1 agreements with landowners and local governments financing wind power: the future of energy may 8,...

27
1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody LLP 1100 Clinton Square Rochester, NY 14604 P (585) 263-1306 [email protected]

Upload: helena-moody

Post on 26-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

1

Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments

Financing Wind Power: The Future of EnergyMay 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ

Matthew S. MosesNixon Peabody LLP1100 Clinton SquareRochester, NY 14604

P (585) [email protected]

Page 2: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

2

Introduction• Wind power projects are essentially real estate projects• Most significant development assets:

– site control– right to build– tax agreement

• Goal – create financeable project• Objectives:

– take care of real estate details at earliest possible time– fix project costs to greatest extent possible, including state

and local tax cost

Page 3: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

3

Real Estate Matters

• Goal – obtain site control to all project property from turbine to point of interconnection

• Landowner Agreements– Potential interests and instruments

• Easement• Lease• Fee• License• Option• SNDA

Page 4: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

4

Real Estate Matters (cont’d)• Key issues

– Scope• Control of entire farm/ranch – location of improvements determined later• Contemplated improvements

– Access roads– Laydown areas– Collection wires

» Overhead» Underground

– Turbines – foundations and towers– Transformers– Substation/Switchyard– Met towers– Communications towers– Fencing

Page 5: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

5

Real Estate Matters (cont’d)

– Payment• Fixed

– Pros: easy to calculate and administer; predictable revenue to landowners

– Cons: landowners may disfavor

• Variable – Royalties

– Pros: landowners want to share in wealth

– Cons: difficult to calculate; unpredictable; risk of opening books to landowners; government may want similar deal

• Signing bonus

• Revenue expectation management

Page 6: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

6

Real Estate Matters (cont’d)

– Environmental• Land disturbance and restoration

• Repair of farm/ranch improvements

– drainage tile, farm roads, ditching, irrigation system

• Minimal impact on current and future farm/ranch use

• Hazardous Substances

– protect against activities of landowner

– Decommissioning• Standard of decommissioning – what stays and what goes

• Security

– When funded

– Amount – net of salvage value

– Form of instrument – bond, letter of credit, fund/escrow account, parent guarantee

Page 7: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

7

Real Estate Matters (cont’d)

– Indemnification and insurance• Limit to just project and project-related activities

– Taxes• Beware of indemnification for increases in tax on landowner property

– Financing issues• Free alienability – no restrictions on assignment or transfer

• SNDA – subordination and non-disturbance agreement

– Project agreements not subject to foreclosure by a landowner’s lender

– Need to work with landowners’ lenders

• Project mortgage allowed

Page 8: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

8

Real Estate Matters (cont’d)

• Other Real Estate Matters

– Title insurance• involve title insurance company early on in process

– Municipal franchise and road permits

– Substation/switchyard• transfer to utility

– Project mortgage• Stands in position of project real estate, ahead of

farm/ranch mortgage

• Landowners not involved

Page 9: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

9

Real Estate Matters (cont’d)

• Trouble Spots

– Financing – issues that may stand in the way of closing• Incomplete real estate interests

– Power collection system – not all dots connected

– Roads – adjacent landowners own to middle of road

• Municipal franchises

– Underlying land rights but no permit from municipality

– Road crossings

• Wrong owner – marriage, divorce, death, joint ownership, etc.

• Sale of parcel during development

• Setbacks – lack of border easement

Page 10: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

10

Real Estate Matters (cont’d)

– Construction and Operation of Project– Location of improvements

• Hyper-communication with landowners• Build project consistent with Plans and Specs / turbine

locations should match locations identified in permits• Construction loan covenants

– Construction impacts – remediation– Tax liability on underlying farm/ranch– Release of unnecessary land from project– TV, noise, shadow flicker (landscaping)

• beware of adjacent property owners

Page 11: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

11

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities

• Goal – obtain all permits necessary to built and operate project and protect project from uneconomic taxation

• Major issues– Permits

• What’s in it for me (for local governments)• Effectively a pay-for-permit game• Governmental oversight of project

– Taxes• Property (personal and real property), Sales, Mortgage Recording, and

Transfer Taxes• Exemptions and abatement programs• Vehicle for property tax agreement (e.g. payment in-lieu of tax agreement

(PILOT), host community agreement (HCA), voluntary payment agreement (VPA))

• Appropriate amount in face of high capital cost of project– Amount project can afford to achieve hurdle rate– Local government expectations

Page 12: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

12

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

• PILOT Agreement– Term– Scope – covers all project improvements

• Include transmission line and substation/switchyard• Underwater lands? Offshore?

