1 chill chain management and shelf life optimisation...
TRANSCRIPT
1
1
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Chill Chain Management and Shelf Life Optimisation Chill Chain Management and Shelf Life Optimisation of MAP of MAP SeabreamSeabream Fillets:Fillets:
A TTI Based Alternative to FIFO A TTI Based Alternative to FIFO
Petros Taoukis, Theofania Tsironi, Eleni Gogou, Marianna GiannogPetros Taoukis, Theofania Tsironi, Eleni Gogou, Marianna Giannogloulou
2
2
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Chill Chain Chill Chain –– Need for better managementNeed for better management
It is generally recognized by the European industry, retailers, It is generally recognized by the European industry, retailers, food authorities and even consumers that the weakest link that food authorities and even consumers that the weakest link that affects directly safety and quality of chilled products is the affects directly safety and quality of chilled products is the actual actual chill chainchill chain. A big percentage of . A big percentage of foodbornefoodborne disease is due to disease is due to temperature abuse.temperature abuse.
3
3
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Chill Chain Chill Chain –– Need for better managementNeed for better management
Application of an optimized quality and safety assurance system Application of an optimized quality and safety assurance system for chilled distribution of fresh chilled products requires for chilled distribution of fresh chilled products requires continuous monitoring and control of storage conditions from continuous monitoring and control of storage conditions from production to consumption. The systematic management of the production to consumption. The systematic management of the chill chain and the improved evaluation of safety, quality and schill chain and the improved evaluation of safety, quality and shelf helf life of the products can lead to reduced safety risk and increaslife of the products can lead to reduced safety risk and increased ed quality, with a significant health and economic impact to the quality, with a significant health and economic impact to the society and the market.society and the market.
4
4
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Chill chain: Monitoring andChill chain: Monitoring and ManagementManagement
Producer
Consumer
Packer/Processor
Wholesaler
RetailerHospital
Schools...
5
5
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
S M A S
Development and application of a TTI based Safety Monitoring Development and application of a TTI based Safety Monitoring and Assurance System for Chilled Meat Productsand Assurance System for Chilled Meat Products
A European Commission Research and Technology Development ProjecA European Commission Research and Technology Development Projectt
Quality of life and management of living resourcesQuality of life and management of living resources
http://http://smas.chemeng.ntua.grsmas.chemeng.ntua.gr
6
6
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
What is SMAS?
SMAS is an integrated chill chain management system, expected to lead to an optimised handling of products in terms of both safety and quality. It is based on the ability to continuously monitor the storage conditions of each product with the use of Time Temperature Integrators (TTI).
7
7
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
The SMAS project The acronym SMAS summarizes the long title of the 3 year (2003-2006) action project “Development and application of a TTI based Safety Monitoring and Assurance System for Chilled Meat Products”, funded by the EC and co-ordinated by the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA). The project basis consisted of validated predictive models of predominant meat microorganisms growth and kinetics of the response of selected TTI, all applied in an expanded TTI application scheme that translates TTI response to meat microbiological and quality status. The ultimate purpose was to deliver an effective chill chain decision and management tool.
