1-23-11 brs state treasury bond app 2

8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2

1/18

3881 Building Utilization Page 5-3

Existing/Adequate

(K-2) Lower Elementary

(3-5) Upper Elementary

(6-8) Junior High

(9-12) High School

Sub Totals

Remodeled

(K-2)Lower Elementary


(6-8) Junior High

(9-1 2) High School

Sub Totals

Proposed New

(K-2)Lower Elementary


(6-8) Junior High

(9-12)High School

Sub Totals

Total TeachingStations

List # ofTeaching

Stations

30

30

List # ofTeachingStations

o

0


0

30

Current Gr. Structure

Proposed Gr. Structure

9-12

9-12

CapacityX Factor

x 20 =

x25

x 22.5 =

x 21.25 =

Capacityx Factor

x 20 =

x 25

x 22.5 =

x 21.25 =

CapacityX Factor

x 20 =

x 25

x 22.5

x 21.25 =

TotalCapacity

Projected5-Year

Pn r/->l man t

Utilization Percentage(Projected 5-Year Enrollment / Total Capacity)

Capacity

0

0

0

63 8

63 8

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

638

488

77%

1 Listthe numberof teaching station inappropriatecolumn.

2 Calculate otal capacity usingtheapplicable capacity factor.

3 Enter five(5) year projectedenrollment.

4 Calculate building utilizationrate.

5 Attach floor andsite plan of thebuilding.Show the rooms and category (adequate,remodeled, proposed new,closed).Number the teaching stations inconsecutive order.

List# ofFacility to be Closed Teaching x

Stations

(K-2)Lower Elementary x

(3-5) Upper Elementary x

(6-8) Junior High x

(9-12) High School x

Total Teaching Stations 0

Square Footage forClosed Facility

CapacityFactor

20 =

25 =

22.5

21.25 =

TotalCapacity

Capacity

0

0

0

0

0

Please transfer applicable informationto the Utilization Summary othe application.

n Page 7 of


2/18

Page 6-3

Facility Condition Assessment

Project Number

Perform w alkthrough inspection of the facility including special-use areas such as the cafeteria, art rooms, industrial arts areas,and science labs. Please complete the following assessment form by responding to ALL statements.

High School

Please provide an overall assessm entof each section or comment on anydeficiencies or special circumstances:

Health SectionYe sX "

No N/A____________________________________1 Visible mold/damage does not exist due to past or present water/moisture leaks.2. Indoor surfaces are free of loose and peeling paint.3. |AiF temperature is comfortable throughout the building. X4. jUnique/objectionable odors are not present in specific areas_or throughout the'"bui~!ding7 ~ ' "~ ~x

Overall assessmentor comments:

Life Safe ty Section HZHm j Yes I NO j N/A1 . |Lightedexit signs are present at each entrance/exitand are clearly v isible. X2 . iJ ire suppressiqn_equigment is pjesenj injotchen, science rooms and corridors. X.L j Washroom facilities have barrier free accessibility. _ X4. [Building access is limited to select, controlled entries, X"~|

Overallassessment or comments:

structural section Ye s i N O iN / A ~1 . Inside masonry wallsdo not show visible signsof cracks beyondn q r r n _ a j _aging._ X

_ 2_ Surface cracksdo no? exist around perimeterof interior/exterior doorsand windows. ____ | "x3. Roof structure doesnot show visible signsof damage. __ X4. [Building exterioris intact and does not show visible deteriorationbeyond"normal aging. ___ _ X

Overall assessment or comments: Some interior masonry cosmetic cracking in storeroom at loading dock area . Some interior concrete floor cosmetic crackingat library entrance.

Mechanical Section _j ^ Ye s j_ N O _ _[ _ N / A ^1. "I Windows and exterior doors prevent inefficient air leakage. X2 jWater pressure exists [o_wash_ha_ndsL sijp_glv_water fountains, and flush toilets. _ X _3. I Water drains quickly from sinks. _ X __ j __ j __4, iFloor area near toilet s and sinks is dry ___ X _

Dverallassessment or comments. Someair infultrationat door thresholdsat some exteriordoors.

