1 | page republic of indonesia forest carbon partnership facility
TRANSCRIPT
1 | P a g e
Republic of Indonesia
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), BioCarbon Fund Initiative for Sustainable (BioCF ISFL)
for Forest Landscapes Portfolio
Aide Memoire – Preparation and Supervision Mission
January 11–19, 2016
1. A World Bank Team1 visited Indonesia from January 11-19, 2016, to undertake a combined preparation and supervision mission for those forest-related activities implemented by the Government of Indonesia
(GoI) under the landscape program (“Recipient-Executed forest activities”). The mission met with: the
Governor of East Kalimantan; authorities and technical staff from the Ministry of Environment and
Forestry (MoEF), including the Secretary General (Acting), Forest Research Development and Innovation Agency (FORDIA), the Directorate General (DG) for Climate Change (DG-CC), Planning
Bureau and International Cooperation Bureau (KLN); Ministry of Finance (MoF); Ministry of Planning
(Bappenas), provincial agencies for agriculture, environment, estate crops, forestry, mining, and planning (Bappeda); and key Development Partners including Embassy of Norway, GIZ (FORCLIME),
UK Climate Change Unit, USAID, Canadian Embassy, French Development Agency (AFD), UN-
REDD, and TNC.
2. The mission wishes to thank the GoI, and in particular, Honorable Awang Faroek Ishak, Governor of
East Kalimantan, Dr. Henry Bastaman, Director General, FORDIA, MoEF, and their teams for the
hospitality, cooperation and support for the successful completion of the mission. The mission agenda
and a detailed list of participants are included in Annexes A and B, respectively.
3. The overall objective of the mission was to jointly agree with the GoI, through MoEF, the initial
activities to be included in the Sustainable Landscapes Program (see Paragraph 27). The specific
objectives of the mission were to: (i) assess the progress to-date in achieving REDD+ Readiness, and outline areas for further action; (ii) further define the critical issues to be addressed by the Forest
Partnership Carbon Facility (FCPF) Program (FCPF Readiness Program and Carbon Fund), including
proposed technical assistance and financial support for investments; (iii) discuss potential partnership
arrangements; and (iv) discuss the BioCarbon Fund Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes (BioCF ISFL) and discuss how these potential funding resources can be most strategically used to
effectively support MoEF’s highest priorities.
4. This Aide Memoire summarizes the principal conclusions of, and agreements reached during the mission.
Principal Conclusions
5. Overall Assessment of Progress on REDD Implementation: While the transition process following the 2014 elections, supported by the Presidential Decree No. 16-2015 including the restructuring of MoEF,
resulted in delayed implementation of many Readiness activities, important progress has recently been
made through the consolidation of institutional responsibilities for REDD+. This has created
opportunities to further advance and align donor- and government-supported activities going forward. The Mission noted the significance of Indonesia’s reaffirmed commitment to REDD+ at COP21 in
Paris last December, which has been followed up with the January announcement of the creation of the
1 Ann Jeannette Glauber (FCPF/ Biocarbon Fund ISFLTTL), Alexander Lotsch (Senior Carbon Finance Specialist), Dinesh Aryal
(Senior Natural Resources Management Specialist), Tini Gumartini (Forest Policy Specialist), Azis Khan (Forestry Specialist), George Henry Stirrett (Environmental and Natural Resources Specialist), Emile Jurgens (Forestry Specialist/Consultant), I Gusti Ngurah Wijaya Kusuma (Financial Management Specialist), Budi Permana (Procurement Specialist), and Agustina Eviani (Team Assistant).
2 | P a g e
Peatland Restoration Agency, and the leadership exhibited at the national and sub-national levels. The
mission noted that the new institutional arrangements for REDD+ place leadership firmly within MoEF under the DG-CC, and integrate numerous related functions under a single unit. However, such
arrangements still represent an institutional challenge in addressing those drivers of deforestation and
degradation that relate to non-forest sectors (e.g. agriculture). At the same time, it is important to now
demonstrate swift and effective progress on REDD+ implementation and delivery of results. This will require near-term decisions to clarify and assign institutional responsibility for strategically important
activities to proceed. At the sub-national level, the Mission was pleased to note the outstanding
leadership, awareness and ownership on REDD+, which will form a strong basis for implementation going forward.
FCPF Readiness Fund:
6. Existing REDD+ Readiness Grant: The mission reviewed the status of existing Readiness Grant work
program and its implementation, and congratulated the government for successfully implementing most of the activities. However, the mission cautioned the need to expedite the implementation of on-going
activities to ensure their completion before the current closing date of the Grant Agreement, i.e.,
November 30, 2016. The mission informed that the closing date of the existing grant will not be extended and all deliverables under the grant must be finalized and submitted prior to November 30,
2016. Accordingly, it was agreed that the Government prioritize: (i) completion of safeguards
instruments (see Paragraph 20); and (ii) finalization of the ER-PIN and critical upstream analyses and technical preparation of the Emission Reduction Program Document (ER-PD). If funds are available,
additional activities could be supported. Other work program activities will be included in the
Additional Funding (see Paragraph 23). It was agreed that a revised work plan along with an updated
procurement plan for the reminder of the existing Readiness Grant will be submitted to the Bank by Feb 5, 2016. It was agreed that such a work plan should include a column motivating for each activity,
including a strong justification in the context of ensuring REDD+ Readiness. Furthermore, the mission
reviewed activities under the GA including their execution status (see Annex C). It was agreed that the Bank would inform the status of the Bank-executed activities by March 26, 2016.
7. Disbursement Status: Based on the Client Connection per January 15, 2016, the Bank has disbursed USD 2,934,150 for TF099721 including USD 299,989 in the Designated Account. The accounted
project expenditure is USD 2,634,161, or 82% of the total grant. A total of up to $562,267 may be
available for project activities.
8. Additional REDD+ Readiness Grant Funding: At the fourteenth FCPF Participant's Committee (FCPF
PC) Meeting, in Lima, Peru, in July 2014, the FCPF PC allocated up to US$5m for Additional Funding
for Readiness to Indonesia. Subject to a request from the GoI, such funds would be made available to support achievement of the Readiness Grant's Development Objective, e.g., is to contribute to the
development of Indonesia's capacity to design a sound national REDD+ strategy, develop national and
sub-national reference scenarios, and establish a forest monitoring and carbon accounting system, all consistent with local, regional and national conditions and circumstances. It was agreed that MoEF,
through the MoF, would by February 15, 2016, submit a letter to the World Bank Country Director for
Additional Funding of Readiness activities.
9. The mission discussed the initial activities proposed for Additional Funding and agreed that MoEF
would: 1) undertake a quick gap analysis of achievements to-date on Readiness; and 2) prioritize
activities to be supported with Additional Funding to strategically fill key gaps. Once such activities
3 | P a g e
are clear, it was agreed that MoEF would develop a work plan along with a procurement plan, and
submit them to the Bank by no later than February 15, 2016. The mission also discussed that a finalized "Readiness Package," outlining the up-to-date progress on Readiness activities, submitted to and
endorsed by the FCPF PC, is a prerequisite for ER-PD approval. The World Bank provided information
on the content of said Readiness Package.
10. The mission was informed that if it were a new Grant Agreement (GA), and not an extension of/amendment to the existing GA, there are several internal approval steps. It was therefore agreed that
by February 15, 2016, the MoEF would inform the World Bank of the mandatory steps and timeline
for approval of: 1) a new GA; and 2) an amended GA.
