1. eu – unicef project july 2011 – july 2013 – objective 1: in four countries, analysis of...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1. EU – UNICEF Project July 2011 – July 2013 – Objective 1: In four countries, analysis of gaps in the accountability and responsiveness of service providers](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072008/56649d745503460f94a54177/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Strengthening Child Protection systems in their response to violence against children
Turning evidence into policy and resultsWorkshop in the context of EU-UNICEF Project
Sarajevo, 18-19 September 2012
![Page 2: 1. EU – UNICEF Project July 2011 – July 2013 – Objective 1: In four countries, analysis of gaps in the accountability and responsiveness of service providers](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072008/56649d745503460f94a54177/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• EU – UNICEF Project July 2011 – July 2013– Objective 1: In four countries, analysis of gaps in the
accountability and responsiveness of service providers (actors with key mandates in child protection) in identification, referral and response to violnce against children – aim strengthening of the system;
– Objective 2: Strengthen independent monitoring of civil society of child rights violations and in particular on violence against children;
– Objective 3: Systematic policy dialogue state actors and civil society;
– Objective 4: Sharing of lessons learned at larger regional level
Context of workshop
![Page 3: 1. EU – UNICEF Project July 2011 – July 2013 – Objective 1: In four countries, analysis of gaps in the accountability and responsiveness of service providers](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072008/56649d745503460f94a54177/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Objectives of the workshop
• Disseminate findings of the research – stock taking for strengthening child protection system for allowing proper response for protecting children
• Identify strengths and weaknesses in responses to violence against children in the participating countries
• Agree on policy changes and changes in services building coherent child protection systems;
• Review opportunities, challenges and lessons learned for such policy reforms.
![Page 4: 1. EU – UNICEF Project July 2011 – July 2013 – Objective 1: In four countries, analysis of gaps in the accountability and responsiveness of service providers](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072008/56649d745503460f94a54177/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
HEALTH
EDUCATION
UNICEF Regional office CEE/CIS 4
JUSTICE & INTERIOR
SOCIAL POLICIES
CHILD WELFARE
CASH SUPPORT
SERVICES: PREVENTION & PROTECTION
Basic assumptions– multi-sectoriality of the child protection system
![Page 5: 1. EU – UNICEF Project July 2011 – July 2013 – Objective 1: In four countries, analysis of gaps in the accountability and responsiveness of service providers](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072008/56649d745503460f94a54177/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
UNICEF Regional office CEE/CIS 5
Basic assumptions – multi-layer child protection system
Republic of Azerbaijan: Child Protection Institutional SystemRepublic of Azerbaijan: Child Protection Institutional System
National and District level. Subordination, reporting, referral and monitoring lines.
Ministry of Justice
Council of Trustees on rights of young
offenders
Public Monitoring Council for
justice issues
Ministry of InteriorDepartment ofprevention and profilaxis of adolescents
Counter ,Trafficking Unit
Ministry of Education
Department for adoptions
Ministry of Health
Department for adoptions
Ministry of Finance
Ministry of Labour & Social Security
Department of Social support
VTEK – Medical Commission
Department for disabled and lonely people
Ministry of Youth, Sport and Tourism
Child coordination council
Transit centres (3)
Street children, children in conflict with the law, victims
of trafficking
Police units and stations:
temporary detention (KPZ)
Children with disabilities and children without parental care (4-18)
Presidential Apparatus
Medical Psycho-pedagogical commission
Children with disabilities and children without parental care (0-3)
Children with disabilities and family allowances
Psycho-neurological dispensaries (Polyclinics)
Dwelling Units and Public
consumptions (Jeks):
(Pedagogues)
Children in conflictwith the law and
adoptions
Institutes for children with severe disabilities
NGOs: drop in centre for street children, homes
for victim of trafficking,
psychological support
Cabinet of MinistersDeputy PMfor Humanitarian Deputy PM Issues Committee for Refugees and IDPs,
Homes and schools for
children with
disabilities
Rieducation schools for
boys
NGOs: day care centres for children with
disabilities;SOS village
Executive CommitteeExecutive Committee
Public Prosecutor
Detention Centres
Home education
Commission on Minors Commission on
Guardianship and Adoption:
Child Protection Inspectors
Education Authority (psycho-
pedagogical commissions)
SOBES: allowances
for disabilities,
IDPs, refugees, families
VTEK –Medical
Commission for disabilities
Depart-ment of
JEKS
Child IDPs, Refugees, Asylum seekers
Baby homes (incl. Psycho-neurological problems)
Homes and schools for children
deprived of parental care
Rehabiliation centre
Sanatoriums for chronic diseases (including STD)
OMD: emergency unit for children
abandoned at birth
Isolation Centres during investigations
(SIZO)
Judge of preliminary
inquiry
Court
Deputy Minister:national coordinator
Child inspectors
![Page 6: 1. EU – UNICEF Project July 2011 – July 2013 – Objective 1: In four countries, analysis of gaps in the accountability and responsiveness of service providers](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072008/56649d745503460f94a54177/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
UNICEF Regional office CEE/CIS 6
Policy review and
formulationStrategic and operational
planning
Budget formulation
and adoptionBudget
execution
Monitoring and reporting
Audit and evaluation
Basic assumptions– whole system strengthening – influence within policy cycle
![Page 7: 1. EU – UNICEF Project July 2011 – July 2013 – Objective 1: In four countries, analysis of gaps in the accountability and responsiveness of service providers](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072008/56649d745503460f94a54177/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Structure of the workshop
• Evidence as a basis for an improved response – Session 1 and 2
• Strategies to move from evidence to harmonized cross sectorial policy – session 3
• What needs to go into the action plan – gaps and recommendations for current responses – session 4
• Road maps – session 5