1 economics of healthcare and its impact on health and human services in the seacoast may 2, 2012...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Economics of healthcare and its impact on health and human services in
the Seacoast
May 2, 2012
“…to raise new ideas and improve policy debates through quality information and analysis on issues shaping New Hampshire’s future.”
Dennis DelayEconomist, NHCPPS
22
Although we focus on energy, health care growth absorbs more of your income than changes in oil prices.
Source: Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), US Dept of Energy
New Hampshire Expenditures on Health Care and Energy as a Percent of Personal Income
0
5
10
15
20
25
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
Per
cen
t o
f N
ew H
amp
shir
e P
erso
nal
Inco
me
Health Care% of PersonalIncomeEnergy Expenditures % ofPersonal Income
33
More expensive
And growing faster relative to oureconomic competitors
4
High Quality, High CostDashboard 2011 Z Scores for Quality vs. Cost 2011
ALAKAZ AR
CA
CO
CT
DE
FLGA
HI
ID
IL
IN
IA
KSKYLA
ME
MD
MA
MIMN
MS
MO
MT
NE
NV
NH
NJ
NM
NYNC
ND
OH
OK
OR
PA
RI
SC
SD
TN
TX
UT
VT
VA
WA
WV
WI
WY
-8.0
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
$4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 $11,000 $12,000
Spending per Person
Qua
lity
BestHigh Quality,Low Cost
Worst: Low Quality,High Cost
55
Providers: Hospitals and Physicians are the primary source of growth
NH Hospital spending rose rapidly post 1998, physicians after 2003
Source: Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and NHCPPS estimates
NH Personal Health Care Spending in 2010 Dollars, 1990-2010
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
$4,500
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Year
Exp
end
itu
re (
$ m
illi
on
s)
Hospital CarePhysician ServicesOther Professional ServicesDental ServicesHome Health CarePrescription DrugsOther Non-Durable Medical ProductsDurable Medical ProductsNursing Home CareOther Personal Health Care
6
Economists study markets:
•Health Care Markets include:
•Professional services market (nursing, physicians)
•Institutional services market (hospitals, nursing homes, ambulatory care)
•Health care financing (how do we pay for it?)
•Other inputs (pharmacy, technology)
7
What is required for a perfect market?
•Lots of buyers and sellers!
•No barriers to entry, or exit
•Perfect information (everybody knows cost and quality)
•No participant with market power to set prices
8
Market Actions - Example: Cost-Shifting
•The allocation of unpaid costs of care delivered to one patient population through above-cost revenue collected from other patient populations.
•For hospitals, nursing facilities and physicians, the historical cause of cost shifting has been below-cost reimbursement rates paid by public programs and uncompensated care losses due to charity care and bad debt.
9
Figure 1: Revenue Structure of a Health Care Provider
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
160%
170%
% of Gross Charges by Payer
% o
f C
ost
Pai
d
Insurance45%
Self-Pay7%
Medicare41%
Medicaid7%
0% 100%
If all payers pay 100% of COST, then the provider will break even.(If all pay 104% of cost, the provider will have a 4% operating margin)
Break Even
10
Hospital Cost-Shifting in 2009(Aggregate of 26 NH Acute Care Hospital Only)
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
Percent of Gross Charges
Pa
ym
en
t a
s P
erc
en
t o
f C
os
t
3rd Party Payers (insurance)44%
Medicare40%
Medicaid8%
bad debt & charity
5%
Total amount cost-shifted: $531 million Net operating gain: $216 million (Post-Tax)Operating margin: 5.6%
other3%
The Costs of NH’s Health Care System: Hospital Prices, Market Structure, and Cost-Shifting (NHCPPS, March 2012)
11
Why does cost shifting confuse economists?
• Cost shifting occurs when negotiated private prices are raised in reaction to lower administered prices (by the government).
• “Some economists distinguish between cost shifting and price discrimination. Price discrimination is defined as different prices charged to different payers for similar services. Cost shifting is defined more narrowly as a dynamic response by hospitals to a reduction in Medicare payments, in the form of a fully or partially compensating increase in prices charged to private insurers.”
James Robinson, Health Affairs, July 2011
12
Cost shifting really means something else:
• For cost shifting behavior to make economic sense, a hospital must possess some monopoly power that it has not already exploited.
• Price discrimination seen in industries with high capital costs, and where consumers are unable to resell the service.
• “Shift” depends on the magnitude of the price elasticity of demand.
Source: REXFORD E. SANTERRE, Health Economics, 2009
13
Health Care is NOT A Traditional Market System
• Consumers have limited, if any, access to information on price or quality.
• There are institutional monopolies.• The seller determines what the consumer
will get; supply drives demand.• Important health care services are often
obtained at a time of personal crisis.• Government regulation and programs alter
provider behavior.
14
Growth in New Hampshire Health Care Expenditures
14.4%
12.2%
13.2%12.9%
12.6%
15.9%
13.0%
14.9%
12.7%
8.2%
10.7%
8.6%
3.5%
8.8%
7.3%
6.5%
8.0%
10.2%
6.4%
5.4%
8.6%8.6%
9.7%9.2%
8.3%
7.1%
4.9%4.4%
4.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
State Health Expenditures
Hopeful Signs:
15
But here come the baby boomers ….
16
Goals for the Health Care System
• Low Cost (for a given level of quality)• High Quality
– Constant health improvement of population– Use of best practices in treatment of conditions
(where they exist)– Satisfaction with healthcare system
• Access (and equity)– Health resources are distributed in a way consistent
with our expressed demands (income, age, gender, etc..)
17
Final Thought Piece on Health Care Costs
•A study by Boyle et al. (1983) showed that it cost $2,900 per life-year gained and $3,200 per quality-adjusted life-year gained to use neonatal intensive care to increase the survival rates of low-birth weight infants weighing from 1,000 to 1,499 grams.
•For newborns weighing between 500 and 999 grams, the figures were $9,300 and $22,400, respectively.
•The study results indicated that neonatal intensive care has a higher benefit/cost for newborns weighing between 1,000 and 1,499 grams than for lower birth weight children.
1818
Want to learn more?
• Online: nhpolicy.org• Facebook: facebook.com/nhpolicy• Twitter: @nhpublicpolicy• Our blog: policyblognh.org• (603) 226-2500
“…to raise new ideas and improve policy debates through quality information and analysis on issues shaping New Hampshire’s future.”
Board of DirectorsSheila T. Francoeur, Chair
David Alukonis
Michael Buckley
William H. Dunlap
Eric Herr
Richard Ober
James Putnam
Stephen J. Reno
Stuart V. Smith, Jr.
Donna Sytek
Brian F. Walsh
Martin L. Gross, Chair Emeritus
John D. Crosier, Sr.,
Todd I. Selig
Kimon S. Zachos
Directors Emeritus