11. Regarding the implementation arrangements for Additional Funding, the mission discussed possible
options including implementation by the DG-CC or continuation by FORDIA. It was agreed that by
February 15, 2016, MoEF would inform the Bank of the final proposed implementation arrangements for the Additional Funding.
12. In terms of timing, the mission emphasized the need to expeditiously process the Additional Funding
to ensure there will not be a gap between the closing of the existing grant (on November 30, 2016) and
effectiveness of Additional Funding.
FCPF Carbon Fund:
13. Emission Reduction - Program Idea Note (ER-PIN): GoI presented an Emission Reduction Program
Idea Note (ER-PIN) to the FCPF Carbon Fund Participants at their eleventh meeting in October 2014 in Washington, D.C. Carbon Fund Participants requested substantive revisions to the proposal,
including the geographic consolidation into a single contiguous area. At the thirteenth meeting of the
Carbon Fund in October 2015, the GoI presented an update on the revisions and communicated the decision to focus the program on the province of East Kalimantan. Toward that aim, MoEF submitted
an ER-PIN to the FCPF FMT on December 17th 2015 for preliminary review.
14. The proposed ER Program focuses on East Kalimantan province and is closely aligned with the existing
provincial REDD+ Strategy. The mission congratulated the team at MoEF and East Kalimantan on delivering a robust document, and made a number of suggestions for improvement. The main areas for
strengthening the ER-PIN include: enhancing the alignment of the Reference Level with the CF's
Methodological Framework; and restructuring the program description around the priority drivers of deforestation. Detailed comments are attached in Annex E. The GoI welcomed the feedback, and agreed
to provide a revised ER-PIN for virtual review by Carbon Fund Participants by February 29, 2016. Part
of the remaining FCPF Readiness funds will be used to support the completion of the ER-PIN (see
Paragraph 9).
15. Letter of Intent: It is expected that the revised ER-PIN can be selected into the CF pipeline in May 2016
subject to Carbon Fund Participants providing their consent on the revisions. This will authorize the
World Bank to negotiate and sign a Letter of Intent (LoI) on behalf of the FCPF Carbon Fund. Such negotiations will require a clear counterpart and a decision on the Program Entity that is authorized to
sign the LOI and prepare the program and eventually sign an Emission Reduction Payment Agreement
(ERPA). The Mission stressed the importance of GoI to carefully consider the institutional arrangements going forward to ensure a smooth transition from program preparation to implementation.
16. Emission Reduction - Program Document (ER-PD): After the selection of the ER-PIN and the signing
of the LoI, MoEF would begin developing the ER-PD which sets out the detailed program design to
achieve emissions reductions. While the financing provided through the FCPF CF are for emissions reductions, the mission discussed the need to align such efforts with the provincial development
objectives, specifically those associated with sustainable forest management and associated economic
development. In that vein, the mission discussed possible an initial Project Development Objective and associated outcome indicators (see Annex D).
4 | P a g e
17. Preparation of the ER-PD will require specific documents and mechanisms including a land tenure
assessment, a Feedback and Grievance Redress Mechanism, a Benefit Sharing Plan, and a Safeguards Plan. The mission discussed a number of preliminary studies that could be completed using part of the
remaining funds from the FCPF Readiness Fund. These include finalization of the Reference Level,
analysis of potential emissions reductions, preliminary assessment of land and tenure issues,
identification of specific investment opportunities, and identification of Development Partners and investment sources. Based on experience in other countries, the detailed program preparation and
implementation planning is expected to take 12-18 months. An ER-PD that meets the technical
requirement of the Carbon Fund Methodological Framework as well as those by the World Bank would form the basis for a decision to negotiate and sign and ERPA.
18. Complementary World Bank Support: The mission noted that the FCPF Carbon Fund (FCPF CF)
includes limited complementary resources to be executed by the World Bank. These resources would be targeted to leverage World Bank expertise toward objectives of the FCPF CF. One area of potential
engagement could be to support the GoI in completing an inventory of degraded lands in East
Kalimantan.
19. REDD Support Facility: The mission informed about the status of REDD Support Facility which is a fund executed by the World Bank. The fund supports the REDD readiness processed in Indonesia. The
work planning for this fund is agreed in an annual basis with GOI (through the former REDD+ Agency),
World Bank and donors. The mission requested the GOI to inform the Bank by February 19, 2016 which GOI agency would be responsible for working with the Bank and donors in under this Facility.
Cross-Cutting Issues
20. Safeguards: There has already been significant attention and strong performance in developing
environmental and social safeguard instruments for Indonesian REDD+ activities. However, several safeguard instruments and frameworks (i.e. SIS-REDD+) have been developed to comply with
UNFCCC safeguard principles, but not specially addressing World Bank safeguard policy
requirements. The FCPF PC calls for Emission Reduction Programs to meet the World Bank’s environmental and social safeguard standards, in addition to supporting UNFCC REDD+-related
safeguard guidance. In that vein, the FCPF Grant Agreement calls for completion of a Strategic
Environmental and Social Assessment (SESA) and an Environmental and Social Management
Framework (ESMF), including a resettlement policy framework, an indigenous peoples’ planning framework, a pest management framework, and guidelines and procedures for the development of
environmental and social management plans, resettlement action plans, indigenous peoples’
development plans, pest management plans and physical cultural resources management plans. Hence, there is an urgent need to complete both the SESA and ESMF as soon as possible.
21. The mission agreed that: 1) by March 31, 2016, MoEF would document the status of SESA work to-
date, including consultations and outcomes (World Bank safeguards staff are available to assist); and 2) MoEF would undertake preparation of the ESMF, incorporating relevant Indonesian laws and
regulations; pertinent parts of SIS-REDD+, PRISAI, and East Kalimantan (and possibly other)
provincial guidelines (i.e., SES-Kalimantan); and the applicable World Bank safeguard policies to
ensure that emission reduction projects are designed and implemented in accordance with Indonesian, UNFCCC, and World Bank environmental and social requirements. The mission suggests that the
ESMF prepared for FIP is a good starting point for the FCPF ESMF; and the analysis of gaps between
Bank safeguards policies and Indonesian legislation and REDD+ instruments that is a necessary part of the ESMF preparation process will identify the additional work to be done. Members of the Bank FCPF
team have offered to meet with MOEF team to assist in preparation of an ESMF work plan that should
be ready by March 31, 2016. These activities need to have the highest priority with the remaining
5 | P a g e
Readiness Grant funds not only to ensure compliance with the Grant Agreement, but also to ensure
safeguard documents do not result in delays for the preparation of the entire ER Program.
22. Financial Management: Overall the mission rates the financial management performance of the
ongoing FCPF Readiness preparation grant (TF99721) as Moderately Satisfactory. The mission noted
some of the good financial management practices including: i) timely submission of financial reports;
ii) clean audit opinion regarding the project's financial statement; and iii) documentation available to support reported expenditures. However, the following actions are needed to be taken by the
implementing agency to support 2016 project implementation:
To immediately finalize the 2016 project budget and include it in the 2016 DIPA. The 2016 DIPA is expected to be effective no later than March 15, 2016;
To process the issuance of commitment maker's decree (SK PPK) as an official authorized to
initiate payment request. This is expected to be done no later than February 1, 2016; and To complete the follow up of the audit report, no later than April 30, 2016.
