1 mental models senge: chapter 10 the fifth discipline
TRANSCRIPT
1
Mental Models
Senge: Chapter 10THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 2
What are Mental Models?
• The mental constructs that dictate – the decisions that we take– the actions that we engage in
• The Second of Five Disciplines– Who remembers the other four?
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 3
What’s the Problem?• Many of the best ideas never get put
into practice– Why???– Because they conflict with deeply held
internal images of how the world works– These images limit us to familiar ways of
thinking and acting
• We keep making the same mistakes over and over again--we’re not learning
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 4
The discipline of Mental Models (MMs) Involves• Surfacing these models• Testing these models• Improving our internal pictures of
how the world works• PROMISES TO BE A MAJOR
BREAKTHROUGH FOR BUILDING LEARNING ORGANIZATIONS
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 5
Why are MMs so powerful in affecting what we do?• They affect what we see
– They become the cognitive lense through which we view the world
– Two people with different MMs can see the same situation and describe it differently
– Big three auto-makers believed Americans bought cars on the basis of styling
– Today outdated MMs dominate the service industries, which still provide mediocre quality in the name of controlling costs
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 6
So the Problem arises when our mental model is wrong…RIGHT?• WRONG!!!• The problem with mental models is
that they are tacit--below the level of awareness
• We don’t realize that our behavior is being dictated by a certain mental model that we have bought into deeply
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 7
A Digression and Break• Arm Wrestling• Good Exercise• Good way to break up a boring
session on mental models• Find an opponent
• The contestant who can defeat his opponent the most times in one minute wins.
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 8
An Industrial Goods Manufacturer• Was losing market share• Production managers held
inventories as low as possible• Result was long lead times, long
delivery times even though production capacity was adequate
• A team of MIT system dynamicists were brought in
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 9
What did the models show?
• Low inventories meant long lead times• Why not carry some inventory• They did this for a while and it worked
– The firm’s market share picked up
• But the new policies were not taken to heart• Four years later when another recession
occurred, the firm went back to their original low inventories and began losing market share again
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 10
Why did they do this?
• The inertia of deeply entrenched mental models can overwhelm even the best systemic insights
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 11
Shell--one of the first firms to investigate MMs• Is broken up into over a hundred
companies• Must continually challenge the
leaders of these firms to scrutinize their MMs
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 12
Overcoming the basic diseases of the hierarchy• For hierarchical organizations the
dogma is “manage, organize, control”• For learning organizations, the dogma
is vision, values, and MMs• Healthy firms are ones that bring
people together to develop the best possible MMs for facing any situation at hand
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 13
The Experience at HANOVER
• Hanover--an insurance carrier (a property and casualty insurance firm)
• Hanover hired consultant Chris Argyris. He brought in his “ACTION SCIENCE”
• Argyris: “Because we insulate our mental models from examination, we develop ‘SKILLED INCOMPETENCE..’”
• Recall a conflict with a client--what did you say--what did you think, what did you not say
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 14
Left-Hand Column Analysis– The left-hand column details what you were
thinking– The right-hand column details what was actually
said
• Sample case: Jim is an R&D project manager. Jim assumes his supervisor Todd feels harshly about him. Jim just had a conversation with Todd. Jim writes out the conversation with Todd in the right-hand column and his thoughts at the time in the left.
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 15
• We’re two months late and I don’t think he knew. I was hoping we could catch up
• I need to make it clear that I’m willing to take responsibility for this, but I don’t want to volunteer for more work
• He never offers this help in the planning stages, when I could really use it. It’s too late now to bring that up.
• The changes he keeps making are the real reason we’re late. He must have another one.
• It’s a shame I can’t tell him that he’s the cause of the delays. If I can hold him off two more weeks, I think we’ll be ready.
• TODD: Jim, I’d like to come down there next week. We’re a few weeks behind, and I think we might all benefit from a meeting at your office.
• ME: I’ve been very concerned about these deadlines. As you know, we’ve had some tough luck here, and we’re working around the clock. But of course, we’ll squeeze in a meeting at your convenience.
• TODD: Well, its occurred to me that we could use better coordination. There are some ways I could help.
• ME: Well, I’m happy to talk through any changes you have in mind.
• TODD: I don’t have anything specific in mind
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 16
What can you do with this?• You can learn a lot about how your
responses could have been better, more to the point.
• You can also ask yourself what has really led me to think and feel this way?
• What was my intention? What was I trying to accomplish?
