1 improving the acoustic environment of schools for pupils and teachers bridget shield & anne...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Improving the acoustic environment of schools for pupils and teachers
Bridget Shield & Anne Carey
London South Bank University
Julie Dockrell & Kate Rigby
Institute of Education, University of London
LARCI seminarResearch for Education - Making a
Difference10 November 2005
2
Outline of talk
• Acoustic requirements for classrooms• Background to EPSRC project - previous research• EPSRC project - aims and methodology • Acoustic surveys of classrooms• Remedial acoustic treatments to classrooms• Teachers’ voice levels• Amplification in the classroom
– installation– benefits
• Summary and conclusions
3
Acoustic requirements for classrooms
• To provide good listening and speaking conditions a classroom must have– Low background noise– Short reverberation time– Good sound insulation
• between classrooms to minimise transmission of classroom noise
• of external façade to minimise intrusion of external noise
4
Building Bulletin 93 (DfES, 2003)Acoustic design of schools
• School buildings built since 2003 must comply with the Building Regulations
• Legal requirements for acoustic design of new schools specified in Section 1 of Building Bulletin 93
5
Building Bulletin 93 (DfES, 2003)Acoustic design of schools
• Indoor ambient noise levels
• Airborne sound insulation
• Impact sound insulation
• Reverberation time
• Sound absorption in corridors and stairwells
• Speech intelligibility in open plan spaces
DfES kept informed of results of EPSRC project which will inform any revision of BB 93
6
Two major research projects on classroom acoustics
• The effects of noise on the attainments and cognitive performance of primary school children– Department of Health/DEFRA 1999-2001
• Acoustic design guidelines and teacher strategies for optimising learning conditions in classrooms for hearing and hearing-impaired children– EPSRC (EQUAL) 2002 - 2005
7
Background - previous study
• Noise surveys outside 142 primary schools in 3 London boroughs
• Noise surveys inside 140 classrooms in 16 schools in two boroughs
• Questionnaire survey of all Year 2 children in one borough (N>2000) and their teachers (N>50)
• Comparison of noise levels with SATs results• Experimental testing of mainstream and SEN
children in typical noise conditions
Methodology
8
Background - previous study results• Children are exposed to higher noise levels at school than
recommended by BB 93 and WHO
• Children are aware of noise and annoyed by specific noise sources
• Ease of listening in the classroom is related to external noise levels
• Exposure to noise affected performance on academic tasks
– Classroom babble affects performance on verbal tasks
– External environmental noise affects non-verbal tasks and speed of processing tasks
– Children with special educational needs are differentially affected
• Majority of teachers experience voice and throat problems
9
External noise (142 schools) Internal noise (16 schools)
Maximum noise level v Maths scores
20
40
60
80
100
20 40 60 80 100
dB LAmax
KS
2 M
ath
s sc
ore
%
Background noise level v English score
20
40
60
80
100
40 45 50 55 60 65dB LA90
KS
2 En
glis
h s
core
%
Results hold when data corrected for socio-economic factors
Effects of noise on Key Stage 2 SATs
10
Effects of noise on speed processing task
05
1015
202530
3540
45
Quiet Babble Babble + envnoise
Changes in test scores in noise
11
Effects of noise on children with special educational needs
Change in reading scores
05
10152025303540
quiet noise
SENTypical
Change in spelling scores
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
quiet noise
SENTypical
Results of experimental testing
12
• To identify those acoustic parameters that are most applicable to children’s hearing and listening in classrooms
Acoustic design guidelines and teacher strategies for optimising learning conditions in classrooms for
hearing and hearing-impaired children
• To investigate ways of improving the acoustics in classrooms
• To investigate the use and effectiveness of classroom amplification systems
• To investigate the effects of acoustics on teachers’ voices
• To develop new word tests for hearing and hearing impaired children