23. As for the proposed Additional Funding for the FCPF Readiness Grant, as the implementation
arrangements and detailed activities to be funded have not yet been determined, it was not possible to advance with FM capacity assessment. Once determined, the Bank will update the financial
management capacity assessment including identification of potential risks for the Additional Funding
and proposed mitigation actions.
24. Procurement Management: The mission reviewed FY2015 procurement activities and discussed the
proposed Additional Funding. Details of the review are included in Annex E. In summary, the mission
was informed that there were no new procurement activities in FY2015. The mission noted that there was a delay on the issuance of government budget (DIPA) for the Readiness Grant due to government
internal issues, with final DIPA issuance in August 2015. The mission requested MoEF revise the
Procurement Plan to incorporate agreed changes for FY2016 and submit for the Bank’s prior review
by February 15, 2016.
25. As with Financial Management, until the implementation arrangements and detailed work plan are in
place for the proposed Additional Funding for FCPF Readiness Grant, the Bank will update the
procurement capacity assessment and assist the Implementing Agency(s) in preparing the Procurement Plan and provide training as needed.
BioCarbon Fund ISFL
26. BioCarbon Fund: Indonesia was selected by the BioCarbon Fund donors as a candidate country for the Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes (ISFL). This decision was communicated previously to
Pak Heru Prasetyo, Head of BP-REDD, by the World Bank’s Indonesia Country Director, Rodrigo A.
Chaves, in August 2014, and the potential scope and location were initially discussed with GoI prior to the institutional transition. The mission discussed the ISFL’s overall objectives -- including the
effective engagement with the private sector and the focus on agricultural commodities -- and presented
examples of potential jurisdictions on the basis of an earlier feasibility assessment. The mission noted that the BioCarbon Fund provides a flexible financing mechanism, which includes funds for program
development, grant finance for investments, and payments for results. The specific respective funding
allocation will be determined as part of the development of a program concept note.
27. The mission noted that an important next step is for GoI to respond to the World Bank with a decision
on the preliminary geographic scope of the program and a responsible counterpart for subsequent
program development and implementation. The mission was informed that this decision will be made at the level of DG CC and agreed that GoI would respond on this matter as part of the next mission
(April 18 to 27, 2016) to allow for a formal identification mission to take place. The findings of the
6 | P a g e
identification mission will form the basis for the development of a formal program concept note and
the release of program preparation funds. As in other ISFL countries, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) – the private sector arm of the World Bank Group – can play an integral part in the
development and implementation of the program, including potentially through its own investments.
Other Issues
28. MoEF Priorities for Addressing Sustainable Landscape Management: The mission discussed the
importance of promoting integrated sustainable landscape management as a precondition for achieving REDD+. The World Bank presented their new Country Partnership Framework for Indonesia, covering
activities in 2016-2020, noting the core focal area on Sustainable Landscapes Management, which aims
to support activities and policies to improve land and forest management outcomes in all land-based sectors. It was noted that existing and planned World Bank support for Sustainable Landscape
Management with a focus on REDD+, in addition to the US$3.6 million (m) readiness grant under
implementation by MoEF (FORDIA), includes another approximately US$180 m is preliminarily
allocated to Indonesia in support of REDD+ activities. MoEF management noted that their overall priorities include a focus on reducing deforestation and land degradation, as well as reducing poverty
among forest dependent-communities. The mission agreed that programming of World Bank-supported
Sustainable Landscapes support should be specifically designed to support these MoEF priorities.
29. IEQ Results: The mission presented the World Bank’s most recent Indonesia Economic Quarterly
(IEQ), published in December 2015, which assessed the economic costs to Indonesia of the forest fires which took place between June and October of last year. The study, which was done jointly with BNPB
and BPS, found that those fires, which affected 2.6m ha of land, incurred approximately $16.1 billion
in damage and losses to the Indonesian economy, representing about 1.9% of total GDP. The mission
shared copies of the assessment, which can provide important background data and analysis for preparation of the FCPF Additional Funding and CF as well as the BioCF ISFL.
30. Link with FIP, DGM and GEF: The mission noted that one of the main challenges for the ER Program implementation is the need for available investment finance as the FCPF Carbon Fund does not provide
upfront investment to support the priority actions that will lead to the achievement of emission
reduction. Therefore to achieve this, the program needs to be coordinated and linked with other
activities financed by the government and development partners. For example the mission informed that the WB Task Teams for FIP, DGM, GEF and FCPF/BioCarbon Fund supported projects have been
coordinating and encouraged the government to do the same. Furthermore, the mission encouraged the
government to leverage these resources more effectively to achieve the emission reduction objective.
31. Meeting with Development Partners (DPs): A meeting with Development Partners active on REDD+
was hosted by MoEF to update on the progress of REDD+ implementation with a focus on FCPF implementation and development. Development Partners expressed appreciation for the briefing on the
preparation process, and the finalization of the East Kalimantan reference emission level. They also
expressed unanimous support for the proposed FCPF CF Program, with many partners highlighted the large degree of synergy with their existing climate change, forestry, and landscape programs. The
Government, World Bank, and other Development Partners expressed commitment to close
collaboration in the preparation of the FCPF CF Program and more broadly, to the achievement of
Indonesia’s climate change commitments. Given the performance based nature of the FCPF CF, it was recognized that a significant risk to the program’s success in East Kalimantan is the absence of secured
investment financing to support necessary activities to counter deforestation and degradation.
Development Partners welcomed a joint partnership, where all existing or proposed activities in East Kalimantan that contribute toward REDD+ objectives would be coordinated.
7 | P a g e
32. Next Mission: The mission agreed that the next combined preparation and supervision mission would
tentatively take place in April 18 to 27, 2016.
33. Disclosure: Under the World Bank’s Access to Information Policy introduced on July 1, 2010, the Aide
Memoire may be made public, if the client and the World Bank agree. The disclosure of this Aide Memoire was discussed and agreed to with project counterparts at the closing meeting at FORDIA
Offices in Bogor, chaired by Dr. Henry Bastaman, Director General, FORDIA, MoEF on January 19,
2016. The client and the World Bank agreed that the Aide Memoire would be classified as Public.
Table 1: Agreed Action Plan
Action By When? Responsible Party Remarks2
A revised work plan along with an
updated procurement plan for the reminder of the existing
Readiness Grant will be
submitted to the Bank.
Feb 15, 2016 FORDIA Submitted on Feb 18
Inform re status of Bank-executed activities under the existing
Readiness Grant.
Feb 19, 2016 WB Revised to March 31 in
formal communication
A letter wold be submitted to the
World Bank Country Director for Additional Funding of
Readiness activities.
Feb 15, 2016 FORDIA Revised to March 31 at
request of GOI
REDD Readiness Additional Funding work plan along with
a procurement plan would be
submitted to the Bank.
Feb 15, 2016 DG-CC
Agreed to submit prior to and discuss during
upcoming mission in
mid-April 2016
For REDD Readiness Additional Financing, MoEF would
inform the World Bank of the
mandatory steps and timeline for approval of: 1) a new GA;
and 2) an amended GA.
Feb 19, 2016 FORDIA Revised to March 31
MoEF would inform the Bank of
the final proposed implementation arrangements
for the Additional Funding.
Feb 15, 2016 DG-CC
Agreed to submit prior
to and discuss during upcoming mission in
mid-April 2016
A revised ER-PIN for virtual
review by Carbon Fund Participants would be
submitted to the World Bank.
