1 hi iiiiiiv i union i ii ilium iiiiiiiiiiiin hi - · pdf filehi iiiiiiv i union i ii ilium...

1111111111111111111

HI iiiiiiv i union i ii ilium iiiiiiiiiiiin HIW ^AwJEll 1 1. nJJj i!!'!''' ill""" "l" III

RESULTS OF IP TRAVERSING

ON THE TAGLIAMONTE CLAIMS,

CAIRO TOWNSHIP, MATACHEWAN, ONTARIO

for

REGENT ROCK RESOURCES INC.

RECEIVEDOCT 1 9 t988

by MINING LANDS SECTION

J. B. Boniwell

Exploration Geophysical Consultant

August 18, 1988

^fe BXGA III INTEW GONS

010

11111111111111111l1

* III lilll! 1 Illllll42A02SE8272 2.11724 CAIRO

LIST OF CONTENTS

Introduction

Description of Property

Details of Survey

Discussion of Results

Conclusions and Recommendations

Appendix

LIST OF DRAWINGS

DWG. NO. TITLE

EIC-1931 Locality Plan

-1989 Chargeability, Resistivity Pseudo-Section

-1990 " " "

-1991 " " "

-1992 " " "

-1993 " " "

-1994 " " "

-1995 " " "

-1996 " ' " "

-1997 Superimposed Results in Plan

IB

in010C

Page 1

2

3

4

8

12

SCALE

1:2,000,000

,500W 1 1250

600W 1 1250

700W 1 1250

800W 1 1250

900W 1 1250

1000W 1 1250

1100W 1 1250

1200W

1:2500

BXGAblBUR INTERNATIONAbCONSULTANTS IsTD.

lll l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l l

INTRODUCTION

A total of eight cross-sections have recently been

traversed by IP/resistivity on the 6-claim Tagliamonte property

in Cairo Township near Matachewan, Ontario. This work fulfilled

the recommendations stemming from a prior geophysical surveying

of this ground by magnetics and VLF seeking new mineral

possibilities in the area (see Excalibur report #88-RRR-1,

Geophysical Results from the Tagliamonte Claims, Cairo Township,

Ontario, by J. B. Boniwell, April 1988).

These latest results have been compiled into pseudo-

sections, contoured, and anomalies translated into plan for

purposes of presentation and interpretation. The significance of

data is evaluated herein, and the advisability of a follow-up

drilling subsequently determined.

BXGAbinilR INTERNATIONAL, GONSUbT&NTS IsTD.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

- 2 -

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

The constituent claims number six and are identified as

follows:

L 892133-38 incl., Cairo Twp., Larder Lake Mining

Division, Ontario.

They are all registered in the name of Regent Rock

Resources Inc., 425 University Ave., TORONTO, Ontario, M5G 1T6.

Each claim is nominally of 40 acres, and is non-patented;

together they form a contiguous block in the northwest corner of

the township. Access to them is by bush roads from a point on

Highway 66 approximately 3.5 kms east of Matachewan. The total

distance from Matachewan to the property is in the order of

6 kms.

There exists an above-average amount of outcrop within

the claims area. Because of it, the ground is lumpy and locally

abrupt. In these conditions, drainages are confined, albeit

still swampy at the bottom of depressions. Several potholes

therein are filled with water. The land is forested with a

mixture of spruce, jackpine and poplar.

BXGAblBUR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS bTD.

SCALE 1 : 2,000,000

Gowganda SCALE V - 8 miles


CAIRO TWP. PROJECT Larder Lake M.D., Ontario

LOCATION MAP

DWG.No. E.I.C. - 1931


- 3 -

DETAILS OF SURVEY

The subject induced polarization (IP) and resistivity

surveying was carried out under contract; it was completed in the

period 25 July - 3 August 1988.

A dipole-dipole electrode array was employed for the

traversing, the 'a' spacing of the dipoles set at 25 m, the fna'

distance between dipoles being varied through the equivalent of

'ns 1,2,3 and 4. The station interval along line was maintained at

25 m; however the existence of the several ponds and small lakes

in the grid area curtailed coverage in places and effectively

confined the programme to eight consecutive cross-sections in the

property centre.

The equipment employed was of the pulse transient type,

viz. Huntec MK IV receiver working in conjunction with a 2 kva

Phoenix IPT1 transmitter. At the receiver, a 240 msec delay time

was interposed before integrating the obtained secondary signal

over the ensuing 100 msec period.

The entire survey operation was conducted by Claridge La

Rose Geophysics Ltd. of Bracebridge, Ontario.

BXGAblBUR INTERNATIONAL, CONSULTANTS I*TD.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l I l l l l

- 4

DISCUSSION OP RESULTS

A heartening amount of IP anomaly has been recorded in

this survey beyond the known horizonal loop em. (HLEM) anomalies.

