1 3 acoustic liquid level analysis 2014

Upload: luis-enrique-munoz-segura

Post on 13-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    1/54

    Acoustic Liquid LevelMeasurement Analysis

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    2/54

    Time to Distance ConversionThe distance from the gun to a reflector

    in the casing annulus isproportional to the Round TripTravel Time (RTTT) for the soundto travel from the gun down to theanomaly and back to themicrophone.

    To convert time to distance it isnecessary to determine anaverage acoustic velocity in thegas.

    Acoustic velocity may be determinedfrom:a-Collar reflectionsb-Depth of known downholechanges in cross sectionc-Gas gravity or composition

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    3/54

    Marker Flags Most Probable Liquid Level

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    4/54

    1. Most probable Liquid level echo is automatically flagged by the softwarefrom reflected acoustic signals digitally processed, filtered, and displayed

    versus time.2. Measured time for the acoustic pulse to travel through the gas from the

    surface to the liquid level and reflect back to the surface (round trip traveltime, RTTT).

    3. Other echoes that could indicate liquid level are also noted and can be

    selected by user.

    Acoustic Trace - RTTT

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    5/54

    The indicated acoustic velocity 1156.93 corresponds to that of the gas inthe 250 to 800 ft section of the wellbore. It is obtained from the frequencyof collar echoes (jts/sec) for the record between 0.5 and 1.5 seconds.

    Automatic Depth DeterminationDepth to last collar counted ismarked (C) on the acousticrecord.

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    6/54

    Average Joint Length Is Used to Convert jts/sec to ft/sec

    AcousticVel=(29.98*2)*18.2482= 1156.93 ft/sec

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    7/54

    Count Echoes from Collars

    as Deep as PossibleIn practice need toextrapolate collar countsince amplitude of echoesdecreases and cannot bedistinguished from thebackground noise level.

    Apply digital filtering to digcollar echoes out ofbackground noise level

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    8/54

    Automatic Filtering to Count Deep Collar Echoes

    1-Program scans through acoustic record in 1second intervals to identify collar echo rate(jts/sec) in each section.

    2-Builds a narrow-band filter for first section andfilters the acoustic trace from zero to RTTT toremove noise.

    3-Counts identifiable collar echoes.

    4-Repeats for all filters built from each section.

    5-Displays result for the filter that gives thedeepest collar count.

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    9/54

    Automatic Collar Count Procedure

    1 st filterC=131 jts

    2nd filterC=124 jts

    4th

    filterC=124 jts

    7 th filter

    C=142 jts

    Program always displays screenfor deepest collar count.

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    10/54

    Analysis Method: Automatic Collar Count

    Average Acoustic Velocity over the time interval where collar echoes werecounted.

    Liquid Level Echo

    Shot Fired: time = 0First 2seconds

    Collar count Stops

    Collar count Starts

    91% of tubing joints counted

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    11/54

    Accuracy of Results from Automatic CalculationRTTT = 5.329 +/- 0.001 seconds

    Number of Joints to liquid = 98.77 +/- 0.1 when collar count is deep

    Distance to liquid = 3130.9 +/- (depends on value of average joint length )

    When using correct average value ( 29.98 ft/jt) : +/- 3 feet

    When default value (31.7) is used : +/- (1.7x98.8) = 168 feet error !!!!!!!!

    Accuracy of Automatic LL DepthDepth to last collar counted ismarked (C) on the acousticrecord.

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    12/54

    Automatic Depth- Short Collar CountDepth to last collar counted ismarked (C) on the acousticrecord.

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    13/54

    Analysis Method: Automatic Collar Count

    Average joints per Second used to extrapolate to Liquid Level

    Liquid Level Echo

    Collar count Stops

    Collar count Starts

    Only 52% of tubing joints counted.Program computesmissing joints.

    Extra Noise in Record

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    14/54

    Automatic Collar Count Accounting of Missing Joints

    Average Jts/sec or ft/sec over the time interval where collar echoes werecounted.

    Liquid Level Echo

    Shot Fired: time = 0

    First 2seconds

    Collar count Stops

    Time from zero to firstcollar and from LastCollar to Liquid Level is

    converted to number of joints using average jts/sec

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    15/54

    Missing Collars Accounting

    Average Jts/sec or ft/sec over the time interval where collar echoes werecounted.

