1 criteria for comparison of schedules n time per course n choices available n cost n student load n...

74
1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules Time per course Time per course Choices available Choices available Cost Cost Student Load Student Load Teacher Load Teacher Load Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class (period or block) of E,M,SS, and SC per (period or block) of E,M,SS, and SC per year) year) Meeting format: daily (yearlong), every- Meeting format: daily (yearlong), every- other-day (yearlong), daily (semester) other-day (yearlong), daily (semester)

Upload: leona-lane

Post on 18-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

1

Criteria for Comparison of Schedules Time per courseTime per course Choices availableChoices available CostCost Student LoadStudent Load Teacher LoadTeacher Load Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class (period or Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class (period or

block) of E,M,SS, and SC per year)block) of E,M,SS, and SC per year) Meeting format: daily (yearlong), every-other-day Meeting format: daily (yearlong), every-other-day

(yearlong), daily (semester)(yearlong), daily (semester)

Page 2: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

2

6-Period Day

Period 1Period 1

Period 2Period 2

Period 3Period 3

Period 4Period 4

Period 5Period 5

Period 6Period 6

Time per course-57 x 180Time per course-57 x 180 Choices available-6Choices available-6 Cost Factor- 5/6 (83%)Cost Factor- 5/6 (83%) Student Load-6Student Load-6 Teacher Load-5Teacher Load-5 Percentage Core-67%Percentage Core-67% Meeting format: daily-Meeting format: daily-

yearlong yearlong

Page 3: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

3

6-Period Advantages

Daily meetingDaily meeting Total time per course-More than all but 6 Total time per course-More than all but 6

A/BA/B Percentage of core-67% is more than all Percentage of core-67% is more than all

others and equivalent to the 6 A/Bothers and equivalent to the 6 A/B Cost- Same as 6 A/B; more than 6/7 or 7/8; Cost- Same as 6 A/B; more than 6/7 or 7/8;

less than all others.less than all others.

Page 4: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

4

7-Period DayPeriod 1Period 1

Period 2Period 2

Period 3Period 3

Period 4Period 4

Period 5Period 5

Period 6Period 6

Period 7Period 7

Time per course-48 x 180Time per course-48 x 180 Choices available-7Choices available-7 Cost Factor- 5/7 (71%), 6/7 Cost Factor- 5/7 (71%), 6/7

(86%)(86%) Student Load-7Student Load-7 Teacher Load-5 or 6Teacher Load-5 or 6 Percentage Core: 57%Percentage Core: 57% Meeting format: daily-Meeting format: daily-

yearlong yearlong

Page 5: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

5

7- Period Advantages

Daily meetingDaily meeting Total time per course (less than 6-period, 6 A/B Total time per course (less than 6-period, 6 A/B

and 7 A/B; more than 8-period, 8 A/B, 4X4, and and 7 A/B; more than 8-period, 8 A/B, 4X4, and Hybrid 4X4Hybrid 4X4

Percentage of core (less than 6-period and 6 A/B; Percentage of core (less than 6-period and 6 A/B; more than 8-period, 8 A/B, 4X4 and Hybrid 4X4)more than 8-period, 8 A/B, 4X4 and Hybrid 4X4)

Choice (one more than 6-period; one less than 8-Choice (one more than 6-period; one less than 8-period, 8 A/B, 4X4, and Hybrid 4X4)period, 8 A/B, 4X4, and Hybrid 4X4)

Page 6: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

6

8-Period Day

Time per course-43 x 180Time per course-43 x 180 Choices available-8Choices available-8 Cost Factor- 5/8 (62.5%), Cost Factor- 5/8 (62.5%),

6/8 (75%), 7/8 (87.5%)6/8 (75%), 7/8 (87.5%) Student Load-8Student Load-8 Teacher Load-5, 6, or 7Teacher Load-5, 6, or 7 Percentage Core: 50%Percentage Core: 50% Meeting format: daily-Meeting format: daily-

yearlong yearlong

Period 1Period 1

Period 2Period 2

Period 3Period 3

Period 4Period 4

Period 5Period 5

Period 6Period 6

Period 7Period 7

Period 8Period 8

Page 7: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

7

8- Period Advantages

Daily meetingDaily meeting Choice (Same as 8 A/B, 4X4, and Hybrid Choice (Same as 8 A/B, 4X4, and Hybrid

4X4; more than all others.)4X4; more than all others.) Flexibility for double-dosingFlexibility for double-dosing

Page 8: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

8

Why Have Schools Moved to Block Schedules?

To maintain/expand choice in the face of To maintain/expand choice in the face of increasing core credit requirements for graduation,increasing core credit requirements for graduation,

To improve school management,To improve school management, To allow/encourage teaching in depth and higher To allow/encourage teaching in depth and higher

level thinking skills, to permit more (or less time) level thinking skills, to permit more (or less time) for students to attain high levels of mastery on for students to attain high levels of mastery on state accountability tests, andstate accountability tests, and

To reduce stress, for both students and teachers, To reduce stress, for both students and teachers, yet still offer a broad and rigorous curriculum.yet still offer a broad and rigorous curriculum.

Page 9: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

9

What mistakes have some schools made when implementing block schedules? The use of a flawed decision-making process to adopt a The use of a flawed decision-making process to adopt a

block schedule.block schedule. Poor preparation for teaching in the block, including Poor preparation for teaching in the block, including

insufficient staff development and/or inattention to insufficient staff development and/or inattention to course pacing.course pacing.

