1 northern pipelining & practical experience presentation to:apegga april 21, 2005 calgary

20
1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to: APEGGA APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

Upload: geraldine-harper

Post on 28-Dec-2015

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

1

Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience

Presentation to:

APEGGAAPEGGAApril 21, 2005

Calgary

Page 2: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

2

Topics

• Enbridge (NW) Pipeline System Overview• “Northern” Pipeline Challenges and

Successes• Maintenance and Monitoring• Inspection and Integrity Management• Reporting• The people that make it possible

Page 3: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

3

Quick Facts

• Constructed: 1983 – 1985• Diameter: 323.8 mm• Length: 869 km• Design: Limit States• Features:

– 140 defined water crossings

– 2 major rivers

– 150 significant slopes

– ambient temperature pipeline

• Design Pressure: 9930 kPa

Inuvik

Norman Wells

Zama

Ft. Simpson

Wrigley

Enbridge (NW) Pipeline System

Page 4: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

4

Quick Facts

• Throughput: 30,000 BPD (4,800 m3/d)• One shipper from Norman Wells to KP 839.2

Two shippers from there to KP 869 (Zama)• Three (3) Pump Stations:

– 1 natural gas powered (NW)

– 2 diesel powered (WG & MC)

• Crude Characteristics:– Density = 827 kg/m3

– Pour Point = -50° Celsius

– RVP < = 103 kPag

– Viscosity = 2.0 cSt.

• Remote Operations from Edmonton

Enbridge (NW) Pipeline System

Aerial View of Norman Wells

Page 5: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

5

“Northern” Pipeline Challenges

Unique “Northern” P/L Issues• Capital Cost• Geography and Remote Access• Permafrost

Enbridge Experience Applied to

Future Development• Proven sub-surface

construction in permafrost• Proven methods of monitoring

pipeline integrity

Inuvik

Norman Wells

Zama

Ft. Simpson

Wrigley

Page 6: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

6

Norman Wells Successes: Design Innovation

• Operating temperatures

• Limit States Design– lower cost– strain limit

0.5%

• Integrity monitoring

Page 7: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

7

Norman Wells Successes: Permafrost Challenges Met

• Design• Environmental/ Geotechnical

– Right of Way – trenching

Ice Rich

Page 8: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

8

Norman Wells Successes: Slopes – Then and Now

• Design• Environmental/

Geotechnical– Right of Way– trenching– slope

stabilization

1984 1997

Page 9: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

9

Experience:Permafrost

Map and Diagram from Geological Survey of Canada website

Region requiring design consideration for permafrost Conventional pipeline design and construction

Area of sporadic permafrost that requires minimal pipeline

design and construction considerations for permafrost

Page 10: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

10

Norman Wells Successes:Dealing with Ice

• Design• Environmental/

Geotechnical– Right of Way– trenching– slope

stabilization– thaw

settlement / frost heave

Ice lens

Page 11: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

11

Inertial Inspection Runs – GEOPIG

% Strain vs Time for Slope 92

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000

Year

Str

ain

Page 12: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

12

Integrity Management inPermafrost

• Geo-Pig

Page 13: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

13

Maintenance Activity – Pipe Replacement

Page 14: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

14

Maintenance Activities

Lenth of Ditchline Backfilled

48

37

4 20

10

20

30

40

50

60

1986 1987 1988 1989

Year

Len

gth

(km

)

Page 15: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

15

Maintenance Activities to Present

MaintenanceActivities

90/91 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01

ILI KP 0 to KP336

ILI KP 336 to KP586

ILI KP 586 to KP869

Filling voids inwood chip cover

Installation ofadditionalinstrumentation

Forest fire impactremediation

Pipeline repairs Bathymetricsurveys

Note: ILI = In-Line Inspection

Page 16: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

16

Monitoring Activities

Activity Frequency/Monitoring Year

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Visual Reconnaissance Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly

Detailed Reconnaissance September September September September September

Thaw Depth Investigation October Note 1 October Note 1 October

Instrumentation Readings Note 2 Note 2 Note 2 Note 2 Note 2

Inertial Geometry Tool(GEOPIG)

Norman Wellsto Zama

Norman Wellsto Wrigley

Norman Wellsto Mackenzie

Highway

Norman Wellsto Wrigley

Norman Wellsto Zama

Notes:1. Unless an ongoing review of instrumentation and other data indicates a need for thaw probing at a particular slope, no probing

will be conducted in odd numbered years.2. Instrumentation within 1 meter of the pipeline, for a distance of 140 km from Norman Wells, will be read on a monthly basis.

Remaining instrumentation will be read on a monthly or quarterly basis.

Page 17: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

17

Reporting to Regulators

• Annual Reports– Operations &

Maintenance Activities– Condition of Pipeline– Terrain Monitoring– Slope Monitoring and

Performance– Operations &

Monitoring Program– Right-of-way

Assessment

Page 18: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

18

Pipeline Maintenance

• Hauling propane to remote area valve sites.

Page 19: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

19

Field Personnel

• Employees are permanent residents of the communities of Norman Wells and Ft. Simpson.

• They provide significant contributions to the quality of life in the communities through their volunteer activities.

• Successful and enduring positive northern relationships are built and maintained on the basis of mutual honesty, respect and trust.

Page 20: 1 Northern Pipelining & Practical Experience Presentation to:APEGGA April 21, 2005 Calgary

20

Questions