1-4 x-ray characterization of materials.ppt

Upload: dr-saad-b-h-farid

Post on 14-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    1/27

    X-Ray Characterization of Materials

    Dr. Saad B. H. Farid

    Former ly: Chief Researchers

    Currently: Assistant Professor

    University of Technology

    Department of Materials Engineering

    1

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    2/27

    Generation of Monochromatic X-ray

    Schematic Electronic transitions in an atom

    Emission processes indicated by arrows

    2

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    3/27

    The schematic of a typical x-ray emission spectrum, for

    clarity indicating only the presence of continuous background

    and three characteristic wavelengths: K1, K2, and K,

    which have high intensities.

    Left- the schematic of the x-ray emission spectrum shown as the solid line overlapped with the

    schematic of the ()function of the properly selected -filter material (dotted line).

    Right- the resultant distribution of intensity after filtering as a function of the wavelength.

    The spectra of the unfiltered beams from a copper target

    (Z=29) filtered by nickel (Z=28)

    3

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    4/27

    Modern filtration technique utilizing divergent Monochromators

    (Crystal monochromators include pyrolitic graphite, Si, Ge, and

    LiCl). Usually graphite Monochromator is employed.

    4

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    5/27

    A point Lattice, each point may

    represent atom(s) or molecule

    A unit cell, the bold a, b and c

    represents vectors of the unit cell. 5

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    6/27

    6

    Crystal Systems and Bravais Lattices

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    7/27

    Crystal Diffraction

    Max von Laue

    (1879-1960)

    1914 Nobel prize

    Laue 1912

    Lattice spacing

    typicallyo

    1010 m 1

    In 1912, the German physicist von Lauereasoned that, if crystals were

    composed of regularly spaced atoms, and if x-rays were electromagnetic

    waves of wavelength about equal to the inter-atomic distance in crystals,

    then it should be possible to diffract x-rays by means of crystals.

    Under his direction, experiments to test this hypothesis were carried

    out: a crystal of copper sulfate was set up in the path of a narrow beam ofx-rays and a photographic plate was arranged to record the presence of

    diffracted beams, if any. The very first experiment was successful and

    showed without doubt that x-rays were diffracted by the crystal out of the

    primary beam to form a pattern of spots on the photographic plate.

    These experiments proved, at one and the same time, the wave nature

    of x-rays and the periodicity of the arrangement of atoms within a crystal. 7

    http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1914/laue-bio.htmlhttp://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1914/laue-bio.html
  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    8/27

    Laue X-ray diffraction YAlO3c-axis normal to picture

    Typical Laue X-ray diffraction pattern

    Symmetryof the crystal

    Symmetryof the pattern

    Each spot corresponds to a

    different crystal plane

    Some Applications:alignment of single crystal

    info on unit cell

    info on imperfections,

    defects in crystal8

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    9/27

    The account of these experiments was

    read with great interest by two English

    physicists, W. H. Bragg and his son W. L.

    Bragg.

    The latter, although only a young studentat the time it was still the year 1912

    successfully analyzed the Laue

    experiment and was able to express the

    necessary conditions for diffraction in a

    somewhat simpler mathematical form

    than that used by von Laue.

    He also attacked the problem of crystal

    structure with the new tool of x-ray diffraction

    and, in the following year, solved the structures

    of NaCl, KC1, KBr, and KI, all of which have

    the NaCl structure; these were the first

    complete crystal-structure determinations evermade.

    9

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    10/27

    SymmetryThere are 32 unique combinationof symmetry elements called point groups

    Glide planes: is the combination of a mirror reflection plane with a corresponding

    translations (1/2 or 1/4 units) parallel to the plane, results in a total of five possible

    crystallographic glide (shift) planes occurs.

    Screw axes: Screw axes perform a rotation simultaneously with a translation along therotation axis. In other words, the rotation occurs around the axis, while the translation occurs

    parallel to the axis. Crystallographic screw axes include, only two-, three-, four- and six-fold

    rotations

    When glide planes and screw axes is added to them, we have 230 unique space symmetry

    called space groups

    All are listed in I nternational tables for crystallography 10

    Systematic absences:

    It is the absence of

    certain (h k l) diffracted

    x-ray due to cancelationsof out of phase

    equivalent reflections

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    11/27

    Reciprocal lattice

    The concept of a reciprocal lattice was first

    introduced by Ewald and it quickly became an

    important tool in the illustrating and

    understanding of both the diffraction geometry

    and relevant mathematical relationships. Let a,

    b and c be the elementary translations in a

    three-dimensional lattice (called here a direct

    lattice)A second lattice, reciprocalto the direct lattice,

    is defined by three elementary translations a*,

    b* and c*, which simultaneously satisfy the

    following two conditions:

    Diffraction methods

    What is V, V* ?!