8
8
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
OVERALL OBJECTIVE
State of the art ofTTI technology + PM and QMRA
⇓Development of SMAS, an effective and reliable quality optimization management system for products, extending from production to the
table of consumer
9
9
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Current practice: First In- First Out (FIFO)Disadvantages:ü ignores variations of product characteristicsü ignores the REAL time-temperature history of the product
Proposed practice: SMASMain Advantages:üvariations of product characteristics are consideredüthe REAL time-temperature history of the product is taken into account based on TTI response
School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of Athens, Greece
10
10
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
TThhee ccoonnttrriibbuuttiioonn ooff SSMMAASS iinn tthhee cchhiillll cchhaaiinn mmaannaaggeemmeenntt ccaann bbee vviissuuaalliizzeedd aass aa mmiinniimmiizzaattiioonn ooff rriisskk ffoorr iillllnneessss aanndd ooppttiimmiissaattiioonn ooff tthhee pprroodduucctt qquuaalliittyy aatt tthhee ttiimmee ooff ccoonnssuummppttiioonn
School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of Athens, Greece
11
11
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
TasksTasks
ØØ Study of Study of the temperature conditions in the chill chain the temperature conditions in the chill chain
(fluctuations during transport/storage, variability within (fluctuations during transport/storage, variability within the domestic equipment)the domestic equipment)
ØØCorrelationCorrelation of temperature handling to food quality with the use of temperature handling to food quality with the use
of of Time Temperature IndicatorsTime Temperature Indicators
ØØ Validation of the Validation of the Safety Monitoring and Assurance System (SMAS) Safety Monitoring and Assurance System (SMAS)
by simulation and experiment by simulation and experiment
12
12
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ACTUAL CHILL CHAIN
13
13
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Temperature conditions FROM production TO the retail outlet
Conclusions from survey (1)
• Sharp (but short) increases of temperature (during transport)• Cases of retail storage at temperatures > 7°C• Significant temperature fluctuations
14
14
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Survey for temperature conditions (2)
Electronic dataloggers
4 data loggers were distributed randomly to potential consumers to monitor variations
INSIDE the refrigerator
2st stage of the survey:
Variations WITHIN the domestic refrigerator
1
2
3
4 1: upper shelf2: middle shelf3: lower shelf4: door
15
15
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
% o
f dom
estic
refr
iger
ator
s
26%
28%
23%
15%
8%
< 4°C4°C<T< 6°C6°C<T< 8°C8°C<T< 10°C10°C<T< 12°C
Average temperature of domestic refrigerators(~400 cases)
Temperature variation within domestic refrigerators
05
1015202530
-2.0-0.80.31.52.73.85.06.27.38.59.710.812.0
upper shelf middle shelf
lower shelf door
Temperature (°C)
16
16
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Temperature variationsin distribution and storage conditions
Justification for continuous monitoringTTI
17
17
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
TTI PRINCIPLES &
APPLICATION
18
18
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
TTI: main principlesTime Temperature Integrators (TTI) are simple, inexpensive devices that can show an easily measurable, time and temperature dependent change that cumulatively indicates the time-temperature history of the product from the point of manufacture to the consumer, allowing the location and the improvement of the critical points of the chill chain
TYPES OF TTI
ENZYMATIC Polymer basedDiffusion based
Microbial
Photochemical
19
19
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
?? : measurable change of : measurable change of ??????
Response Response functionfunction:
F(X) = k t
TTI RESPONSE KINETICS
Temperature dependenceTemperature dependence -- expressed by expressed by EaEa( ) t
11
−
−==
ref
aI TTR
EexpkktXF I
ref
20
20
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Measurement of the??? response
F(X)
Teff
Teff
f (A)
AtQuality at time t
Response function:
Quality function
( ) tTTR
EexpkAf
refeff
aAt ref
11
−
−=
( )
I
ref
a
I
t
refeff E
kXF
lnR
TT
−= −−
11
Iref aI Ek , aA Ekref
,? a (? ? ?) = ? a (food)
TTI Application scheme
21
21
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Integrated Approach to enable Traceability of the Cold chain of Integrated Approach to enable Traceability of the Cold chain of Fresh Fresh Chilled Meat and Fish Products by means of tailorChilled Meat and Fish Products by means of tailor--made made
Time/Temperature IndicatorsTime/Temperature Indicators
http://http://www.freshlabelwww.freshlabel/net/net
FRESHLABELFRESHLABEL
22
22
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Shelf life study of gilthead Shelf life study of gilthead seabreamseabream fillets packed under fillets packed under
modified atmospheremodified atmosphere
23
23
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
§§ The limited and variable shelf life of chilled fish The limited and variable shelf life of chilled fish products is a major problem for their quality products is a major problem for their quality assurance and commercial viability. assurance and commercial viability.
§§ Products like chilled fillets from marine cultured Products like chilled fillets from marine cultured Mediterranean fish such as gilthead Mediterranean fish such as gilthead seabreamseabreamhave high commercial potential if their shelf life have high commercial potential if their shelf life can be extended through packaging or minimal can be extended through packaging or minimal processing. processing.