Feb 29, 2016 FORDIA Completed.
The GOI to inform the Bank regarding which GOI agency
would be responsible for
working with the Bank and
Jan 20, 2016 DG-CC Completed
2 Following the FCPF coordination meeting held on February 29 these agreed action plan has been revised due to the
needs for additional time for internal discussion among the MOEF team.
8 | P a g e
donors under the REDD
Support Facility.
MoEF would document the status
of SESA work to-date,
including consultations and outcomes.
March 15, 2016 DG-CC Revised to March 31
MOEF will work with WB to
identify ways to strengthen
FIP ESMF to serve as ESMF for Readiness activities
March 31, 2016 DG-CC
The decision on the preliminary
geographic scope of the
BioCarbon program and a responsible counterpart will be
made and the World Bank will
be informed.
Mar 22, 2016 DG-CC
Agreed to discuss
during upcoming mission in mid-April
2016
The MoEF will send comments on
the safeguards related progress
and agreed next steps.
Feb 19, 2016 DG-CC Revised to March 18
9 | P a g e
Annexes:
Annex A: Agenda
Annex B: List of Participants
Annex C: Status of activities implemented under current Grant Agreement of FCPF Readiness Grant
Annex D: Initial Project Development Objective and associated outcome indicators
Annex E: Detailed comments from FCPF FMT on the Revised ER-PIN (submitted on December 17, 2015)
10 | P a g e
Annex A: Agenda
Monday, January 11
Time Venue Agenda Responsible/Team Composition
08:30 - 09:00 PPI Formal opening of mission. Review of agenda.
Lead: Henry Bastaman (Director General of FODIA)
Participants: FORDIA, DG CC, KLN
09:00 – 10:00 Presentation and discussion on the status and priority of the national REDD+ implementation
Emma Rahmawati (DC CC)
10:00 – 10:15 Coffee break
11:30 - Leave for Balikpapan, East Kalimantan Garuda Air GA 568 JKT – BLP 3:30 – 6:45 PM. Travel to Samarinda and Check in at Aston Hotel
Tuesday, January 12
Time Venue Agenda Responsible/Team
Composition
09:00 – 12:00 Guvernor Office, Samarinda
a. Discussion with relevant stakeholders involved in the ER-PIN preparation
Lead: DDPI Participants: WB, MoEF,
DDPI, partners
12:00 – 12:30 b. Meet with governor and key stakeholders to understand key challenges in reducing deforestation and degradation.
12:30 – 17:30 c. Visit selected field sites (Bukit Soeharto) and discussion on sites to understand challenges being addressed by ER-PIN
Wednesday, January 13
Time Venue Agenda Responsible/Team
Composition
09:00 – 10:00 Selyca Mulia Hotel, Samarinda
FCPF Carbon Fund a. Presentation on the status, process
and progress to date, including potential priority activities
Lead: DDPI Participants: WB, MoEF,
DDPI, partners Presentation: Zahrul
Muttaqin (MoEF)
10:00 – 10:30 b. Presentation on example of jurisdiction approach currently implemented by TNC in Berau, East Kalimantan
Niel Makinuddin (TNC)
11:00 – 12:00 c. Presentation on timeline Alex Lotsch (WB)
12:00 – 13:00 Lunch
13:00 – 17:30 d. Focus group discussion: PDO and outcome indicators
Thursday, January 14
11 | P a g e
Time Venue Agenda Responsible/Team
Composition
08:30 – 10:00 Selyca Mulia Hotel, Samarinda
Discussion on Reference Emission Level Presentation: main feedback from FMT on
the revised ER-PIN (submitted on Dec 17, 2015)
Lead: DDPI Participants: WB, MoEF,
DDPI, partners Presentation: Alex Lotsch
(WB)
09:00 – 12:00 FORDIA office, Bogor
Parallel discussion on procurement and Financial Management
FM and Procurement Specialist from WB and FORDIA
12:00 - Travel to Airport Depart: GA BLP – JKT 3:55 – 5 PM
Friday, January 15
Time Venue Agenda Responsible/Team
Composition
08:00 – 09:00 Secretariate General Room Manggala Wanabakti
Meeting with the Secretary General: a. Presentation on WB support to
REDD+ implementation and sustainable landscapes
b. Strategic priorities for MOEF with the WB REDD+ financing
Lead: Agus Justianto Presentation: AJ Glauber Participants: FORDIA, DG CC,
KLN
09:00 – 09:30 Presentation on field visit findings, relevance to ER-PIN development Subarudi (FORDIA)
09:30 - 10:30 FCPF Readiness Fund Reporting on the country progress
monitoring framework, including: a. status and update of the project b. project achievement to-date (for
each Component) c. status of project implementation
(disbursement, procurement) d. main lessons learned, issues and
challenges e. Implication from the project
restructuring (activities, implementation arrangement)
Lead: Sri Murniningtyas Presentation: Tri Wahyudiyati
(FORDIA)
10:30 – 11:30 FCPF Additional Financing Presentation and discussion on proposed
scope and implementation arrangements
Niken Sakuntaladewi (FORDIA)
11:30– 13:30 Lunch and Friday Praying
13:30 – 17:30 Cont. discussion on FCPF Readiness Fund – review status of activities per focus area and discuss priority activities for the remaining budget, next steps and timeline
12 | P a g e
Monday, January 18
Time Venue Agenda Responsible/Team
Composition
08:30 – 10:00 Manggala Wanabakti (tbd)
Meeting with Development Partners: Discussion on an ongoing/potential
complementary activities and co-financing
Lead: Bambang Tri Hartono (FORDIA)
Participants: DPs, MoEF, Bappenas, MoF
10:00 – 10:30 Coffee break
10:30 – 11:00 Bio Carbon Fund ISFL a. Presentation and discussion on the
BioCarbon Fund
Alex Lotsch (WB)
11:00 – 11:30 b. Presentation on the result of feasibility assessment
George Stirrett Wood (WB)
11:00 – 12:30 Discussion on the preliminary objective and initial thoughts from the GoI on: geographical scope; Implementation arrangement; linkages to GoI's emerging priorities
Lead: FORDIA Participants: FORDIA,
DG CC, MoF,
12:30 – 13:30 Lunch
13:30 – 14:30 Discussion on next steps and timeline for program preparation
14:30 – 16:00 Presentation and discussion on safeguards a. progress to date to finalize
SESA/ESMF at national level
Novia Widyaningtyas
(DG CC)
Tuesday, January 19
Time Venue Agenda Responsible/Team
Composition
10:00 - 12:00 FORDIA, Bogor Wrap-up meeting Lead: Henry Bastaman (DG of FORDIA)
Participants: FORDIA, DG CC, MoF, Bappenas
12:00 – 13:00 Lunch + technical discussion on REL
13:00 – 15:30 Cont. wrap up meeting (finalizing the draft Aide Memoire
15:30 – 17:00 Discussion on priority activities under FCPF Additional Financing
13 | P a g e
Annex B: List of Participants
World Bank
1 Ann Jeannette Glauber World Bank 081219458102 [email protected]
2 Alexander Lotsch World Bank [email protected]
3 Dinesh Aryal World Bank +12024468982 [email protected]
4 George Henry Stirrett Wood World Bank 081286063144 [email protected]
5 Tini Gumartini World Bank 081221229873 [email protected]
6 Azis Khan World Bank
7 Emile Jurgens World Bank
8 Budi Permana World Bank 08128226432 [email protected]
9 ID W. Kusuma World Bank 081511889341 [email protected]
10 Jeffry Anwar World Bank 08129603171
11 Anita Kendrick World Bank 08129530448 [email protected]
13 Fajar Argo Djati World Bank
Government of Indonesia
No Nama Instansi HP E-Mail
Ministry of Environment
and Forestry
Forest Research Development
and Innovation Agency
(FORDIA)
Henry Bastaman P3SEKPI 08181135225 [email protected]
Bambang Tri Hartono P3SEKPI 081392608482 [email protected]
