1 implementation of the mdss pooled fund study david huft, south dakota dot aashto research advisory...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Implementation of theMDSS Pooled Fund Study
David Huft, South Dakota DOTAASHTO Research Advisory Committee
Kansas City, MO July 27, 2010
Implementation of theMDSS Pooled Fund Study
David Huft, South Dakota DOTAASHTO Research Advisory Committee
Kansas City, MO July 27, 2010
Connecting South Dakota and the Nation
2
Motivation for Maintenance Decision Support System (MDSS)
Motivation for Maintenance Decision Support System (MDSS)
Rising demands of travelers & commercial carriers High labor, material, equipment & fuel costs Constrained agency funding and staffing Reliable, timely condition reports hard to get Some weather conditions difficult to forecast Complex pavement response to weather and
maintenance New deicing chemicals available Environmental concerns about deicer use Retiring maintenance staff replaced by less
experienced workers
3
MDSS Operating PremiseMDSS Operating Premise
If you know… road characteristics current conditions predicted weather physics & chemistry of
snow, ice, chemicals available resources
(material, equipment, schedule)
MDSS can recommend… treatment type application rate optimal timing
…and predict future road conditions
with or without treatments
4
MDSS is New…but Not UnprovenMDSS is New…but Not Unproven
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Assess DOT Needs, Readiness
Evaluate FHWA Functional Prototype
Develop MDSS Software
6-State Limited Deployment
Refine MDSS Software
Validation Studies
8-State Field Trials
Broad Deployment
2007 Expanded Deployment
Independent B/C Analysis2008
10-State Field Trials
12-State Field Trials
14-State Field Trials
2009
2010
Refinement, Management Tools
2001
2000 Surface Transportation Weather Decision Support Requirements (FHWA)
FHWA Functional Prototype (by NCAR)
5
MDSS Growth 2002-2010MDSS Growth 2002-2010
5 states(2002)
15 states(2010)
Meridian EnvironmentalTechnology
6
Essential Elements of MDSSEssential Elements of MDSS Report actual road conditions Report maintenance
treatments Assess past & present
weather conditions Assess present roadway
state Predict storm weather Recognize resource
constraints Identify feasible maintenance
treatments
Predict road surface behavior
Communicate recommendations to supervisors and workers
7
Achievements:Road Surface ModelingAchievements:Road Surface Modeling
MDSS considers past, current, and future conditions & actions
8
Achievements:Road Condition PredictionAchievements:Road Condition Prediction
9
Achievements: Information Integration & VisualizationAchievements: Information Integration & Visualization
Science-based integration of:– Weather observations– Weather forecasts– Maintenance vehicles– Human-reported
conditions & activities
GIS-based user interface for visualization and analysis of:– Weather observations &
forecasts– Road condition forecasts– RWIS/ESS data– Camera imagery– Mobile data & cameras– Blowing snow forecasts– Maintenance
recommendations & outcomes
10
Achievements:Maintenance Plans & Outcomes
Achievements:Maintenance Plans & Outcomes
Different conditions forecast from different maintenance plans
Side-by-side comparisons permitted
Multiple maintenance plans and expected outcomes:– “Dynamic” approach to
maintain service level in consideration of cost, available resources
– “Standard” approach based on local, state, or national rules of practice
– “What If?” approach for user-defined plans
11
Achievements:MDSS Field Trials 2008-2009Achievements:MDSS Field Trials 2008-2009
CA 66
CO 108108
IN 156156
IA 6565
KS 1818
KY 55
MN 185185
NENE 101101
NHNH 77
NYNY 1717
NDND 7777
SDSD 8080
VAVA 99
WYWY 6868
12
Achievements:Field Decision SupportAchievements:Field Decision Support
Real-time data from maintenance vehicles– Road temperature– Air temperature– Observed precipitation– Observed road
conditions– Plowing activity– Chemical type & rate
MDSS adjusts predicted conditions and need for further maintenance
