1 achievement, standards, and assessment in iowa and in iowa districts
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa
and in Iowa Districts
Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa
and in Iowa Districts
![Page 2: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Presenter – Dr. Tony VanderZyl,
Assessment ConsultantIowa School Boards Foundation (ISBF)
Presenter – Dr. Tony VanderZyl,
Assessment ConsultantIowa School Boards Foundation (ISBF)
![Page 3: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Did you know that:• Students in Iowa are not achieving as
well as they should/could.• 20-25% of Iowa students are not meeting
the relatively low standard of proficiency on the Iowa Tests.
• Scores on the Iowa Tests have remained relatively flat for two decades.
• Only about one-third of Iowa students are proficient on the national assessment.
![Page 4: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Did you know that:• While Iowa’s scores on the national
assessment (NAEP) have remained relatively flat over the 15 years of testing, Iowa’s rank among the states has dropped from the top five to the middle.
• Iowa’s state standards and assessment are rated among the lowest of the states.
• The Iowa Core Curriculum (ICC) is among the most rigorous and comprehensive state standards.
![Page 5: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Education Week – Quality Counts
Ed Week’s Quality Counts 2011 is the 15th annual study of states’ education quality:•Iowa ranks 33rd in K-12 achievement, based on performance, improvement trends, and achievement gaps.•Iowa ranks 45th in standards, assessments, and accountability policy.
![Page 6: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Did you know that:• Only about one-third of Iowa districts
currently have local standards that are rigorous and comprehensive.
• Most Iowa districts do not have a comprehensive assessment plan .
• It will take significant leadership and effort for Iowa districts to implement the ICC with fidelity .
![Page 7: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Iowa Students’ Achievement?
Iowa Students’ Achievement?
![Page 8: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Iowa Student Proficiency
79 8174 77
3441
32 34
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
4th Reading 4th Math 8th Reading 8th Math
% P
rofi
cien
t
I TBS
NAEP
![Page 9: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
PISA Mathematics Literacy 15 Year Olds, 2009(US is tied for 25th out of 34)
Korea, Republic of 546 Austria 496Finland 541 Poland 495Switzerland 534 Sweden 494
Japan 529Czech Republic 493
Canada 527United Kingdom 492
Netherlands 526 Hungary 490New Zealand 519 Luxembourg 489Belgium 515 Ireland 487Australia 514 Portugal 487
Germany 513United States 487
Estonia 512 Italy 483Iceland 507 Spain 483Denmark 503 Greece 466Slovenia 501 Israel 447Norway 498 Turkey 445France 497 Chile 421Slovak Republic 497 Mexico 419
![Page 10: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Iowa Testing TrendsIowa Testing Trends
![Page 11: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Iowa 4th Grade ITBS Reading% of Students Proficient
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
1995
-97
1996
-98
1997
-99
1998
-00
1999
-01
2000
-02
2001
-03
2002
-04
2003
-05
2004
-06
2005
-07
2006
-08
2007
-09
2008
-10
2009
-11
2010
-12
2011
-13
2012
-14
Biennium
AMO Actual Projected
Data adjustedfrom 1992 normsto 2000 norms
2000 Norms
![Page 12: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Iowa 8th Grade ITBS Math% of Students Proficient
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Biennium
AMO Actual Projected
2000 NormsData adjustedfrom 1992 normsto 2000 norms
![Page 13: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
NAEP TRENDSNAEP TRENDS
![Page 14: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Iowa 4th Grade NAEP Reading* Note: Intervals between testing years
are not equal
225 221221223223223223225
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1992 1994 1998 2002 2003 2005 2007 2009
Year
Sca
le S
core
![Page 15: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Iowa’s Rank among the States4th Grade NAEP Reading
![Page 16: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Iowa 4th Grade NAEP Math * Note: Intervals between testing years
are not equal
243243240238231229230
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
1992 1996 2000 2003 2005 2007 2009
Year
Sca
le S
core
![Page 17: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Iowa’s Rank among the States4th Grade NAEP Math
![Page 18: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Iowa 8th Grade NAEP Reading * Note: Iowa did not have adequate data
prior to 2003
267 265267268
240
245
250
255
260
265
270
275
280
1992 1994 1998 2002 2003 2005 2007 2009
Year
Sca
le S
core
![Page 19: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Iowa’s Rank among the States8th Grade NAEP Reading
![Page 20: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Iowa 8th Grade NAEP Math * Note: Intervals between testing years
are not equal
284285284284284283278
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1990 1992 1996 2003 2005 2007 2009
Year
Sca
le S
core
![Page 21: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Iowa’s Rank among the States8th Grade NAEP Math
![Page 22: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
ISBF Researchon
State Standards, Assessments and the
Iowa Core Curriculum (ICC)
![Page 23: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Standards in Iowa(Past, present, and future)
• Legislated rigorous local standards
• “Iowa Standards” adopted (2007)
• The Iowa Core Curriculum (ICC) Essential Concepts and Skills must be learned by all students (2013-14)