• Did I achieve the results I intended?• Did my comments contribute to the
difficulties
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 17
When we examine our mental models…• Each of us has contributed to a conflict
through our own thinking• We made sweeping generalizations
about others that determined what we said and how we behaved
• We are led to see subtle patterns of reasoning which determines our behavior and how these continually got us into trouble
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 18
Hanover & Argyris’s Colleague Lee Bolman
• Bolman further exposed Hanover’s managers to the ideas and practices of action science
• Be a good inquirer• Balance inquiry with advocacy• Understand that all we ever have are
assumptions, never “truths,” that we always see the world through our mental models and that the mental models are always incomplete and in Western culture, non-systemic
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 19
Hanover Bottom Line Results• Over a 15 year period, Hanover got
better and better at its margins and market share
• Its average return was 21.8% where the industry average was 15.9 percent
• Today, Hanover continues to build a foundation of basic skills in reflection, surfacing and public examination of mental models
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 20
Hanover’s Strategy
• Recognize “leaps of abstraction”– Jumps from observation to generalization
• Exposing the “left-hand column”• Balance inquiry and advocacy• Facing up to distinctions between
espoused theories (what we say) and theories in use (what we do as determined by our MMs)
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 21
The Discipline of Mental Models• Bring key assumptions about important
business issues to the surface– Who remembers the Goldratt mechanism
for doing just this?
• Without surfacing these assumptions, an organization’s range of actions are limited to what is familiar and comfortable
• Develop face-to-face learning skills
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 22
The Discipline of MMs, Continued• Both sides of the discipline--business
skills and interpersonal issues--are crucial
• Without interpersonal skills, learning is still fundamentally adaptive, not generative
• Generative learning requires managers with reflection and inquiry skills, not just consultants and planners
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 23
Planning as Learning and Internal Boards: Managing Mental models Throughout an Organization• Firms need to put in place mechanisms
that make the practices of reflection and surfacing mental models unavoidable
• How? By recasting traditional planning as learning and establishing “internal boards of directors” to bring senior management and local management together
• How? By using SCENARIOS in the case of Shell
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 24
More ways to surface mental models• Use tools for mapping mental
models--Shell. These include systems thinking tools like the archetypes, as well as the computer simulation capabilities of a tool like VENSIM
• Microworlds and numerous other “soft systems” tools are also used
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 25
What is the common denominator of these tools?• They work to expose assumptions
about important business issues• The basic idea is to institutionalize
managing mental models through the planning process
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 26
Hanover also uses internal boards• Composed of two to four senior
managers and local general managers
• Senior managers are not allowed to impose their mental models on local managers
• Hanover developed a Credo on Mental Models
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 27
Hanover’s Credo• The effectiveness of a leader is related to the
continual improvement of the leader’s mental models
• Don’t impose a favored mental model on people• Self-concluding decisions result in deeper
convictions and more effective implementation• Better mental models enable owners to adjust to
change in environment or circumstance• Internal board members rarely need to make
direct decisions
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 28
Hanover’s Credo, Continued• Multiple mental models bring multiple
perspectives• Groups add dynamics and knowledge
beyond what one person can do alone• The goal is not congruency among the group• When the process works it leads to
congruency• The leaders’ worth is measured by their
contribution to others’ MMs
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 29
Reflection and Inquiry Skills: Managing Mental Models at Personal and Interpersonal Levels• Reflection skillsReflection skills concern becoming
more aware of how we form our mental models and the ways they influence our actions
• Inquiry skillsInquiry skills concern how we operate in face-to-face interactions with others
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 30
Reflection Skills
• Recognize leaps of abstraction• Miller’s 7 plus/minus 2 rule• Untested models of customer behavior
are often leaps of abstraction• To surface leaps of abstraction, ask
“What do I believe about how the world works?”
• Then ask, “Is this generalization inaccurate or misleading?”
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 31
Reflection Skills
• Where possible test the generalizations directly
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 32
Inquiry skills
• Use left-hand, right-hand column analysis
• In conflicts, avoid the systems archetype of escalation
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 33
Mental Models and The Fifth Discipline: Systems Thinking• The two disciplines go hand-in-
hand• ST without MM is like an airplane
without wing flaps
2-19-00 Prepared by James R. Burns 34
Copyright C 2000 by James R. Burns• All rights reserved world-wide.
CLEAR Project Steering Committee members have a right to use these slides in their presentations. However, they do not have the right to remove this copyright or to remove the “prepared by….” footnote that appears at the bottom of each slide.