Gilthead Gilthead seabreamseabream filletsfillets ((SparusSparus aurataaurata))
24
24
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Marine cultured gilthead seabream fillets were MA packed and stored at controlled isothermal conditions 0, 5, 10 and 15°C
Gilthead Gilthead seabreamseabream filletsfillets ((SparusSparus aurataaurata))
25
25
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Modified atmosphere packagingModified atmosphere packagingGas headspace analysisGas headspace analysis
CheckMateCheckMate 9900 O9900 O22/CO/CO22 devicedevice(Boss NT42N, Bad Homburg, Germany)(Boss NT42N, Bad Homburg, Germany)
26
26
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Microbiological analysisMicrobiological analysis§§ Total viable countTotal viable count§§ PseudomonasPseudomonas sppspp..§§ Lactic acid bacteriaLactic acid bacteria
pH measurementpH measurementSensory evaluationSensory evaluation
§§ Sensory panel of 8Sensory panel of 8§§ Rating on a 1Rating on a 1--9 descriptive hedonic scale9 descriptive hedonic scale
AppearanceAppearanceOdourOdourFreshnessFreshnessTextureTextureTasteTaste
The microbial growth was modeled using the The microbial growth was modeled using the BaranyiBaranyi Growth ModelGrowth Model
27
27
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
-- Samples were stored under non isothermal conditionsSamples were stored under non isothermal conditions
§§ ScenarioScenario 1:1:TTeffeff =5.4=5.4°°C C
TTeffeff =9.4=9.4°°C C
Validation of the developed kinetic models under dynamic Validation of the developed kinetic models under dynamic temperature conditionstemperature conditions
Temperature profiles were obtained from electronic data loggers (COX TRACERTM, Belmont, NC)
1
3
5
7
9
0 10 20 30 40 50Time (h)
T(°
C)3
5
7
9
11
13
0 10 20 30Time (h)
T(°
C)
§§ ScenarioScenario 2:2:
99°°C, 4hC, 4h55°°C, 3hC, 3h
22°°C, 2hC, 2h
99°°C, 2hC, 2h1212°°C, 3hC, 3h
55°°C, 2hC, 2h
28
28
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
§§ Marine cultured gilthead Marine cultured gilthead seabreamseabream fillets were MA packed and fillets were MA packed and stored at controlled isothermal conditions 0, 5, 10 and 15stored at controlled isothermal conditions 0, 5, 10 and 15°°C.C.
§§ 220% CO0% CO22 -- 8800% % airair§§ 550% CO0% CO22 -- 5500% % airair§§ 880% CO0% CO22 -- 2200% % airair
Gilthead Gilthead seabreamseabream filletsfillets ((SparusSparus aurataaurata))
29
29
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Gas headspace changesGas headspace changes ((COCO22 andand OO22)) in fish fillet packagesin fish fillet packages
50% CO50% CO22--50% 50% airair
02468
1012
0 100 200 300 400 500 600?????? (h)
%O
2
0C5C10C15C
45
50
55
60
65
0 100 200 300 400 500 600?????? (h)
%CO
2
0C5C10C15C
Time (h) Time (h)
30
30
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Microbial growth on chilled gilthead Microbial growth on chilled gilthead seabreamseabream fillets packed under fillets packed under MA 5MA 50% 0% COCO22 atat 0, 5, 10 and 150, 5, 10 and 15°°CC
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 100 200 300 400 500 600?????? (h)
logC
FU/g
0°C5°C10°C15°C
Total viable countTotal viable count PseudomonasPseudomonas sp.sp.
Lactic acid bacteriaLactic acid bacteria
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 100 200 300 400 500 600?????? (h)
logC
FU/g
0°C5°C10°C15°C
3
4
5
6
0 100 200 300 400 500 600?????? (h)
logC
FU/g
0°C5°C10°C15°C
Time (h) Time (h)
Time (h)
31
31
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Specific growth ratesSpecific growth rates k k ((hh--11)) and kinetic parameters of lactic acid and kinetic parameters of lactic acid bacteria in MAP (50% CObacteria in MAP (50% CO22 –– 50% air)50% air)
1515°°CC
1010°°CC
55°°CC
00°°CC
??
