1 msw management in seville and its surrounding area ippc implementation experience seville june 12...
TRANSCRIPT
1
MSW management in Seville and its surrounding area
IPPC Implementation ExperienceSeville June 12th 2012
Contents
Presentation of the group Firms belonging to the group History
Aborgase Activities Installations Complex of Montemarta Cónica IPPC implementation
Other firms of the group Edifesa Tegner Energía sur de Europa
Conclusions Contact information
2
IPPC implementation process presentation
1.IPPC certification process summary2.Overview of facilities 3.Audit Results4.Actions carried out after audit 5.Mayor impacts of implementing the standard
3
1 - IPPC Certification Process
4
The company The administration
Development of process description report Discussion and agreement on final process
description report
Carried out audit Correction of ”easily” corrigible
issues
Proposal of plant modification project
Accomplishment of plant modification project Fulfillment of all IEP requirements
May’05Nov’05
Apr’08
Autum’08
Apr’11
Mar’10
Oct’07Initial Integrated Environmental Permit
granting
Jul’09 Approved extension of Permit
2 - Facilities Covered under IPPC Permit – Montemarta Environmental Complex
5
Weight bridge
1
Gross MSW processing
2
Fermentation wharehouse 3
Compost processing
4
Compost aging area
5
Metal recycling plant
Plastic recycling plant
6
MSW Processing
2 - Facilities Covered under IPPC Permit – Montemarta Environmental Complex
6
Landfill
Landfill gas power plant
3
Closed areas Active landfill1Gas field2
Leachate pool 4
Leachate treatment plants5
2 - Facilities Covered under IPPC Permit – Montemarta Environmental Complex
7
Other waste
Recycle plant
1
Hospital waste plant2
Construction and demolition plant
3
Clarification required Immediate corrective action Beyond Aborgase scope
3 - Audit Results
8
Carried out on April 2008
Implemented according to IPPC standard
Verified 164 issues
134 in order 30 no
conformities
Procedure Technical Documents Immediate accomplishment
Corrective measure
Cla
ssi
fica
tio
n
acc
ord
ing
to
Nature
30
134
9
7
11
3
7
6
1730 No
conformities
3 - Audit Results
9
1 Clinical Waste (RBS) admission procedure
2 Documented control plan
3 Risk assessment for MA by ECCM
4 Maintenance and Cleaning Plan
5 Recovery of potentially recoverable fractions
6 Previous treatment of green waste (PARK and GARDENS) , landfilling treatment procedure during technical shutdowns and weekends
7 Landfilling of potentially recoverable fractions
8 Basic characterization analysis clinical waste (RBS)
9 Temporary storage area for no admissible waste
10 Open air storage of recovered fractions, including compost
11 Green waste is neither ground nor composted
12 Clinic waste piling above 2 levels
13 Clinic waste labeling
14 Editing of landfill incidents book
15 Neither segregation nor storage of WEEE (waste electrical and electronic equipment)
16 Open containers of Hazardous Waste
17 Hazardous waste labeling
18 Hazardous Waste area signaling 19 Used oil storage without dike
20 There is neither specific HW loading area, nor draining in the HW storing area
21 PTL and engines emission points conditioning
22 Leachate collection wells in closed and active landfill bodies
23 Untreated clinic and HW leachate and cleaning water
24 Compost and recovered fraction open air storage
25 Meteorological data recording
26 Leachate analytics parameters
27 Autoclave monitoring results report
28 No previously treated waste landfilled report
29 Report of landfilled waste with no previous treatment
30 Summary of 2007 control plan
Clarification required
Solution beyond Aborgase scope
Immediate solution
4 - Immediate solution (I)
10
No conformities Improvement Action Implications Basic characterization analysis clinical waste (RBS)
Presented a suitability certificate of analytical operations proposed in standards used for this kind of waste
Increase in the current number of records and work procedures
Temporary storage area for no admissible waste
Justified the refuse of non admissible waste according to procedure describe in NC 1
Increase in controls
Clinic waste piling above 2 levels
According to containers homologation, they can be piled due to piling, resistance and sealing tests
Continue with the same working practice (no implication)
Clinic waste labeling Improvements in the HW signaling Slight improvement in the work procedure. HW area adaptation
8
9
12
13
12 13
4 - Immediate solution (II)
11
No conformities Improvement Action Implications Neither segregation nor storage of WEEE
Studied commonly with IMS WEEE the option of sending material. The option is rejected due to the bad condition of the waste
Stored and sent just the potentially reused material (< 10 t/y)
Leachate collection wells in closed and active landfill bodies
The first leachate accumulation is detected in 2011. Installed a pneumatic system in order to pump it out
Continue with the same working procedure. NO IMPLICATION
Untreated clinic and HW leachate and cleaning water
Analyzed waste water and discharged to public sewage system is considered
Continue with the same working procedure. NO IPMLICATION
22
23
15
22
4 - Clarification required (I)
12
No conformities Improvement Action Implications Clinical Waste (RBS) admission procedure
Development of an specific procedure for the clinic waste admission and acceptance
Increase in controls
Documented Environmental Impacts control plan
Adapted the existing control plan to the IPPC EIA requirements
Increase in controls
Risk assessment for MA by ECCM
Presented Risk Evaluation to the ECCMA
Increase in controls
Maintenance and Cleaning Plan
Developed a maintenance and cleaning program according to specifications
Increase in current working procedure records
2
3
1
4
4 - Clarification required (II)
13
No conformities Improvement Action Implications Editing of landfill incidents book
Incident book is edited, including use instructions and custody responsible
Increase in controls
Open containers of Hazardous Waste
General improvement of the loading area; adapting tanks, and properly signaling and labeling
Increase in controls
Hazardous waste labeling