Niken Sakuntaladewi P3SEKPI
14 | P a g e
Tri Wahyudiyati P3SEKPI 0811053558 [email protected]
M. Zahrul Muttaqin P3SEKPI
Galih Kartika Sari P3SEKPI
Retno Maryani P3SEKPI 081310797717 [email protected]
Subarudi P3SEKPI
Haruni Krisnawati P3SEKPI 081315662519 [email protected]
Sri Sulawati P3SEKPI
Mohammad Iqbal P3SEKPI
Indartik P3SEKPI
Ratna Widyaningsih P3SEKPI
Mirna Aulia Pribadi P3SEKPI
Retno Wijaya P3SEKPI
Deden Djaenudin P3SEKPI
Iis Alviya P3SEKPI
Directorate General of
Climate Change
Emma Rachmawaty Dir. of Climate Change
Mitigation
081585302888 [email protected]
Novia Widyaningtyas Dir. of Climate Change
Mitigation
081329346418 [email protected]
Idham Cholik Dir. of Climate Change
Mitigation
085292344567
Suyitno Dir. of Climate Change
Mitigation
085292344567 [email protected]
Haryo Pambudi Dir. of Climate Change
Mitigation
085743486650 [email protected]
Wawan Gunawan Dir. of GHG Inventory ad
MRV
081584685777 [email protected]
Secretariat General
Agus Justianto SAM, Natural Resource
Economics
15 | P a g e
Sri Murniningtyas International Cooperation
Bureau
5701114
Tri Jatmiko International Cooperation
Bureau
081383043906 [email protected]
Dino International Cooperation
Bureau
Tri Jatmiko International Cooperation
Bureau
081383043906 [email protected]
Arfan Adhi K Planning Bureau 081333216085 [email protected]
Tri N Planning Bureau 081260664458 [email protected]
Eka Febriyanti Planning Bureau 085728966093 [email protected]
Deden S Biro Umum
Rokhmiati Setjen 081315174775
Jamaludin Biro Umum
Agus Hm Biro Umum
Didi S Biro Umum
Joko M Biro Umum
Suradi Biro Umum
Gede Y.P Biro Umum
Lawin Bastian KLHK 081212242520
Rudi Karyono TU
Heri Nofian INHUT 081804962525 [email protected]
Anjar Yogie INHUT 081322123301 [email protected]
Yadi Mulyadi Sekretariat
Riska Dian A IPSDH planologi 08563716480
Eko S.W Putro ISDH/Planologi 08121551106 [email protected]
Rasito
Vida
Darto
Ministry of Finance
16 | P a g e
Adisty Badan Kebijakan Fiskal,
Kemenkeu
081287713331 [email protected]
Djoko Hendratto Direktur PPK
BLU/Kemenkeu
Ari Wahyuni Direktur SMI/Kemenkeu
Ismed Dit SMI/Kemenkeu
Dwi A Dit PPK BLU/Kemenkeu
BAPPENAS
Pungky Widiaryanto BAPPENASS 081578056455 [email protected]
Provincial Government, East Kalimantan
No Nama Instansi HP Email
Awang Farouk
11 Daddy Ruchyat DDPI
15 Yosua Naibaho DDPI 081347249271 [email protected]
22 Nela Mariana DDPI 08125522147 [email protected]
30 Dina Riska DDPI 081350031982 [email protected]
31 Reski Udayanti DDPI 085250804443 [email protected]
33 Soeyitno S DDPI E 0811585649
19 Dedi PDKLLL 08133279822 [email protected]
44 Sopian Noor BLH Provinsi East
Kalimantan
081347080819 [email protected]
6 Erwinsyah 081346255852 [email protected]
8 D Momo Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi 085247151961 [email protected]
12 Hadi Wardoyo Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi 08125512688
13 Sutrisno Hardadi Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi 081269838111
12 Hadi Wardoyo Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi 08125512688
9 Anwar Saleh Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi 081347719010
32 Chairil Anwar Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi
17 | P a g e
12 Wilma Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi 08125851826
11 Henny H Dinas Perkebunan
Provinsi
082072225165
18 Aspianur A FAuzi POKJA REDD+ 082157093089
12 Wilma Dinas Kehutanan
Provinsi
08125851826
9 Henny Hendiyanto Dinas Perkebunan East
Kalimantan
082172225165
10 Ujang Rachman Bappeda Provinsi [email protected]
19 Nurani Citra A Bappeda Provinsi 081253110694 [email protected]
17 Nurani Citra Bappeda Provinsi 081253110694
16 Fachrudin BLH Provinsi
20 Syahrial BLH Provinsi 081283078139
44 Sopian Noor BLH Provinsi 081347080819 [email protected]
17 Djulson S Kapuangan Dinas Pertambangan
Provinsi
081347335438 [email protected]
34 Isabella SP Setda Provinsi
20 Pathur Rahman As’ari Biro Perekonomian Setda
Provinsi
08125806703 [email protected]
21 Istiko Tj Biro Perekonomian Setda
Provinsi
081347312006
24 Sutan Alamsyah UPTD Pengeola THR
Bukit Soeharto
08138050463
25 Rusmadi UPTD Pengelola THR
Bukit Soeharto
08125527743 [email protected]
18 FX. Sumary UPTD Bukit Soeharto 082254540861
27 Tabroni Balai Besar Dipterocarpa 081219300505 [email protected]
21 Farida h Susanty Balai Besar Penelitian
Dipterocarpa
08125342759 [email protected]
29 Ahmad Gadang P Balitek KPA Samboja 082190019695 [email protected]
38 Anggi Arindya Protokol Gubernur 08115572020
18 | P a g e
39 Ade Almeira Protokol Gubernur
36 Azhar Rahman Biro Humas 081253741529
37 Aji Enny Rivim Biro PPWK
40 Arwindya Dini Biro PPWK
41 Iskaridan Biro PPWK
35 Siti Masithah Biro PPWK 081952474779
18 Aspianur A FAuzi POKJA REDD+ 082157093089
19 Dedi PDKLLL 08133279822 [email protected]
x6 Erwinsyah 081346255852 [email protected]
Non-Governmental Organization/Universities, East Kalimantan
No Nama Instansi HP Email
1 Pajar Gumilar BIOMA 085250501166 [email protected]
2 Alfan Subekti GIZ FORCLIME 08125425059 [email protected]
3 Lenny Christy GIZ Gelamai 08115804417 [email protected]
4 Daru Widyatmoko GAPKI 08136602323 [email protected]
5 Ismail Arrasyid AMAN 081350180166
6 Delon Marthinus TNC 08111180262 [email protected]
7 Niel makinuddin TNC 0811552624 [email protected]
8 M. Fadli Yayasan Bumi 082158168061 [email protected]
9 Dyah Catur Global Green
GrowthInstitute/GGGI
081347082975 [email protected]
10 Herliati Rahmi GGGI 08125872584 [email protected]
11 Agus Budi GAPKI 081358675701 [email protected]
12 Akas P. Sujalu UNTAG 1945 082157612433
13 Deddy Akdriyaksa C3S-UNMUL 0811555051
14 Erina APHI 085387747442 [email protected]
14 Delon Marthinus TNC 08111180262 [email protected]
16 Niel Makinuddin TNC 0811552624
19 | P a g e
Development Partners
No Nama Instansi HP Email
1 Adam Gerrand FAO/UN-REDD [email protected]
2 Peter Oksen ESP3/DANIDA 8577981005
3 Taswin Munir ESP3 085772020117 [email protected]
4 Tom Owen Edmund British Embassy/UKCCU [email protected]
5 Dwi Puji Lestari FAO 082337853982 [email protected]
6 Marthien Lux UNDP 08119200930 [email protected]
7 Rini Astuti UNDP 082136033699 [email protected]
8 Nadyhda Yegay Canadian Embassy 08191000064 [email protected]
9 Erik Streed USAID 08118437953 [email protected]
10 Ovind Dahz Norway EMbassy 08118052028 [email protected]
11 Georg Badihol GIZ/FORCLIME 08118117205 [email protected]
12 Jean-Hugues de Fanl-reault AFD 081210648624
13 Wahjudi Wardojo TNC 08118890894 [email protected]
14 Herlina Hertanto TNC 08118118923
15 Tian Partiani ITTO
16 Elisda Damayanti ITTO
20 | P a g e
Annex C: Status of activities implemented under current Grant Agreement of FCPF Readiness Grant
ANNUAL WORK PLAN FOREST CARBON PARTNERSHIP FACILITY (FCPF) GRANT No. TF.99721-ID
10 Juni 2011 - 30 November 2016
NO Sources of Funds : 2011-2016
Implementing Agency
Status up to 2015
cummulative
Sources of Funds :
The World Bank
34,489,372,865
Total Sources of Funds
34,489,372,865
Uses of Funds :
Focus Area 1: Analytical Works
1 1.1
Analyze drivers of deforestation from a development perspective, land use demands, and demographic development
World Bank Done?
