1 dave chandler university of warwick biopesticides in the uk: can we get regulatory innovation?
Post on 15-Jan-2016
212 views
TRANSCRIPT
1
Dave Chandler
University of Warwick
Biopesticides in the UK: can we get regulatory innovation?
2
• Dept of Politics & International Studies.Wyn Grant, Justin Greaves.
• Warwick HRI.Dave Chandler, Gill Prince.
• Dept of Biological Sciences.Mark Tatchell.
RELU project team at Warwick
3
Microbials: lack of products
USA 150 - 210
Europe 60
Germany 10
France 15
Netherlands 15
UK 5
(data: EPA 2006, Agri-Food Canada 2005; PSD 2006)
4
Biopesticides: why regulation is needed
• Contribute to IPM, but natural doesn’t = safe.
• Costs of regulatory failure are high.
– UK BSE episode stifled regulatory innovation.
• Public money invested in discoveries that never reach the market.
• Need a system of regulation that will
– lead to more products on market
– & not sacrifice safety.
5
New understanding of UK biopesticide regulation
• Limitations of biopesticide regulatory system.
• Cost / benefits of biopesticides– How is uptake constrained by social factors?
– Policy network theory, workshops, interviews.
– Identify processes that sustain regulatory innovation.
• Compare regulatory models for pesticide use reduction:– UK (private governance)
– Denmark, USA (legislative)
6
Some problems:• Regulatory system in UK & EU is based on chemical
model.– Acts as a barrier to commercialisation (ACP, 2003).– Emphasizes costs rather than benefits.– sustainability goals get forgotten in favour of short term objectives.
• Need a tailored system for biopesticides (now happening).– But the regulator has a difficult job: resolve conflicts of interest.– Bureaucracy is shaped by what’s happened in the past. This
affects what can be done in the future.
7
Complex, highly regulated system for plant protection products in the EU
• National authorisations.
• EU wide arrangements.
• Mutual recognition between states.
• Doesn’t work.
8
Biopesticides industry: a political maturity problem
• ‘Biological control industry has the weakest policy network I have encountered’ (Grant).
• Small industry largely made up of SMEs.
• IBMA does not have resources of agro-chemical industry, still undergoing organisational development.
• Little coalition building with environmental groups.
9
Fractured UK policy network
retailers growers
BiopesticideRegulator
BiopesticideIndustry (IBMA) Non government
organisationsResearchers
10
Fractured UK policy network
retailers growers
UK biopesticideRegulator (PSD)
BiopesticideIndustry (IBMA) Non government
organisations
Researchers
11
Problems of external costs• Financial costs of biopesticides are borne by
producers.
• But benefits are accrued down the food chain.
• Need to pass benefits back to producers.
12
Lack of knowledge
• UK Advisory Committee on Pesticides– Group of experts, responsible for pesticide
approvals including biopesticides.
– Work with the regulator (Pesticides Safety Directorate) but have final say.
– No expertise in biocontrol.
13
Developments in UK
• PSD – pilot project leads to Biopesticides Scheme.
• Reduced fees, pre submission meetings.
• Industry not taking full advantage.
• Regulator = scientific public servants: keen to improve knowledge, want sustainable IPM.
– Project team giving lectures, workshops.
– Observe ‘closed’ meetings (PSD, ACP).
14
For debate - subsidies• US IR-4 programme; safe & effective pest
management solutions for growers of speciality crops.
• Funded 43 projects since 1994 = $2.85M.
• Works closely as a partner with EPA.
• Supported growth of trade association.
• Is there a market failure that can be remedied by government intervention in UK / EU?
15
Some design principles for better regulatory system (UK, EU)
• System must support sustainability objectives (economic, social, environmental).
• An improved knowledge base & chain.
• Stakeholders fully involved in debate about regulation, good communication links.
• Biopesticides ‘champion’ (quasi-governmental), acting as advocate for biopesticides.
• Address challenges posed by role of retailers, & complexities of regulatory state (EU).
16
Visit our website
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/biopesticides/