Unclear goals, over-promising or not meeting promises Unclear goals, over-promising or not meeting promises mademade..

Poor scheduling decisions in the adoption phasePoor scheduling decisions in the adoption phase .. Budgetary concernsBudgetary concerns.. The lack of a rigorous formal evaluationThe lack of a rigorous formal evaluation..

Page 10: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

10

6 A/B Schedule

A Day B Day

Block 1 Class 1 Class 2

Block 2 Class 3 Class 4

Block 3 Class 5 Class 6

Time per course-119 Time per course-119 x 90x 90

Choices available-6Choices available-6 Cost Factor- 5/6 Cost Factor- 5/6

(83%)(83%) Student Load-6Student Load-6 Teacher Load-5Teacher Load-5 Percentage Core: Percentage Core:

67%67% Meeting format: E-Meeting format: E-

O-D-yearlong O-D-yearlong

Page 11: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

11

6-A/B Advantages

Total time per course-More than all other Total time per course-More than all other schedules listed.schedules listed.

Percentage of core-67% is more than all Percentage of core-67% is more than all others and equivalent to the 6-period.others and equivalent to the 6-period.

Cost- Same as 6 period; more than 6/7 or Cost- Same as 6 period; more than 6/7 or 7/8; less than all others.7/8; less than all others.

Page 12: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

12

MM TT WW RR FF

Block 1Block 1

(100)(100) 11 22 11 2211

22

Block 2Block 2

(100)(100) 33 44 33 4433

44Block 3Block 3

(82)(82)5 and 5 and LunchLunch

5 and 5 and LunchLunch

5 and 5 and LunchLunch

5 and 5 and LunchLunch

5 and 5 and LunchLunch

Block 4Block 4

(100)(100) 77 66 77 6666

77

7 A/B Schedule (Atlee High School)

Time per course-Time per course-100 x 90 or 50 X 100 x 90 or 50 X 180180

Choices available-7Choices available-7 Cost Factor- 5/7 Cost Factor- 5/7

(71%), 6/7 (86%)(71%), 6/7 (86%) Student Load-7Student Load-7 Teacher Load-5 or 6Teacher Load-5 or 6 Percentage Core: Percentage Core:

57%57% Meeting format: E-Meeting format: E-

O-D yearlong or O-D yearlong or daily-yearlong daily-yearlong

Page 13: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

13

7- A/B Advantages

Total time per course (less than 6-period and 6 Total time per course (less than 6-period and 6 A/B; more than 7-Period, 8-period, 8 A/B, 4X4, A/B; more than 7-Period, 8-period, 8 A/B, 4X4, and Hybrid 4X4)and Hybrid 4X4)

Percentage of core (same as 7-period, less than 6-Percentage of core (same as 7-period, less than 6-period and 6 A/B; more than 8-period, 8 A/B, period and 6 A/B; more than 8-period, 8 A/B, 4X4, and Hybrid 4X4)4X4, and Hybrid 4X4)

Choice (one more than 6-period; one less than 8-Choice (one more than 6-period; one less than 8-period, 8 A/B, 4X4, and Hybrid 4X4)period, 8 A/B, 4X4, and Hybrid 4X4)

Daily student loadDaily student load Daily teacher loadDaily teacher load

Page 14: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

14

8 A/B Schedule

A Day B Day

Block 1 Class 1 Class 2

Block 2 Class 3 Class 4

Block 3 Class 5 Class 6

Block 4 Class 7 Class 8

Time per course-88 Time per course-88 x 90x 90

Choices available-8Choices available-8 Cost Factor- 5/8 Cost Factor- 5/8

(62.5%), 6/8 (75%), (62.5%), 6/8 (75%), 7/8 (87.5%)7/8 (87.5%)

Student Load-8Student Load-8 Teacher Load-5, 6, Teacher Load-5, 6,

or 7or 7 Percentage Core: Percentage Core:

50%50% Meeting format: E-Meeting format: E-

O-D-yearlong O-D-yearlong

Page 15: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

15

8- A/B Advantages

Choice (Same as 8 A/B, 4X4, and Modified Choice (Same as 8 A/B, 4X4, and Modified 4X4; more than all others.)4X4; more than all others.)

Flexibility for double-dosingFlexibility for double-dosing Daily teacher load (if teaching 5 or 6)Daily teacher load (if teaching 5 or 6) Daily student loadDaily student load

Page 16: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

16

Benefits of the Alternate day Block Schedule

Longer classes encourage teaching with a variety of Longer classes encourage teaching with a variety of instructional models.instructional models.

Fewer “start-ups” and “endings” result in more useable Fewer “start-ups” and “endings” result in more useable instructional time.instructional time.

Fewer class changes improve school climate, discipline, and Fewer class changes improve school climate, discipline, and cleanliness.cleanliness.

Because teachers see fewer students daily they know Because teachers see fewer students daily they know students better and are able to give more individual students better and are able to give more individual assistance.assistance.

Compared to every day models, students have fewer classes, Compared to every day models, students have fewer classes, quizzes, tests, and homework assignments on any one day.quizzes, tests, and homework assignments on any one day.

