1 an income tax, not a wage tax: comments on “a fair and simple tax system for our future” peter...
TRANSCRIPT
1
An Income Tax, Not A Wage Tax:Comments on “A Fair and Simple
Tax System for Our Future”
Peter R. Orszag
Co-Director, Tax Policy Center
January 31, 2005
2
Moving back to an income tax
• Tax changes over past several years have been moving toward taxing only labor income, not capital income
• This proposal would move the system back toward a true income tax– 1986 reform also moved in this direction, by
reducing capital income preferences
3
Wage tax vs. consumption tax• Consumption tax: Tax break only for new
saving, not for existing capital – Imposes tax on existing assets and future wages
(two sources of financing for consumption)
• Bulk of economic benefit from consumption tax derives from tax on existing assets
• Without tax on existing assets, result is simply a wage tax– All the regressivity of a consumption tax, little or
none of the economic benefits
4
Using broad tax reform to boost saving: A flawed approach
• Aim of consumption/wage taxes: Boost new saving by reducing tax burden imposed on it
• Flaw: Especially at top of income distribution where bulk of tax benefit is provided, tax preferences generate little new saving – Asset shifting, not new saving– Regressive without significant beneficial impact on
saving
• This proposal correctly moves in opposite direction
5
A better approach: Two key steps
• Make it easier to save– Evidence showing significant effects from automatic
enrollment and automatic escalation (automatic 401k)
• Level the playing field for tax-preferred saving– Evidence that contributions made by lower-income
workers more likely to be net addition to saving– Yet current system provides larger incentives to
higher-income workers– Universal credit to level the playing field
6
Level the playing field$100 deposited by:
Immediate tax saving under
current system
Immediate tax saving under CAP proposal
High-income family
$35 $25
Middle-income family
$15 $25
Low-income family
$0 $25
7
Conclusions
• Among its many features, proposal highlights need to fundamentally re-think how we encourage private saving
• Represents very useful contribution to tax reform and retirement security debates