Electrical Section j Ye s j N O | N / A1 | Lighting system providesadequate intensity, diffusion, anddistribution orFllumination. _ X2. Electrical controlsare safely protectedand accessible. __________ i X ; ____ j ____3 . |Classrooms have sufficient outletsto prevent regularuse of electrical extension cords. __ ___ X j _ [_4. jThe proximity~oTeTectricalsystems or panels is dryand free of standing water. __ _____________ [ __ X __[ __ [ _____

Jverallassessment or comments:

Certificate by Registered Architectcertify that I have assessed the factors described above and that the conditions relative to the facility are true and correct to the bes t of my knowledge and belief.

Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs, Inc.* 1301032176

ignature Printed Name

[email protected] 810-229-6767

Firm Name andLicense Number

810-229-2701

Dale E-mail Address Fax Number Area Code and Telephone Number

7_0


3/18

3881 Page 4-4

Project Sheet

Name of School Building: Bus Garage

Description of Proposal or Series 1 Project:New maintenance garage.Buses.

Description of Proposal or Series 2 Project:


Instructional Technology DescriptionNA

Site Work Description

NA

Cost per Sq Ft 103.53

Cost per Sq Ft

Type of Project:0 New Building >Ne wConstruction SquareFt 1,500EHAddition(s) >New Addition Square Ft.

- D RemodelingD Facility Closing -> O Demolish O Retain for future use O Convert to non-instructional

D Site Work O Sell or Lease O Undetermined

Statement describing any existing environmental or usability problems the proposed project will address.(ex: asbestos, energy use, or ADA requirements)NA

Estimated Cost of Proposed Construction Project: (Attach analysis showing ho w cost estimates were calculated.)

Total Proposal/Series 1 Proposal/Series 2 Proposal/Series 3

N ew Construction

RemodelingConstruction Contingencies

Instructional TechnologyLoose Furnishing/Equipment

BusesSite WorkSite Acquisition

Architectural Fees and CostsCM Fees and Costs

Estimated Costs(Not including election or bond issuance costs)

$155,300$0

$155 ,30_

$ o$1,509,266

__ $0__ _ _ _ _ $ 0 _

_|10,690$14,320

$10,9_75

_$0

$0

_$532,064_

O

$977,202

$10,690$14,320

$1,700,551 $723,349 $977,202 $0

Certificate by Registered ArchitectI certify that the details of the proposed project(s) described above and the attached detail relative to the construction project(s) are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief

Signature

10/28/10

Date

Ootl T. I looft

Printed Name

scott(5)intdesians.com_

E-mailAddress

Integrated Oeoignc, Inr

810-220-6767Fax Number

Firm Name an d License Number

81 -229-2701Area Code and Telephone Number


4/18

Wolgast Corporation BEAVERTONRURALSCHOOLS 11/4/2010Integrated Designs CONCEPT BUDGET SUMMARY

School Descriptiop BudgetBeaverton Rural Schools

Bu s Garage Series 11,500 Sq Ft Maintenance Building $105,300.00Fuel Tank @ Bus Garage $50,000.00

Construction Cost Subtotal $155,300.00

A/E Fees $10,690.00CM Fees $10,415.00Construction Support Cost $3,905 00Contingency $10,975.00Buses $532,064.00Furniture/Equipment $0.00Technology $0.00

TOTAL COSTS $723,349 .00


5/18


[Bus Garage

Existing/Adequate



(6-8) Junior High

(9-12) High School

Sub Totals

Remodeled



(6-8) Junior High

(9-12) High School

Sub Totals

Proposed New



(6-8) Junior High

(9-12) High School

Sub Totals


List # ofTeaching

Stations

0


0


0

0



NA

NA

Capacityx Factor

x 20 =!

x 25

x 22.5

x 21.25 =

Capacityx Factor

x 20 =

x 25

x 22.5 =

x 21.25 =

Capacityx Factor

x 20 =

x25

x 22.5

x 21.25 =

TotalCapacity

Projected5-Year

Pnrnl mont


Capacity

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

NA

NA

1 List the number of teaching station inappropriate column.

2 Calculate total capacity u sing theapplicable capacity factor.

3 Enter five(5) year projected enrollment.

4 Ca lculate building utilizationrate.

5 Attach floorand site plan of the building.Show the rooms and category (adequate,remodeled, proposednew, closed).Number the teaching stations inconsecutive order.