Hazardous Waste area signaling Used oil storage without dike There is neither specific HW loading area, nor draining in the HW storing area
16
17
14
18
19
20 16-20
4 - Clarification required (III)
14
No conformities Improvement Action Implications Meteorological data recording
Created a record with meteorological parameters obtained from the closest National Network of Meteorological Stations
Increase control and records
Leachate analytics parameters
Increase of numbers of characterized parameters
Increase controls and records
Autoclave monitoring results report
Report with the result of parameters monitoring control in the autoclave (P, T, time) sent yearly to Environmental Authority
Increase in controls and records
27
28
25/26
2825
9 kms
4 - Clarification required (IV)
15
No conformities Improvement Action Implications Report of landfilled waste with no previous treatment
Yearly report recording waste landfilled no previous treatment
Increase in controls
Summary of 2007 Control Plan
Report with results of sanitary data control to be sent to Environmental Authority
Increase in controls 30
29
4 - Solution beyond Aborgase (I)
16
No conformities Actions Implications Recovery of potentially recoverable fractions
Designed a plant for bulky waste treatment Presented to local association a cost assessment in order to increase tipping fee
Constructed the first phase of the bulky waste treatment plant
No increase in tipping fee
Previous treatment of green waste, landfilling treatment procedure during technical shutdowns and weekends
Designed a bulky waste treatment plant
Desigend a revamping of MSW recycling plant, with 5 authomatized sorting lines, aimed at increasing capacit up to maximum
Constructed the first phase of the bulky waste treatment plant
After several modifications, increase manual sorting lines and optimized feeding and organic fraction refining processes Landfilling of potentially
recoverable fractions
6
7
5
5
4 - Solution beyond Aborgase (II)
17
No conformities Actions Implications Open air storage of recovered fractions, including compost
Cost study of covering the area carried out
Proposed by ABORGASE, expanded plastic treatment warehouse
No coverage in the rest of storage areas
Green waste is neither ground nor composted
Designed a Bulky Waste treatment plant, with a front grinder for green waste (previous to composting)
Grinder in included in second phase, which was not finally accomplished
Compost and recovered fraction open air storage
Carried out cost assessment of covering all the required areas
Proposed by ABORGASE, expanded plastic treatment warehouse
No coverage in the rest of storage areas
11
24
10
24 10
4 - Audit Results
18
1 Clinical Waste (RBS) admission procedure
2 Documented control plan
3 Risk assessment for MA by ECCMm
4 Maintenance and Cleaning Plan
5 Recovery of potentially recoverable fractions
6 Previous treatment of green waste , landfilling treatment procedure during technical shutdowns and weekends
7 Landfilling of potentially recoverable fractions
8 Basic characterization analysis clinical waste (RBS)
9 Temporary storage area for no admissible waste
10 Open air storage of recovered fractions, including compost
11 Green waste is neither ground nor composted
12 Clinic waste piling above 2 levels
13 Clinic waste labeling
14 Editing of landfill incidents book
15 Neither segregation nor storage of WEEE (waste electrical and electronic equipment)
16 Open containers of Hazardous Waste
17 Hazardous waste labeling
18 Hazardous Waste area signaling
19 Used oil storage without dike
20 There is neither specific HW loading area, nor draining in the HW storing area
21 PTL and engines emission points conditioning
22 Leachate collection wells in closed and active landfill bodies
23 Untreated clinic and HW leachate and cleaning water
24 Compost and recovered fraction open air storage
25 Meteorological data recording
26 Leachate analytics parameters
27 Autoclave monitoring results report
28 No previously treated waste landfilled report
29 Report of landfilled waste with no previous treatment
30 Summary of 2007 control plan
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
donedonedone
Partially
Partially
Partially
All no conformities found were finally corrected, except 3 whose solution exceeded ABORGASE scope; but
were partially solved
5 - Major impacts - Operation and Investments
19
Operation Costs Processing cots increases due to the necessity of processing 100% of waste and fostering by-products recovery
+12%
Landfill adaptation costs
Expend costs for adapting landfills to national legislation during 2011 - 2018
6,4 M€
Infrastructure Environmental controls
General high increase in the level of control and recording, which will be expend during the landfill operating life plus the post closure period (- 2046)
300.000 €/year
New Infrastructures Bulky waste processing plant – phase 1
MSW plant expansion
By-products press expansion
650.000 €
1.900.000 €
140.000 €
IPPC Environmental Standard implementation has meant increase on control and recording levels, higher operation cost for
processing 100% of incoming waste and additional investments in landfill and processing plant
5 - Major impacts - Operation and Investments
20
Increase in controls and records
Treat all waste and maximize recovery
Landfill Standards Post closure activity
21
Conclusions – IPPC Implementation The whole certification process has taken 6 years, being still alive
The certification was completed successfully, being granted in October 2007, and extended in July 2009
Out of a total 165 issues, just 30 were no conform 7 were of immediate solution 17 required discussion to really understand the situation and agree a feasible solution In 6 the solution exceeded ABORGASE scope, 3 were solved by means of extra investment
and in 2, were partially solved in agreement with the administration
The implementation process, moreover 6 years of work, has implied additional investments (9,4 M€), higher operation costs (+12%) and high increase in number of controls and records
The additional cost (investment and operation) are partially covered by ABORGASE
The IPPC has been a high challenge, but today we do a more responsible and respectful waste management activity
22
Questions & Answers