Page 17: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

17

Issues to Be Addressed in the Alternate Day Block Schedule Attention SpanAttention Span Teacher planningTeacher planning Lunch periodsLunch periods AbsencesAbsences ReviewReview ““Sink time”Sink time” To float or not to floatTo float or not to float Equalizing students’ loadEqualizing students’ load Block vs. single period in 7 course plansBlock vs. single period in 7 course plans Teaching in the BlockTeaching in the Block

Page 18: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

18

4 X 4 Schedule

Sem. 1 Sem. 2

Block 1 Class 1 Class 2

Block 2 Class 3 Class 4

Block 3 Class 5 Class 6

Block 4 Class 7 Class 8

Time per course-88 Time per course-88 x 90x 90

Choices available-8Choices available-8 Cost Factor- 5/8 Cost Factor- 5/8

(62.5%), 6/8 (75%), (62.5%), 6/8 (75%), 7/8 (87.5%)7/8 (87.5%)

Student Load-8Student Load-8 Teacher Load-5, 6, Teacher Load-5, 6,

or 7or 7 Percentage Core: Percentage Core:

50%50% Meeting format: Meeting format:

Daily-semester Daily-semester

Page 19: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

19

4X4 Advantages

Choice (Same as 8 A/B, 4X4, and Modified 4X4; more than all Choice (Same as 8 A/B, 4X4, and Modified 4X4; more than all others.)others.)

Flexibility for double-dosingFlexibility for double-dosing Daily and semester teacher loadDaily and semester teacher load Daily and semester student loadDaily and semester student load Acceleration and credit recovery possibilitiesAcceleration and credit recovery possibilities

Adaptations Needed for the 4X4 Performing ArtsPerforming Arts AP or IBAP or IB Special EducationSpecial Education Foreign LanguageForeign Language

Page 20: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

20

The 4 X 4 Schedule(Music Variation 1)

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

Concert BandConcert BandMarching BandMarching Band

6655

Semester IISemester IISemester ISemester I

11 22

33 44

Page 21: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

21

The 4 X 4 Schedule(Music Variation 2)

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

8877

6655

Semester IISemester IISemester ISemester I

33 44

9 WeeksMarching

Band

27 Weeks Concert Band

27 Weeks elective: Jazz, computer, jour., etc

Page 22: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

22

The 4 X 4 Schedule(Music Variation 3)

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

6655

Semester IISemester IISemester ISemester I

11 22

33 44

Day 1: Band, Choir, Journ., PE/H, etc.

Day 2: Orchestra, Jazz Band, Chorale, comp., PE/H, etc.

Page 23: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

23

The 4 X 4 Schedule(Music Variation 4)

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

6655

Semester IISemester IISemester ISemester I

11 22

33 44

Day 1: Band or Orchestra.

Day 1Lessons

Day 2Lessons

Day 1PE/H

Day 1PE/H

Page 24: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

24

AP Options

One semester-one creditOne semester-one credit Two semesters AP-two creditsTwo semesters AP-two credits One semester Pre-requisite; one semester One semester Pre-requisite; one semester

AP-two creditsAP-two credits A/B AP courses-one creditA/B AP courses-one credit 3-9 Weeks AP+ 1 9-Week Elective3-9 Weeks AP+ 1 9-Week Elective

Page 25: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

25

The 4 X 4 Schedule(AP Variations)

Var. 4Var. 4

Var. 3Var. 3

Var. 2Var. 2

Var.1Var.1

Semester IISemester IISemester ISemester I

Day 1: AP Gov’t & Econ or CP Gov’t & Econ.

Day 2: AP English or CP English 12.

Var. 5Var. 5

45 minutes: AP English

45 minutes: AP Government and Economics

27 Weeks AP9 WeeksElective

9 WeeksElective

27 Weeks AP

Semester 1Prerequisite

Semester 2AP Course

Page 26: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

26

The 4 X 4 Schedule(Special Ed. Variation 1)

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

Resource Support ClassResource Support Class

Elective Course 2Elective Course 2Elective Course 1Elective Course 1

Semester IISemester IISemester ISemester I

Required Course 1Required Course 1 Required Course 2Required Course 2

Required Course 3Required Course 3 Required Course 4Required Course 4

Page 27: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

27

The 4 X 4 Schedule(Special Ed. Variation 2)

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

Resource Support Class &Resource Support Class &

Required Course 5 (i.e. SPED EnglishRequired Course 5 (i.e. SPED English

Elective Course 2Elective Course 2Elective Course 1Elective Course 1

Semester IISemester IISemester ISemester I

Required Course 1Required Course 1 Required Course 2Required Course 2

Required Course 3Required Course 3 Required Course 4Required Course 4

Page 28: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

28

The 4 X 4 Schedule(Foreign Language Sequencing A)

Year 4Year 4

Year 3Year 3

Year 2Year 2

Year 1Year 1

Other LanguageOther Language

AP SpanishAP SpanishSpanish 5Spanish 5

Semester IISemester IISemester ISemester I

Spanish 1Spanish 1 Spanish 2Spanish 2

Spanish 3Spanish 3 Spanish 4Spanish 4

Page 29: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

29

The 4 X 4 Schedule(Foreign Language Sequencing B)

Year 4Year 4

Year 3Year 3

Year 2Year 2

Year 1Year 1

Semester IISemester IISemester ISemester I

Spanish 1Spanish 1 Spanish 2Spanish 2

Spanish 3 Either SemesterSpanish 3 Either Semester

Spanish 4 Either SemesterSpanish 4 Either Semester

Spanish 5Spanish 5 AP SpanishAP Spanish

Page 30: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

30

The Hybrid 4 X 4 Schedule with a Limited Number of Yearlong Embedded A/B Classes or “Skinnies”

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

6655

Semester IISemester IISemester ISemester I

11 22

Day 1 Course 3Day 1 Course 3 Day 2 Course 4Day 2 Course 4

Course 8 Everyday Yearlong “Skinny”

Course 7 Everyday Yearlong “Skinny”

Page 31: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

31

Hybrid 4X4 Advantages

Choice (Same as 8-Period, 8 A/B, 4X4; Choice (Same as 8-Period, 8 A/B, 4X4; more than all others.)more than all others.)