2 1.2 Identity priority investments needed to reduce deforestation and forest degradation
World Bank Done
3
1.3 Identifity Activities Within the country that result in reducing emision and increasing removal
770,564,544
PUSPIJAK Done
4 1.4 Stakeholder coordination comprehensive mitigation action for REDD+
162,467,800
PUSPIJAK Done
Focus Area 2: Management of readiness process
2.1 Institutional setting and legal framework for REDD Impementation:
5
2.1.1 Stakeholder process to review existing regulatory framework and formulate an integrated REDD Regulation
178,603,000
PUSTANLING Done
6
2.1.3 Develop guidance for effective engagement of indegenous people and local communities (DKN)
72,100,000
PUSPIJAK Done
21 | P a g e
7
Develop guidance for effective engagement of indegenous people and local communities (DKD Maluku)
543,407,250
PUSPIJAK Done
8
2.2 Capacity building of institution and stakeholders involved in the implementation of REDD activities : ToT on carbon accounting and monitoring (ground check and spatial data analysis) at sub-nat levels.
1,996,724,250
PUSTANLING Done
9 2.2.2 Training of trainers on carbon accounting and monitoring at central level
148,154,150
PUSPIJAK Done
10 2.4.2
Dissemination of information throguh website and printed publication (rephrased to become "Dissemination of information of FCPF REDD+ readiness preparation")
2,025,602,500
PUSPIJAK has change to P3SEKPI
Will be continued in
2016
11 2.4.3
Workshop to develop guidance for effective engagement of indigenous people and local communities
334,735,000
PUSPIJAK Done
12
2.4.4 1. WS/dialogues on drivers of deforestation from a development perspective, land use and demands, demographic development
937,821,700
PUSTANLING Done
2.4.4 2. workshop on investment
priority to reduce deforestation
WORLD BANK Done
13
2.4.4 3. Consultation to identify activities within the country that result in reduced emissions and increased removals, and stabilization of forest carbon stocks
1,095,644,450
PUSTANLING Done
14 2.4.5 Public consultation in Jakarta on
institutional setting and legal framework
478,514,500
PUSTANLING Done
15
2.4.6 Finalize National REDD WG--> direvisi mjd : Establishment of Information System of Safeguards
166,901,000
PUSTANLING Done
16
2.4.6 Public consultation to facilitate establishment of REDD WG at sub-national level
383,458,000
PUSTANLING Done
17
2.4.7 Outreach on management of data and lessons on readiness activities / DA
590,713,800
PUSTANLING Done
22 | P a g e
18 2.4.9 Workshop PSP to discuss and
strategy of future maintenance of PSP
1,458,830,200
PUSPIJAK Done
19 2.4.10 Workshop on MRV 539,030,150
PUSPIJAK Done
20 2.4.12 Stakeholder analysis: Workhsop DA
100,637,600
PUSPIJAK Done
21
2.5 Management of data, lessons , and funding partner coordination, including periodic review of demonstration activities
666,426,100
PUSTANLING Done
22
2.6 Development of SESA : direvisi menjadi : Development of SESA Encourage and strengthen the implementation of safeguards national policies and framework for the implementation of REDD+ in Indonesia
1,342,847,000
DKN, revised to DG-CC
Will be continued in
2016
-Facilitation for preparation (targeted process of incentive result-based payment mechanism for REDD+ small activities
DG-CC
-Initial Process for bio carbon
fund preparation DG-CC
23
Encourage Safeguards National Polices In Implementation Of REDD+ In Indonesia : Delivers of National Forestry Cpuncil (DKN) side views about safeguards and formulate next strategic movement
PUSPIJAK
Focus Area 3 : Reference Emission Level (REL) and Measurement Reporting and Verification (MRV)
24 3.2
Development of a time series analysis of the primary social economic and policy aspects of land use change
986,491,800
PUSPIJAK Done
25 3.3
Reenumeration of the new PSPs and reenumeration of the existing PSPs direvisi menjadi : Establishment of Permanent Sampl Plots (PSPs) for ground-based foret carbon monitoring (for estimating forest related GHGs emissoins by sources and removals by sinks and monitoring forest carbon stock change), maintenance
3,512,282,849
PUSPIJAK has change to P3SEKPI
Will be continued in
2016
23 | P a g e
the PSPs that have been developed (enumeration of the new PSP and re-enumeration of the existing PSPs)
26 3.3.1 Development of Suistanable monitoring forest carbon application system
1,494,252,800
PUSPIJAK Done
27
Forest Carbon Monitoring Database to Support National Forest carbon Monitoring System (NFMS)
511,364,200
PUSPIJAK Done
Focus Area 4: Regional Data Collection and Capacity Building
-
28
4.1 1.Capacity building and studies to set up REDD+ framework at selected area (locatios : South Kal., West Papua, South Sul., Musi Rawas Distrit, South Sum., NAD) (being revised: capacity building to develop and improve REDD+ Framework at selected area, with mainstreaming/combining both climate change adaptation and mitigation ( sub national level in Eastern part of Indonesia)
2,320,356,000
PUSTANLING revised to DG-CC
Will be continued in
2016
29
2.Capacity Building and study to set up REDD+ Framework including developing socio economic and biophysical baseline data
1,003,193,344
PUSPIJAK PUSPIJAK
30
3.Developing baseline data of socio economics and biophysics
263,647,400
PUSPIJAK PUSPIJAK
31
- Preparation and submission of ERPIN carbon fund (being revised: Facilitation for finalizing ER-PIN)
936,571,070
PUSPIJAK has change to P3SEKPI
Will be continued in
2016
32
- Facilitation for preparing ERPD :
1,397,660,000
PUSPIJAK has change to P3SEKPI
Will be continued in
2016
- Study on how to effectively
address the drivers of deforestation
- mainstreaming CF based
emissons reduction program in the distric development plan
- Calculating cost of ER
Programs in Kaltim and volume of carbon emissions that can be
24 | P a g e
reduced by each prioritised activity
33
- Public consultation to facilitate establishment facilitation of REDD+ working group at sub national level
539,310,000
PUSPIJAK has change to P3SEKPI
Will be continued in
2016
34 Procurement Plann ( Repository,Mebeler and website, plann buy to vehicle, travels)
341,956,350
PUSPIJAK PUSPIJAK
35 Facilitation for Supporting the Focus Areas (SFA) ; Travels, Meetings, Honorarium, Outsourcing)
7,189,104,058
PUSPIJAK has change to P3SEKPI
Will be continued in
2016
Total
34,489,372,865
25 | P a g e
Annex D: Initial Project Development Objective and associated outcome indicators
Summary of two groups (national and sub national level) discussed about the initial project development objective with associated outcome indicators.