Even more gratifying, much of this anomaly locates with favouring

features identified from the earlier geophysics:

1) the NW-bearing fault axis in the south quarter. This

structure given prominence in the prior interpretation has now

been further distinguished by polarization anomaly coinciding

with its locus. This correlation is distinctive along the

eastern reaches of the axis, especially on line 700W where a

clear anomaly has been picked up in depth (ns3). It is

accompanied by perceptibly lowered resistivities.

This particular event holds importance since it was

closely approached by the DDH #C51-2 wherein gold was assayed

(160 ppb) in the core at virtual hole bottom, the only known

anomalous gold value so far obtained on the property. On the

balance of evidence, it is believed this hole did not extend far

enough to intersect either the structural axis nor the main

source of the polarization associated with it. The hole however

had penetrated 3.2 m (10.5') into a felsic tuff before being

stopped, and this material has been logged (J. Watkins, 1976) as

containing 5X disseminated pyrite on the average. In the one and

only sample taken thereof, this mineralization proved to host the

above-noted gold assay.

BXGAMBUR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS LTD.


However in the overlying lithologic sections, a 5%

concentration of sulphides is fairly commonplace according to the

same log. Thus there is uncertainty about which polarization

response belongs to what source; moreover the graphite component

of the carbonaceous argillites in this hole has not been

specifically described, while measured core angles suggest a

prevalence of relatively flat dips, or of distorted strikes. All

this makes for uncertainty at the same time as it promotes the

intrigue of the setting and the need for a more precise

resolution of the inherent possibilities.

2) the low magnetic region in the south. At the south

extremities of line 800W, 900W, some very fair IP anomaly has

been encountered in correlation with a magnetic depression. This

is a new indication of mineral incidence in the area.

Interestingly, the anomaly involved again appears more related to

structure than to any individual lithology: on both lines the IP

expression is broadly and incompletely resolved (open to the

south) while exhibiting some sense of burial. This set of

circumstances would fulfill the existence of a source

mineralization centred upon and following in part the projected

major NNE fault which falls in between. At the same time there

is some evident tendency for the anomaly to be influenced by the

local stratigraphy and the syenite intrusion which borders to the

grid south. However a diabase dyke flanking the anomaly to the

west interrupts the flowering of any such budding relationship

here.

BXGAMBUR INTERNATIONAL, CONSULTANTS bTD.


- 6 -

3) the separate incidences of perceived magnetic

abatement. The two specific locations 100S/1000W, 225S/800W

cited in the previous report are both supported by IP anomaly,

the first clearly and individualistically, the second

indistinctly in a compound expression. The first case is

particularly satisfying since it signifies potentially a new

mineral occurrence not before identified despite the lowered

resistivities which accompany it. The second case is not as

certainly established but again there is a resistivity low in the

setting. It retains an appeal in consequence.

All these events are important inasmuch as they occur

independent of the HLEM. Predictably the conductor axes

themselves provide IP anomaly and quite marked low zones in

resistivity in correlation. Resistivities of less than 50

ohm-metres, on occasion less than 10 ohm-metres, have been

recorded along these em. systems in a consistent fashion. The

highly conducting nature of these sections in fact has often

inhibited reliable determinations of chargeability within them.

Still looking beyond these conductors to outside

possibilities, there exists an array of IP anomaly in the west

that is additional to the specific features already discussed.

Anomalous conditions dominate virtually the whole of the line

1200W section south of the BL. Up to six separate peakings can

be recognized in this distance (350 m), and in combination they

constitute a sector that manifestly is widely mineralized.

Moreover it is to be noted that- this is a sector in the so-called

mobile zone close to the Montreal River-Narrow Lake break where

regional movement has been seen to have deformed country strikes.

BXGAMBUR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS bTD.

- 7 -

A considerable potential for gold occurrence emerges here as a

consequence.

Within this context also, the possibility opens up that

the diabse dyke immediately to the east acts as a locus for IP

anomaly along its flanks. There are anomalies for instance at

SON and 350S on the adjacent line 1100W section that fit this

category, and both expressions are fair and additional to prior

considerations. Again at the BL on line 1200W, a strong peaking

there the most northerly of the six peakings on the section

is tucked in against the side of the dyke. The one exception to

this rule in the coverage is at the northeasterly extremity of

the same line (1200W) where there appears no anomaly on the

dyke's furthest flank. This result may just possibly mean that

mineral fluids moving along the dyke edges came in from the south

and died out with distance northwards across the property.

BXGAblBUR INTBRNATIONAb CONSULTANTS fcTD.


- 8 -

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The completed IP/resistivity surveying has fulfilled its

primary objectives, that is to detect other mineralized settings

in the area separate from the drilled conductors. In this

respect it can be said that results have exceeded expectations.

