1 comparison of method description formalisms niek broer (0331694)

12
1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

Upload: irene-clark

Post on 29-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

1

Comparison of Method

Description Formalisms

Niek Broer (0331694)

Page 2: 1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

2

Last Week

Find and choose method description formalisms

“Failed”

Find and choose criteria

“Failed”

Read up on EMMSAD ’09

“Completed”

Page 3: 1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

3

This Week

Find and choose method description formalisms

“Pending!”

Find and choose criteria

“Pending!”

Catch up on EMMSAD ’09

“Done” (for now)

Page 4: 1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

4

Method Description Formalisms 1/3

Method NameSpec

PDD Q1 Process-Deliverable Diagram Yes

PASSI Process for Agent Societies Specification and Implementation No

SPEM Software Process Engineering Model Yes

MOF Meta Object Facility Yes

Q1 What is the name of the Method that utilizes PDD’s?

Page 5: 1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

5

Method Description Formalisms 2/3

Method NameSpec

OPFRO OPEN Process Framework Repository Organization Yes

OPEN ? Yes

Map ? No

ASPECS Agent-oriented Software Process for Engineering Complex Systems No

Page 6: 1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

6

Method Description Formalisms 3/3

To be done: E-mail the authors of the last methods not yet

found… Cossentino, Ralyté & Koukam

Start analyzing and selecting methods …

Page 7: 1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

7

Criteria 1/4

Improving the Effectiveness of Visual Representations in Requirements Engineering: An Evaluation of i* Visual Syntax

By Moody, Heymans & Matulevicius (2009)

Usability Assessment of a UML-based Formal Modeling Method.

By Razali, Snook, Poppleton & Garratt (2006)

ISO 9126: Quality Model

Q2Q2 Has anyone found an appropriate criteria list for evaluating methods?

Page 8: 1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

8

Criteria 2/4

Improving the Effectiveness of Visual Representations in Requirements Engineering: An Evaluation of i* Visual Syntax

By Moody, Heymans & Matulevicius (2009)

Semiotic Clarity

Perceptual Discriminability

Visual Expressiveness

Graphic Economy

Page 9: 1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

9

Criteria 3/4

Usability Assessment of a UML-based Formal Modeling Method.

By Razali, Snook, Poppleton & Garratt (2006)

Diffuseness

Secondary Notation

Role Expressiveness

Visibility

Page 10: 1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

10

Criteria 4/4

ISO 9126: Quality Model

Functionality

Usability

Maintainability

Page 11: 1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

11

To do

As stated: E-mail the authors of the last methods not yet

found… Cossentino, Ralyté & Koukam

Select methods

But also: Define criteria

Page 12: 1 Comparison of Method Description Formalisms Niek Broer (0331694)

12

“The End”…