List # ofFacility to be Closed Teaching x c to

Stations

(K-2)Lower Elementary x 20

(3-5) Upper Elementary x 25 =

(6-8) Junior High x 22.5

(9-12) High School x 21.25 =


Square Footage for TotalClosed Facility Capacity

Please transfer applicable informationto the Utilization Summary on Page 7 ofthe application.

Capacity

0

0

0

0

0


6/18

Page 6-4


Project Number

Perform walkthrough inspection of the facility including special-use areas such as the cafeteria, art rooms, industrial arts areas ,and science labs. Please complete the following assessment form by responding to ALL statements.

Bu s Garage

Please provide an overall assessm entof each section or comment on anydeficiencies or special circumstances:

Health Section1 jVisible mold/damage does no t exist due to past or present water/moisture leaks2. jIndoor surfaces are free of loose an d peeling paint.

Ye s | No ; N/A

Air temperature is comfortable throughout the building4. Unique/objectionable odors are not present in specific areas or throughput the building.

xx

Overall assessment or comments:

Life Safety SectionLighted exit signs are present at each entrance/exit and are clearly visible.

Yes | No J_ N/Ai X

2 ._ Fire suppression equipment is present in kitchen, science_rpoms_ and corridors.3. [Washroom facilities have barrier free accessibility.

_4. jBuilding access is limited to select, controlled entries.Overall assessment or comments:Washroom facilities accessible, but toilet room fixtures and toilet stall configeration do not meet the current barrier free requirements

i I *1 L X

X

structural section1. [Inside masonry walls do not show visible signs of cracks bey qnd_nprmaIagjng^

Yes j No j N/A_

2. Surface cracks do not exist around perimeter of interior /exterior door s and windows.3. Roof structure does not show visible signs of damage.

j | I_

XX

_ 4 . jBuilding exterior is intact and does not show visible deterioration beyond normal aging,Overall assessment or comments: Existing metal siding contains cosmetic denting at several locations.

Mechanical Section Y e s1. Windows and exterior doors prevent inefficient air leakage.

No ; N/A

XWater pressure exists to wash hands, supply water fountains, and flush toilets.

Water drains quickly from sinks._ 4 j Floor area near toilets and sinks is dry.

XX

Overall assessment or comments:

Electrical SectionLighting system provides adequate intensi ty, diffusion, and distribution of illumination.

Yes i No j N/A

Electrical controls are safely protected and accessible.Classrooms have sufficient outlets to prevent regular use of_ejectri_cal_extens[qnCoords.

4. JThe proximity of electTlcalsystems or panels is dry and free of standing water.Overall assessment or comments:

Certificate by Registered ArchitectI certify that I have assessed the factors described above and that the conditions relative to the facility are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs,Inc. * 1301032176

Signature Printed Name

icottf5?intdesiqns com 810-229-6767

Firm Name andLicense Number

810-229-2701

E-mailAddress Area Code and Telephone Number


7/18

3 8 8 1 Page 4- 5

Project Sheet

Name of School Building: PreschoolBuilding

Description of Proposal or Series 1 Project:Remove and replace approximately 3,000s.f. of roof ares.





NA

Cost per Sq Ft

Cost per Sq Ft

Type of Project:D New Building > New Construction SquareFt

D Addition(s) *New Addition Square Ft

0 RemodelingD Facility Closing ~> O Demolish O Retain for future use O Convert to non-instructional


Statement describing any existing environmental or usability problems the proposed project will address.( e x : asbestos, energy use, or ADA requirements)Energy efficiency will be increased with the removal and Replacementof roofing materials.

Estimated Cost of Proposed Construction Project: (Attach analysis showing how cost estimates were calculated.)