Real-time, vehicle-specific information fed back into vehicles– Radar imagery– Weather forecasts– Maintenance
recommendations– Fleet depictions
13
Achievements:Field Decision SupportAchievements:Field Decision Support
14
Mobile Data Collection Sensors & AntennasMobile Data Collection Sensors & Antennas
15
Achievements:Training & EvaluationAchievements:Training & Evaluation
“Storm playback” of recent or saved storms at user-defined pace– Evaluation of
maintenance operations– What information was
available for decisions and when
– Train new employees on winter maintenance concepts and use of MDSS
– Predict effects of programmatic changes
Support emergency and traffic management
16
MDSS Benefits:Predicted & RealizedMDSS Benefits:Predicted & Realized
Predicted Same level of service with
less cost– 23% material savings in
New Hampshire study
Achieve better level of service at same cost– 10-15% less
“unacceptable” conditions in New Hampshire study
8:1 Benefit/Cost Ratio New Hampshire
Similar studies performed in MN, CO
Only salt costs considered
Realized Indiana first-year statewide
deployment 2008/2009– $12M saved salt use
– $1.3M saved overtime/fuel
– $11M (of $40M) saved overall after normalizing for winter conditions
Mitchell Region (SD) event $60/mile versus $300/mile
Minnesota estimate ~50% material saved at defined level of service
More consistent winter maintenance
17
Resistance to ChangeResistance to Change
18
Change Obstacles & AgentsChange Obstacles & Agents
Obstacles Fear Technology glitches Cost Perceived value Executive support Conservative culture
Agents Training Maturing technology B/C analysis Actual success Targeted outreach Leadership &
implementation teams
“There are two basic rules of life: Change is inevitable and everybody resists change”
Roger Von Oech
19
Pooled FundStudy MDSSProgression
Innovation
Envision
DesignBuild
Demonstration
Test
EvaluateRefine
Operation
Implement
EnhanceExpand
MDSS PFSImplementation ModelMDSS PFSImplementation Model
20
MDSS Marketing EffortsMDSS Marketing EffortsGeneral MDSS FHWA Market-Ready
Technology AASHTO Technology
Implementation Group – Outreach brochure– 6½ minute video– Case studies– State & region meetings
AASHTO/FHWA/LTAPProduct Demonstration Showcases
National Center for Atmospheric Research
MDSS Pooled Fund PFS technical panel
meetings (3/year) MDSS PFS Fact
Sheet Segment of Product
Demonstration Showcase (by vendor and PFS states)
TRB conferences ITS America WASHTO, SCOH American
Meteorological Society
21
Product Demonstration ShowcasesProduct Demonstration Showcases
Jointly sponsored by AASHTO TIG, FHWA Resource Center, FHWA LTAP
Free workshop State & local
participants State, local & vendor
presentations and demonstrations
Q/A panel discussions
22
MDSS Pooled Fund Study: Lessons LearnedMDSS Pooled Fund Study: Lessons Learned
Winter maintenance is complex MDSS requires & drives culture change Implementation process is long Training is crucial to adoption & acceptance MDSS technology is still young and will
continue to mature MDSS does not replace the decision maker Benefits of MDSS as an information and
management tool may parallel direct benefits from recommendations
23
MDSS Pooled Fund Study: Current Technical DirectionsMDSS Pooled Fund Study: Current Technical Directions
Foster initial deployments Evaluate, validate predictive capabilities Refine physical models More effectively use mobile data collection Link to other DOT systems
– Maintenance Management– Asset Management– Traveler Information
More powerful management tools & reports
24
MDSS Pooled Fund Study: Benefits of MembershipMDSS Pooled Fund Study: Benefits of Membership Jointly directed
leading-edge R&D Convenient funding
mechanism Low-risk opportunity
to deploy Learning
– State to State– Vendor to State– State to Vendor
Intellectualproperty: open but not public domain
Nationally prominent forum for advancing MDSS and related technologies
New States Are Welcome
25
Questions?Questions?
Thanks to: Tony McClelland
Indiana DOT Ben Hershey
Meridian Environmental Technology
For additional info:
David Huft
SDDOT Research Program Manager
605.773.3358