1 erik nordlund, dept. of electrical engineering testing of silver-, copper- and electro-graphite...

10
1 Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering Testing of Silver-, Copper- and Electro-Graphite Brush Materials for Slip Ring Units

Upload: blaze-potter

Post on 04-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering Testing of Silver-, Copper- and Electro-Graphite Brush Materials for Slip Ring Units

1

Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering

Testing of Silver-, Copper- and Electro-Graphite Brush

Materials for Slip Ring Units

Page 2: 1 Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering Testing of Silver-, Copper- and Electro-Graphite Brush Materials for Slip Ring Units

2

Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering

Why slip rings?

The Four Quadrant Transducer (4QT) system

Page 3: 1 Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering Testing of Silver-, Copper- and Electro-Graphite Brush Materials for Slip Ring Units

3

Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering

Slip ring topology

Page 4: 1 Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering Testing of Silver-, Copper- and Electro-Graphite Brush Materials for Slip Ring Units

4

Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering

Test setup

Integral motor

Torque meter

Slip rings

ACCurrent

Signal slip rings

A UTo data logger for temperatures

Brushes

Page 5: 1 Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering Testing of Silver-, Copper- and Electro-Graphite Brush Materials for Slip Ring Units

5

Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering

Test setup

PT-100 temperature sensors

Signal slip rings

Measurement instruments

Page 6: 1 Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering Testing of Silver-, Copper- and Electro-Graphite Brush Materials for Slip Ring Units

6

Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering

Losses in slip rings

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 500050

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Speed [rpm]

Fri

ctio

n l

oss

es

[W]

2.6 A/cm2

5.2 A/cm2

7.8 A/cm2

10.4 A/cm2

13 A/cm2

Friction losses

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 50000

50

100

150

200

250

Speed [rpm]

Ele

ctri

cal

Loss

es

[W] 2.6 A/cm 2

5.2 A/cm 2

7.8 A/cm 2

10.4 A/cm 2

13 A/cm 2

Electric losses

Page 7: 1 Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering Testing of Silver-, Copper- and Electro-Graphite Brush Materials for Slip Ring Units

7

Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering

The different brushes

Material• Brush 1 Silver – Graphite• Brush 2 Copper – Graphite• Brush 3 Electro – Graphite• Slip ring Brass• Holder Brass

Page 8: 1 Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering Testing of Silver-, Copper- and Electro-Graphite Brush Materials for Slip Ring Units

8

Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering

Speed dependency

Temperature rise

Electrical lossesFriction losses Contact voltage drop losses

Total losses

Page 9: 1 Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering Testing of Silver-, Copper- and Electro-Graphite Brush Materials for Slip Ring Units

9

Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering

Current dependency

Friction losses Electric losses

Total losses Temperature rise

Page 10: 1 Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering Testing of Silver-, Copper- and Electro-Graphite Brush Materials for Slip Ring Units

10

Erik Nordlund, Dept. of Electrical Engineering

Conclusions

• A strong correlation is shown “as expected” between the total losses and the temperature rise

• The temperature rise is mostly dependent of the current density in the brushes.

• The temperature rise with constant current and different speed is small

• The most suitable brush for the specified application is the copper-graphite brush.

• Due to:• Lowest total losses• Low temperature rise• Cheaper material than the silver-graphite brush with the

most common behavior• The electro-graphite brush performed inefficiency for this type of

operation

Temperature rise constant speed different currents

Temperature rise constant current different speedTotal losses Total losses