1 3 acoustic liquid level analysis 2014
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
1/54
Acoustic Liquid LevelMeasurement Analysis
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
2/54
Time to Distance ConversionThe distance from the gun to a reflector
in the casing annulus isproportional to the Round TripTravel Time (RTTT) for the soundto travel from the gun down to theanomaly and back to themicrophone.
To convert time to distance it isnecessary to determine anaverage acoustic velocity in thegas.
Acoustic velocity may be determinedfrom:a-Collar reflectionsb-Depth of known downholechanges in cross sectionc-Gas gravity or composition
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
3/54
Marker Flags Most Probable Liquid Level
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
4/54
1. Most probable Liquid level echo is automatically flagged by the softwarefrom reflected acoustic signals digitally processed, filtered, and displayed
versus time.2. Measured time for the acoustic pulse to travel through the gas from the
surface to the liquid level and reflect back to the surface (round trip traveltime, RTTT).
3. Other echoes that could indicate liquid level are also noted and can be
selected by user.
Acoustic Trace - RTTT
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
5/54
The indicated acoustic velocity 1156.93 corresponds to that of the gas inthe 250 to 800 ft section of the wellbore. It is obtained from the frequencyof collar echoes (jts/sec) for the record between 0.5 and 1.5 seconds.
Automatic Depth DeterminationDepth to last collar counted ismarked (C) on the acousticrecord.
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
6/54
Average Joint Length Is Used to Convert jts/sec to ft/sec
AcousticVel=(29.98*2)*18.2482= 1156.93 ft/sec
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
7/54
Count Echoes from Collars
as Deep as PossibleIn practice need toextrapolate collar countsince amplitude of echoesdecreases and cannot bedistinguished from thebackground noise level.
Apply digital filtering to digcollar echoes out ofbackground noise level
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
8/54
Automatic Filtering to Count Deep Collar Echoes
1-Program scans through acoustic record in 1second intervals to identify collar echo rate(jts/sec) in each section.
2-Builds a narrow-band filter for first section andfilters the acoustic trace from zero to RTTT toremove noise.
3-Counts identifiable collar echoes.
4-Repeats for all filters built from each section.
5-Displays result for the filter that gives thedeepest collar count.
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
9/54
Automatic Collar Count Procedure
1 st filterC=131 jts
2nd filterC=124 jts
4th
filterC=124 jts
7 th filter
C=142 jts
Program always displays screenfor deepest collar count.
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
10/54
Analysis Method: Automatic Collar Count
Average Acoustic Velocity over the time interval where collar echoes werecounted.
Liquid Level Echo
Shot Fired: time = 0First 2seconds
Collar count Stops
Collar count Starts
91% of tubing joints counted
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
11/54
Accuracy of Results from Automatic CalculationRTTT = 5.329 +/- 0.001 seconds
Number of Joints to liquid = 98.77 +/- 0.1 when collar count is deep
Distance to liquid = 3130.9 +/- (depends on value of average joint length )
When using correct average value ( 29.98 ft/jt) : +/- 3 feet
When default value (31.7) is used : +/- (1.7x98.8) = 168 feet error !!!!!!!!
Accuracy of Automatic LL DepthDepth to last collar counted ismarked (C) on the acousticrecord.
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
12/54
Automatic Depth- Short Collar CountDepth to last collar counted ismarked (C) on the acousticrecord.
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
13/54
Analysis Method: Automatic Collar Count
Average joints per Second used to extrapolate to Liquid Level
Liquid Level Echo
Collar count Stops
Collar count Starts
Only 52% of tubing joints counted.Program computesmissing joints.
Extra Noise in Record
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
14/54
Automatic Collar Count Accounting of Missing Joints
Average Jts/sec or ft/sec over the time interval where collar echoes werecounted.
Liquid Level Echo
Shot Fired: time = 0
First 2seconds
Collar count Stops
Time from zero to firstcollar and from LastCollar to Liquid Level is
converted to number of joints using average jts/sec
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
15/54
Missing Collars Accounting
Average Jts/sec or ft/sec over the time interval where collar echoes werecounted.