New Construction

Remodeling

Construction Contingencies

Instructional Technology

Loose Furnishing/Equipment

Buses

Site Work

Site Acquisition

Architectural Fees and Costs

CM Fees and Costs

Estimated Costs( N o t including election or bond issuance costs)

SO

$21,900

$0

$21,900

_ $ 1 _ , 6 4 5 _

$0

$1,645

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

J 1 , 6 0 0

$2,145

$0

J 5 1 . 6 J D O

$2,145

$27,290 $27,290 $0 $0

Certificate by Registered Architectc e r t i f yt h a t t h e d e t a i ls o f t h e p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t ( s ) d e s c r ib e d a b o v e a n d t h e a t t a c h e d d e t a i l r e la t i v e t o t h e c o n s t r u c t io n p r o j e c t ( s ) a r eIrue a n d c o r r e c t t o th e b e s t o f m y k n o w l e d g e a n d b e l i e f .

Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs, Inc. #1301032176

Signature

10/28/10Date

Printed Name

scott < 8 >intdesiqns.comE-mail Address

_8JO-22_0-676JFax Number

Firm Name and License Number

810-229-2701 _Area Code andTelephoneNumber


8/18


Existing/Adequate



(6-8) Junior High

(9-12) High School

Sub Totals

Remodeled



(6-8) Junior High

(9-12) High School

Sub Totals

Proposed New



(6-8) Junior High

(9-1 2) High School

Sub Totals


List # ofTeaching

Stations

0


0


0

0



NA

NA

CapacityX Factor

x 20 =

x 25 =

x 22.5 =

X 21.25 =

CapacityX Factor

x 20 =

x 25

x 22.5 =

x 21.25 =

Capacity* Factor

x 20 =

x 25

x 22.5

x 21.25 =

TotalCapacity

Projected5-Year

F^rtiVkllm int


Capacity

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

NA

NA

1 List the number of teaching station inappropriate column.

2 Calculate total capacity using th eapplicable capacity factor.

3 Enter five (5 ) year projected enrollment.

4 Calculate building utilization rate.

5 Attach floor and site plan of the building.Show th e rooms and category (adequate,remodeled, proposed new, closed).Number the teaching stations inconsecutive order.

List # ofFacility to be Closed Teaching x ^ paci ^ = Capacity

Stations

(K-2) Lower Elementary x 20 = 0

(3-5) Upper Elementary x 25 = 0

(6-8) Junior High x 22.5 = 0

(9-1 2) High School x 21.25 = 0I



Please transfer applicable informationto the Utilization Summary on Page 7 ofthe aoolication.


9/18


10/18

Page 6-5


:t Number

irm walkthrough nspection of the facility including special-use are=>s such as the cafeteria, art rooms, industrial arts areas,icience labs. Please complete the following assessment form by responding to ALL statements.

Preschool Building

Please provide an overall assessmentof each section or comment on anydeficiencies or special circumstances:

th Section | _ _ Ye s _|_NO j N /AVisible mold/damage does not exist due to past or present water/moisture leaks, XIndoor surfaces are free of loose and peeling paint. XAir temperature is comfortable throughout the building XUnique/objectionable odors are not present in specific areas or throughout the building^ XI assessment or comments:

Safety Section ITZZZTTZZIZZZ Y e s N^ 1 N/ALighted exit signs are present at each entrance/exit and are clearly visible. XFire suppression equipment is present in kitchen, sc ience rooms and corridors. j N A ~Washroom facilities have barrier free accessibility. XBuilding access is limitedJo elect, controlled entries. _ XI assessment o r comments .

oom facilitiesaccessible, but toiletroom fixtures and toilet stallconfigerationdo not meet the current barrierfree requirements

:tural section ~ !_Yes _ N O _ I _N/AInside masonry walls do not show visible signs of cracks Beyond normal aging. j XSurface cracks do not exist around perimeter of interior/exterior doors and_wjndows^_ j X _Roof structure does not show visible signs of damage. XBuilding exterior is intact and does not show visible deterioration_beypnd norrna[agjn_g. _ _ Xassessment or comments: Existingmetal siding contains cosmetic denting at several locations

lanicalSection N/ AA/indowsand exterior doors prevent inefficient air leakage.