Flexibility for double-dosingFlexibility for double-dosing Daily and semester teacher loadDaily and semester teacher load Daily and semester student loadDaily and semester student load Mitigates testing and continuity concerns Mitigates testing and continuity concerns

related to the 4X4 for certain coursesrelated to the 4X4 for certain courses

Page 32: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

32

5 Block Trimester Schedule60

Days60

Days60

DaysBlock

1Class 1.5 CR

Class 6.5 CR

Class 11.5 CR

Block 2

Class 2.5 CR

Class 7.5 CR

Class 12.5 CR

Block 3

Class 3.5 CR

Class 8.5 CR

Class 13.5 CR

Block 4

Class 4.5 CR.

Class 9.5 CR.

Class 14.5 CR.

Block 5

Class 5 .5 CR

Class 10 .5 CR

Class 15 .5 CR

Time per course-69 Time per course-69 x 120x 120

Choices available-Choices available-7.57.5

Cost Factor- 4/5 Cost Factor- 4/5 (80%)(80%)

Student Load-5Student Load-5 Teacher Load-4Teacher Load-4 Percentage Core: Percentage Core:

4/7.5 (53%)4/7.5 (53%) Meeting format: Meeting format:

Daily-trimester Daily-trimester

Page 33: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

33

5-Block Advantages Choice (7.5) Choice (7.5)

Flexibility for 1.5 credit classesFlexibility for 1.5 credit classes Daily and trimester teacher loadDaily and trimester teacher load Daily and trimester student loadDaily and trimester student load More days of contact than 4X4More days of contact than 4X4

5-Block Adaptations Needed

Performing ArtsPerforming Arts AP or IBAP or IB

Special EducationSpecial Education

Page 34: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

Time Comparison Chart

6 Period 7 Period 8 Period 6 A/B 7 A/B5 Block

Trimester

8 A/B, 4X4,

Hybrid

Homeroom 13 14 11 13 15 15 13

Passing Time 35 40 45 20 25 30 25

Lunch 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Class Length57 48 43 119

3 X 100 and 1X

5069 88

Total 420 420 420 420 420 420 420

Time Per Course

10,260 8,640 7,740 10,710 9,000 8280 7920

Choices 6 7 8 6 7 7.5 8

Class Meetings per Year

180 180 180 90 90 or 180 120 90

Percentage Core (E,M,SC,SS)

5/6 (67%) 4/7 (57%) 4/8 (50%) 5/6 (67%) 4/7 (57%)4/7.5 (53%)

4/8 (50%)

All computations based on a 7 hour (420 minutes) student day.

Page 35: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

Cost Comparison Chart8-Period,

8 A/B, 4X4, or Hybrid; Teach 7

7 Period or 7 A/B; Teach 6

6-Period or 6 A/B;

Teach 5

5 Block Trimester;

Teach 4

8-Period, 8 A/B,

4X4, or Hybrid; Teach 6

7-Period or 7 A/B; Teach 5

8 A/B, 4X4,

Hybrid; Teach 5

Student Load

8 7 6 5 8 7 8

Teacher Load

7 6 5 4 6 5 5

Cost Factor

87.5% 86% 83% 80% 75% 71% 62.5%

Less Expensive More Expensive

Page 36: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

36

I. Almost Guarantees From A/B, 4/4, or Trimester Block Schedules

The number of discipline referrals to the office is reduced.

The number of class tardies is reduced. The school day becomes less stressful for both

students and teachers. Over time and with quality staff development,

teachers change teaching behaviors; there tends to be less lecture and more active student engagement during classes.

Research SummaryCanady and Rettig, 2000

Page 37: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

37

Research Summary con’t.

After at least two years of implementation 65-80 After at least two years of implementation 65-80 percent of teachers, students and parents state they percent of teachers, students and parents state they prefer the block. In many schools with A/B and 4/4 prefer the block. In many schools with A/B and 4/4 schedules, the percentage of support is greater than schedules, the percentage of support is greater than 90%.90%.

Both teacher and student attendance is likely to Both teacher and student attendance is likely to improve slightly.improve slightly.

There will be an increase in the use of media center There will be an increase in the use of media center materials.materials.

There will be an increase in the use of technology that There will be an increase in the use of technology that is available in the school.is available in the school.

Page 38: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

38

II.II. Academic Results Academic Results (Softer data)(Softer data) The number of students on the “A, B Honor Roll” will The number of students on the “A, B Honor Roll” will

increase.increase. The overall GPA for the school will increase. Note: The overall GPA for the school will increase. Note:

Initially, the number of “F’s” in 4/4 schools may increase.Initially, the number of “F’s” in 4/4 schools may increase. If coming out of a six or seven period schedule, students If coming out of a six or seven period schedule, students

will complete more classes. For a selected group of will complete more classes. For a selected group of students this seems to lead to completion of additional students this seems to lead to completion of additional math classes and higher levels of other classes. Students math classes and higher levels of other classes. Students also have opportunities for traditional classes in also have opportunities for traditional classes in vocational areas and in the performing arts.vocational areas and in the performing arts.