• “Common Core” national standards
![Page 24: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
The ISBF Study of Local Standards
1. Many districts had trouble finding their standards.
2. Many district standards were missing significant content.
3. There was wide variation in the rigor of district standards.
![Page 25: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Education Week’s “Quality Counts”Ratings of Education Policy in the
States
1. Iowa ranks 45th in standards, assessment, and accountability policy.
2. Key deficiencies noted are the lack of grade and course-specific standards and the lack of rigorous assessment items.
![Page 26: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
The ISBF Study of State Standards
1. There is considerable variability in the quality of state standards, assessment, and accountability.
2. Iowa’s state standards and assessment are less rigorous than most states.
3. There is a significant relationship between states’ standards, assessment, and accountability and student achievement gains and gap closure on NAEP.
![Page 27: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
The ISBF Study of the ICC
1. We focused on the rigor and comprehensiveness of the ICC.
2. Rigor requires a mix of levels of cognitive demand (Bloom’s Taxonomy, rev. 2001).
3. Comprehensiveness requires strands specified in national standards/reports.
4. Structured review process.
![Page 28: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Findings on the ICC
• In general, the ICC is significantly more rigorous and comprehensive than the Iowa Standards.
• ICC is roughly as rigorous as the state standards of the states we identified as strong in improving achievement and closing gaps.
• No major areas of content are missing from the ICC.
![Page 29: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Relationship between Ed Week’s QC Ratings and
NAEP Gains
The scattergram on the following slide shows Ed Week’s QC ratings and NAEP gain for each of the fifty states
There is a significant positive relationship (r = 0.51) between higher QC ratings and greater NAEP gains
On average, each 1 point gain in QC rating is associated with 2 points in NAEP score gain
![Page 30: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Relationship between QC Ratings and NAEP Score Gains (4th & 8th Reading & Math Ave., All 50 States)
IA
MN
WI
IL
IN
OHKY
MOMI
0
24
68
1012
1416
18
0 2 4 6 8 10
QC Rating
NA
EP
Gai
n
![Page 31: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Math Standards Rigor by State (Bloom's Taxonomy)
3%
30% 30%35% 38% 35%
67%
30%
39%
54% 42%36%
54%
33%
25%
16%
13%18%
8%
0%
29%
6% 9% 2%0%
7%
0%6%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
13%7%
1%4%0% 2%0%0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
DE MA MN NY VA IA ICC
State
% o
f It
ems
Create
Evaluate
Analyze
Apply
Understand
Remember
![Page 32: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Literacy Standards Rigor by State (Bloom's Taxonomy)
4% 3%
17% 7%
45% 43%34%
55% 47%
9%
7%
10% 18%
25%
0%20%
47%
30%26%
35% 44%6%
7% 6%
2%
3%
7% 7% 4%
21%
0% 0%0%0%0%
55%
0%
7%14%
0%
19%14%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
DE MA MN NY VA IA ICC
State
% o
f It
ems
Create
Evaluate
Analyze
Apply
Understand
Remember
![Page 33: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Dr. Tony VanderZyl, ISBF Assessment [email protected]
800.795.4272
Dr. Tony VanderZyl, ISBF Assessment [email protected]
800.795.4272
![Page 34: 1 Achievement, Standards, and Assessment in Iowa and in Iowa Districts](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e6f5503460f94b6c6bd/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Achievement, standards, and assessment in Iowa
and in Iowa districts
Achievement, standards, and assessment in Iowa
and in Iowa districts