    Liquid Level Echo

    Shot Fired: time = 0

    First 2seconds

    Collar count Stops

    Time to first collar = 0.248 sec.Time to last collar counted= 9.184 sec.Time to LL=14.827 sec.Time from last collar to LL = 14.827-9.184=5.643 sec.

    Additional joints=(0.248+5.643)*19.8075=116.69 jtsJoints counted =177

    Total joints to liquid =177+116.60 =293.69 jts

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    16/54

    Automatic Collar Count Conversion to Distance

    Average Jts/sec or ft/sec over the time interval where collar echoes werecounted.

    Liquid Level Echo

    Shot Fired: time = 0

    First 2seconds

    Collar count Stops

    Joints to liquid level = 293.686 jtsIs converted to Depth to liquid level using the

    Average Joint Length entered by user in well file: 31.19 ft/jt

    DEPTH TO LIQUID LEVEL = 293.686 jts x 31.19 ft/jt = 9161.24 ft

    If default average joint length of 31.7 ft/jt had been used:Depth to liquid level = 293.686 x 31.7 = 9309.84 ftDifference = 9309.84-9161.24=148.6 ft

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    17/54

    Summary of Collar Count Guidelines

    C line past 70% of LL time OK

    C line short of LL time Not OK - Repeat shot with more pressure

    Compute the Average Joint Length for thespecific well and enter in well file instead of using the DEFAULT value of 31.7 ft/jt

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    18/54

    Example Acoustic Records

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15Sec

    1 0 0

    . 0 m

    V

    PFL _Lot of Gas2

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6Sec

    1

    0 0

    . 0 m

    V

    Average well

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    19/54

    Alternate Methods for LiquidLevel Depth Determination Known or Computed Acoustic Velocity Calculation from known downhole Markers Manual Collar Count

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    20/54

    No Collars or Inside Tubing

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    21/54

    Acoustic Velocity from Gas Specific Gravity

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    22/54

    Estimate Acoustic Velocity from Gas Gravity

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    23/54

    Portable Gas Gravitometer

    Dual ranges0.52-1.03 and .097-1.90

    specific gravity0.05% of reading

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    24/54

    Portable Gas Composition Analyzer

    Accuratelycalculate heating

    value, relativedensity, andcompressibility

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    25/54

    Earth Temperature Gradients

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    26/54

    Analysis Method: Acoustic Velocity

    Enter Velocity Enter Gas CompositionReference: Acoustic Velocity for Natural Gas, Echometer Company

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    27/54

    Gas SpecificGravity from

    Acoustic velocity

    Known: Acoustic velocity =1400 ft/sec

    Pressure = 400 psiTemperature = 108 F

    Gas Gravity = 0.6

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    28/54

    Gas Gravity in BHP Screen

    Gravity ofannular gas is

    c o m p u t e d

    from acoustic

    velocity,pressure andtemperature

    Gas gravity isused tocompute thegas pressure atdepth of liquidlevel.

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    29/54

    Determine Depth to Liquid Level by Identifying Echoesfrom Downhole Markers (changes in cross-section area)

    Tubing Cross-overTubing Anchor

    Casing LinerEnd of Casing/Open HolePerforations

    Gas Lift MandrelsLanding NipplesPacker Bores

    Low and High Pass Filters can be used to enhance echoes

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    30/54

    Depth Determination from Downhole Marker

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    31/54

    LL Depth using the Perforations Upkick Echovs. Automatic Collar Counting

    Liquid Level:

    PerforationsMarker:LL @ 8004 ft

    AutomaticCollar Count:LL@ 7991 ft

    Collar count stops early

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    32/54

    Field Data Examples

    In Examples group of TWM/TAM software Liner at 5240 feet Coal Bed Methane Well

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    33/54

    Very High Liquid Level

    First secondof data is notprocessed fordetection ofliquid level.Software

    flags firstrepeat

    Operatormustmanuallymove LLmarker to firstecho at o,623seconds

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    34/54

    Manual Counting of Collars

    Notice: the 11 pointtick marks displayed inthe lower left window donot line up with collarechoes .

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    35/54

    Manual Selection of Collar EchoesProcedure:

    1. Select: Manual Analysis Method.2. Identify 1 second interval to analyze.3. Align leftmost tick mark with one tubing

    collar reflection.4. Adjust width11 point dividers to align

    most tick marks with the collars.