    Where is the reciprocal lattice ?!

    Reciprocal Lattice and Ewald's Sphere

    Where and when the Bragg's condition is

    met

    Which is the possible Braggs reflections

    (Related to the symmetry and beyond thescope of this lecture) 11

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    12/27

    Oscillating, Weissenberg, precession

    and de Jongh Bouman photographs

    12

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    13/2713

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    14/27

    14

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    15/27

    Intensity of powder diffraction peaks

    1. Integrated intensity: The area under the peak fitted to Gaussian or Lorentz Distribution

    2. Scale factor: to compensate diffraction geometry and Sample shape

    3. Multiplicity factor: equivalent Braggs angle for reflections such as h00, -h00

    4. Lorentz-polarization factor : intensity that reaches the detectors 1/sin2

    5. Absorption factor: dependent on both the geometry and properties of the sample and the

    focusing method

    6. Preferred orientation: departure from random distribution of the orientations of crystallites

    7. Extinction factor: back-reflection within the same crystallite and multiple crystallites

    For single crystals

    Structure factor1. Structure amplitude: Shared by multiple

    atoms in the unit cell

    2. Population factor: In general, gi =1/n,

    where n is the multiplicity of the symmetry

    element

    3. Temperature factor: also known as "atomic

    displacement parameters; atoms are in a

    continuous oscillating motion about their

    equilibrium positions

    4. Atomic scattering factor: the ability to

    scatter radiation varies depending on thetype of an atom

    5. Phase angle: "phase problem" in diffraction

    analysis; due to lost phase angles in

    measurable intensities

    Single Crystal X-ray

    Crystallography is a complete solution

    of Crystal Structure.Also called The Phase Problem of

    X-ray Crystallography (FC calculations)

    This is beyond the Scope of this

    presentation

    15

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    16/27

    Crystallite size,

    not crystal or

    particle size !!!

    16

    The chief problem in determining

    particle size from line breadths is

    to determine B from the measured

    breadth B of the diffraction line.

    Of the many methods proposed,

    Warren's is the simplest. Theunknown is mixed with a standard

    which has a particle size greater

    than 1000A, and which produces a

    diffraction line near that line from

    the unknown which is to be used

    in the determination.

    B2=B2Measured-B2Standard then

    B=0.9/tcos

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    17/27

    Two powder diffraction patterns ofLaB6 collected using different 's

    The simulated powder diffraction pattern of copper

    (space group Fm3m, a =3.615 A, Cu K1, K2 radiation,

    Cu atom in 4(a) position withx = 0, y = 0, z= 0). 17

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    18/27

    Qualitative XRD Analysis

    Basic principles. The powder pattern of a substance is characteristic of that substance and

    forms a sort of fingerprint by which the substance may be identified. 18

    The experimental diffraction pattern of a silicon and

    Al2O3 mixture. Numbers with three digits mark the

    Miller indices of corresponding crystallographic planes

    A powder diffraction file (PDF) of hydroxyapatite.(Reproduced with permission from the

    International Centre for Diffraction Data, ICDD.)

    Diffraction pattern of a powder specimen of hydroxyapatite

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    19/27

    details are given of the method used for

    obtaining the pattern (radiation, camera

    diameter, method of measuring intensity, etc.),

    and a reference to the original experimental

    work. The rest of the left hand portion of the

    card contains room for various crystallographic,

    optical, and chemical data which are fullydescribed on introductory cards of the set.

    A typical card from the ASTM

    file is reproduced in Fig. 14-1.

    At the upper left appear the d

    values for the three strongest

    lines (2.28, 1.50, 1.35A) and, in

    addition, the largest d value

    (2.60A) for this structure.

    The lower right-hand portion of

    the card, gives d values listed

    versus the relative intensities

    I /I1, expressed as percentages of

    the strongest line in the pattern.

    19

    Analysis

    1- Manual analysis and match

    2- Computerized match followed by manual

    analysis. The computer program is supplied

    with database of standard x-ray patterns of

    inorganic and/or organic compounds.

    Search criteria should be applied like expected

    number of elements and element types.

    In all analysis, nothing can be accomplishedfrom scratch !!!

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    20/27

    Quantitative XRD Analysis

    Quantitative analysis by diffraction is based on the fact that the intensity of the diffraction

    pattern of a particular phase in a mixture of phases depends on the concentration of that

    phase in the mixture. The relation between intensity and concentration is not generallylinear, since the diffracted intensity depends markedly on the absorption coefficient of the

    mixture and this itself varies with the concentration.