Encouragingly, all such possibilities perceived from the

preceding magnetic and VLF surveying have been enhanced by these

IP results. Chargeability anomalies up to 5 times background

have been observed in those places, as well as in one or two

additional localities outside the encompass of the horizontal

loop em. conduction. Host resistivities range from 500-5000

ohm-metres. As a consequence, a number of fresh and diverse

targets for investigation present themselves. In these, the

chief goal is seen to be gold mineralization.

To accomplish an adequate testing of the resident

possibilities, however, it is specifically recommended that a

programme of diamond drilling be undertaken which will be largely

cross-sectional in nature directed at the various mineral

indications provided by IP/resistivity. The holes and sections

which are prescribed are listed below.

DDK #RR-88-1: Collar at 40S/800W

to be drilled grid S at -500 for 100 m

BXGAblBUR INTERNATIONAL, CONSULTANTS bTD.

- 9 -





DDK #RR-88-4: Collar at 40N/1200W

to be drilled grid S at -50 0 for 100 m







DDK #RR-88-8; Collar at 225S/1200W


DDH #RR-88~9: Collar at 280S/1200W


DDH #RR-88-10: Collar at 290N/900W

to be drilled grid S at -500for 120 m

DDH #RR-88-11: Collar at 450S/900W

to be drilled grid N at -50 0 for 125 m

EXGAblBUR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS IsTD.


- 10 -

This drilling amounts to 1270 m (4165 1 ). It is

considered a practical outlay for the area and for the potential

newly proffered by the IP results. Care has been taken to cover

as many bets as possible, including the lingering chance of a

zinc-rich base metal mineralization in the wider volcanic context

of the property geology. Most holes are relatively short in

order to stay fairly close to the various aspects of the targeted

geophysics, especially the perceived structural components.

As the exploration enters the drilling stage, it is

further recommended that:

i) the graphite component of any carbonaceous sediments

be duly noted and estimated volumetrically;

ii) physical measurements of the core be carried out.

Magnetic susceptibility and conductance

determinations need to be made fairly regularly to

establish characteristic relationships between any

intersected source and its geophysical response. The

causes of conduction, polarization and magnetic

anomaly require explanation here if effective

projections of mineral potential are to be made in

future.

iii) the exact locations of past drill holes be fixed with

respect to present grid co-ordinates.

BXGAblBUR INTBRNATIONAb CONSULTANTS IsTD.


- 11 -

A budget total of S200,000 is foreseen to fund these

recommendations if carried out in full (see Appendix). It is

strongly recommended that the proposed drilling be implemented

this fall, and more or less as given, since time is of the

essence and the property clearly warrants this kind of testing.

JBB:sb

August 18, 1988

J. B. Boniwell

Exploration Geophysical Consultant

BXGAblBUR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS LTD.


- 12 -

APPENDIX

Costs

Total costs for the recommended drilling stage on the

property are estimated at $195,000.00 as follows:

i) diamond drilling:

1270 m at SIIO.OO all-up

ii) assaying:

1000 samples at S12.00 (Au only)

100 samples at S7.50 (Zn)

iii) geological logging, sampling,

on-site supervision:

25 days at $350.00

iv) subsistence, transportation, supplies:

$139,700.00

12,000.00

750.00

8,750.00

1,750.00

v) geologic compilation, reporting, drafting: 3,500.00

vi) management, incl. assessment submission,

physical measurements on core:

Contingency

3,500.00

169,950.00

25,500.00

8195,450.00

EXGAblBUR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS bTD.

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministdre du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

300Whitney Block, Room 6biu Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

Telephone: (416) 965-4888

November 30, 1988 Your file: W8808-490 Our file: 2.11724

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Sir:

Re: Notice of Intent dated November 15, 1988Geophysical (Induced Polarization) Survey submitted on Mining Claims L 892133 et al in the Township of Cairo

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

W.R. CowanProvincial Manager, Mining LandsMines fc Minerals DivisionR™RM:plEnclosure

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining and Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

Regent Rock Resources Inc. 425 University Ave. Toronto, Ontario M5G 1T6

ONTARfO 3SOI.OGICAL SURVEY

ASSfcSSMENT FILES OFFICE

DEC l 1983

R E C e l v E D

Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake, Ontario

Mr. J.B. Boniwell 10 Hurontario Street Mississauga, Ontario L5G 3G7

Mmisivy.'oiNorthern Deve\opmen\

Mines

Ontarioa^LMi mj

Technical Assessment Work Credits

Date

November 15. 1988

File2.11724

Mining Recorder'* Report of Work No.