A/ater pressure exists to wash hands, supply water fountains, and flush toilets./Vater drains quickly from sinks. _rloor area near toilets and sinksjs dry.__assessment or comments:

rical Section.ighting system provides adequate intensi ty, diffusion, and distribution of illumination. _Electricalcontrols are safely protected and accessible.Classrooms have sufficient outlets to prevent regular use of e]ectrica[extension cords^'he proximity of electrical systems or panels is dry_andjre[ of standjnc;j/vater._assessment or comments:

N ;A

Certificate by Registered Architect

that I have assessed the factors described above an d that the conditions relativeto the facilityare true an d correct to the best of myknowledge an d belief.

Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs,Inc. # 1301032176

Printed Name

[email protected]

Firm Nameand License Number

810-229-6767E-mailAddress Area Code and Telephone Number


11/18

3881 Page 4-6

Project Sheet

Name of School Building: Administration Building

Description of Proposal or Series 1 Project:Remove and replace approximately 3,535 s.f. of roof area.





NA

Cost per Sq Ft

Cost per Sq Ft

Type of Project:D New Building > New Construction SquareFt

D Addition(s) > New AdditionSquare Ft.

G DRemodelingD Facility Cosing -* O Demolish O Retain for future use O Convert to non-instructional


Statement describing any existing environmental or usability problems the proposed project will address.(ex: asbestos, energy use, or ADA requirements)Energy efficiency will be increased with the removaljand replacernent^ofroofing materials^._

Estimated Cost of Proposed Construction Project: (Attach analysis showing how cost estimates were calculated.)


New Construction

Remodeling

Construction Contingencies

Instructional Technology

Loose Furnishing/Equipment

Buses

Site Work

Site Acquisition

Architectural Fees and Costs

CM Fees and Costs

Estimated Costs(Not including election or bond issuance costs)

$o$9,450-

$p$o

$_9,450

_ 5559_5P.

$0

$_ $ 0

$535

$715

$11,250

_ $ _ p _$535$715

$11,250 $0 $0

Certificate by Registered Architectcertify that the details of the proposed project(s)described above and the attached detail relative to the construction project(s) are true an d correct to the best of myknowledge an d belief

Signature

_10/28/irjDate

TScptt_T.Jjoeft_PrirJtecTName ~

[email protected]

810-220-6767

lntegrated_Designs, Inc. #1301032176Firm Mamfi and License Number

810-229-2701Fax Number Area Code and T elephone Number


12/18

Wolgast Corporation BEAVE RTO N RURAL SCHO OLSIntegrated Designs CONCEPTBl IDGET SUMMARY

School Description Budgeteaverton Rural Schools

Central OfficeRoof Replacement $9,450.00

Construction Cost Subtotal $9,450.00

A/E Fees $535.00CM Fees $520.00Construction Su pport Cost $195.00Contingency $550.00Buses $0.00Furniture/Equipment $0.00Technology $0.00

TOTAL COSTS $11,250.00


13/18

38 1 Building Utilization Page 5-6

Administration Building

Existing/Adequate

ub Totals

Remodeled

ub Totals

Proposed New

(-2) Lower Elementary

i-5) Upper Elementary

i-8) Junior High

i-12) High School

ub Totals


List # ofTeaching

Stations

0


0


0

0

urrent Gr. Structure

oposed Gr. Structure

N A

NA

CapacityX Factor

x 20 =

x 25

x 22.5 =

x 21.25 =

CapacityFactor

x 20 =

x 25

x 22.5 =

x 21.25 =

Capacityx Factor

x 20 =

x 25

x 22.5

x 21.25 =

TotalCapacity

Projected5-Year

pnml mant

Utilization Percentage(Projected 5-Ye ar Enrollment / Total Capacity)

Capacity

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NA

NA

NA

1 List the number of teaching station inappropriate colum n.

2 Calculate total capacity using theapplicable capacity factor.

3 Enter five (5) year projected enrollment.

4 Calculate building utilization rate.

5 Attac h floor and site plan of the building.Show the room s and category (adequate,remodeled, proposed new, closed).Number the teaching stations inconsecutive order.