Liquid Level Echo
Shot Fired: time = 0
First 2seconds
Collar count Stops
Time to first collar = 0.248 sec.Time to last collar counted= 9.184 sec.Time to LL=14.827 sec.Time from last collar to LL = 14.827-9.184=5.643 sec.
Additional joints=(0.248+5.643)*19.8075=116.69 jtsJoints counted =177
Total joints to liquid =177+116.60 =293.69 jts
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
16/54
Automatic Collar Count Conversion to Distance
Average Jts/sec or ft/sec over the time interval where collar echoes werecounted.
Liquid Level Echo
Shot Fired: time = 0
First 2seconds
Collar count Stops
Joints to liquid level = 293.686 jtsIs converted to Depth to liquid level using the
Average Joint Length entered by user in well file: 31.19 ft/jt
DEPTH TO LIQUID LEVEL = 293.686 jts x 31.19 ft/jt = 9161.24 ft
If default average joint length of 31.7 ft/jt had been used:Depth to liquid level = 293.686 x 31.7 = 9309.84 ftDifference = 9309.84-9161.24=148.6 ft
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
17/54
Summary of Collar Count Guidelines
C line past 70% of LL time OK
C line short of LL time Not OK - Repeat shot with more pressure
Compute the Average Joint Length for thespecific well and enter in well file instead of using the DEFAULT value of 31.7 ft/jt
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
18/54
Example Acoustic Records
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15Sec
1 0 0
. 0 m
V
PFL _Lot of Gas2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6Sec
1
0 0
. 0 m
V
Average well
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
19/54
Alternate Methods for LiquidLevel Depth Determination Known or Computed Acoustic Velocity Calculation from known downhole Markers Manual Collar Count
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
20/54
No Collars or Inside Tubing
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
21/54
Acoustic Velocity from Gas Specific Gravity
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
22/54
Estimate Acoustic Velocity from Gas Gravity
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
23/54
Portable Gas Gravitometer
Dual ranges0.52-1.03 and .097-1.90
specific gravity0.05% of reading
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
24/54
Portable Gas Composition Analyzer
Accuratelycalculate heating
value, relativedensity, andcompressibility
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
25/54
Earth Temperature Gradients
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
26/54
Analysis Method: Acoustic Velocity
Enter Velocity Enter Gas CompositionReference: Acoustic Velocity for Natural Gas, Echometer Company
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
27/54
Gas SpecificGravity from
Acoustic velocity
Known: Acoustic velocity =1400 ft/sec
Pressure = 400 psiTemperature = 108 F
Gas Gravity = 0.6
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
28/54
Gas Gravity in BHP Screen
Gravity ofannular gas is
c o m p u t e d
from acoustic
velocity,pressure andtemperature
Gas gravity isused tocompute thegas pressure atdepth of liquidlevel.
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
29/54
Determine Depth to Liquid Level by Identifying Echoesfrom Downhole Markers (changes in cross-section area)
Tubing Cross-overTubing Anchor
Casing LinerEnd of Casing/Open HolePerforations
Gas Lift MandrelsLanding NipplesPacker Bores
Low and High Pass Filters can be used to enhance echoes
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
30/54
Depth Determination from Downhole Marker
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
31/54
LL Depth using the Perforations Upkick Echovs. Automatic Collar Counting
Liquid Level:
PerforationsMarker:LL @ 8004 ft
AutomaticCollar Count:LL@ 7991 ft
Collar count stops early
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
32/54
Field Data Examples
In Examples group of TWM/TAM software Liner at 5240 feet Coal Bed Methane Well
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
33/54
Very High Liquid Level
First secondof data is notprocessed fordetection ofliquid level.Software
flags firstrepeat
Operatormustmanuallymove LLmarker to firstecho at o,623seconds
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
34/54
Manual Counting of Collars
Notice: the 11 pointtick marks displayed inthe lower left window donot line up with collarechoes .
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
35/54
Manual Selection of Collar EchoesProcedure:
1. Select: Manual Analysis Method.2. Identify 1 second interval to analyze.3. Align leftmost tick mark with one tubing
collar reflection.4. Adjust width11 point dividers to align
most tick marks with the collars.