W8808-490

Recorded Holder

Regent Rock Resources Inc.Township or Area

Cairo Township

Type of turvey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Rfldinmptrir Hays

Inrlnred polarization 20 riay^

Other . riays

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological riays

Genchemiral riays

Man days f] Airborne i i

Special provision RI Ground Q

O Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

fi Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

l 8 92133 892135-136 892138

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

5 days Induced Polarization

L 892134

Mo credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

Q not sufficiently covered by the survey Q insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) -60.

628 (85/12)


Report of Work

Ontario

^rPOx^.

Instructions: - Please type or printf- If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Not*: - Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

- Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(f)

Claim Holder(s)Induced Polarization/resistivity

Township or Ar*a

Cairo Twp.Prospector's Licence No.

Regent Rock Resources Inc.Address

Survey Company425 University Ave. , Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1T6--————

TBate of Survey (from A to)

Claridge La Rose Geophysics Ltd. ___ p&y | flo. | 3?. \ 8a3yv i Xw i ff f̂'ay | Mo. j Yr.

Total Miles of lin* Cut

N/AName and Address of Author (of Geo-Technicat report)

——-———3. B . Boniwell, 10 Hurontario St., MISSISSAUGA, Ontario, L5G 3G7Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions Geophysical

For first survey: -Electromagnetic Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting) . Magnetometer

For each additional survey: - R"diometric

using the same grid: i -m\ •Other ( Ir)

Enter 20 days (for each)

Geological

Geochemical

Man Days ^^^ Geophysical

FiY Ft /fjI.Vi" J* - '" "^ P^TMlectromagnetic *tdJ8nter J6f.al(s) here . . ! i 0* jj

r^wS ' -' - 'lagnetometer

^ " OCT 21 J966 ^ iadiometric/o?. X -̂ ) ty~ ' ) ther

C~^T\ Geo1 'gical

~~ —————————— -CTBfhemical

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions Electromagnetic credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys. ; Magnetometer

; Radiometric

Days per Claim

20

Days per Claim

•••"••"'

Days per Claim

——————

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be appo choice. Enter number of days cr In columns at right.

l at the claim holder's er claim selected

DateOct. 19 '88

Recon Agent (Signature) l"

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Total numb*r of mining claims covered by this report of work.

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

performed the work

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

•T. R. Rnniwell, 10 Hurontario St.,

MISSISSAUGA, Ontario, L5G 3G7Date Certified19 Oct. '88

Certifi

1362 (85/12)

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

rMinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

ntario

Geophysical-Geologlcal-Geochemlcal Technical Data Statement

File-

l l

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survcy(s). Town ship or Area.

Claim Holder(s)—

Induced Polarization

Cairo Township, Ontario

Regent Rock Resources

___425 University Ave. , Toronto,————..

Survey Company Claridge La Pose Geophysics—————

Author of Report J . B. Boniwell——————————————

Address of Author 10 Hurontario St., Mississaugat Ont.

Covering Dates of Survey .23 July - 3rd August ' 88————((incoming to office)

Total Miles of Line Hut N/A_____;_________;—————,

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer——Radiometric——

DAYSper claim

(IP) 20

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic.to airborne surveys)

omctric ____

Oct. 17/88

(enter dayi per claim)

SIGNATURE:A\'

Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED LUt numerically

L 892133 """"(pYe'fixf

892134(number)

892135

892136

892138

l

1j

TOTAL CLAIMS.

B37 /8S/12J

INDUCED rO!.-\R!7AT10\-

RF.SISTIVITY GRAVITY ELECTROMAGNETIC MAONF.TIC

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

NumbT of St^ti""* Number of Readings ,

Station interval Line spacing

Profile srale

Contour interval

Instrument

AcC'irary — Srale ronstant

Diurnal rorrerfion method

Base Station check-in interval (hours)

Rase Station location and value

Instrument

Coil configuration , . ,

Coil separation

AccuracyMethod: D Fixed transmitter D Shoot back Q In line

Frequency .(•pecify V.L.F. tution)

Parameters measured.

Instrument

Srale ronstant

Corrections made

Rase station value and location

Elevation arruracy

Instrument . ,. , .,. .

Method fD Time Domain D Frequency Domain

Parameters — On time 1 sec ' Frequency

-Off time 1 sec Range..

- Delay time 240 IPS

— Intepration time 100 msO

Power 2 Kva ,

F/lectrod** a.rrny r5ipolG~d!LDolG

Electrode spacing . 25 m , . . . . . ,- , ..., ,

Type of electrode ————— porous pots ———————————————————————————————

1

1

1

1

1

1

1H

D Parallel line

1

1

1

1

1m1̂m

l1

1


Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and ExpenditJitures)

O f "i '-7 Of** (V^nin^Apt JL v 'W

instructions: — Please type or print.— If number of mining clarms i traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

./S "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

" "" — Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s)

Induced Polarization/resistivityClaim Holder(s)

Township or Area

Cairo Two.