0.00.028292829
0.00.019251925
0.00.010781078
0.000.00342342
k (hk (h--11))
EEaa= = 9911 kJ/molkJ/mol
kkref(4ref(4ººC)C)=0.0=0.007390739 hh--11
RR22=0.9=0.94747
−+=
T1
T1
RElnklnk
ref
aref
Arrhenius equation
-6
-5
-4
-3
-0.0001 0 0.0001 0.00021/Tref-1/T
lnk
32
32
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Predicted (Predicted (SLSLpredpred) and experimental shelf life () and experimental shelf life (SPSPexpexp) of MAP ) of MAP gilthead gilthead seabreamseabream fillets under fillets under nonisothermalnonisothermal conditionsconditions
--1.01.0
233233
235235
5050% CO% CO22
% % errorerror
SLSLexpexp (h)(h)SLSLpredpred (h)(h)
ScenarioScenario 11
--12.812.8
112112
127127
5050% CO% CO22
% % errorerror
SLSLexpexp (h)(h)SLSLpredpred (h)(h)
ScenarioScenario 22
1
3
5
7
9
0 10 20 30 40 50Time (h)
T(°
C)3
5
7
9
11
13
0 10 20 30Time (h)
T(°
C)
33
33
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Shelf life evaluation of gilthead sea bream Shelf life evaluation of gilthead sea bream stored in MAP (50% COstored in MAP (50% CO22))
82 (3 d)76 (3 d)15°C
140 (6 d)129 (5 d)10°C
301 (12 d)268 (11 d)5°C
563 (23 d)612 (25 d)0°C
Shelf life (h) evaluated by sensory analysis
(total impression>5)
Shelf life (h) evaluated bymicrobiological growth
(lactic acid bacteria <6 logCFU/g)
Storage temperature
EEaa= 85.5 kJ/mol= 85.5 kJ/molEEaa= 90.8 kJ/mol= 90.8 kJ/mol
34
34
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Application of the ArrheniusApplication of the Arrhenius--type model for shelf life prediction of type model for shelf life prediction of chilled gilthead chilled gilthead seabreamseabream fillets under MAPfillets under MAP
−
−=
T1
T1
REexp
COCOCOkk
ref
a
2max
22maxref
% CO% CO2 2 concentrationconcentrationTemperatureTemperature ?? Shelf lifeShelf life
Limit:Limit: 101066 for LABfor LAB**
2828 dd1818 dd1313 dd1010 dd99 dd77 dd66 dd55°°CC
6161 dd4040 dd2929 dd2323 dd1919 dd1616 dd1414 dd00°°CC
80%80%70%70%60%60%50%50%40%40%30%30%20%20%TT
COCO22 concentrationconcentration
** Based on Based on organolepticorganoleptic acceptability the end of shelf life coincided with 10acceptability the end of shelf life coincided with 1066 LAB for MAP stored samples.LAB for MAP stored samples.
35
35
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Application of the ArrheniusApplication of the Arrhenius--type model for shelf life prediction of type model for shelf life prediction of chilled gilthead chilled gilthead seabreamseabream fillets under MAPfillets under MAP
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Temperature (°C)
Shel
f lif
e (h
)aerobically packed
? ? ? (20% CO2)
? ? ? (30% CO2)
? ? ? (40% CO2)
? ? ? (50% CO2)
? ? ? (60% CO2)
? ? ? (70% CO2)
? ? ? (80% CO2)
36
36
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Kinetic Study of the Kinetic Study of the
TTIsTTIs
37
37
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
OnVu TTIs are based on the inherent reproducibility of reactions in crystal phase
TTI Color reference scale
Photosensitive compounds are excited and coloured by exposure at UV radiation
The coloured state reverses to the initial colorless at a temperature depended rate
Photochemical TTI
38
38
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
TTI testing
•TTIs were activated and studied at several charging times
Inactivated TTI Hand charger use Activated TTI
39
39
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Instrumental measurement of TTI colour
X-rite Eye1pro Colorimeter
Illumination D50Measurement of visual response with CIE Lab
40
40
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
TTI Response KineticsTTI Response Kinetics
oo ResponseResponse functionfunction:
( ) t 11
−
−==
ref
aI TTR
EexpkktXF I
ref
( ) ( )[ ] tdTTR
EexpkdttTkXF
t
ref
aI
t
tI
ref ∫∫
−
−==
00
11
oo ForFor variablevariable temperature distribution:temperature distribution:
oo UsingUsing effective temperature:effective temperature:
( ) tTTR
EexpkXF
refeff
aIt
I
ref
−
−=
11
41
41
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Instrumental measurement of TTI colour
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00
t (h)
L
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00t (h)
a
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00t (h)
b
42
42
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Response function
kt
EE −=
∆∆
exp0
2max
2min
2max )()aa()( bbLLE −+−+−=∆
43
43
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
B1 TTI response modelling
TTI Activation: UV lamp exposure for 1 seconds
168,28168,280,00610,00613.53.5
204,01204,010,00500,00502.52.5
126,40126,400,00810,008155
20,2420,240,05040,05041515
49,7749,770,02050,02051010