Student failure rates will decline (4/4).Student failure rates will decline (4/4).

Research Summary con’t.

Page 39: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

39

Graduation rates will increase.Graduation rates will increase. The overall drop-out rate will decrease. The overall drop-out rate will decrease. There is evidence that special education resource students There is evidence that special education resource students

benefit from being assigned fewer classes at one time benefit from being assigned fewer classes at one time (Fairfax).(Fairfax).

Schools gain greater flexibility in helping students who need Schools gain greater flexibility in helping students who need to be accelerated and students who need extended learning to be accelerated and students who need extended learning time (more in 4/4).time (more in 4/4).

There is no consistent evidence that just changing the There is no consistent evidence that just changing the schedule will either increase or decrease performance on schedule will either increase or decrease performance on standardized tests.standardized tests.

Research Summary con’t.

Page 40: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

Zepeda and Mayers, 2006

58 Studies58 Studies Higher GPAHigher GPA Improved School ClimateImproved School Climate Inconsistent Results on Standardized Tests and Inconsistent Results on Standardized Tests and

AttendanceAttendance Teachers LikeTeachers Like Teachers Change in Practice InconsistentTeachers Change in Practice Inconsistent Need Staff DevelopmentNeed Staff Development

40

Page 41: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

41

SREB HSTW Study 2002 More progress was made when a flexible schedule was More progress was made when a flexible schedule was

adopted allowing up to 32 credits rather than 24.adopted allowing up to 32 credits rather than 24. Mathematics departments with the flexibility to reschedule Mathematics departments with the flexibility to reschedule

failing students into re-teach classes every quarter saw failing students into re-teach classes every quarter saw math scores rise and failure rates decline.math scores rise and failure rates decline.

Many principals can show that the adoption of a more Many principals can show that the adoption of a more flexible schedule contributed to improved student flexible schedule contributed to improved student achievement, fewer course failures, and fewer dropouts achievement, fewer course failures, and fewer dropouts when graduation requirements rise and instruction changes when graduation requirements rise and instruction changes to make good use of the additional focused teaching and to make good use of the additional focused teaching and learning time.learning time.

Schools in the HSTW network that made the greatest gains Schools in the HSTW network that made the greatest gains in reading, math, and science achievement had adopted a in reading, math, and science achievement had adopted a 4X4 schedule and required students to complete 4 years of 4X4 schedule and required students to complete 4 years of math and science and 24 or more credits for graduation.math and science and 24 or more credits for graduation.

(Bottoms, 2002)

Page 42: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

42

7-Period Day with Intervention/Enrichment Period

Period 1Period 1

Period 2Period 2

Period 3Period 3

Intervention/Enrichment 30-45 MinutesIntervention/Enrichment 30-45 Minutes

Period 4Period 4

Period 5Period 5

Period 6Period 6

Period 7Period 7

Page 43: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

43

The 8 A/B Schedulewith Intervention/Enrichment Block

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

Intervention/ Intervention/ EnrichmentEnrichment77

6655

Day 2Day 2Day 1Day 1

11 22

33 44

Page 44: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

44

The 8 A/B or 4X4 Schedule with a 9th Period Added for Intervention/Enrichment

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

Course 8Course 8

Course 6Course 6

Sem. 2 or Day 2Sem. 2 or Day 2Sem. 1 or Day 1Sem. 1 or Day 1

Intervention/EnrichmentIntervention/Enrichment99thth Period Period

Course 4Course 4

Course 2Course 2

Course 4Course 4

Course 3Course 3

Course 2Course 2

Course 1Course 1

Page 45: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

45

Short Inter-sessions for Intervention/Enrichment

3737DaysDays

33DaysDays

3737DaysDays

33DaysDays

3737DaysDays

33DaysDays

3737DaysDays

2020DaysDays

Assessm

ent

Assessm

ent

Assessm

ent

Assessm

ent

Intervention/E

nrichment

Intervention/E

nrichment

Intervention/E

nrichment

Post-Exam

Enrichm

ent Unit

Paced

Instru

ction

Paced

Instru

ction

Paced

Instru

ction

Paced

Instru

ction

Page 46: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

Key Issues for Intervention/ Enrichment Period All students must be productively engaged; All students must be productively engaged; the time cannot be the time cannot be

allowed to devolve into a dreaded study hall!allowed to devolve into a dreaded study hall!

A system for keeping track of students during this period must be A system for keeping track of students during this period must be implemented.implemented.

While some school-wide, grade level, or team activities While some school-wide, grade level, or team activities (assemblies, pep rallies, school pictures, guidance meetings, course (assemblies, pep rallies, school pictures, guidance meetings, course registration, seminars, etc.), may use some of this period, the registration, seminars, etc.), may use some of this period, the primary purpose is for Intervention/Enrichment, which may include primary purpose is for Intervention/Enrichment, which may include extended learning time, re-teaching, re-testing, tutoring, etc.extended learning time, re-teaching, re-testing, tutoring, etc.

The best I/E periods are data-driven by a strong formative The best I/E periods are data-driven by a strong formative assessment system.assessment system.