    Methods

    20

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    21/27

    21

    5. Rietveld refinement: of multiple phase samples may be

    used for relatively accurate quantitative analysis. It requires

    knowledge of the atomic structure for each phase present in

    the mixture. It refines the difference between observed and

    calculated Ihkl6. Full pattern decomposition: does not require the atomicstructure to be known and it produces intensities of

    individual Bragg peaks. Thus, multiple reflections from

    each phase can be used to compute intensity ratios required

    in methods described in items 1 through 4 above, which

    increases the accuracy of the analysis. The use of multiple

    Bragg peaks in evaluating an average intensity ratio, to

    some extent diminishes the detrimental influence of

    preferred orientation as long as it remains small to

    moderate.

    This method, however, requires lattice parameters and

    therefore, is applicable to indexed patterns only. The phase

    composition is actually determined using any of the first

    four methods listed above by using intensities of several

    strong or all Bragg peaks instead of a single reflection.

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    22/27

    22

    X-ray fluorescenceThe most intense lines of this spectrum are

    the K

    and K lines if the element werebombarded with x-rays of high enough energy

    (fluorescence). They are always called

    "characteristic lines" to emphasize the fact that

    their wavelengths are fixed and characteristic

    of the emitting element.

    The primary radiation (Fig. 15-1) causes the

    sample to emit secondary fluorescent

    radiation, which is then analyzed in aspectrometer. This method, commonly known

    asfluorescent analysis, give information about

    the chemical elements present in the sample,

    irrespective of their state of chemical

    combination or the phases in which they exist.

    The wavelength of each spectral line iscalculable from the corresponding Bragg angle

    and the interplanar spacing of the analyzing

    crystal used.

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    23/27

    23

    The useful range of fluorescent wavelengths extends from

    about 0.5 to about 2.5A. The lower limit is imposed by the

    maximum voltage which can be applied to the x-ray tube,

    which is 50 kv in commercial instruments.

    The two main problems in fluorescent analysis, namely the

    achievement of adequate intensityand adequate resolution.

    There is a common

    Mistake; it is the calculation

    of relative contents by

    simply dividing intensities !

    Quali tative analysis

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    24/27

    24

    Quali tative analysis

    In qualitative work sufficient accuracy can be obtained by automatic scanning of the

    spectrum, with the counter output fed to a chart recorder. Interpretation of the recorded

    spectrum will be facilitated if the analyst has on hand (a) a table of corresponding values of

    and 2 for the particular analyzing crystal used, and (b) a single table of the principal K and L

    lines of all the elements arranged in numerical order of wavelength.Since it is important to know whether an observed line is due to an element in the sample

    or to an element in the x-ray tube target, a preliminary investigation should be made of the

    spectrum emitted by the target alone. For this purpose a substance like carbon or plexiglass is

    placed in the sample holder and irradiated in the usual way; such a substance merely scatters

    part of the primary radiation into the spectrometer, and does not contribute any observable

    fluorescent radiation of its own. The spectrum so obtained will disclose the L lines of tungsten,if a tungsten-target tube is used, as well as the characteristic lines of whatever impurities

    happen to be present in the target.

    Quanti tative analysis

    In determining the amount of element A in a sample, the single-line method is normally

    used: the intensity Iu of a particular characteristic line of A from the unknown is compared

    with the intensity Is of the same line from a standard, normally pure A.

    The way in which the ratio Iu / Is varies with the concentration of A in the sample

    depends markedly on the other elements present and cannot in general be predicted by

    calculation. It is therefore necessary to establish the variation by means of measurements

    made on samples of known composition.

    Figure 15-8 illustrates typical curves of this kind for three binary mixtures containing

    iron.

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    25/27

    25

    Matri x Ef fect in X-ray F luorescence Analysis:

    These curves show that the intensity of a fluorescent line from element A is not in general

    proportional to the concentration of A. This nonlinear behavior is due mainly to two effects:

    (1) Matrix absorption: As the composition of the alloy changes, so does its absorption

    coefficient As a result there are changes both in the absorption of the primary radiation

    traveling into the sample and in the absorption of the fluorescent radiation traveling out.

    (2) Multiple excitation: If the primary radiation causes element B in the specimen to emit its

    characteristic radiation, of wavelength fB, and iffB is less than KA, then fluorescent Kradiation from A will be excited not only by the incident beam but also by fluorescentradiation from B.

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    26/27

  • 7/30/2019 1-4 X-Ray Characterization of Materials.ppt

    27/27

    Measurements of film thickness,

    stress measurements, micro-

    crack detection, topography,

    structure of thin films, textureanalysis, etc. They are not mere

    characterization of materials but

    tests for produced parts

    27