Group 1: National level
PDO: To achieve sustainable forest management
Intervensi Tolak Ukur
Fisik/Ekologi Sosial Ekonomi
Restorasi Ekosistem
(policy beda ijin
usaha, kemudahan
ijin)
Tutupan meningkat
Riap meningkat
Biodiversity
meningkat (flora dan
fauna)
Partisipasi
masyarakat
meningkat
Multifier effect
kesejahteraan
masyarakat
HPH
(policy harga pasar) Tutupan meningkat Konflik
menurun
Perambahan
menurun
PNBP meningkat
Pajak meningkat
Multifier effect
kesejahteraan
masyarakat
Hutan Tanaman
(policy harga pasar) Tutupan tetap
Produktivitas
Konflik
menurun
Perambahan
menurun
PNBP meningkat
Pajak meningkat
Multifier effect
kesejahteraan
masyarakat
Sosial Forestry Tutupan meningkat Konflik
menurun
Perambahan
menurun
Penghasilan meningkat
APL Berhutan (policy perubahan
status kawasan)
Tutupan tetap Perambahan
menurun
Ada
pengelolanya
(ownership)
Jasa lingkungan
Hutan Lindung Tutupan tetap
Biodiversity
Konflik
menurun
Perambahan
menurun
Jasa lingkungan
Multifier effect
Hutan Konservasi Tutupan tetap
Biodiversity
meningkat
Konflik
menurun
Perambahan
menurun
Jasa lingkungan
Ecotourism
Multifier effect
Pertambangan di
kawasan hutan Tutupan meningkat
Biodiversity
meningkat (flora dan
fauna)
Partisipasi
meningkat
Penghasilan
meningkat
26 | P a g e
Key Partners Responsibility Support Needed
Nasional KemenLHK Koordinator
pelaksanaan kegiatan
pengurangan emisi
Penguatan
koordinasi
Kemenkeu Financial policy Technical assistant
BAPPENAS Mengintegrasikan
pembangunan rendah emisi
ESDM Tambang ramah
lingkungan
Penilaian
rehabilitasi tambang (teknikal aspek)
Pertanian/
perkebunan
Perkebunan ramah
lingkungan (policy)
Sub Nasional
Propinsi DDPI Koordinator Kelembagaan (finansial
support) Dinas Kehutanan Teknikal aspek
BAPPEDA RPJP, pendanaan
BLH Teknikal aspek
Dinas Pertambangan Teknikal aspek (tambang)
Dinas Perkebunan Teknikal aspek
Dinas Tanaman Pangan Teknikal aspek
KPH Pengelolaan hutan, SFM
NGO Pendampingan, advokasi
DKD Pendampingan
Distrik Dinas Kehutanan Teknikal aspek Kelembagaan (finansial
support) BAPPEDA RPJP, pendanaan
BLH Teknikal aspek
Dinas Pertambangan Teknikal aspek (tambang)
Dinas Perkebunan Teknikal aspek
Dinas Tanaman Pangan Teknikal aspek
KPH Pengelolaan hutan, SFM
NGO Pendampingan, advokasi
27 | P a g e
Tapak Masyarakat Pelaksana kegiatan
pengurangan emisi
Kelembagaan
Pemegang ijin Pelaksana kegiatan
pengurangan emisi
Kelembagaan
Group 2: Sub national level
Project expected to achieve by 2024 (PDO):
Penurunan deforestasi dan Degradasi:
Untuk bisa berkontribusi terhadap INDC 29%, Kaltim harus menurunkan laju deforestasi dari
78.944 ha/tahun menjadi 54.000 ha/tahun di tahun 2024
Penurunan Emisi:
Emisi Kaltim 2024: 39 juta ton CO2/tahun
Target 29% INDC untuk Kaltim : 11,4 juta ton CO2/tahun
Ekspektasi di tahun 2024 : 27,6 ton CO2/tahun SFM:
• HCV, RIL, HCS, HVC, Social Forestry
Mining : Tidak ada ijin baru
Plantation: 100% ISPO Other:
Provincial Strategic Area (HoB, Danau Semayang, Jempang, melintang)
Success Indicators:
1 Laju deforestasi Kaltim 54.000 ha/tahun
2 Emisi Kaltim 27,6 ton Co2/tahun
3 Perkebunan yang telah memiliki kelas kebun telah mencapai ISPO 100% 4 SFM dari 76 HPH, (mininal 50% RIL)
5 Tidak ada ijin baru untuk Pertambangan
Who will implement the Project:
Implementing agency : Pemerintah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur (DDPI)
Key partners for project
implementation
Responsible What support needed
(Technical
Assistance,
Funding)
National • KLHK (Dirjen PPI dan
Balitbang)
• Kementan (Dirjen Bun)
• ESDM (Dirjen Minerba)
• Kemendesa, PDT dan
transmigrasi
• Koordinasi
dan
implementasi
• Support legislasi
REDD+ fund untuk
program ( misal Peta
masyarakat adat)
28 | P a g e
• Kementrian Agraria dan Tata Ruang
• Kemenkeu
• BNPB
• Pembiayaan
Province Pemerintah Provinsi
District Pemerintah Kabupaten
NGOs/communities TNC, WWF, GIZ, GGGI, BIOMA, Bumi, Asosiasi
(APHI, GAPKI, Apkasindo,
APBBI, GPPI, Asosiasi
Petani Kelapa Sawit, Masyakarat Peduli Api,
Kelompok Tani Peduli Api)
• Advokasi dan
fasilitasi • Pendanaan
• Capacity
Building
Parking lot:
Standart apa yang digunakan untuk memverifikasi penurunan emisi
Bagaimana mekanisme memilih verifikator penuruan emisi
Siapa yang membiayai proses verifikasi penurunan emisi FREL apakah akomodatif terhadap kegiatan logging
29 | P a g e
Annex E: Comments on Indonesia Draft ER-PIN (version 17.12.2015)
Section 2: Political Commitment This section could be made considerably more concise. The last two paragraphs, dealing with project
partners could be moved to section 4.