Regent Rock Resources Inc.Prospector's Licence No.

Address

Survey Company425 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1T6

Claridge La Rose Geophysics Ltd.[Date of Survey (from a to)23 ,07 . 88 l 03 . 08 88^Day j Mo. ] Yr. J Day j Mo. j Yr.

(Total Miles of line Cut

N/AName and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

________J. B. Boniwell, 10 Hurontario St., MISSISSAUGA, Ontario, L5G 3G7Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Men Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

-Other (IP)

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

20

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total

Total Expenditures Days Credits

S -h 15 -Instructions

Total Days Credits may be apportion choice. Enter number of days crauitt In columns at right. l l f

Date Oct. 19 '88

\Recorded 1Vj^

cM a t the claim holder's rjer claim selected

1Kbld^pr Agent (Signature)ES&l^rtl'

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix Number

L892133L892134

L892135

L892136

L892138

Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

Date Recorded

Date Approved as Recorded

Mining Recorder

Branch Director

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

performed the work

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

.T. R. Roniwell,—10-Huron.tflrifiL-Stt

HTSSISSAUGA, Ontario, L5G 3G7Date Certified19 Oct. '88

Certifi

1362 {85/12)

AREAS WITHDRAWN ' ÔM DISPOSITION

M.A.O. - MINING RIGHTS ONLY

S.M.O. -SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

M.* t. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS

MIMN3 AND SURFACE HfiMTS NOT OPENTO STAKING, APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 3 l(b) JUNE I2J997.

GL4MM - PCNOM AfUCAlKM UMOeR rUBLJC UU08 ACT

hJMD UU KMHIT

NOTES

AREA WEST QF WEST MONTREAL RIVER

CLOSED TO STAKINO SUBJECT TO SEC. 3B(f)

OP THE WININO ACT, CO SEPT. I9T8

CTDV ANOTICE OF FOPrTrtS TOWNSHIP 7 ARE* PUONSKl FOREST MANA

AND MAY BE SUBJECTTHE MNR UNIT FORESTCONTACTED AT; P.O. BC

SWASTIKA. ONT. POK ITO 705-642-3222

42AWSE0272 2. H724 CAIRO

Alma Twp.

l——___l- ———

1—T^—1=4-—-—rrTaaovrr"— nrî^*^^ i!L i.-*lj—J—L—CJ *-. '.""i.T—-T~iT —— ~-j i _ i

rL TL ~~l 104*384 i 10480911833651 \ 8 33663

^1^. _______ I.. __ .

___ ' --_)...^ TL IL

982567 *825a i J M287C

,v |- ;i \*l 1*480 l I4477\

1014713 1511446

-—-L *——i—r^ l ^* l495919 I.B2I3I3 k 621312 ;

' i -' r '•~J } v. , i ,_^-^' l .

i ' ' ^.-. _ ,' I.*1643IB6 .643155 i e

^JC':'*T^:': ::-^'?^" ~

643160 J643I59 643167 |643I56851 i-IB2I3I6 ! 180350*621304 l l "f J l

.—, lL.,--J-—— \HSIlTB^î^ r i T \ -i^~ ^ !î

•,a A4JM0^ T ^ "* ^ ™ ^^——*-"~~~J x

200 Kimberley Twp.

. r

Q.v*

O)

ii.—

kfc.Uk.

DATE OF ISSUE

OCT 211988

HlGHW'V A;4D ROUTE Na

OTHER ROADS

TRAILS '

SURVEYED LINES:TOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES. ETC.

i.. MINING CLAIMS. PARCELS. ETC,

JNSURVEYED LINES:LOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARY -MINING CLAIMS ETC

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY

UTILIT\ LINES

NON-PERkNNIALSTFEAM

. .CODING OR FLOOD'NG RIGHTS

SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN

K5SERVATIONS

ORIGINAL SHORcLIKE

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES

TRAVERSE MONUMENT .

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

OF DOCUMENT

ÂTENT, SURFACE ft M, KING. s-jsFAce R IGHTS.MINING RtGHTbO.LY .....

LEASE. SURFACE 4 MlfllNG RIGHT? .

" ,SURFACc RICH "SONL''. _ ,

" , MINIf J RIGHTS ONLY....—

L'CENCEOF OCCUPATION . ___ .

ORDER-IN-COUNClL .. .... .........

RESERVATION..... ..,....... —

CANCELLED ,................ ...

SAND 4 GRAVEL . __ .....,........

