1 maritime security risk analysis model uscg presentation to area maritime security committee

14
1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

Upload: jessie-bates

Post on 16-Jan-2016

228 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

1

Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model

USCG Presentation to

Area Maritime Security Committee

Page 2: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

2

History of USCG Risk Tools

Port Security Risk Assessment Tool (PSRAT) V1 – November 2001 – supports COTP level risk planning

Port Security Risk Assessment Tool (PSRAT) V2 –November 2002 - supports COTP/HQ risk planning

Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model (MSRAM) V1 – December 2005 - supports local, regional and national risk planning

MSRAM V2 – March 2007 an integrated methodology to support DHS wide security risk analysis

Page 3: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

3

Critical Infrastructure Protection

Homeland Security Presidential Directive - 7

identify, prioritize, and protect

“critical infrastructure”

and

“key resources”

Page 4: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

4

“Critical Infrastructure”Systems and assets, so vital that the destruction of which

would have a debilitating impact on: security, national economic security, national public health or safety

“Key Resources”

Resources essential to the minimum operations of the economy and government

Page 5: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

5

Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model (MSRAM)

MSRAM was designed to identify and prioritize critical infrastructure, key resources and high consequence scenario’s across sectors using a common risk methodology, taxonomy and metrics to measure security risk from terrorism at the local, regional and national levels

Page 6: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

6

“What should drive our intelligence, policies, operations, and preparedness plans and the way we are organized is the strategic matrix of threat, vulnerability and consequence. And so, we'll be looking at everything through that prism and adjusting structure, operations and policies to execute this strategy.”

Secretary Chertoff 4/20/05

Risk = Threat * Vulnerability * Consequence

Page 7: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

7

MSRAM Elements

MSRAM Design is Based on Terrorist Attack Modes against Types of Targets

For Official Use Only

For Official Use Only

21

National Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources/Assets (CI/KA) Sectors

Critical Infrastructure1. Agriculture & Food

2. Water (WTS)

3. Public Health

4. Emergency Services

5. Defense Industrial Base

6. Information Technology

7. Telecommunications

8. Energy

9. Transportation

10. Banking and Finance

11. Chemical & Hazardous Materials

12. Postal and Shipping

Key Resources/assets1. National Monuments & Icons

2. Nuclear Power & Materials

3. Dams

4. Commercial Facilities

5. Government Facilities

HSPD 7:

Target / Asset Attack Mode

Scenario

Attack Modes address the full range of DHS Attack

Modes (WMD)

Page 8: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

8

MSRAM Elements

For Official Use Only

For Official Use Only

Target / Asset Attack Mode

Scenario

Risk

Primary Consequence + X Vulnerability =

Threat Attack

Probability

Secondary Economic

Impact

X Scenario Consequence

MSRAM Design begins with threat input from USCG Intel Coordination Center

AMSC mbrs in the field capture their best evaluation of scenario consequences and vulnerability for each required scenario (attack mode – target type)

Risk = Threat * Consequence *Vulnerability

Page 9: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

9

CONSEQUENCE

LIK

ELIH

OO

D

FVT Risk Group 1

Risk Group 2

Risk Group 3

HighLow

Low

High

Target/Attack Mode Risk

Risk Plot / Base line risk

Page 10: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

11

MSRAM Change Case

Base Case/MARSEC 1Potential Change Cases:

• MARSEC level changes

• Seasonal changes (Summer, Winter)

• Changes to threat, consequence or vulnerability profiles

• Reallocation of USCG/LEA resources

• Changes in response capability

• Changes in system security capability/capacity/strategy

• Changes in technology (RAD detection)

• Changes in scenarios (e.g., (NSSE, LPG vessels transits in AOR, new targets)

Page 11: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

12

CONSEQUENCE

LIK

LIE

HO

OD

FVT Risk Group 1

Risk Group 2

Risk Group 3

HighLow

Low

High

SY

STEM

SEC

UR

ITY

RESPONSE

PREVENTION

Risk Reduction Strategies!

Target/Attack Mode Risk

Page 12: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

13

CONSEQUENCE

LIK

LIE

HO

OD

FVT Risk Group 1

Risk Group 2

Risk Group 3

HighLow

Low

High

Security Risk Reduction counter measures / grant proposals

Target/Attack Mode Risk

Page 13: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

14

MSRAM Contacts Policy Questions

Port Security Evaluation Division–LCDR Brady Downs, USCG

–LCDR Mark Shepard, USCG

MSRAM HELP DESK – [email protected]

Page 14: 1 Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model USCG Presentation to Area Maritime Security Committee

15

Questions

MSRAMQuestions