List* ofFacility to be Closed Teaching x c P < =

r*. raCiOrStations

(K-2) Lower Elementary x 20 =

(3-5) Upper Elementary x 25 =

(6-8) Junior High x 22.5

(9-12) High School x 2 1 2 5 =



Capacity

0

0

0

0

0

Please transfer applicable informationto the Utilization Summary on Page 7 ofthe aoolication.

. i;


14/18

Page 6-6


;t Number

rm walkthrough inspection o f the facility including special-use a reas such as the c afeteria, art rooms, industrial arts areas,cience labs. Please complete the following assessm ent form by responding to ALL statements.

Preschool Building

Please provide an overall assessmentof each section or comment on anydeficiencies or special circumstances:

th Section _ _ i _ Y 5 s _! N O I N / AVisible mold/damage d oes not exist due to past or presentwater/moisture jgaks. XIndoor surfacesare free of loose and peeling paint. x"T~"Air temperature is comfortable throughoutthe building. ~"xUnique/objectionable odors are not present in specific a reas or throughout Thebuilding. X~I assessment o r comments:

Safety Section j Y e s i N O | N / ALightedexit signs are present at each en trance/exit and are clea rly visible. ~ XFire suppression equipmentis present in kitchen, science roomsand_corridors. T ~NA~Washroom facilities have barrier free accessibility. >fBuildingaccess is limited toselect, controlledentries. "Z*T~I assessment or comments:oom facilities accessible,but toilet room fixturesand toilet stall configeration do not meet the current barrier free requirements.

:turai section ! _ _ Ye s[ _ N O _ _ | _ N / A _Inside maso nry wallsdo not show visiblesigns of cracks beyond normal aging. _ NASurface cracks do not exist aroun d perimeter of interior/e xteriordoors jnd windows. __XRoof structure doesno t show v isible signsof damage _XBuildingexterior is intact an d does no t show visible deterioration Beyondnormaj aging. Xa s s e s s m e n tor comments: Existing metal siding contains cosmetic dentingat several locations.

lanical Section [ Yes J_ N _ O _ _ |N /AMndows and exterior doorsprevent inefficient air leakage. __XA/ater pressure existsto wash hands, supply water fountains,and flush toilets. X_

/Vater drains quickly from sinks. Xrloor area n ear toiletsand sinks is dry. X j jassessment or comments

rical Section !_Yes j N O i N / Alighting'systemprovidesadequaTiTntensity,diffusion,and~distributibriroflTluTniiTatjonr'" XElectrical controlsare safely protected and accessible. XClassrooms hav e sufficient outletsto prevent regularuse of electrical extension cord s. i NAfhe proximityof electrical system sor panels is dry and free o^sjaiding_water. Xassessment or comments:

Certificate by Registered Architect

that I have assessed the factors described above and that the conditions relative to the facility are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Scott T. Hoeft IntegratedDesigns. nc * 1301032176Printed Name

:ott(S)intdesiqns-Com 810-229-6767

Firm Name and License Number

810-229-2701

E-mailAddress Area Codean d Telephone Number


15/18

Utilization Summary

(Name of School D strict: Beaverton Rural Schools (Dstrict Code Number: 26-010

List ALLdistrict facilitiesin the following order: elementary schools,junior high/middle schools, high schools,and non-instructional facilities.

Proj No.

1

Name of School Facility

Primary School

2 Middle School

3 High School

4 Bus Garage / Maintenance

SiPreshool

6 AdministrationBuilding

Bus Garage / Maintenance

Service Building

Current GradeStructure

K-3

4 - 8

9 - 1 2

na

na

na

na

Proposed GradeStructure

K- 3

Projected5-Year Enrollment

Adequate Pupil Remodel PupilCapacity Capacity NewPu

342J 310 1 20 1"4 - 8 49 1

9 - 1 2 488

na| na

naj na

na

nai

na ! na

Storage / Primary School na! na

Athletic Storage na na

Lockers/ Concessions na j na

na

635 0|

638 0-

na na

na na|

na naj

na na naina | na na j

na na na!

nai na na

na! na naj !