SYMBOL

^ c*

....rf ....... CT

. __ .. _ .-^. B

.,. __ ,...LA*-~

, .......... _ . Of

WOTI: WININO M IGHTS M PARCELS P*~fcNTto PHIO* T O MA*

1*13. V tSTIti i* ORIGINAL P ATfNTEE i 1 THC *Utj' LA W Of ACT F .; o |97O CMA* 3*O, SCC *3. i -J M l C

SCALE ,ti' V - -'1C

•(ITTOO 6000

O 200 lOOOl l KM)

2UOO (2 -M t

j TOWNSHIP

CAIROJM M.R. ADMINISTRATIVE OISTRffT

KIRKLAND LAKEMINING DIVISION

LARDER LAKELAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

TIMISKAMING

Ministry of Ministry ofNatural Northern DevelopmentResources and MVies

OntarioOat* JULY 1984

G-3209

o o

600K

400N

200N

OS

200S

400S

600S

700So oCD

O O

oo f\J

o o o

ooCO

o cOD

o o

o oCM O

o oCT)

6-

.v^

*TR---~~\

\ \U \ \ \j Q LC ANIC^S

\ " 88-4

GABBRO

Porphyry,,

4CCN

\ \ \ lo. o

l-V/\

. t' tlll

s*V(b

V̂y

200N

\ \

/v'

\ \

y f 1

fsrV '

\\\

\ \

V N"\

. \

\ \^1 l*

\ ^

\''

x X \

Xx

x

x o x o

\\

200S

\ 8 Syenite

400S

600S

o oCM

Oo c

o oCO

o oUD

O O

o o ex

LEGEND

Interpreted fault showing

relative movement and

basis for projection.,... M - Magnetics V - VLF EM tNSS) G - Geology

Projected geologic contact,

Magnetic horizon.............

H LEM conductor showing width ,,

Old DDH with identification C

showing horizontal extent... 0

IP anomaly showing peak,

relative amplitude and lateral extent,. . ,.. ... . ..

Proposed DDH with identifier and horizonta projection ,.........

Limits of l P coverage .

WKMed Strong

88-2

200m

-2500


CAIRO TOWNSHIP PROJECT

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

ONTARIO CANADA

PLAN of INTERPRETATIONSHOWING i P RESULTS

Date - AUGUST 1988 DWG. Mo E.l.C. - 1997

42A02SE027a 2.11724 CAIRO aio

325S

LiJ

UJo:CL Q.

CD <LJ Otr <i: o

D- Q.

500W

J 1724 CAIRO

300S 275S 250S 225S 2GOS 75S l SOS 25S DCS rss SOS 25S ON 25N 5 CM 75N CON 25N 1 SON

4171 2167 177 12.0

4841

3536

100 2796 1566 396! 4290

14.0

353 77.0

5085

2534

2-9 3.1 5.1

.5.2

5.9

ri = 2

n = 3

n = 4

320

SURVEY SPECIFICATIONSDELAY TIMF ' 2 40 m secINTEGRATION TIME t l 00 m secCONFIGURATION * D l p o l e-D l p o l e Array

DIPOLE SEPARATION - 2 5 meters

PLOTTING SPECIFICATIONS

HORIZONTAL SCALE : 1=1250

CHARGEABILITY

RESISTIVITY

Contour

10 msec contour

1 msec contour

Re n g e

Above 2500

2500 - 500Below 500

O

! n t e r v a l

0000 ohm-fn

2500 ohm-m500 ohm-m100 ohm-m

•" o- fc ,-*f -*-

DATA ACQUISITION i

DATA PROCESSING iJOB NUMBER -

TESLA-10 LTD TC-1044

REGENT ROCK RESOURCES INC


IP PSEUDO SECTION

LINE '- 5 00W

Dwg N o . E.I.C.-1989 Date i 15-Aug-88

ro u Q

O) o O

APPARENT CHARGEABILITY

(msec)

APPARENT RESISTIVITY

(ohm-m)

OJ

Ol

•o CO GJ r\)

•01 Ol

C/)

Ol o ro 1 rj\

CO 'O!

CO Ol

•o

en ro Ol

CO o

•o CO . 01 CO Ol

. o CO

O C

(O m

o to ID

O O (B en i > c 10i 00

00

m

"D CO m

c:

o

o

o O

o*CO n~

iO

o

O

-H

CO x l— t

13 O C- m

o

m

o m O

O m CO o O m CO o

c, o

o >

DD

-H

c: t

) 3 ^

DCD

O

rn o

20

m CO

o

m

i en

o

-p-l ~-

o

O

D CO

CO

—

i

O

O

Cv

\ ' f

jb

O

DO r

oa

en—

oo

O

en

eno o

o o

cr

o ro

en

o o

ro o

—

en e

n o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o y 3 I 3

3 —

m CO

l—

lto

o O m CD

— o

O Z > CO o f—

m en

o

O —H

-H O CO

ID m

o O —i

t-^ O

2

CO

D

O—

' o

o T

Ir~

—i

m o

O mm

CD

CO m

-D ;p.

