1 african peer review mechanism : progress so far and lessons learnt nepad/ oecd roundtable,...

33
1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena Jerome APRM SECRETARIAT, MIDRAND

Upload: ricky-southers

Post on 29-Mar-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

1

AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR

AND LESSONS LEARNT

NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO

12 DECEMBER 2006

Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena JeromeAPRM SECRETARIAT, MIDRAND

Page 2: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

2

Overview of the APRM The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) is a self-monitoring instrument voluntarily agreed to by member states of the African Union. Its primary purpose is:“To foster the adoption of policies, standards and practices that lead to political stability, high economic growth, sustainable development and accelerated sub-regional and continental economic integration through sharing of experiences and reinforcement of successful and best practice, including identifying deficiencies and assessing the needs of capacity building.”

It is unprecedented in scope.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 3: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

3

Overview of the APRMThe APR processes entail periodic reviews of the policies and practices of participating countries to ascertain progress being made towards achieving the mutually agreed goals and compliance in the four focus areas, namely:

Democracy and Political Governance; Economic Governance and Management; Corporate Governance; and Socio-Economic Development.

Details on the Standards and Codes and Objectives of each thematic area are contained in the 88- page Questionnaire

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 4: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

4

What does the APRM do?Monitor compliance with agreed norms, standards and codes;

Promote policy dialogue;

Promote transparency, accountability and mutual learning: through dissemination of Information and best practice; and

Identify gaps and capacity constraints and ways of rectifying them.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 5: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

5

Member Countries of the APRM

Twenty-five Countries have so far acceded to the APRM as at December 2006.

These are: Algeria, Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia.

Sao tome & Principe has requested for accession

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 6: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

6

APRM Coverage

652, 476,125 out of Africa’s total population of 885,977, 259 or 73.67%.

Membership of the APRM constitute the largest countries on the continent.

APRM Countries

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 7: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

7

African Countries in NEPAD’SCommittees

Tunisia

Libya

Botswana

Sao-Tome & Principe

Benin

Burkina Faso

Malawi

Lesotho

Sierra Leone

Tanzania

Uganda

HGSICHGSIC APR ForumAPR Forum

AlgeriaNigeriaSenegalMaliGhanaSouth AfricaCongoMauritiusEgyptAngola

Kenya

Ethiopia

Mozambique

Gabon

Cameroon

Rwanda

To date twenty five member states of the AU have voluntarily acceded to the APRM.

Page 8: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

8

APRM Principles

National ownership and leadership by the participating country are essential factors underpinning the effectiveness of the APRM.

The APRM process is designed to be open and participatory. It is also guided by the principles of transparency, accountability, technical competence, credibility and it should be free from manipulation.

The APRM is not a score-card exercise, meant to exclude or punish countries. There is no conditionality attached to the mechanism.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 9: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

9

Organisational Structure of the APRM

The overall responsibility for the APRM is vested in the Committee of Participating Heads of State and Government of the Member States of the APRM [APR Forum].

The 7 – Member Panel of Eminent Persons [APR Panel] appointed by the Heads of State oversees the conduct of the APRM processes and ensures the integrity of the APRM.

The APRM Secretariat provides the secretarial, technical, coordinating and administrative support services for the implementation of the APRM.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 10: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

10

Strategic partners

The African Development Bank:

United Nations Economic Commission for Africa

United Nations Development Programme Regional Bureau for Africa

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 11: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

11

A National Commission with broad stakeholder representation should ideally be in place to interact with the support mission team.

A trend seems to emerge that includes a Focal Point and Governing Council supported by a Secretariat as well as Technical Research Institutes.

While uniformity may not be easy to achieve based on the contexts of countries, national ownership and broad-based stakeholder representation are key features required for these institutions.