Before:velocity
758.9 ft/sec
LL 236.42 ftAfter:velocity
1258,3 ft/secLL 391.96
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
36/54
Extremely High Fluid Level
TWM does not flag correct echo
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25Sec
1 0 0
. 0 m
V
Program gives warning that cannotidentify fluid level echo
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
37/54
Very High Fluid Level
TWM does not flag correct echoManually adjust vertical scale and move marker
First shot at 13:410 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24Sec
1 0 . 0
m V
Second shot at 13:470 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24Sec
1 0
. 0 m V
V Hi h Fl id L l
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
38/54
Very High Fluid LevelFluid level echo at 0.259 seconds or about 159 ftManually adjust vertical scale and collar markers
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
39/54
Multiple Echoes
1 2
3
4
5
Which isLiquidLevel ?
1-upkick
2-down
3-down
4-upkick5-upkick
Assume hole in the Tubing Wave Path Analysis
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
40/54
Assume hole in the Tubing Wave Path Analysis
RTT1 =6.256 upkick ( -------- )
RTT2=10.714 downkick ( )
RTT3= 2x6.256 = 12.512 downkick
RTT4=6.256 +2x4.458 = 15.172 upkick
RTT5=2x6.256 + 4.458 = 16.97 upkick
1
2
3
4
5
RTTT=6.256
RTTT=4.458
10.714
1 2 3 4 5
Liquid Level ?
Hole in Tubing ?
Dashed arrows indicate polarity inversion
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
41/54
Field Data Examples
In Examples group of TAM software PFL Coal Bed Methane Well
PFL Anomaly
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
42/54
Quality Control of Acoustic Survey Data
Inspect the well noise before shooting. If excessive noise exists: Use a larger pressure charge in the gas gun. Close Casing Valve and Determine if Noise from Downhole. Increase the casing pressure to attempt to reduce the noise
level.
Inspect the acoustic trace. If an insufficient liquid level kick is obtained,data is otherwise unsatisfactory, or shot not detected:
Inspect connections and Acoustic Cable Increase the pressure in the volume chamber Increasing casing pressure improves collar and liquid level
response. Shut down Noisy Pumping Unit (Surface Equipment) and Re-
shoot
Dont leave Casing to Flowline valve closed too long. Added pressuremay push Liquid Level below pump in some depleted wells.
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
43/54
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15Sec
3 1
. 6 m
V
300psi
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15Sec
3 1
. 6 m
V600psi
Effect of Chamber Pressure
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
44/54
Low Pass Filter for High Frequency Noise
Highfrequencynoisecaused byinjection ingas lift well
Low pass
filterhighlightsliquid levelandmandrels
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
45/54
Low Pass Filter for High Frequency Noise
High frequency noise caused by hydraulic pumping unit
Low passfilterhighlightsliquid level
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22Sec
3 . 2
m
V
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22Sec
3 . 2
m V
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
46/54
Noise Induced byConnection to Tree
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
47/54
AC Charger NoiseConnection of AC chargerto AC or DC-AC inverter,while acquiring data,may
cause additional noise onacoustic trace.
WithCharger
WithoutCharger
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
48/54
Pumping Related Noise
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28Sec
1 0 . 0
m V
Pumping speed = 6.38 SPM
Pumping period = 9.404 sec.
9.4 sec 9.4 sec
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
49/54
T bi Fl id L l @ 98 ft
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
50/54
Tubing Fluid Level @ 98 ft
Echo from top ofpump and repeat
Acoustic velocity intubing fluid = 4435 ft/sec
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
51/54
High Pressure Casing Head
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
52/54
Questions ?
L P H d b G
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
53/54
Low Pressure Hydrocarbon Gas
Velocity =1130 ft/sec Gravity=0.81
Hi h P H d b G
-
7/26/2019 1 3 Acoustic Liquid Level Analysis 2014
54/54
High Pressure Hydrocarbon Gas
Velocity=1260 ft/sec
Read fromgraphGravity=0.63
Pressure
= 1000 psig