1 electroweak physics lecture 4. 2 physics menu for today top quark and w boson properties at the...

33
1 Electroweak Physics Lecture 4

Upload: marshall-flowers

Post on 16-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Electroweak PhysicsLecture 4

2

Physics Menu for Today

• Top quark and W boson properties at the Tevatron

3

Hadron-Hadron Collisions

fragmentation

partondistribution

partondistribution

Jet

Underlyingevent

Photon, W, Z, t, H etc.

ISRFSR

Hard scattering

4

Physics at Hadron Colliders

• Since hadron colliders collide composite objects – the extraction of the physics is often ''messy'' and not straight-forward.

• Need to understand:– underlying event, multiple interactions– proliferation of QCD radiation– high event rates

• Places a premium on:– real-time triggering (selection of interesting events)– accurate detectors with some redundancy– understanding QCD

5

Life at a Hadron Collider• What happens when two hadrons collide:

1. ~ 25% ELASTIC collisions – hadrons change direction/momenta but there is no energy loss : dull !

2. ~ 75% INELASTIC collisions – one or both of the hadrons have a change in energy and direction : rate ~ 1/Q4 : Q is energy transfer – mostly dull !

• In a collider we have bunches of hadrons circulating the accelerator– each bunch contains ~ 1011 protons (anti-protons ~109)

• We can have more than one collision as the bunches pass through each other at the interaction region : ''Multiple Interaction''

30 m

15cm

BUNCH : 1011 P: BUNCH

6

A typical (interesting) event

For EWK physics: Try to extract the information about the subprocess

7

Hard Subprocesses• The hadrons (protons and anti-protons) are made of

quarks and gluons• The momentum distribution of the quarks and gluons

as a function of Feynman x:

• Effective energy of the collision: Ecmx1x2

– Not known on an event by event basis

• To make predictions (to compare with the Lagrangian) we need to know about the x distribution of the quarks and gluons. Parton Density Functions– This is known (to some precision) from lepton-nucleon

experiments

parton

hadron

px

p

8

Hard Subprocesses

• Three possible hard scattering processes:– qq: quark-quark, quark-antiquark, antiquark-antiquark– qg: quark-gluon, antiquark-gluon– gg: gluon-gluon

• at the Tevatron (2 TeV) quark-antiquark is dominant• at the LHC (14 TeV) gluon-gluon is dominant … the

LHC is really a gluon-gluon collider !

9

To relate what we want to know to what we want to measure define ''luminosity functions'' to determine what the important partonic sub-processes will be.

- this is where HERA measurements are vital

Knowledge of PDFs is Vital!PDFs = Particle Density Functions

How many quarks and gluons are in proton and how much of each

10

Remember the TeVATRON!• At Fermilab

• Proton anti-proton collider– Run 1 from 1987 to 1995: √s=1.8 TeV– Run 2 from 2000 to 2009: √s=1.96 TeV

• Two experiments: CDF and DØ

11

• Current integrated luminosity: 1500 pb−1

• Current Analysis: up to 400 pb−1

• Analysis with 800 pb−1 underway

Run II Luminosity

12

When protons & (anti-)protons

collide• Physics at proton collider

is like…• Drinking from a firehose

– At TeVATRON: 1 collision every 396ns

– 1 to 2 interactions per collision

• Panning for gold– W, Z, top are rare

events!– Need high luminosity – Use high momentum

muons and electrons to select interesting events

Collision Energy

( anything)pp

( )pp W X

( )pp tt

13

Vital at hadron collider eg: - b quark was discovered with one b event per 1010 collisions - top quark was discovered with one top per 1012 collisions! by comparison, this is trivial at a lepton collider

Needle in a haystack moving at 186,000 miles per second ...

