1 design of rfid tags for the real world (and how to test you got it right) ian j forster clive p...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Design of RFID Tags for the Real World
(and how to test you got it right)
Ian J Forster
Clive P Hohberger
2
Tag requirements
In designing a tag for the ‘real world’ we have to start somewhere with...
The REQUIREMENT
AT BESTA well researched detailed
description of exactly what is needed, where it will work, on what,
when…
AT WORSTOn napkins…
Summarised as two key
parameters:Cost and
Performance
3
Inlay cost and performance drivers
Inlay Cost drivers
• Area of silicon
• Cost of chip
• Cost of antenna
• Assembly technique
• Test methodology
• Quality of roll
• Wafer yield – chips
• Volume
• +
But… its like pushing on Jell-O, all parameters interact
Inlay Performance drivers
• Process size used
• Parasitic effects
• Antenna Conductivity
• Assembly technique
• Antenna size
• Target product range
• +
4
The blob of Jell-O
With cost and performance,everything affects everything else
Can I ever say ‘YES’ or ‘NO’… without a ‘BUT’?
Smaller Chip
Higher assembly
cost
Lower threshold sensitivity
Lower cost antenna to achieve a
given performance
5
OK, now what?
• The key is making the right trade-offs in cost and performance to be “good enough”
• Robust antenna designs can be made which work well over a wide range of applications
• We’ll talk about one such design later.
6
Transponders are perfect in free space
• Nothing is physically there to distort their field or detune their antennas
• Reader is so far away that it interacts with the transponder only through the RF signal (“far field”, typically a few wavelengths away– UHF wavelength ~0.34m, so 3 meters is far field)
• In the free space and far field, the tag acts like the spec sheet says
• Then some idiot goes and slaps it on a carton…
7
RF properties of things…
• What’s in YOUR carton?
100%RF Reflecting
100% RF Absorbing
100% RF Transparent
● Canned hams
● Potato chips in foil bags
● Jars of pickles
● Bottled water
● Bubble wrap
● Dried foods
8
Real products in cartons
• Alien squiggle transponder, horizontally polarized• Measured distance at which good read rate drops to 50%
Product in carton Product Packaging Distance Comment(product as purchased) inches
Air none 75Cheerios Cardboard box 70 weak absorberPennzoil 10w40 HDPE bottle 65 weak absorberTortilla chips Aluminized plastic bag 50 foil bag scatters RFRoot beer (24 pk) 12 oz aluminum cans 45 best if tag vertical in gapGatorade Plastic bottle 41 electrolytes absorb RF energyLiquid Tide HDPE bottle 35 electrolytes absorb RF energyCat litter Cardboard box 35 clay is good passive RF absorberIvory Soap plastic/paper wrapped 25 soap is good RF absorberPantene Shampoo HDPE bottle 21 soap + electrolytesCascade Foil covered paper box 15 Foil capacitance detunes antenna
9
We’re not in free space any more, Toto..
