1 draft - not for publication april 5-7, 2006, maastricht itrs - ye itwg meeting in maastricht april...

5
1 DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION April 5-7, 2006, Maastricht ITRS - YE ITWG Meeting in Maastricht April 6-7, 2006 Lothar Pfitzner, ++49 9131 761 110, [email protected] Andreas Nutsch, ++49 9131 761 115, [email protected]

Upload: luke-barnett

Post on 27-Mar-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION April 5-7, 2006, Maastricht ITRS - YE ITWG Meeting in Maastricht April 6-7, 2006 Lothar Pfitzner, ++49 9131 761 110, lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.delothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de

1

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION April 5-7, 2006, Maastricht

ITRS - YE ITWG

Meeting in MaastrichtApril 6-7, 2006

Lothar Pfitzner, ++49 9131 761 110, [email protected] Nutsch, ++49 9131 761 115, [email protected]

Page 2: 1 DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION April 5-7, 2006, Maastricht ITRS - YE ITWG Meeting in Maastricht April 6-7, 2006 Lothar Pfitzner, ++49 9131 761 110, lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.delothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de

2

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION April 5-7, 2006, Maastricht

Maastricht 2006 YE ITWG Meeting Participants

• 12 Participants (Europe, Japan, USA)

– Lothar Pfitzner (Fraunhofer IISB)– Ines Thurner (Infineon)– Dilip Patel (ISMI)– Sumio Kuwabara (NEC)– Andreas Nutsch (Fraunhofer IISB)– Andreas Neuber (MW Zander)– Dieter Rathei (D R Yield)– Dirk de Vries (Philips)– Chris Muller (Purafil)– Francois Finck (ST)– Allyson Hartzell (Exponent)– Dave Roberts (Air Products)

Page 3: 1 DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION April 5-7, 2006, Maastricht ITRS - YE ITWG Meeting in Maastricht April 6-7, 2006 Lothar Pfitzner, ++49 9131 761 110, lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.delothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de

4

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION April 5-7, 2006, Maastricht

YE TWG• Topics

– DDC: update the tables

– DDC: remark that metrology tools need to be available for technology development 18 to 24 months before each technology generation ius actually introduced

– YMDB: Defect budget survey will be done in Japan, the data will be supplied to ITRS, if other regions participate

– YMDB: The defect size distribution will be kept on scaling with 1/x³. Remark: it might be possible for smaller defect size the defect numbers might increase significantly stronger, because effects e.g. nucleation are expected

Page 4: 1 DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION April 5-7, 2006, Maastricht ITRS - YE ITWG Meeting in Maastricht April 6-7, 2006 Lothar Pfitzner, ++49 9131 761 110, lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.delothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de

5

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION April 5-7, 2006, Maastricht

Cross TWG• Cross TWG

– Lithography– ESH– FEP– Interconnect– Factory Integration– Test

• Topics– Lithography: For immersion lithography: Is there a need for a new

method for defect inspection? Is a specific defect specification required? – Answer: no additional specs. Follow up: exchange on information on sensitivity etc. (requirements on defect detection)

– FEP: Yield model in ITRS: requires input from Fabs requires further discussion

– FEP: Defect budgets: still no new survey available– TEST: Common coordinate system neccessary

Page 5: 1 DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION April 5-7, 2006, Maastricht ITRS - YE ITWG Meeting in Maastricht April 6-7, 2006 Lothar Pfitzner, ++49 9131 761 110, lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.delothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de

6

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION April 5-7, 2006, Maastricht

Cross TWG

• Cross TWGs of WECC

– Litho: Further improve definition of interfaces and parameters

– Factory integration (FI): Further clarification of interfaces

– Front end processing (FEP): Follow-up on AMC and CVD/ALD precursor specifications

– Assembly and Packaging: Second contact with regard to new requirements

– ESH: Yield modelling for impact analysis will be difficult due to potential reliability issues, further coordination on CVD/ALD precursor material screening and yield impact analysis of recycling