Press Box / Storage nai na|_ nai na na

iAthletic Storage nai ! i

na ; na] na; na

IStorage /Middle School na! na| na na na

\ \ \ I j

Total Pupilpit Capacity Capacity Utilization%

Closed PupilCapacity

70 1_ 400 86% na

O J 63 5 77 %

0 638 j 76%

na i na na

na

na

na

na! na na na

naj na| na na

na{ na| na

na na naI

na na na

na naj na

na

na

na

na

na na | nai na

na L na na

na naj na

na na na

i

na

na

na

Subtotals by School District's Grade Configuration

Elementary School

Middle School

Highj5chool

Total:

K- 3

4 - 8

9- 12

K - 3

4 - 8

9 - 1 2

I

342

491

488

1321

310|_ . . . - . . .635 1

638 1

1 5 8 3 J

20'

O j

o j20)

7 0 i

0

0

70

400

635

638

1673

110%j

77%!

76%

82 % j


16/18

Facility Summary

| Name of School D strict: Beaverton Rural Schools Dstrict Code Number:26-010

List ALL district facilities in the following order: elementary schools, unior high/middle schools, high schools, and non-instructional facilities

Pro/".Mo.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Col. 1

Facility Type'

Instructional

Instructional

Instructional

Bus Garage

Col 2

Name of School Facility

Primary School

Mddle School

High School

Bus Garage / Maintenance

Non-Instructional Preschool

Non-instructional / Adrnjn istr ation BuildingAdministration

Non-instructional / BusGarage

Non-instructional / ServiceBuilding

Non-instructional /Storage, Primary School

Co. 3

Address

1 27 Tonkin Street

Col.4

City

Beaverton

440 South Ross Street i BeavertonI

3090 Crockett Road Beaverton

3384 M-18 JBeaverton

1 06 Tonkin j Beaverton

468 South Ross Street i Beaverton!

Col 5 Col.

YearBuilt Year(s) Ren

1953 1962, 6

1965 198

1997i

new

1935 1963,

1972

Bus Garage / Maintenance j1 22 Tonkin Street ! Beaverton 1 942

Service Building

Storage / Primary

Stadium Athletic Storage

[122 Tonkin Street JBeaverton i 1942

127 Tonkin Street

3090 Crockett Road

Stadium / Fieldhouse \ Lockers / Concessions 13090 Crockett Road

Stadium | Stadium Press Box /Storage 13090 Crockett Road

Stadium

Storage

Athletic Storage 3090 Crockett Road

Storage / Middle School 406 Ross

Beaverton

Beaverton.... .

1985 !

1986 :

Beaverton 2003

Beaverton i 1986

Beaverton ; 1976

Beaverton j1992

i

5 Col. 7

modeled Site Size (Acres)

7,97 10j

Col. 8

Total Sq.Ft.

32,281

5 16 j 34,075

Col. 9WeightedAverage

Age

33.30

3730

1 ' \33 102,330 1300

|

i 5

97 i 2

2

2

2_ L . _. ..

incl in Primary

incl in HighSchool

incl in HighSchool

incl in HighSchool

incl in HighSchool

incl in Mddlei School

72

8,000

25,222

3,535

1,540

Col. 10

New S/leCAcres)

0

0

0

NA 0

49.17 0

28

NA

~ "" '2,160 NA

280 25.

1 344 24

3,950 7

704 24

0

0

0

0

0

I0

0

448 34 0

1,728 18 0

217,597

Col. 1 1

Bldg InUse? Y/N

Y

Y

v

S

Y

:, YY

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Col. 12Sq Ft ofClosedFacility

0

0

0

0

0

1,540j

2,160

0

0

0

0

0

0

Col 13

Disposition ofClosed Facility"

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Demolish

Demolish

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

-----

"Facility Type:Instructional

Non-Instructional

Bus GarageStorage

Stadium

"Cosed Facility Ref:1. Demolish

2. Convert to non-instr.

3. Sell or lease4. Retain for future use

5. Undetermined


17/18

Cost Summary

Name of SchoolDistrict: Beaverton Rural Schools [District Code Number: 26-010

Pro/.