Structures to manage the process at country level

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 12: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

12

Country Review Processes

Five Stages:

Stage One: Constituting National Structures and developing the country’s self-assessment Report based on the questionnaire and a preliminary Programme of Action; and the submission of these to the APR Secretariat. The APR Secretariat also prepares a Background paper on the country;

Stage Two: the Country Review Team visits the country to undertake wide consultations with stakeholders;

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 13: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

13

Structures to manage the process at country level

Stage Three: the drafting of the report by the Country Review Team;

Stage Four: the submission of the Country Review Report to the APR Secretariat and the APR Panel, and to the Forum for Peer Review discussions among the Heads of State and Government;

Stage Five: the final stage of the APR process involves making public the country’s report and related actions.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 14: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

14

APRM Master QuestionnaireDemocracy and Good

Political Governance (9 Objectives)

Economic Governance and Management (5

Objectives)

Corporate Governance(5 Objectives)

Socio-Economic Governance (6

Objectives)

30 International instruments and Standards/ 16 Regional instruments and Standards

15 Standards and codes 9 Standards and codes 10 Standards and codes

1. Prevent and reduce intra- and inter-country conflicts.

1. Promote macroeconomic policies that support sustainable development

1. Promote an enabling environment and effective regulatory framework for economic activities

1. Promote self-reliance in development and build capacity for self-sustaining development

2. Constitutional democracy, including periodic political competition and opportunity for choice, the rule of law, a Bill of Rights and supremacy of the Constitution.

2. Implement sound, transparent and predictable government economic policies

2. Ensure that corporations act as good corporate citizens with regards to human rights, social responsibility and environmental sustainability

2. Accelerate socio-economic development to achieve sustainable development and poverty eradication

3. Promotion and protection of economic, social and cultural rights, civil and political rights as enshrined in African and international human rights instruments

3. Promote sound public finance management

3. Promote adoption of codes of good business ethics in achieving the objectives of the corporation

3. Strengthen policies, delivery mechanisms and outcomes in key social areas including education and combating HIV/AIDS and other communicable diseases

4. Uphold the separation of powers, including the protection of the independence of the judiciary and of an effective parliament

4. Fight corruption and money laundering

4. Ensure that corporations treat all their stakeholders (Shareholders, employees, communities, suppliers and customers) in a fair and just manner

4. Ensuring affordable access to water, sanitation, energy, finance (including micro-finance), markets, ICT, shelter and land to all citizens, especially the rural poor

5. Ensure accountable, efficient and effective public office holders and civil servants

5. Accelerate regional integration by participating in the harmonization of monetary, trade and investment policies

5. Provide for accountability of corporations, directors and officers

5. Progress towards gender equality in all critical areas of concern, including equal access to education for girls at all levels

Page 15: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

15

APRM Master QuestionnaireDemocracy and Good

Political GovernanceEconomic Governance

and Management

Corporate Governance Socio-Economic Governance

6. Fighting corruption in the political sphere

6. Encourage broad-based participation in development by all stakeholders at all levels

7. Promotion and protection of the rights of women

8. Promotion and protection of the rights of children and young persons

9. Promotion and protection of the rights of vulnerable groups including internally displaced persons and refugees

Page 16: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

16

Progress So Far

The APRM has launched reviews in 12 countries:- Ghana, Rwanda, Mauritius, Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, Algeria, South Africa, Benin, Tanzania, Burkina Faso and Mozambique.

3 countries have so far completed the entire process -Ghana, Rwanda and Kenya.

South African review process is nearing completion. Hopefully, to be peer reviewed in January 2007.

The Country Review Mission for Algeria has been completed.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 17: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

17

Ghana Review Process

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

6 Best Practices including:An oasis of peace and tranquility in a sub-region perpetually in turmoil.

Unique processes for fostering democracy such as the Annual Governance Forum and the People’s Assembly;

Main ChallengesLow representation of women in politics; corruption; decentralisation; and chieftaincy disputes which have been quite rife in recent year. Others are – bloated cabinet - 88 ministers in all; weak internal capacity for economic policy making; weak oversight by Parliament; and heavy dependence on external aid.

Page 18: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

18

Page 19: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

19

Rwanda Review Process

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Best Practices including:The highest proportion of Women in Parliament (49%) in the in the world; efforts in providing social services especially free education; and using ICT strategy to transform the country into a service-based economy.

Main ChallengesAid dependence - about 90% of the capital expenditure funded externally; relations with its neighbours in the Great Lakes region which has been a source of conflict; and the issue of legitimacy and trust in the Gacaca.

Page 20: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

20

Page 21: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

21

Kenya Review Process

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

9 Best Practices including:Kenya’s role in pacifying her neighbours; considerable degree of freedom in exercising political and civil rights; promotion of decentralisation; reduction in the prevalence rate of HIV/AIDS; and firing of 29 judges to clean up the Judiciary.