46

Page 47: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

47

7-Period Day Double Dose

Per. 1AP ChemPer. 1AP Chem

Per. 2 AP ChemPer. 2 AP Chem

Period 3Period 3

Period 4Period 4

Period 5Period 5

Period 6Period 6

Period 7Period 7

Page 48: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

48

Double Dose

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

ElectiveElectiveElectiveElective

PE/HPE/HSocial StudiesSocial Studies

Day 2/Sem. 2Day 2/Sem. 2Day 1/Sem.1Day 1/Sem.1

EnglishEnglish ScienceScience

AP CalculusAP Calculus AP CalculusAP Calculus

Page 49: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

49

Parallel Double Dose

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

ElectiveElectiveElectiveElective

PE/HPE/HSocial StudiesSocial Studies

Day 2/Sem. 2Day 2/Sem. 2Day 1/Sem.1Day 1/Sem.1

EnglishEnglish ScienceScience

AP StatisticsAP Statistics Computer ClassComputer Class

Page 50: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

50

Two Double Doses

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

ScienceScienceElectiveElective

PE/HPE/HSocial StudiesSocial Studies

Day 2/Sem. 2Day 2/Sem. 2Day 1/Sem.1Day 1/Sem.1

AP EnglishAP English AP EnglishAP English

AP CalculusAP Calculus AP CalculusAP Calculus

Page 51: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

51

Double-Duty Double Dose

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

ElectiveElectiveElectiveElective

PE/HPE/HSocial StudiesSocial Studies

Day 2/Sem. 2Day 2/Sem. 2Day 1/Sem.1Day 1/Sem.1

EnglishEnglish ScienceScience

AP W. HistoryAP W. HistoryAP W. AP W.

History/AVIDHistory/AVID

Page 52: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

Key Aspects of Double Dosing Adding more instructional time requires a revision of the Adding more instructional time requires a revision of the

course pacing guide; how is the additional time going to be course pacing guide; how is the additional time going to be utilized effectively?utilized effectively?

Not all students enrolled in an AP course require Not all students enrolled in an AP course require additional time to learn; when is double dosing justified additional time to learn; when is double dosing justified for all?for all?

Double dosing eats up FTEs in the department utilizing the Double dosing eats up FTEs in the department utilizing the practice increasing class size in other departmental practice increasing class size in other departmental sections or requiring additional departmental staffing.sections or requiring additional departmental staffing.

Double dosing eats up electives in students’ schedules; this Double dosing eats up electives in students’ schedules; this is especially problematic in 6 and 7 course schedules or is especially problematic in 6 and 7 course schedules or when multiple courses are double-dosed in any schedule.when multiple courses are double-dosed in any schedule.

52

Page 53: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

Key Aspects of Double Dosing, con’t. Instructors often favor double-dosing for AP courses Instructors often favor double-dosing for AP courses

because it provides an edge over the competition, it reduces because it provides an edge over the competition, it reduces the number of groups and preps for the teacher, and it the number of groups and preps for the teacher, and it increases the time the instructor spends with “better” increases the time the instructor spends with “better” students. Consequently, the “default” format for all courses students. Consequently, the “default” format for all courses (including AP courses) should be the standard format: one (including AP courses) should be the standard format: one period per day or an every-other-day block. (Please note period per day or an every-other-day block. (Please note while the standard format for the 4X4 is a block class that while the standard format for the 4X4 is a block class that meets daily for one semester, we do not recommend this for meets daily for one semester, we do not recommend this for AP courses because of the May testing timetable. Most AP courses because of the May testing timetable. Most schools that operate a 4X4 schedule, hybridize it for AP schools that operate a 4X4 schedule, hybridize it for AP courses by embedding an A/B schedule into the master for a courses by embedding an A/B schedule into the master for a limited set of courses.) limited set of courses.)

53

Page 54: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

54

7-Period Day Support Course

Per. 1AP A/B Calc.Per. 1AP A/B Calc.

Period 3Period 3

Period 4Period 4

Period 5Period 5

Period 6Period 6

Period 7Period 7

P1. D1 AP Support

P1. D2 PE or .5 Elec.

Page 55: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

55

The 8 A/B Schedule: AP Support

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

ElectiveElectiveElectiveElective

PhysicsPhysicsMath AnalysisMath Analysis

Day 2Day 2Day 1Day 1

U.S. History A.P.U.S. History A.P.

English 12English 12 Spanish IVSpanish IV

A.P. Support or A.P. Support or ElectiveElective

Page 56: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

56

The 8 A/B Schedule: AP Support

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

ElectiveElectiveElectiveElective

PhysicsPhysicsMath AnalysisMath Analysis

Day 2Day 2Day 1Day 1

A.P. WorldA.P. World

English 10English 10 AVIDAVID

A.P. Support or A.P. Support or ElectiveElective

Page 57: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

57

The 4X4 Schedule: Algebra I A/B Support

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

ElectiveElectiveElectiveElective

World Hist.World Hist.Earth ScienceEarth Science

Day 2Day 2Day 1Day 1

Day 1: Day 1: Algebra IAlgebra I

English 9English 9 Spanish ISpanish I

Day 2: Algebra 1 Day 2: Algebra 1 Support or ElectiveSupport or Elective

Page 58: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

58

The 8 A/B Schedule: Algebra 1 Support

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

ElectiveElectiveElectiveElective

World Hist.World Hist.Earth ScienceEarth Science

Day 2Day 2Day 1Day 1

Geometry 1Geometry 1

English 9English 9 Spanish ISpanish I

Geometry Support Geometry Support

or Electiveor Elective

Page 59: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

59

Critical Issues Regarding AP Support Classes AP support classes may be course specific AP support classes may be course specific

or more generic departmental supports or more generic departmental supports serving multiple AP courses.serving multiple AP courses.