Aims of EPSRC EQUAL project
13
• To identify those acoustic parameters that are most applicable to children’s hearing and listening in classrooms
Acoustic design guidelines and teacher strategies for optimising learning conditions in classrooms for
hearing and hearing-impaired children
• To investigate ways of improving the acoustics in classrooms
• To investigate the use and effectiveness of classroom amplification systems
• To investigate the effects of acoustics on teachers’ voices
• To develop new word tests for hearing and hearing impaired children
Aims of EPSRC EQUAL project
14
• 39 mainstream and special schools in London, Herts, Berks, Hants
Acoustic design guidelines and teacher strategies for optimising learning conditions in classrooms for
hearing and hearing-impaired children
• Acoustic surveys of 55 classrooms in 25 schools• Measurements of voice levels of 36 teachers
• Study of installation and use of amplification systems (SFS) in ~20 schools
– Questionnaire surveys of children with and without SFS
– Cognitive testing of children with and without SFS
– Structured observation of children with and without SFS
Methods used in EPSRC EQUAL project
15
Unoccupied reverberation time (Tmf) in 55 classrooms in 25 schools.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
36 11 13 35 12 5 53 34 7 52 43 14 15 42 41 27 20 28 29 46 49 24 25 22 32 31 26 30 4 45 55 54 16 2 3 17 48 6 38 1 8 47 44 40 10 39 50 18 51 19 23 9 21 37 33
Classroom identification number
Re
ve
rbe
rati
on
tim
e,
Tm
f (s
)
Untreated classrooms Treated classrooms
18 out of 44 untreated rooms meet BB 93 criterionAll treated rooms meet criterion
Acoustic survey of 55 classrooms: reverberation times
16
Teachers’ voice levels
36 teachers voice levels (4 male, 32 female) at 1.0 m
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
15 34 8 5 4 20 10 13 6 2 9 18 26 3 21 17 1 27 30 16 11 14 31 7 29 33 36 24 32 25 22 19 12 23 35 28
Teacher identification number
LA
eq a
t 1
.0m
, d
B(A
)
female male
F
M
17
What can be done to improve the acoustic conditions for teaching and learning?
• For teachers• For children
– mainstream– with permanent hearing loss– with temporary hearing loss– with language problems– with attention difficulties
Two approaches investigated: •Increasing acoustic absorption to reduce reverberation time•Using amplification/sound field systems in the classroom
18
No absorption: RT = 1s
Acoustic absorption can be added to the ceiling (as here) or to the ceiling and walls
With absorption: RT = 0.5s
Effectiveness of acoustic treatment
19
Effectiveness of acoustic treatment
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
100 1000 10000
Frequency (Hz)
Sp
ati
ally
av
era
ge
d r
ev
erb
era
tio
n t
ime
, T3
0 (
s)
Average of 7 treatedclassrooms withstandard deviation bars
Average of 6 untreatedclassrooms withstandard deviation bars
Measurements in 7 untreated and 6 matched treated classrooms
20
What is a Sound Field System (SFS)?
• A SFS is essentially a simple speech reinforcement system used by the teacher.
• Three main types: - 4 small moving coil loudspeaker - single column loudspeaker - multiple flat panel (DML) in ceiling
• Systems usually consist of boom or collar mounted directional radio mic & transmitter, radio mic receiver, mixer/amp & loudspeakers.
• Typical price £1000 - £1500 per system.
Amplification in the classroom
21
Why are SFS installed?
• To provide all pupils in the classroom with equal speech signal from the teacher• Installed in classrooms where there is a hearing impaired child• Installed for use by a teacher with voice problems
• Systems are installed: for individual pupils, to improve acoustics by the school, or in a blanket manner by LEA.
• General misconception that SFS solve all acoustical problems
Amplification in the classroom
22
Where are SFS installed?
37.3dB(A)
37.4dB(A)
31.9dB(A)
30.3dB(A)
36.8dB(A)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400
Estimated volume (m3)
Re
ve
rbe
rati
on
tim
e,
T mf (
s)
Untreated classrooms Treated classrooms Classrooms with SFS
SFS installed across whole range of
classrooms measured
Some systems installed in suitable rooms and may
be working well and making a difference
Some systems installed in very small rooms with low background noise – any
point?