K-

X)

O-H o

m

m

ro o

en -

—

roo

-^•o

o o

3

o

0—

33

r-*-

ft

O

l W

ft

l ft

ft

CO m CO

~D m

o ol

TO

O

O)

—O

CO

425S 400S

CO

CO UJce

UJo:Q.O,

mUJo

O

LUo:o.

700W

375S 350S 325S 300S 275S 250S 225S 200S 75S 150S 25S OOS 75S SOS 25S

279 256 303 829 1212

306 220 527

266

394 658 1346 '2236n = A

4-4 3.0 0-9 9-4

SURVEY SPECIFICATIONSDELAY TIME ' 240 msecINTEGRATION TIME ' 100 m secCONFIGURATION - D l p o l e-D l p o l e A rrayDIPOLE SEPARATION - 2 5 meUrs


1 O 250HORIZONTAL SCALE :

CHARGEABILITY

RESISTIVITY

Contour

10 msec contour l msec contour

Range

Above 2500

2500 - 500 Below 500

I n i: e r v a l

0000 ohm-m2500 o hm-m500 o h m~m100 o hm~m

DATA ACQUISITION

DATA PROCESSING JOB NUMBER

TESLA-10 LTDTC-1044

REGENT ROCK RESOURCES INC-

CAIRO TOWNSHIP PROJECT IP PSEUDO SECTION

LINE 700W

Dwg No. E .I,C. - 1991 Date i !5-Aug-88

2.11724 CAIRO 240

450S 425S 400S 3753 350S

LOLU ce

CL Q.

CD

x o

LU

Q- 0-

800W

325S l

300S 275S 250S 225S 200S 75S 50S 125S IOCS 75S 505 25S ON 25N

635 866 550 29? 931

B49

990

509

1564 3379 2346 3572 26387

100

1520

5361 2588 1093

3.7 13.0

10.0

25-56

SON

.1.53445 - n ^ 2

n = 3

n s 4

n = 2

n = 3

n = 4

SURVEY SPECIFICATIONSDELAY T IME i 240 msecINTEGRATION TIME : 100 msecCONFIGURATION : D lpo i e-Dl po l e ArrsyDIPOLE SEPARATION ' 25 meters

PLOTTING SPECIFICATIONSl:1250HORIZONTAL SCALE '

CHARGEABILITY i

RESISTIVITY

Contour-

10 msec c ontour l m sec c ontour

Range Interval

Above 2500 10000 o hm-m 2500 ohm-m

2500 - 500 5 00 ohm-m Be l ow 500 100 ohm-m

DATA ACQUISITION

DATA PROCESSING JOB NUMBER




IP PSEUDO SECTION

LINE : 800W

Dwg No . E.I.C.- 1992 Date i 15-Aug-88

2.11724 CAIRO 250

LU a: LU o: o, Q.

CD

< LJJ

O CCL

< x

o UJ o: O-

O-

900W

500S

475S

45

0S

425S

40

0S

375S

35

0S

325S

30

QS

275S

25

0S

225S

20

0S

] 7

5S

1 503

125S

l O

OS

75S

S

OS

25

SON

25N

SON

75N

DON

25Ii

150N

17

5N

200N

22

5N

250N

27

5N

300N

32

5N

350N

37

5N

400N

42

5N™

H

1 r

l F

ill

1079

9

5! 1

02036

773

7438

!443

232

21-3

24

-

34-9

)"\

) ^

\\

35.7

3.5

1.6

3-3

2.3

m

NR/,5

S

NR

^^

*

2.0

1.3

n -

2

n ^

3

n =

4

n -

2

n =

3

n =

4

SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS

DELAY TIME

: 240

msec

INTEGRATION TIME

' l 0

0 msec

CONFIGURATION

' Dipole-Dipols Array

DIPOLE SEPARATION

'- 25 meters


HORIZONTAL SCALE

- 1

:1250

CHARGEABILITY

'

RESISTIVITY

Contour

10 msec contour

1 msec contour

Range

Interval

Above

2500

10000

ohm-m

2500 ohm-m

2500

- 500

500 ohm-m

Be low

500

100

ohm-m

DATA ACQUISITION

DATA PROCESSING

JOB NUMBER

TESLA-10 LTD

TC-1044



IP PSEUDO SECTION

LIN

E

:900

W

Dw

q N

o .

E.I.

C.-

I9

93D

ate

s

l5-A

ug-8

8

42A*2S69272

2,11724

CAIRO

260

525S l—

500S

475S

450S

425S

400S

375S

350S

325S

3QOS

275S

250S

225S

2COS

1 50S

1 25S

l COS

75S

50S

25S

ON25N

SON

75N

100N

1 25N

1 SON

l75N

200N

225N

250N

275N

300N

325N

350N

375N

CO en LU on CC Q-

Q-

CD

< UJ

O

EK

< X

O UJ ce Q-

Q.