Is an AP support course elective for all or Is an AP support course elective for all or mandatory for some? mandatory for some?

If it is mandatory for some, criteria must be If it is mandatory for some, criteria must be established to determine who must enroll.established to determine who must enroll.

Page 60: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

60

Critical Issues Regarding AP Support Classes, con’t. If AP support is elective, care must be taken to If AP support is elective, care must be taken to

ensure that instructors do not make the support ensure that instructors do not make the support course a “required” elective, thereby creating a course a “required” elective, thereby creating a double dose.double dose.

Support courses must be assigned legitimate state-Support courses must be assigned legitimate state-approved course codes so that students may earn approved course codes so that students may earn credit.credit.

Students enrolled in support courses must not be Students enrolled in support courses must not be penalized by limiting their grade in the AP course, penalized by limiting their grade in the AP course, because “It’s not fair that they have more time.”because “It’s not fair that they have more time.”

Page 61: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

Question???

Under what conditions would it be Under what conditions would it be preferable to double dose the whole group preferable to double dose the whole group creating an identifiable cohort that bonds creating an identifiable cohort that bonds together versus differentiating between together versus differentiating between “Tier 1” students who don’t need AP “Tier 1” students who don’t need AP support and “Tier 2” students, who do need support and “Tier 2” students, who do need support?support?

61

Page 62: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

Scheduling a Summer or Pre-AP Critical Skills Class (or sooner or bigger) 4-6 weeks in summer or the semester before 4-6 weeks in summer or the semester before

attempting social science, English or attempting social science, English or science AP coursesscience AP courses

Content to include critical reading and Content to include critical reading and writing skills related to the following:writing skills related to the following: Cause and effectCause and effect Deductive reasoningDeductive reasoning Inductive reasoningInductive reasoning

62

Page 63: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

63

Double Blocks of LA and Math with Tutorials: Student Schedule

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

PE/HPE/H

Social StudiesSocial Studies

Algebra IAlgebra I

Language Arts and ReadingLanguage Arts and Reading

Day 2Day 2Day 1Day 1

LA Tutorial 45m

Math Tutorial 45m

Elective or Earth Elective or Earth ScienceScience

Page 64: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

64

Re-cycling in Mathematics

Block IVBlock IV

Block IIIBlock III

Block IIBlock II

Block IBlock I

ElectiveElectiveElectiveElective

PE/HPE/HSocial StudiesSocial Studies

Sem. 2Sem. 2Sem.1Sem.1

LALA ScienceScience

Algebra I-P1Algebra I-P1 Algebra I-P1 or P2Algebra I-P1 or P2

Page 65: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

65

Recovery Model (Sem. 1)(Possibly for Grade 8 Failures)

Semester 1Semester 1 Semester 2Semester 2

30 30 DaysDays

30 30 DaysDays

30 30 DaysDays Potential Re-entryPotential Re-entry

Block IBlock I C1C1 C2C2 C3C3 Course 5Course 5

Block IIBlock II C1C1 C2C2 C3C3 Course 6Course 6

Block IIIBlock III C1C1 C2C2 C3C3 Course 7Course 7

Block IVBlock IV C4-ElectiveC4-Elective C8-ElectiveC8-Elective

Page 66: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

66

Recovery Model (Sem. 2)(For 1st Semester Failures)

Semester 1Semester 1 Semester 2Semester 2

30 30 DaysDays

30 30 DaysDays

30 30 DaysDays

Block IBlock I Req. Course 1Req. Course 1 C5 (1)C5 (1) C6(2)C6(2) C7C7

Block IIBlock II Req. Course 2Req. Course 2 C5 (1)C5 (1) C6(2)C6(2) C7C7

Block IIIBlock III Req. Course 3Req. Course 3 C5(1)C5(1) C6(2)C6(2) C7C7

Block IVBlock IV Elective Course 4Elective Course 4 Elective Course 8Elective Course 8

Page 67: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

67

Achieving Common Goals

Common CurriculumCommon Curriculum Common PacingCommon Pacing Common Formative and Summative Common Formative and Summative

AssessmentsAssessments Collaborative Monitoring SystemCollaborative Monitoring System Common Time for Intervention and Common Time for Intervention and

EnrichmentEnrichment

Page 68: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

68

Progressive AlgebraRettig and Canady, 1998.

T’sT’s Q1Q1 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 Q5Q5 Q6Q6 Q7 Q8

MAMA A1A1 A2A2 A3A3 A4A4 G1G1 G2G2 G3 G4

MBMB A1A1 A2A2 A3A3 A4A4 G1G1 G2G2 G3G3 G3G3

MCMC A1A1 A2A2 A3A3 A3A3 A4A4 G1G1 G2G2 G2G2

MDMD A1A1 A2A2 A2A2 A3A3 A4A4 A4A4 G1G1 G1G1

MEME A1A1 A1A1 A2A2 A2A2 A3A3 A4A4 A4A4 G1G1

MFMF A1A1 A1A1 A2A2 A2A2 A3A3 A3A3 A4A4 A4A4

Key: Q=4.5 weeks; A=Algebra I, 4 Parts; G=Geometry 4 Parts

Page 69: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

69

Staff Development and Preparation

Schedule Creation and ModificationSchedule Creation and Modification Program of studiesProgram of studies Scheduling calendarScheduling calendar

Revision (or creation of) Pacing GuidesRevision (or creation of) Pacing Guides Teaching in the BlockTeaching in the Block Policy ChangesPolicy Changes

Page 70: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

70

How to Fail When Implementing a New Schedule con’t.H. H. Do an incomplete study.Do an incomplete study.