Some systems installed in large rooms with long RT – potentially make things
worse
Amplification in the classroom
23
Amplification in the classroom
• Acoustic conditions in the classroom are suitable• They are installed correctly, in appropriate places in
the classroom• They are installed in consultation with the teachers
who will be using them• Teachers are given training in their use• If they work!
Sound field systems can only be used successfully if
SFS were not used in about half of the classrooms in which they were installed
24
Examples of poor installation/communication
The loudspeakers have been installed in areas where class teaching does not take place
25
Example of poor training of the teacher
The loudspeakers have been decorated for Christmas!
Of teachers surveyed
• 56% not given any training in use of systems• 63% not consulted about placing of systems
26
Evaluation of sound field systems• Schools in Hertfordshire and London• Effects on children’s listening
– questionnaire survey of children in mainstream (Nq=1396) and special schools (Nq=128) before and 6 months after installation
• Effects on children’s behaviour– Structured observation of pairs of hearing and hearing impaired
children in 9 classrooms with and without SFS
• Effect on children’s performance - SFS on/off– testing of 380 children (24 with SEN) over 3 week period– spelling, oral comprehension, speed of processing
• Effect on children’s learning - 6 months after installation– testing of 280 children (41 with SEN) before and after – spelling, oral comprehension, speed of processing, reading, maths
27
Evaluation of sound field systems - impact on listening
• Children in SFS classrooms reported improvements in hearing teacher in 3 out of 8 situations when teacher is speaking– writing on board– working in groups– children making noise outside classroom
• No changes for hearing impaired children– small sample and possible technical difficulties
• Children in special schools reported improvements when– cannot see teacher’s face– writing on board– moving around classroom– children making noise outside classroom
Benefits in hearing teacher for majority of children
28
Evaluation of sound field systems - observational results
• No changes between classrooms with and without SFS in– adult involvement– type of task performed by children– type of sound made by children– underlying teaching and learning activities
• In SFS classrooms– children's hands raised less often– children more attentive– children respond more quickly to teacher– children less distracted by external noise
Beneficial effects for all children
29
Evaluation of sound field systems - effect on children’s performance and learning
Performance (SFS on/off)• Improvements in spelling for all children
– no change in comprehension and speed of processing
• Improvements in spelling and comprehension for SEN children– no change for speed of processing
• Effects greater for SEN children
Improvement in processing oral input, particularlyfor children with additional learning needs
Learning (changes after 6 months)• No changes in spelling and maths• Significant improvements in comprehension and speed of
processing
30
Summary and conclusions
• The acoustic conditions in the majority of existing classrooms do not meet current regulations
• Reducing noise and reverberation would benefit children’s learning and teachers’ health
• Acoustic treatments can be applied to remedy the situation• Amplification in the classroom can improve the listening
and learning situation for mainstream children and those with additional learning needs
• Amplification is not a remedy for poor acoustics • In order to be used successfully amplification must be
installed– in classrooms which are acoustically suitable– in appropriate positions in the classroom– in consultation with the teacher– with adequate training of teachers
31
Current and further EPSRC research
• The acoustics of open plan classrooms(LSBU, EPSRC studentship, 2003 - 2007)
• Modelling performance of SFS (LSBU, EPSRC studentship, 2005 - 2008)
• The acoustic design of secondary schools(LSBU, IoEd, Univ of Salford, new application)
32
Help needed
• Access to schools
• Opportunities to do ‘before’ and ‘after’ testing (acoustic and psychological) where remedial treatment/structural alterations planned
• Access to classrooms to test new word test
33
Acknowledgements
Contacts
Julie Dockrell: [email protected]
Bridget Shield: [email protected]
This work has been funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.
LARCI seminarResearch for Education - Making a
Difference10 November 2005