‘Real World’ influences
Conductors
Dielectrics
‘Mixtures’
Results in changes in:Antenna bandwidth
Operating FrequencyImpedance Match
Antenna Efficiency…
=
10
And its worse than that…
‘Real World’ Products have a 3D shape
T T
T T
C
C
Layer of corrugatedcardboard
Pack of canned goods
Antenna position dramatically changes electrical environment
tag is operating in
11
Still worse…
Connectivity between conductive objects matter
T TC
Layer of corrugatedcardboard
Pack of canned goods
Electrically isolated when
pack is bent, in contact at other
times
So, shape, materials, connectivity all interact with mounting position to determine how well
a deployed label works
And we can’t design a different antenna for each situation…
12
Special antenna technology approach
Avery’s Carton Content Insensitive Technology
‘Near field interaction of specific elements in the antenna design re-tunes the far field response’
H field Interaction
E field Interaction
E field Interaction
When placed 1.7mm away from a set of cans the operating frequency changes by >100MHz
When placed 1.7mm away from a set of cans the operating frequency changes by <10MHzIN BOTH CHIP CENTRE AND CHIP GAP
Carton Contents Insensitive (CCI) technology is intended to reduce the number of different designs we need to cope with a diverse range of products
13
Special antenna technology approach
• Avery’s CCI Technology allows a single tag design to work on a larger group of products
• Works well with metal objects, conductive liquids are a challenge but progress is being made
• More difficult to design than a tag specifically tuned for one position and one product
• More difficult to test
14
Avery’s testing systems for real world products
PRIMARY SYSTEMS
SECONDARY SYSTEMS
TERTIARY SYSTEMS
TEST CUBE SYSTEM
HIGH SPEED INLINE TEST
CONVERTER TEST SYSTEMS
APPLICATION TEST SYSTEMS
SWEET SPOT TESTER
END USER TEST SYSTEMS
Cal
ibra
tion
and
trace
abilit
y
mai
ntai
ned
betw
een
all l
evel
s RESPONSE TEST
SYSTEM
PRIMARY SYSTEMS
SECONDARY SYSTEMS
TERTIARY SYSTEMS
PRIMARY SYSTEMS
SECONDARY SYSTEMS
TERTIARY SYSTEMS
TEST CUBE SYSTEM
HIGH SPEED INLINE TEST
CONVERTER TEST SYSTEMS
APPLICATION TEST SYSTEMS
SWEET SPOT TESTER
END USER TEST SYSTEMS
Cal
ibra
tion
and
trace
abilit
y
mai
ntai
ned
betw
een
all l
evel
s RESPONSE TEST
SYSTEM
• Provides optimal trade-off between
– Accuracy– Cost– Speed– Flexibility
• Ensures repeatability & traceability to National Standards through
– Calibration routines– Test RFID devices– Defined procedures
15
Avery primary response testing system
VECTOR SIGNAL GENERATOR
REAL TIME SPECTRUM ANALYZER
DEVICE UNDER TEST
LOW DIELECTICSUPPORT
CONTROL AND DISPLAY SYSTEM
ROTATOR MOTOR
COMPACT ANECHOIC CHAMBER
IMPORTANT!Does NOT use a reader
Test Distance
Establishes a ‘Baseline’ for all other test systems
16
Zebra primary response testing system
• Built in a G-TEM horn antenna with anechoic foam in bottom
• Uniform field in 6x6x6 inch volume• 3-axis motion stepping tests 3-D
transponder response field
• Uses calibrated UHF reader with PC-controlled step attenuators to measure transponder sensitivity
17
Avery tag testing on real world products
Secondary Reader Based System Calibrated To Primary System
18
Avery “sweet spot” tag position testing
READER SYSTEM AND DISPLAY
COAXIAL CABLENEAR FIELD COUPLER
TEST TAG
COMPLIANT FOAM POLYSTYRENE BLOCK
Tertiary Reader Based System Calibrated To Primary System via secondary system
19
Can I test my own cartons?
• Some simple test procedures are in Annex C of: Proposed Guidelines for the Use of RFID-Enabled Labels in Military Logistics: Recommendations for Revision of MIL-STD-129
• Written by the AIM RFID Experts Group
• Free from AIM at: https://www.aimglobal.org/estore/ProductDetails.aspx?productID=241
20
19 mm (0,75 in) minimumfrom either vertical edge
25 mm (1 in) minfrom natural bottom
430 mm (17 in) maxfrom natural bottom25 mm (1 in) min
from top
Target area for RFID transponder
DoD recommended smart label placement
• Problem: Where is the best spot to put the label in the allowed target area?
21
Reader threshold power test
• Start in the center• Test same tag at different points on case at a fixed distance from a reader with
programmable power• Find relative reader power to activate tag at each position• Find position or region requiring minimum power• Put label there!
DJ
L+6
F-3
G+1
H0dB
J-2
K-1
Mno
E-1
C-1
D-3
B+1
A+2
N+2
P0
Q+1