71,9771,970,01420,014288
332,17332,170,00310,003100
Shelf lifeShelf life(hours)(hours)
Rate Rate k (hk (h--11))
Storage Storage temperature temperature
((ooCC))
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0 100 200 300 400 500t (h)
DE
mod
el
44
44
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
TTI Activation: UV lamp exposure for 2 seconds
B1 TTI response modelling
05
101520253035404550
0 50 100 150 200 250 300t (h)
DE
mod
el
327,27327,270,00370,00373.53.5
396,75396,750,00310,00312.52.5
245,82245,820,00490,004955
39,3639,360,03080,03081515
96,7996,790,01250,01251010
139,96139,960,00870,008788
645,98645,980,00190,001900
Shelf lifeShelf life(hours)(hours)
Rate Rate k (hk (h--11))
Storage Storage temperature temperature
((ooCC))
45
45
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
B1 TTI response modellingEa=116KJ/mol
TTI Activation: UV lamp exposure for 2s
-6,000
-5,500
-5,000
-4,500
-4,000
-1,0E-04 -8,0E-05 -6,0E-05 -4,0E-05 -2,0E-05 0,0E+00 2,0E-05
1/T-1/Tref
lnk
46
46
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Dependence of response rate on charging time
435.18435.180,00330,003333
297.39297.390,00380,003822
576.13576.130,00300,003044
1625.521625.520,00100,00101515
1177.881177.880,00160,00161010
789.42789.420,00240,002466
152.92152.920,00640,006411
Shelf lifeShelf life(hours)(hours)
Rate Rate krefkref (h(h--1)1)
Charging time Charging time (s)(s)
0,000
0,001
0,002
0,003
0,004
0,005
0,006
0,007
0 5 10 15tc(s)
kref
(h-1
)
47
47
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
B1 TTI response modelling
0.00
240.00
480.00
720.00
960.00
1200.00
1440.00
1680.00
1920.00
0 2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2 14 16Temperature (°C)
She
lf lif
e (h
)
1 second ch.t.
2 seconds ch.t.3 seconds ch.t.4 seconds ch.t.6 seconds ch.t.10 seconds ch.t.15 seconds ch.t.
48
48
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 5 10 15Storage Temperature (°C)
She
lf li
fe (h
)gilthead seabream fillets stored in MAP (50% CO2)TTI 2.3s
Ciba Ciba OnVuOnVu HandchargerHandcharger
49
49
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Field Test DesignField Test Design
80 samples of MAP gilthead seabream
fillets
LaboratoryLaboratorysimulatedsimulatedconditionsconditions
Distribution centerDistribution center(decision point)(decision point)
Local marketLocal market
Export marketExport marketconsumersconsumers
50
50
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
2nd step72 h at various T conditions
TTIbased split
Decision pointTTIs reading
Microbiological analysis4th step
Field test Design
80 packages
1st step
40 PackagesTTI tag
attached on each package
40 packages without TTIs
3rdst
ep
Local market
4oC
8oC72, 96 hours
Export market
4oC
8oC144, 168 hours
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 12 24 36 48 60 72Time (hours)
Stor
age
tem
pera
ture
(oC
)
t-T profil1
t-T profil2
t-T profil4
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 12 24 36 48 60 72Time (hours)
Stor
age
tem
pera
ture
(oC
)
t-T profil3
t-T profil5
51
51
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Ä After 72 hours TTI bearing products were split according to the TTI color readings, using the 16-stage color scale
Ä FIFO samples were split randomly
TTI readings at the time of decision
color reference scale
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
52
52
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
3
Sample stored for 72h at Teff=2.3oC(photo taken at the time of split)
1
T-t profil_1
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
Time (hours)
Stor
age
Tempe
ratu
re
(o C) Time Temperature Profil 1
Teff=2.3oC
TTI readings at the time of decision
1st group of 8 samples
53
53
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
5
Sample stored for 72h at Teff=4.4oC(photo taken at the time of split)
1
T-t profil_2
0123456789
10
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
Time (hours)
Stor
age
Tempe
ratu
re
(o C
) Time Temperature Profil 2
Teff=4.4oC
TTI readings at the time of decision
2nd group of 8 samples
54
54
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
8
Sample stored for 72h at Teff=8.0oC(photo taken at the time of split)
1
T-t profil_3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
Time (hours)
Stor
age
Tempe
ratu
re
(o C
)
Time Temperature Profil 3
Teff=8.0oC
TTI readings at the time of decision
3rd group of 8 samples
55
55
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
T-t profil_4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
Time (hours)
Stor
age
Tempe
ratu
re
(o C
)
10
Sample stored for 72h at Teff=9.7oC(photo taken at the time of split)
1
Time Temperature Profil 4
Teff=9.7oC
