1 mental models and the bibliographic universe jan pisanski maja Žumer lida 2007
TRANSCRIPT
1
Mental models and the bibliographic
universe
Jan PisanskiMaja ŽumerLIDA 2007
2
Overview FRBR – conceptual model of bibliographic
universe (What?, Why?, Why not?) Comparing mental models and conceptual
model of bibliographic universe (What? Why? How?)
Proposed research
3
Bibliographic universe “totality of bibliographic entities and their
relationships” (Fattahi, 1997) Functional Requirements for Bibliographic
Records (FRBR) study (IFLA’s Study Group), final report
(1998), conceptual (E-R) model NOT a data model, NOT a standard
4
FRBR Entities Entities (3 groups), relationships between
these entities and their attributes Group 1 entities
Work (a distinct intellectual or artistic creation)
Expression (an intellectual or artistic realization of a work)
Manifestation (a physical embodiment of an expression)
Item (a single exemplar of a manifestation)
5
FRBR (Item and Manifestation)
Item (a single exemplar of a manifestation)
My copy, my library’s copy…
Manifestation (a physical embodiment of an expression)
Doubleday, 2003
6
FRBR (Expression and Work )
Expression (an intellectual or artistic realization of a work)
Brown’s original English text
Work (a distinct intellectual or artistic creation)
The Da Vinci code by Dan Brown
7
Importance of a conceptual model of bibliographic universe
Improves cataloguing and catalogs (it was done in order to cut the costs, to better satisfy user needs…)
An example of end-user benefit
Present displays too chaotic, relationships not explicit
For works with numerous editions
In union catalogues, national bibliographies, portals (aggregation)
8
Benefits of FRBR (example) The European Library (TEL) portal EDLproject (a Targeted Project funded by
the European Commision under the eContentplus programme) (WP2, Task 6)
Explore options of interoperability with other cultural heritage communities
Test the use of FRBR – a small exploratory study of “frbrization” (extracting FRBR structure from existing bibliographic records)
9
But…potential problem of FRBR(+) User-focused but…
(-) NO user studies (to save time and money)
(-) “FRBR models what we do, not what we should do” (P.LeBoeuf) - current cataloguing practice
(+) Based on experience (incl. previous user studies) / world-class experts / long revision process
No formal confirmation of validity of FRBR
10
What can be looked at?“Frbrized” OPACsIn practice: not using full FRBR structure
(result of cataloguing practice -> FRBR does not model what we should do nor what we do?)
Our answer: MENTAL MODELS of BIBLIOGRAPHIC
UNIVERSE
11
Mental models Various definitions (sometimes mutually
exclusive, e.g. static : change over time), various concepts
Norman : “the models people have of themselves, others, the environment, and the things they interact with”
12
Mental models vs. conceptual models Usually how mental models match
conceptual model, but… Should conceptual models be questioned? Carlyle: FRBR not true or false – does it
serve its purpose? But can it be improved?
13
Possible traps Mental models of bibliographic universe:
very abstract Mental models may be influenced by
present catalogue design and cataloguing practice
14
Mental model elicitation
Various methods (observations, interviews, verbal protocols, repertory grid technique,…)
Card sorting
15
Card sorting Non-verbal
15-30 participants
Generative (good for domain modeling)
16
Card sorting Set of cards with descriptions (of instances
of Group 1 entities), Non-library terminology, e.g.
“Dan Brown’s novel the Da Vinci Code” or “The Da Vinci Code, published by
Doubleday in 2003” – limit the effect of current cataloguing practice
17
Card sorting At least 3 groups Criterion: concrete/abstract nature of the
instance of the example on the card (too complicated?)
Asked to name the groups Subsequent informal semi-structured
interviews Concept mapping (What-comes-out-of-
what?) – Do mental models change?
18
What comes out of what?
19
The parting shotVery abstract concepts
Results - valid only for small population:
More FRBR user studies are needed (including studies of prototypes)!!!!
THANK YOU!
ANY QUESTIONS?
E-mail: [email protected]