1000

W

1930

1937

2513

5146

8208

8605

6486

94

65

9020

20167

279S

18?7

1086

521

463

2959

3

772

005-450

3746

6696

J5018

6081

7456

8425

9114

8240

x*0^/

66159

f

^11679

6242

6319

50

65

5540

.9

572

"i5

72

8646

752

n *

2

s 3

n ^

4

1.5

.2-6

l .8

7-1

9.a

1 .6

1 .9

r, ^

2

n =

3

n =

4

SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS

DELAY TIME

: 240

msec

INTEGRATION TINE

' TOO

msec

CONFIGURATION

' D l

p o

l e-D l

p o

l e

Array

DIPOLE SEPARATION

: 25 meters


HORIZONTAL SCALE

: 1=1250

CHARGEABILITY

RESISTIVITY

Contour

10 msec contour

1 msec contour

Range

Interval

Above 2500

10000 ohm-m

2500 ohm-m

2500

- 500

500 ohm-m

Below

500

100

ohm-m

DATA ACQUISITION

DATA PROCESSING

JOB

NUMBER

•^ l

TESLA-10 LTD

TC-1044



IP PSEUDO SECTION

LIN

E

MO

OO

W

Dw

g N

o .

E.I.C

.- 1

994

Date

:

l5-A

ug-8

8270

ro CO Q

O oA

PP

AR

EN

T C

HA

RG

EA

BIL

ITY

C

mse

c)

l

-16 /

APPARENT RESISTIVITY Uhm-m)

.1000

0

6V (n

OJ ro

en

. O CO

O c (O m

o en i i (X)

CO

rn o

o

"D CO m o en m

o

o O 00 X

i—i

"D

"D O

C- m

o

m

o

m o

o 70 m 00 o c: TD

O m

oo o

C-

Oo >

GC

— l

CI

~DIZ

^3

CD

Om

o

3

m LO en

O o

o t/)

o

o

O

o

m

i co

ol

-*

O

CD

ro^

en—

o

o O

xl

en

enO

O

o o

en

o

o

ro o

—

en

en o

o o o o

o o o o

rn

co co

O

X o m CD

o B

O M

o CO o m en

O

"D r~

o —i —i

i—i z

o C/)

~D m o i—i TI i—i o

> —l

l—l o

^ 00

o

oo m

o

~n

m

"y*

m o x

ci >

-H

CO

X)

—1

—m

>

p—i 2

"D

—i

o

rn

Om

l\)

O

—'

IV)

en -

o

-f^

-o o o

3

Ort

—

B 3

f*-

ft

tfl

01

(* l

n

mT

O

o

oO

) —

.

00 cr ^3 ^:

m -c oo ~0 m o i—i ~n

t—i

o

> —i

^—i

o z 00

400S 375S 350S 325S 300S 275S 250S 225S 200S 1 75S 1 SOS 125S 1 COS 75S SOS 25S ON 25N SON 75N DON 125N 150N l 75N 200N 225N 250N 275N

CO

C/3 UJ Cd

Q. Q.

CO

UJ O

LUor

1200W

4782

3426

1602 1558 3322 4232

3359

3548

2893 2948 2375 2916 978 224 241 447 531 329 371 3769

2944 ""5966 3152 2093

4765 2769

3516

3958

B5872 B2988 B6045 J 0212 ^5555 ^ 551 ^3362 B5477 n - 1

4190,^ 6603 n ^ 2

^

722f n = 3

3.7 3.6 3.6 4.

4-6

25.23.2

n = 2

n - 3

n - 4

SURVEY SPECIFICATIONSDELAY TIME : 240 msecINTEGRATION T IME : 100 msecCONFIGURATION : D l p o le-Dlpol e ArrayDIPOLE SEPARATION - 2 5 meters


HORIZONTAL SCALE ' 1:l 250

CHARGEABILITY

RESISTIVITY

Contour

10 msec contour

1 m sec c ontour

Range Interval

Above 2500 10000 ohm-m 2500 ohm-m

2500 - 500 500 ohm-m Be l ow 500 100 ohm-m

DATA ACQUISITION :

DATA PROCESSING 'JOB NUMBER :




IP PSEUDO SECTION

LINE :1200W

Dwg N o. E.!.C. - 1996 Date : 1 5-Aug-88

42A02SE0272 2.11724 CAIRO 230

1 hi iiiiiiv i union i ii ilium iiiiiiiiiiiin hi - · pdf filehi iiiiiiv i union i ii ilium...

Documents