    Before:velocity

    758.9 ft/sec

    LL 236.42 ftAfter:velocity

    1258,3 ft/secLL 391.96

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    36/54

    Extremely High Fluid Level

    TWM does not flag correct echo

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25Sec

    1 0 0

    . 0 m

    V

    Program gives warning that cannotidentify fluid level echo

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    37/54

    Very High Fluid Level

    TWM does not flag correct echoManually adjust vertical scale and move marker

    First shot at 13:410 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24Sec

    1 0 . 0

    m V

    Second shot at 13:470 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24Sec

    1 0

    . 0 m V

    V Hi h Fl id L l

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    38/54

    Very High Fluid LevelFluid level echo at 0.259 seconds or about 159 ftManually adjust vertical scale and collar markers

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    39/54

    Multiple Echoes

    1 2

    3

    4

    5

    Which isLiquidLevel ?

    1-upkick

    2-down

    3-down

    4-upkick5-upkick

    Assume hole in the Tubing Wave Path Analysis

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    40/54

    Assume hole in the Tubing Wave Path Analysis

    RTT1 =6.256 upkick ( -------- )

    RTT2=10.714 downkick ( )

    RTT3= 2x6.256 = 12.512 downkick

    RTT4=6.256 +2x4.458 = 15.172 upkick

    RTT5=2x6.256 + 4.458 = 16.97 upkick

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    RTTT=6.256

    RTTT=4.458

    10.714

    1 2 3 4 5

    Liquid Level ?

    Hole in Tubing ?

    Dashed arrows indicate polarity inversion

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    41/54

    Field Data Examples

    In Examples group of TAM software PFL Coal Bed Methane Well

    PFL Anomaly

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    42/54

    Quality Control of Acoustic Survey Data

    Inspect the well noise before shooting. If excessive noise exists: Use a larger pressure charge in the gas gun. Close Casing Valve and Determine if Noise from Downhole. Increase the casing pressure to attempt to reduce the noise

    level.

    Inspect the acoustic trace. If an insufficient liquid level kick is obtained,data is otherwise unsatisfactory, or shot not detected:

    Inspect connections and Acoustic Cable Increase the pressure in the volume chamber Increasing casing pressure improves collar and liquid level

    response. Shut down Noisy Pumping Unit (Surface Equipment) and Re-

    shoot

    Dont leave Casing to Flowline valve closed too long. Added pressuremay push Liquid Level below pump in some depleted wells.

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    43/54

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15Sec

    3 1

    . 6 m

    V

    300psi

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15Sec

    3 1

    . 6 m

    V600psi

    Effect of Chamber Pressure

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    44/54

    Low Pass Filter for High Frequency Noise

    Highfrequencynoisecaused byinjection ingas lift well

    Low pass

    filterhighlightsliquid levelandmandrels

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    45/54

    Low Pass Filter for High Frequency Noise

    High frequency noise caused by hydraulic pumping unit

    Low passfilterhighlightsliquid level

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22Sec

    3 . 2

    m

    V

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22Sec

    3 . 2

    m V

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    46/54

    Noise Induced byConnection to Tree

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    47/54

    AC Charger NoiseConnection of AC chargerto AC or DC-AC inverter,while acquiring data,may

    cause additional noise onacoustic trace.

    WithCharger

    WithoutCharger

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    48/54

    Pumping Related Noise

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28Sec

    1 0 . 0

    m V

    Pumping speed = 6.38 SPM

    Pumping period = 9.404 sec.

    9.4 sec 9.4 sec

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    49/54

    T bi Fl id L l @ 98 ft

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    50/54

    Tubing Fluid Level @ 98 ft

    Echo from top ofpump and repeat

    Acoustic velocity intubing fluid = 4435 ft/sec

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    51/54

    High Pressure Casing Head

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    52/54

    Questions ?

    L P H d b G

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    53/54

    Low Pressure Hydrocarbon Gas

    Velocity =1130 ft/sec Gravity=0.81

    Hi h P H d b G

  • 7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014

    54/54

    High Pressure Hydrocarbon Gas

    Velocity=1260 ft/sec

    Read fromgraphGravity=0.63

    Pressure

    = 1000 psig