1.1. Don’t read and do research.Don’t read and do research.

2.2. Don’t visit other schools.Don’t visit other schools.

3.3. Don’t do a mock master schedule.Don’t do a mock master schedule.

4.4. Don’t create sample teacher and student Don’t create sample teacher and student schedules.schedules.

5.5. Don’t address benefits for both students and Don’t address benefits for both students and teachers.teachers.

Page 71: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

71

How to Fail When Implementing a New Schedule con’t.II.II. Do Poor PlanningDo Poor Planning

A.A. Don’t create pacing guides.Don’t create pacing guides.

B.B. Assume teachers will change instruction to Assume teachers will change instruction to fit the block without staff development fit the block without staff development assistance.assistance.

C.C. Don’t change school policies to be in line Don’t change school policies to be in line with the new schedule.with the new schedule.

Page 72: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

72

How to Fail When Implementing a New Schedule con’t.III.III. Create a Poorly Constructed ScheduleCreate a Poorly Constructed Schedule

A.A. Don’t balance teams academically.Don’t balance teams academically.B.B. Make sure you have unequal class times.Make sure you have unequal class times.C.C. Create short chunks of unusable time.Create short chunks of unusable time.D.D. Create split periods to run lunch.Create split periods to run lunch.E.E. Make sure students can’t take (fill in the blank) Make sure students can’t take (fill in the blank)

“because of the schedule.”“because of the schedule.”

IV.IV. Don’t Continue to do Staff Development After Don’t Continue to do Staff Development After the first year.the first year.

V.V. Don’t Plan to Evaluate until Someone Asks for Don’t Plan to Evaluate until Someone Asks for It.It.

Page 73: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

73

References

Ball, W. H. and Brewer, P. F. (2000). Socratic seminars in the block. Ball, W. H. and Brewer, P. F. (2000). Socratic seminars in the block. Larchmont, NY. Eye On Education.Larchmont, NY. Eye On Education.

Blaz, D. (1998). Blaz, D. (1998). Teaching foreign languages in the blockTeaching foreign languages in the block. Larchmont, NY: . Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.Eye on Education.

Canady, R. L. & Rettig, M. D. (Eds.) (1996). Canady, R. L. & Rettig, M. D. (Eds.) (1996). Teaching in the block: Strategies Teaching in the block: Strategies for engaging active learnersfor engaging active learners. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.

Canady, R. L. & Rettig, M. D. (1995). Canady, R. L. & Rettig, M. D. (1995). Block scheduling: A catalyst for Block scheduling: A catalyst for change in high schoolchange in high school. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

Conti-D’Antonio, M., Bertrando, R. and Eisenberger, J. (1998). Conti-D’Antonio, M., Bertrando, R. and Eisenberger, J. (1998). Supporting Supporting students with learning needs in the blockstudents with learning needs in the block. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

Gilkey, S. N. and Hunt, C. H. (1998). Gilkey, S. N. and Hunt, C. H. (1998). Teaching mathematics in the blockTeaching mathematics in the block. . Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

Marzano, R. J. (2003). Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into What works in schools: Translating research into actionaction. Alexandria,VA: ASCD.. Alexandria,VA: ASCD.

Page 74: 1 Criteria for Comparison of Schedules n Time per course n Choices available n Cost n Student Load n Teacher Load n Percentage of Core (assuming 1 class

74

References con’t. Pettus, A. and Blosser, M. (2001). Teaching science in the block. Larchmont, Pettus, A. and Blosser, M. (2001). Teaching science in the block. Larchmont,

NY. Eye On Education.NY. Eye On Education.

Rettig, M. D. (2004). Rettig, M. D. (2004). Directory of high school scheduling models in Virginia.Directory of high school scheduling models in Virginia. A report of the "Study of innovative high school scheduling in Virginia". A report of the "Study of innovative high school scheduling in Virginia". Harrisonburg, VA: James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA: James Madison University, http://coe.jmu.edu/EdLeadership/index2.htm.http://coe.jmu.edu/EdLeadership/index2.htm.

Rettig, M. D. & Canady, R. L. (2000). Rettig, M. D. & Canady, R. L. (2000). Scheduling strategies for middle Scheduling strategies for middle schoolsschools. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.

Rettig, M. D., McCullough, L. L., Santos, K.E., and Watson, C.R. (2004). Rettig, M. D., McCullough, L. L., Santos, K.E., and Watson, C.R. (2004). From rigorous standards to student achievement: A practical process.From rigorous standards to student achievement: A practical process. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

Strzepek, J. E., Newton, J., and Walker, L. D. (2000). Teaching English in the Strzepek, J. E., Newton, J., and Walker, L. D. (2000). Teaching English in the block. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.block. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.

Zepeda, S.J, & Mayers, R.S. (2006). An analysis of research on block Zepeda, S.J, & Mayers, R.S. (2006). An analysis of research on block scheduling. scheduling. Review of Educational Research 76 Review of Educational Research 76 (1), 137-170.(1), 137-170.