TTI readings at the time of decision
4th group of 8 samples
56
56
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1615
Sample stored for 72h at Teff=11.8oC(photo taken at the time of split)
1
T-t profil_5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
Time (hours)
Stor
age
Tempe
ratu
re
(o C
)
Time Temperature Profil 5
Teff=11.8oC
TTI readings at the time of decision
5th group of 8 samples
57
57
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
TTI Based Split-Analysis TimetableAfter the TTI color readings all TTI bearing products:
Äare sorted according to their temperature history
ÄSPLIT into 2 subgroups: the 20 more temperature abused belong to ‘Products for local market’, the rest of them belong to ‘Products for distant market’
ÄBoth groups (local & export) are stored in two temperature cabinets (4,8oC)
ÄThe microbiological analysis timetable
144h168h96h72ht4t3t2t1
Export MarketLocal Market
58
58
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Time-Temperature profiles for the TTI bearing products throughout the field test
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (h)
Sto
rage
tem
pera
ture
(oC
)
S11S12S13S14S15S16S17S18S19S20
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (h)
Sto
rage
tem
pera
ture
(oC
)
S1S2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S10
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (h)
Stor
age
tempe
ratu
re (oC
)
S21S22S23S24S25S26S27S28S29S30
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (h)
Sto
rage
tem
pera
ture
(oC
)
S31S32S33S34S35S36S37S38S39S40
59
59
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2021 22 23 24 25 26 27 2829 30 31 32 33 34 35 3637 38 39 40sample
Effe
ctive
Tem
pera
ture
(o C
)
72 hours 96 hours 144 hours 168 hours
72 hours
Effective temperature for all FIFO handled products at the time of “consumption”
Effective temperature for all TTI bearing products at the time of “consumption”
TTI sorting resulted in promoting the more temperature abused products to be “consumed” first
FIFO handled products……
96 hours144 hours
168 hours
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2021 22 23 2425 26 2728 29 30 31 32 33 34 3536 37 3839 40
sample
Effe
ctive
Tem
pera
ture
(o C
)
60
60
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
FIELD TEST RESULTSCalculated microbial log counts for each date of microbiological analysis show the different distribution of microbial load in the 2 groups
012345678
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Samples
Lac
tic
acid
bac
teri
a lo
g co
unts
.
FIFO handled productsTTI bearing products
72 hours after split 96 hours after split 144 hours after split 168 hours after split
Spoilage level=log6
61
61
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Distribution of Lactic acid bacteria growth for all samples at time ofmicrobiological analysis - time of ‘consumption’.
FIELD TEST RESULTS
Spoiled products
The distribution of microbiologicalgrowth moves to the left, to lower
values, for the TTI bearing products
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
log3-log4 log4-log5 log5-log6 log6-log7 >log7
Lactic acid bacteria log counts
% o
f sam
ples
FIFO handled products
TTI bearing products
62
62
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Validation of the developed model of the Validation of the developed model of the TTI response value (TTI response value (? ?? ?))
Predicted vs. observed TTI Predicted vs. observed TTI response values at the time of splitresponse values at the time of split
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 242526 272829 30 31 3233 343536 37 3839 40
sample
?? (TTI
resp
onse
value
)
observed
predicted
63
63
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Predicted vs. observed LAB counts Predicted vs. observed LAB counts for all for all 8080 samples used in the samples used in the
field testfield test
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0(logcfu/g)observed
(lo
gcf
u/g
)pre
dic
ted
Validation of the developed model of Validation of the developed model of Lactic Acid Bacteria growthLactic Acid Bacteria growth
64
64
National Technical University of AthensNational Technical University of Athens, , School of Chemical EngineeringSchool of Chemical EngineeringLaboratory of Food Chemistry & TechnologyLaboratory of Food Chemistry & Technology
Thank you for your attentionThank you for your attention!!
This study was supported by the European Commission FP6 CollectiThis study was supported by the European Commission FP6 Collective Research ve Research Project COLLProject COLL--CTCT--20052005--012371 (http://012371 (http://www.freshlabelwww.freshlabel/net)/net)