– Payment Amount• Fixed• Assessment-based with percentage abatement• Tax rate risk

– Adjustments to Payment Amount• Inflation• Variable payments based on capacity factor, energy prices, etc.• Additions to project

– Additional MW – same payment rate– No new MW – no additional payment (e.g. operations building)

• Deletions from project– Damage, destruction, condemnation, decommissioning– Reduce payment by MW dropped from project

Page 13: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

13

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

– Payment split among local governments • municipal concern (unless deal hinges on split)

– Payment security • company should not offer security but should be prepared

for request from municipality• form of security

– Parent guarantee– PILOT mortgage– LC

Page 14: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

14

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

– Special district taxes• Fire, water, sewer, refuse, ambulance, etc.• Dominance of tax base• How to control

– Bells and whistles• Capacity factor kicker• Energy price kicker• Economic development power• Host payments for community/charitable purposes• Historic preservation payments• Transaction fees

Page 15: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

15

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

– Substation/switchyard• Utility may require ownership of substation/switchyard

– Transfer after construction• Interconnection Agreement may require tax indemnification• PILOT should cover substation taxes

– Financing issues• Free alienability – no restriction on assignment or transfer• Collateral assignment• Consent to Assignment in favor of lender• Lender right to cure default• Termination – right of company to terminate if project

uneconomic

Page 16: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

16

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

• Approach to PILOT Negotiations– Due diligence on local tax system

• Scope of exemption• Statutory scheme and process for obtaining exemption

– Model full tax on project to determine municipal revenue appetite

– Model amount of tax project can afford– Establish strategy

• Portion of full tax• “Competitive” payment with other generators• “Competitive” payment with other wind projects• Portion to tax base

Page 17: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

17

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

– Build relationship with community leaders

– Negotiate terms – plan on multiple meetings• Exchange term sheets to capture ground gained

– Approvals

Page 18: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

18

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

• Host Community Agreement– Non-financial aspects of municipal agreement, but can

be brought into PILOT Agreement or used as a substitute for a PILOT Agreement

– May help “steer” payment to permitting authority

– One document – best if covers all non-tax business dealings with municipality (e.g. road use, municipal costs, decommissioning, etc.)

Page 19: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

19

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

– Potential provisions• Municipal franchise rights and road permits

• Road use

– Why needed?

» Public use

» Limit risk to project for damage to roads caused by project

» Repair – not replace – road

» Cost advantage of private bid

– Separate agreement?

– Traffic plan – list of involved roads

– Right of access to inspect and improve roads

» Agent of municipality

» Over-sized vehicles

» Construction, operation, repair and decommissioning

Page 20: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

20

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

– Pre-construction engineer’s inspection to establish baseline condition

– Reinforcement activities– Post-construction engineer’s inspection to

establish damage needing repair– Repair activities– Municipal acceptance of repair– Costs– Indemnification and insurance

» Car wreck – make sure covered by insurance policy

– Security (e.g. performance bond)

Page 21: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

21

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

• Municipal review and oversight costs– Should developer pay?– Separate agreement?– Attorneys’ fees– Engineers’ fees– Escrow account

» Initial funding» Draws» Replenishment» Interest» Return of principal

Page 22: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

22

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

• Building permits

– Who reviews application – qualifications

– Who oversees construction – qualifications

» Permit conditions

» Building codes

» Plans and Specs

– Who issues certificate of completion – qualifications

– When can project first sell energy

• Operations

– Administration of permit conditions

– Complaint resolution

Page 23: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

23

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

• Decommissioning– Standard of decommissioning– Municipal right to decommission in the event

company fails to do so– Security

» When funded» Amount – net of estimated salvage value» Form of instrument – bond, letter of credit,

fund/escrow account, parent guarantee• Insurance and Indemnification

– Limit to just project and project-related activities• Approvals

Page 24: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

24

Agreements Between Developers and Municipalities (cont’d)

• Other State and Local Taxes– Sales tax

• Statutory exemption – production equipment• BOP costs• Discretionary exemption – governmental abatement

– Mortgage recording tax• Face value of mortgage• Discretionary exemption – governmental abatement

Page 25: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

25

Q&A

Page 26: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody

26

Contact Information

Matthew S. MosesNixon Peabody LLP1100 Clinton SquareRochester, NY 14604

P (585) [email protected]

Page 27: 1 Agreements with Landowners and Local Governments Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 8, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ Matthew S. Moses Nixon Peabody