75 HzTape Robot ~ few Tb / daydisks...

CHALLENGES- ensuring high trigger efficiency & retaining purity- knowing what the trigger efficiency is (use pass-through triggers and rely on pre-scaled triggers with lower thresholds)

Rejection factor of 1:20,000 after level-2

L1 : hardware

5 kHz

375 Hz

L2 : firmware

L3 : software

7.5 MHz

Triggering at the Tevatron

14

Electroweak Lagrangian

Important for MW

Important for mtop

15

Electroweak Lagrangian

Higgs couples to all fermions in

proportion to their mass

Important for mtop

16

Electroweak Lagrangian

Higgs couples to W and Z

WWH vertex

ZZH vertex

Important for MW

17

Electroweak Lagrangian

Higgs quartic coupling to W and Z

WWHH vertex

ZZHH vertex

18

Putting it all Together• W mass predicated in EWK Lagrangian

– Corrections from interactions with Higgs boson and top quark

• Top corrections important for many processes – including those from LEP– Need accurate measurement of top quark mass to make

comparisons between theory and experiment

• Top is by far the heaviest fundamental particle known (~175 GeV/c²)– Same scale as W & Z: it may offer insights into the nature of

electroweak symmetry breaking (Higgs mechanism) – doesn’t have time to hadronise

19

Theory <−> Experiment

• Now we know what physics to expect, let’s make some measurements

• For that we need…

20

Detector Coordinates

Polar Angle: θ

φ

:

:

ln tan 2

Detector Coordinates

psudeorapidity

axial angle

21

CDF in Real Life

Central trackingη 1.0

Muon Chambersη 1.5

Central+Plug Calorimetery

η 3.6

Silicon trackingη 2.0

22

Transverse Quantities• Colliding partons have small momentum transverse to beam• We detect all interactions transverse to the beam

Missing ET direction

0 0x ypart part

p p • Any “missing momentum”

in x,y plane is attributed to the neutrino– Or other non-interacting

particles eg neutralinos

– Transverse momentum:

2 2T x yp p p

23

An easy example: reconstructing Z→ℓ+ℓ−

• pT(μ+) = 54.8 GeV/c

• pT(μ−) = 39.2 GeV/c

• M(μ+μ−) = 93.4 GeV/c²

• Select events with– 2 leptons, – Opposite charge– momentum transverse to

beam, pT>20 GeV/c

• 66 < M(ℓ+ℓ−)/GeVc−2 < 116

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )x x y y z zM E E p p p p p p

24

W Mass

• Current best single measurement of MW is ±58MeV

• World Average: (80.425±0.038) GeV/c²

25

Extracting W Mass• Value of MW is sensitive to PT of lepton and Missing-ET

• The combination of both quantities in the Transverse Mass (MT) has best sensitivity to MW

• Generate lots of MC samples with different MW

• Fit each one to date to find test MW value

Transverse Mass of muon and neutrino. Invariant mass only using components of the momentum transverse to the beam

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )T x x y yM E E p p p p

26

Largest W Mass Systematics

• How well do we understand energy scale of calorimeter?– Use Z→e+e− to calibrate detector

• How well do we understand hadronic recoil– Effects resolution of missing ET

27

Current & Predicted W Mass Measurements

No Run II measurement yet!

CDF Expected error for 200pb−1 is ±76 MeV/c²

28

Top Quark Production• Main mode for top quark production at Tevatron is through

two quarks fusing to form a gluon, which decays into top-antitop

• Gluon-gluon fusion too– All QCD production, no EWK involved

• Cross section decreases as mtop increases

• Predicted cross section for mtop=175 GeV/c²: (6.23-6.82) nb

29

Top Quark Decays

• CKM matrix: top decays 99% of the time into b-quark and W.

• Two tops: two b-quark jets + 2W– Two lepton channel

Easy to identifySmall cross sectionMET from 2 neutrinos

– Lepton+jets 30% of cross section Only 1 neutrino

– All jet channel v. hard to reconstructed

masses

30

Top Event in the Detector

• 2 jets from W decay• 2 b-jets• ℓ±νℓ

31

Top Event Reconstruction

32

Tevatron Summary• Hadron Colliders are great for discovery of new particles• Need to use a trigger to select useful events• Can also be used for precision physics:

– Need to understand PDFs of colliding hadrons

• CDF and DØ have extensive physics programme

• Aim measure:– mtop ±2.5 GeV/c2

– MW to ±40 MeV/c2 – Probably can do better

– Other EWK tests possible too!

33

Backups:Other Tevatron EWK

Measurements