1 nrcan report anil parekh presented to chba trc march 3, 2010

22
1 NRCan Report NRCan Report Anil Parekh Anil Parekh Presented to CHBA TRC Presented to CHBA TRC March 3, 2010 March 3, 2010

Upload: nickolas-cobb

Post on 17-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

NRCan ReportNRCan Report

Anil ParekhAnil Parekh

Presented to CHBA TRCPresented to CHBA TRCMarch 3, 2010March 3, 2010

2

Housing Research ActivitiesHousing Research Activities

OEE Programs Next Generation R-2000 Standard ENERGY STAR for New Homes Next Generation EnerGuide Rating System ecoENERGY Retrofits – Homes program

Research Projects Performance Results of House Mechanicals

3

R-2000 Standard RenewalR-2000 Standard Renewal

4

R-2000 Standard RenewalR-2000 Standard Renewal NRCan initiated renewal process for the R-2000 Standard.

Vision Provide the home building industry and consumers with a technical standard that

represents the leading edge of commercially-viable new home construction, based on available and proven technology, products, materials and building techniques.

Process and Progress to date: CHBA provided recommendations for enhancements to the Standard. Consultations and committee formation based on a Standard Council of Canada

type of process First meeting of the R-2000 Standard Renewal Committee was held in December

2009. recommended energy efficiency target of 50% better than current R2000 or

ERS-80 impact analysis was presented

Conference calls were conducted in the month of January to complete the review Next face-to-face committee meeting will be in the on March 17 and 18

5

ENERGY STAR for New HomesENERGY STAR for New Homes

6

ENERGY STAR for New HomesENERGY STAR for New Homes

Common Technical Specification for Ontario Brings together existing technical specifications to

standardize the marketplace No increase to the minimum requirements Public Review December 2009 Currently finalizing the specification

Next Generation ENERGY STAR for New Homes Process to begin in Spring 2010 Consultations and committee formation based on a

Standard Council of Canada type of process

7

Next GenerationNext GenerationEnerGuide Rating SystemEnerGuide Rating System

8

Development of the Next Development of the Next Generation EnerGuide Rating Generation EnerGuide Rating SystemSystem

NRCan initiated revision process for the EnerGuide Rating System (ERS). Vision

The vision for the next generation EnerGuide Rating System (ERS) process is to develop the most effective energy rating system, supported by the best tools and acceptable to and recognized by all stakeholders.

Parameters able to rate existing and new houses including net zero homes on the same scale only rate energy and factors that are related to energy use in the home ability to account for electrical loads, air conditioning and renewable energy complementary to energy codes. offer stability for stakeholders using the system able to help homeowners make informed decisions

Process and Progress to date: First meeting of the ERS Policy Advisory Committee will be on March 11 and 12. Consultations and committee formation based on a Standard Council of Canada

type of process Completed the background studies Initiated survey of existing stakeholders

9

ecoENERGY Retrofits - HomesecoENERGY Retrofits - Homes

10

ecoENERGY Retrofits - HomesecoENERGY Retrofits - Homes

Program reach: 2008-09: 257,400 home evaluations and 76,368 received incentives Apr 2009 to Feb 15, 2010: 302,770 evaluations and 162,130 received incentives ecoENERGY total: 581,900 homes evaluated and 256,140 qualified for incentives Popular with homes built before 1990 – almost 88% of all evaluations

Before After

Newfoundland & Labrador 3,219 1,005 0.0%Prince Edward Island 4,118 953 8.5%Nova Scotia 25,648 8,787 7.9%New Brunswick 26,726 9,397 9.2%Atlantic Region 59,711 20,142 7.1%Québec 45,961 18,280 2.1%Ontario 327,029 150,920 8.5%Manitoba 18,551 7,513 4.7%Saskatchewan 41,133 19,832 11.7%Alberta 29,302 11,141 3.1%Prairie Region 88,986 38,486 5.2%British Columbia 59,132 28,192 4.4%Nunavut 40 - 0.6%Northwest Territory 768 67 5.7%Yukon 279 53 2.6%North 1,087 120 3.5%Canada 581,906 256,140 5.8%

% Stock (pre 2000) covered with ecoENERGY Evaluations

Province

ecoENERGY Evaluation

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

Be

fore

19

45

19

45

-19

59

19

60

-19

69

19

70

-19

79

19

80

-19

89

19

90

-19

99

20

00

-20

10

Age Groups

Nu

mb

er o

f H

ou

se E

valu

atio

ns

11

Retrofit MeasuresRetrofit Measures Replace heating system with ENERGY STAR qualified model: 67%

installation of 92% AFUE furnace with energy efficient motor Add insulation to attic: 27% Insulate basement: 28% Reduce air leakage (air sealing): 45% Replace windows, doors with ENERGY STAR qualified units: 35%