Section 3: Strategic Context and Rationale of the ER Program The ER Program, in terms of activities and funding, is derived from East Kalimantan’s Action Plan on
Reducing Greenhouse Gases (RAD GRK) and the provincial medium term development plan. In
Section 3, and in the ER-PIN overall, there is room for making this connection more explicit by highlighting how these documents were developed including the relevant consultation processes, the
supporting analytical work, and by describing the implementation progress to date. There should be a
discussion of how the finance from the Carbon Fund complements the existing plans and activities.
Section 4: ER Program Location and Lifetime The background section on East Kalimantan should include a highlight of the value of the province’s forest
resources. This would be part of the justification for locating the ER Program in the province, and for
the ER Program overall. The description should include a summary of East Kalimantan’s forest cover broken down by forest type, and the social and economic values associated with the forests. The former
is also relevant to the section on reference levels, and the latter to the sections on non-carbon benefits
and possibly tenure.
Table 1 on KPH needs to be better integrated into the text. If KPH are playing an important role in the
program, that role should be clearly defined.
The current date for the ERPA may be overly ambitious: following the signing of the LOI, it is expected
that there will be an 18-month exclusivity period, followed by a 6-month negotiation period. The ERPA should not be expected before mid-2018. The implementation period of the CF has been extended to
the end of 2025, which means that the accounting period can include the year 2024, and the final MRV
could be in December 2024. A reasonable timeline is as follows3:
Action Responsible Entity Expected Date
ER-PIN Submitted GOI/MOEF February 2016
ER-PIN Reviewed and Selected into
Pipeline
CF Participants and WB March/April 2016
Letter of Intent Signed GOI/MOEF and WB July 2016
FCPF R-Package Submitted and
Endorsed by FCPF Participants
GOI/MOEF February 2017
Draft ER Program Document Prepared MOEF with technical
support from WB
June 2017
ER Program Document Submitted GOI/MOEF October 2017
ER Program Document Reviewed and
Selected
CF Participants and WB November 2017
ERPA Negotiation CF Participants and WB and GOI/MOEF
(approx. 6 months)
ERPA Signed May 2018
(18 months after LOI)
Implementation, Verification, Payments CF Participants and GOI/MOEF
July 2018- December 2024
3 https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/carbon-fund-0
30 | P a g e
Section 5: Activities and Interventions
Table 2 provides a long list of policies to address deforestation in East Kalimantan. It should be clarified whether these are planned policies or whether they are currently being implemented, and how they are
linked to the ER Program.
Current activities proposed in the ER-PIN are those that are described in the RAD-GRK. To the extend that
this is an ongoing and clearly funded program this could compromise the additionality aspect of the ER Program. If on the other hand the RAD-GRK program is not clearly funded, this should be noted in the
section on financing. The CF primarily addresses additionality through conservative approaches to
setting Reference Levels (e.g., including existing and clearly funded programs or activities within the Reference Level). The ER-PIN should aim to demonstrate how the CF is supporting the implementation
of the RAD-GRK.
Section 6: Stakeholder Information Sharing, Consultation and Outreach The section on previous stakeholder engagement, besides discussing consultations on the ER-PIN should
also describe the consultation process related to the RAD-GRK since that largely constitutes the actual
program. The section on planned outreach and consultation could be strengthened.
Section 7: Operational and Financial Planning (Institutional Arrangements) Currently the only included funding source for the ER Program is the national and subnational budget
allocation for the RAD-GRK program. There should be some discussion of how secure that funding is,
and how established the implementation of the RAD-GRK is (see also note on additionality). Additional effort should be made to identify program partners and include additional funding sources.
Examples of likely program partners include TNC, WWF, and private sector companies.
Section 8: Reference Level and Expected Emissions Reductions The method for developing the Reference Level should be clearly presented so that stakeholders can
understand how the RL was constructed. This requires, among other things, a clear description of how
the emissions from peat decomposition were calculated. Also the table on carbon stocks of various land
covers (Table 6) should be better explained- how were these numbers derived and do they match IPCC submissions? If possible it would be good to show which drivers have been responsible for how much
of the emissions. Also whether there has been a trend in the emissions during the Reference Period and
beyond. Similarly, a short analysis of emissions related to peatland fires could be performed to assess the significance of these emissions. The description of such analyses could be placed in a short annex.
The design of the Reference Level deviates in several aspects from the requirements set out in the
Methodological Framework (MF).
The definition of forest used in the construction of the Reference Level should be specified (Indicator 12.1).
According to Indicator 11.2, the start-date for the Reference Period should be about 10 years before the
end-date, and the start date should not be more than 15 years before the end-date. However, the
Reference Period used in the draft is from 1990 to 2012 (22 years). This can be fixed by excluding the years 1990 and 1996 from the calculation of the Reference Level.
According to Indicator 13.1, the Reference Level may not exceed the average annual historical emissions
over the Reference Period (Note that Indonesia’s ER Program does not qualify for adjustment of the Reference Level above average annual historical emissions.). However, the current Reference Level
includes a significant increase in emissions in a number of land use planning categories that have been
allocated for development, and this substantially raises the Reference Level above the average
emissions level for the Reference Period. This should be fixed.
Given that the RL needs to be a simple historical average, the usefulness of the Transition Probability
Matrix (TPM) and the division into separate land use classifications could be re-assessed.
31 | P a g e
As indicated by the draft ER-PIN, it is expected that planned development in East Kalimantan will lead to
(BAU) emissions over the program period that are significantly higher than the average annual historical emissions over the Reference Period. Using the historical average emissions as a reference
level (as required by the MF) will therefore reduce the amount of saleable ERs that can be achieved.
Following the recalculation of the RL, it will be important to evaluate the feasibility of reducing
emissions below the RL, and the impact on the level of revenue from the sale of ERs to the CF.
Section 9: Forest Monitoring System
The ER Program should ensure that consistent methods and Accounting Area are to be maintained between
estimation of emissions in the Reference Period and during the Term of the ERPA. Similarly, the focus of Section 9.2 needs to be on the consistency (or explanation of differences) with the monitoring
approach at the national level.
Sections 10 and 11: Leakage and Reversals The current draft proposes a buffer of 40% to account for the risk of displacement and reversal. The CF is
currently developing a guideline which links the size of buffers to the estimated risks of
reversal/displacement, with buffers ranging from around 10% to 40%. The ER-PIN should include
some discussion of how the 40% was derived. A 40% buffer could be appropriate if there is a significant risk of reversal, for example through fire.
Section 12: Expected Emissions Reductions
Table 13 shows an expected ER of 24% every year but there is no calculation of how this number was derived. The ER estimate should be made using a bottom-up approach, ideally beginning with the ERs
attributed to each of the major drivers of deforestation, and linking Program activities to specific drivers
and to specific ER estimates.
Section 14: Land and Resource Tenure
More information on issues specific to East Kalimantan would help strengthen this section. In addition,
there could be a discussion of how the ER Program may help resolve ongoing land and resource tenure
challenges.
Section 15: Benefit Sharing
Some of the discussion seems more relevant to the channeling of funds for program implementation, than
to distribution of proceeds from ER sales.
Editorial and Style Issues
There are a number of sections that could be made more compelling by for example tightening the language,
removing unnecessary or irrelevant information, and improving the fit with the overall storyline. There
are some inconsistencies in the dates mentioned that need to be revised.