First Tier Retiree
Pays
Retiree Pays Increase from
2004
2005 Projected Percent of
Retiree Enrollment
CHPW 208$ $ 211 3$ 1%
Group Health Coop.* 137$ 152$ 15$ 28%
Kaiser Foundation* 104$ 111$ 8$ 3%
Options Health Care 212$ 210$ (2)$ 1%
PacifiCare* 140$ 174$ 34$ 10%
Regence 241$ 307$ 66$ 2%
Uniform Medical Plan 126$ 183$ 57$ 55%
2005 Retiree Subsidy= $116.19
* Rates shown above for the Medicare Advantage Plans are subject to change based on CMS Medicare Advantage Rates.