Homeowners typically undertake more than one action Solar DHW ~ 950 installations GSHP ~ 6,745 installations

0

20

00

0

40

00

0

60

00

0

80

00

0

10

00

00

12

00

00

14

00

00

16

00

00

18

00

00

20

00

00

22

00

00

24

00

00

Total Number of Homes Retrofitted

Basement Upgrades

Attic Insulation

Above-grade Wall Insulation

Air-Sealing

Space Heating and Hot Water

Windows and Doors

Cooling Systems

Heat Pumps (Air and Ground)

Heat Recovery Ventilation

Number of Homes

12

IndicatorsIndicators 581,900 pre-retrofit evaluations since April 1/07

(a total of more than 800,000 homes since 1998)

80 Service Organizations licensed to date 1,880 active energy advisors Available across Canada Target for providing homeowner service within 2 weeks

Energy Efficiency Energy savings ranging from 32 to 98 GJ/year

– average 50 GJ/year/house – about 22% Improvement in Rating – average 10 points

GHG emissions – 3.1 tonnes per house per year Federal incentive ~ $1,400 per house (matching incentives added in

most jurisdictions) Homeowners have 18 months to complete upgrades and apply for grant

13

R&D Energy Technology R&D Energy Technology HighlightsHighlights… …

Comparing Comparing Performance of Performance of Mechanical Mechanical SystemsSystems

14

Performance of House Performance of House MechanicalsMechanicals Objective

Energy efficiency and system effectiveness performance of residential space heating, hot water and ventilation systems

Three different systems Conventional separate components: condensing furnace,

induced-draft DHW and HRV Combo: boiler, air handler and HRV Integrated Mechanic System (IMS): space heat, hot water and

HRV all integrated in a one unit Method

Side-by-side testing at Canadian Centre for Housing Technology (CCHT)

15

Performance Verification atPerformance Verification at

Canadian Centre for Housing TechnologyCanadian Centre for Housing Technology

Government of Canada test facility(www.ccht-cctr.gc.ca)

Research quality testing Side-by-side comparisons Commissioning -> benchmarking -> experiment

16

The Standard SystemThe Standard System

condensing natural gas furnace AFUE 90%

power-vented natural gas hot water tank EF of 0.58

heat recovery ventilator (HRV) SRE of 69% at 0 C, and

62% at -25 C

17

The Combination SystemThe Combination System

Boiler - 90% AFUE, Energy Star® qualified.

Air handler Pump between storage tank and

boiler Storage tank - 40 G (151L). HRV - SRE - 69% at 0 C, and

62% at -25 C.

18

Integrated Mechanical SystemIntegrated Mechanical System Condensing boiler provides

both space heat and hot water (Boiler AFUE 93%)

Integrated air handler has ECM motor

Integrated HRV with sensible recovery efficiency of 60% at 0o C

19

Load Profile and Energy UseLoad Profile and Energy Use

Predominantly DHW and ventilation

Part loads: space heat + DHW

+ ventilation

Full loads

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Percent of Days Above Given Load

Lo

ad

(M

J/d

ay)

Load Profile Standard System IMS Combo

20

Comparison of Standard and IMS

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Percent of Days Above Given Energy Use

En

erg

y (M

J/d

ay)

The IMS uses slightly more energy when loads are high

The IMS uses less energy during most of the year.

21

Energy Efficiency LevelsEnergy Efficiency Levels

Standard Combo IMSEnergy Use

Natural Gas (MJ) 80,880 89,590 83,370 Electricity (kWh) 2,840 4,670 1,020

Total Energy (MJ) 91,104 106,402 87,042

ComparisonsNatural Gas (MJ) Base 11% 3%Electricity (kWh) Base 64% -64%

Total Energy (MJ) Base 17% -4%

Annual Cost ($) 1,133$ 1,377$ 1,015$ Cost Savings Base 22% -10%

22

For More InformationFor More Information CanmetENERGY Research

Anil Parekh at 613 947 1959 ([email protected])

Jamie Glouchkow ([email protected])

Visit our Web site or contact us:www.ecoaction.gc.ca

1-800-387-2000 (publications)

1-800-622-6232 (homes)

ecoENERGY Retrofit program: Martin Gaudet

[email protected]

New Housing Programs: Jennifer Talsma

[email protected]