1 innovative use of an n-hasp at a doe closure site presentation at ism best practices workshop...

14
1 Innovative Use of an N- Innovative Use of an N- HASP HASP at a DOE Closure Site at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location 4) September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location 4) by by Brinley Varchol, Fluor Fernald QA Brinley Varchol, Fluor Fernald QA Director Director Dr. Donald Paine, S&H Director Dr. Donald Paine, S&H Director Energy Facility C ontractors G roup

Upload: jeffrey-lindsey

Post on 05-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

1

Innovative Use of an N-HASPInnovative Use of an N-HASPat a DOE Closure Siteat a DOE Closure Site

Presentation atPresentation at

ISM Best Practices WorkshopISM Best Practices WorkshopAurora, ColoradoAurora, Colorado

September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location 4)September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location 4)byby

Brinley Varchol, Fluor Fernald QA DirectorBrinley Varchol, Fluor Fernald QA DirectorDr. Donald Paine, S&H DirectorDr. Donald Paine, S&H Director

Energy Facility Contractors Group

Page 2: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

2

BACKGROUNDBACKGROUND

Energy Facility Contractors Group

• N-HASP Concept used for Silos 1-2 & Silos 3

• Focus of this presentation will be on Silos 3• Silo 3 contained 5,100 cubic yards of cold

metal oxides from the processing of uranium ores

• Primary concern was Thorium 230 and Radium 226.

• Structure classified in a PHAR as a Hazard Category 3 nuclear facility

• One TSR associated with the silo dome load limits

ISM Best Practices Workshop

Page 3: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

3

Energy Facility Contractors Group ISM Best Practices Workshop

Silos 1, 2, and 3 Area

Page 4: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

4

Categorization of the Silos 3 Categorization of the Silos 3 Treatment FacilityTreatment Facility

Energy Facility Contractors Group

• DOE approved method (DOE-Standard 1027) allows partitioning a facility for purposes of hazard classification

• Segmentation is approved for use when hazardous materials within two facilities are separated and cannot be readily brought together

• Silos 3 Treatment Facility is separate from the Silos 3 Structure (Hazard Category 3 Facility)

• Design of the treatment facility limits the amount of Silos material that can be transferred into the remediation equipment

ISM Best Practices Workshop

Page 5: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

5

Energy Facility Contractors Group ISM Best Practices Workshop

Silos 3 Area, including Packaging Facility

Page 6: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

6

Energy Facility Contractors Group ISM Best Practices Workshop

Silos 3 – Vacuuming Process

Page 7: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

7

Safe Harbor ApproachSafe Harbor Approach

Energy Facility Contractors Group

• Documented safety analysis process accepted in DOE Rule 10 CFR 830 Subpart B

• Specifies different forms of safety analyses for different types of projects (i.e. Reactor, D&D, Environmental Restoration

• Table 2, Item 6 describes the Safe Harbor method for development of DSA for Environmental Restoration Activities

• Project Specific Health and Safety Plan (N-HASP) was used for the Silos Project

ISM Best Practices Workshop

Page 8: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

8

Benefits of Safe Harbor ApproachBenefits of Safe Harbor Approach

Energy Facility Contractors Group

• Combines safety requirements into one document

• Improves worker access and simplifies the application of safety requirements

• Improves overall safety by ensuring cooperation between Operations, Safety, and Project Management in creating safety controls and process requirements.

ISM Best Practices Workshop

Page 9: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

9

Energy Facility Contractors Group ISM Best Practices Workshop

Silos 3 – Vacuuming Process

Page 10: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

10

N-HASP ContentsN-HASP Contents

Energy Facility Contractors Group

• Volume 1 includes:• Standard 29 CFR 1910.120 Project Specific

Health and Safety Plan with additional sections for ISM, Conduct of Operations, Nuclear Safety Requirements, Maintenance Management, Quality Assurance, and Occurrence Reporting

• Also includes Task Level Hazard Analysis with Controls and Mitigators

ISM Best Practices Workshop

Page 11: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

11

N-HASP ContentsN-HASP Contents

Energy Facility Contractors Group

• Volume 2 includes:• Supporting Analyses consistent with other

DSA’s developed• Integrated Hazard Analyses, Hazard

Category Calculations, Human Factors Evaluations, ALARA Analysis, Environmental ALARA Report, Fire Hazards Analysis, Accident Analysis, and a Health Physics Plan

ISM Best Practices Workshop

Page 12: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

12

Silos 3 Project ResultsSilos 3 Project Results

Energy Facility Contractors Group ISM Best Practices

Workshop

• Operated for 13 Months• Approximately 2300 packages loaded and shipped• Material retrieve through vacuuming and direct

load-out with no OSHA Recordable injuries and no transportation issues

• Safe Shutdown accomplished with only one recordable injury sustained on the last day of work

• Vacuuming, packaging, and handling of material accomplished with only 60% of the project’s ALARA Goals.

Page 13: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

13

Silos 3 Project ResultsSilos 3 Project Results

Energy Facility Contractors Group ISM Best Practices

Workshop

8148D-118

WORK SCOPE• Remove 5,100 cubic yards of low-level waste from one

concrete silo• Ship waste off site for disposal

CLEANUP REMEDY• Record of Dec ision signed in December 1994

• Explanation of Significant Differences for Operable Unit 4Silo 3 Remedial Action approved in March 1998

• Record of Dec ision Amendment to allow for treatment onlyas required to meet permitted disposal fac ility’s waste acceptance criteria

• Pneumatic retrieval system as well as remotely controlled and manned mechanical excavators used to remove thesilo waste

• Condition material to reduce dispersability, package and ship off s ite for disposal

STATUS• Fac ility design/build – COMPLETE• Packaging operations – COMPLETE

- P roduced nearly 2,300 soft-side packages of waste

- 13 month extraction and packaging operation

- 12 month, 1 million mile shipping campaignto Envirocare

• Safe shutdown and demolition – COMPLETE

PROJ ECT COMPLETION - 2006

WORK SCOPE• Remove 5,100 cubic yards of low-level waste from one

concrete silo• Ship waste off site for disposal

CLEANUP REMEDY• Record of Dec ision signed in December 1994

• Explanation of Significant Differences for Operable Unit 4Silo 3 Remedial Action approved in March 1998

• Record of Dec ision Amendment to allow for treatment onlyas required to meet permitted disposal fac ility’s waste acceptance criteria

• Pneumatic retrieval system as well as remotely controlled and manned mechanical excavators used to remove thesilo waste

• Condition material to reduce dispersability, package and ship off s ite for disposal

STATUS• Fac ility design/build – COMPLETE• Packaging operations – COMPLETE

- P roduced nearly 2,300 soft-side packages of waste

- 13 month extraction and packaging operation

- 12 month, 1 million mile shipping campaignto Envirocare

• Safe shutdown and demolition – COMPLETE

PROJ ECT COMPLETION - 2006

Page 14: 1 Innovative Use of an N-HASP at a DOE Closure Site Presentation at ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, Colorado September 13, 2005 (Session 5-Location

14

Video clip of Silos 3 Vacuuming and Video clip of Silos 3 Vacuuming and Packaging OperationsPackaging Operations

Energy Facility Contractors Group ISM Best Practices Workshop