Main ChallengesDelay in adopting a new constitution to replace the colonial era charter; endemic corruption; weak parliamentary oversight; poor representation of women in key positions; and high incidence of poverty.

Page 22: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

22

Page 23: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

23

The Programme of Action

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

The POA is central to the APRM. It is a major output of the review process, which, in itself, brings out the value-added elements of the APRM process in a country.

The three countries are enthusiastically implementing the POA, some even before they peer review was conducted.

They will be presenting Progress Report to the Forum in January 2007.

Page 24: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

24

Technical Support to APRM

The support from the three strategic partners, together with the Development Bank of Southern Africa has been tremendous.

The APRM has established a pool of African experts who provide technical assistance in the implementation of the APRM Processes. The use of expertise from the diaspora has been a major strength.

Selection of experts for the implementation of the APRM is through a competitive process.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 25: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

25

Financial Support to APRMThe APRM Trust Fund, established by the UNDP at the request of the APR Forum is now operational.

Several African countries/ International Organisations have already contributed to the APRM Trust Fund.

Amount Contributed (US Dollars)South Africa 6,800,000 Algeria 1,500, 000Egypt 1,100,000Nigeria 1,250,000Other African Countries 3,650,000

Canada 570,000UNDP 2,700,000DFID (UK Government) 2,000,000

African contribution 73%

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 26: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

26

Consultative process

Civil Society…As a policy, the APRM puts strong emphasis on

finding ways to involve all segments of the citizenry including civil society- religious groups, trade unions, the media, women and youth, and the private sector in the APRM at country and continental levels.

Country Review Missions are very intense and not confined to the capital. In few instances, the Mission has had to revisit some countries.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 27: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

27

Lessons Learnt

The APRM is a unique African instrument that is trial-blazing and has great potential as a tool to promote and strengthen good governance. It is African in origin, African inspired and African owned.

The experiences emerging out of the APRM implementation process are very encouraging.

The process has been empowering in ways that were not envisaged when it started. The interactive and broad inclusiveness of the process has spawned and strengthening a culture of political dialogue in the countries.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 28: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

28

Lessons Learnt

The preparedness of African governments to engage the civil society and deliberate on national challenges of governance and attempt a framework for addressing them is profoundly significant.

Likewise the willingness to let outsiders examine national findings and express a view on how a country is governed is equally a new experience that should be encouraged.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 29: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

29

Lessons Learnt

The APRM is making it possible for countries to benchmark good governance in Africa on shared African and international norms and standards as well as for citizens to participate in the evaluation of how they are governed.

Capacity is being developed and partnerships within and with external partners are being created.

It is also show-casing African innovative thinking in governance.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 30: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

30

Lessons Learnt

…………Centrality of country processCentrality of country processIntegrity and inclusiveness of processes essential;

Ownership and leadership by stakeholders;

Sustainability of funding/resource allocation;

Good preparation for technical assessments;

Harmonisation with ongoing assessments/strategies for synergy.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 31: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

31

ChallengesAs is apparent in the emerging experiences in the countries implementing the APRM, along with the opportunities it presents, a number of challenges exist and these are being addressed.

The APRM is still clearly misunderstood. It is not a score-card exercise.

The Human and Institutional Capacity of the APR Secretariat.

The recommended time -frame (6-9 Months) –is proving to be quite short - yet there are complaints that the APRM is not moving fast enough.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 32: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

32

Challenges

At the national level, there are daunting challenges, including the establishment of appropriate national structures, financing the process and the organization of a participatory and all inclusive self-assessment process.

Monitoring and Evaluation tools are just being developed.

With over half a century experience, perhaps, the APRM needs to engage with the OECD with a view to promoting learning and exchange, sharing approaches and good practice in conducting peer reviews.

Overview

Progress So Far

Lessons Learnt

Challenges

Page 33: 1 AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM : PROGRESS SO FAR AND LESSONS LEARNT NEPAD/ OECD ROUNDTABLE, BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO 12 DECEMBER 2006 Bernard Kouassi and Afeikhena

33

Thank you for your attentionThank you for your attention