#

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Total

Cosf per

Sq Foot

2

$21.36

$20.35

$9.32

$0.00

$10.14

$33.75

New Cons

SqFeet

3

22,000

0

0

1,500

0

0

New

Construction

4

$3,042,200

$05U

$155,300

$0$0

$3,197,500

Remodeling

5

$689,594

$693,550

$954,115

$0

$21,900

$9,450

$2,368,609

Contingency

6

$257,419

$77,920

$143,190

$10,975

L $1,645

$550

$491,699

Instructional

Technology

7

$196,709

$54,040

$335,350

$0

$0

$0

$586,099

Loose Fum

and Equip

a

$80,000

$0

$10,000

$0

$0

$0

$90,000

Buses

9

$0

$0

$0

$1,509,266

$0

$0

$1,509,266

Site Work

10

$312,500

$562,000

$1,487,800

$0

$0

$0

$2,362,300

Site

Acquisition

11

$0

$0$0$0

$0

$0

$0

A/EFees

and Costs

12

$264,056

$75,900$181,730

$10,690

$1,600

$535

$534,511

CMFees

and Costs

13

$353,671

$101,655

$243,405

$14,320

$2,145

$715

$715,911

Project

Costs

14

$5,196,149

$1,565,065

$3,355,590

$1,700,551

$27,290

$11,250

$11,855,895

Election/

Issue Costs

15

$124,115

$37,383$80,152

$40,619

$652

$269

$283,190

Total

Cost16

$5,320,264

$1,602,448

$3,435,742

$1,741,170

$27,942

$11,519

$12,139,08517. % of Project Costs : (= The total of each column /the total of Column 14)

26.97% 19.98% 4.15% 4.94% 0.76% 12.73% 19.93% 0.00% 4.51%[ 6.04%| 100.00%

18. Election/Bond Issue Costs:

Bond (and Local) Attorney:

Financial Advisor:

Qualification Fee:

Treasury Filing Fee:

Auditor Review:

M.A.C.Fee:

Miscellaneous Costs*:

$29.141

$27,910

$8,900

$1,193

$1,000

400

% of Proi Cost

0.25%

0.24%

0.08%

0.01%

0.01%

0.00%

0 0.00%

(Prorate the total for each project in

Capitalized Interest:

OfficialStatement:

Election Notices:

Bond Dscount:

Credit Rating:

Total Other Costs:

$0

$11,000

$18,658

$158,488

$26,500

$283,190

% of Proi Cost

0.00%

0.09%

0 16%

1.34%

0.22%

2.39%

Co l 14 and distribute prorate within Col15)

19. Funding:

Total Estimated Cost of Project: $12,139.085

LESS:

Estimated Interest Earnings: $39,125

Other (specify):

AMOUNTOF PROPOSED ISSUE

(Amount to be Qualified)$12,099,960

'Explanation of Miscellaneous Costs:


18/18

3881, Worksheet 1: Useful Life Calculation

A school district must demonstrate thatthe weighted average maturityof the qualified bond issue doesno texceed 120% of the average reasonably expected useful lifeof the facilities, excluding landan d siteimprovements, being financed withthe proceeds of the qualified bonds.

The following table liststhe recommended average useful lifeof the categories of asse ts that should beconsidered in this calculation. If a specific item is not listed, it should be a ssigne d to the m ost closely relatedcategory.

Asset Cateory

New School Building

Useful LifeYears

" 40Building Improvements - interior and exterior remodeling such as plumbing, electrical" HVAC, fire!suppression, security systems, elevators, etc.Roofing

I

Flooring20_

, ...... ...~ ,. :

Furnishings and Equipment - furnitureand fixtures thatare not a structuralcomponent of abuilding suchas desks, chairs, tables, storage units, office equipment, copiers,fax machines,communications equipment, kitchen equipmentand appliances, athletic equipment, etc.

10

10

Technology Infrastructure-cables, networks, etc.BusesTechnology (instructionalan d non-instructional)- computers, printers, scanners, etc.

Use the wo rkshee t below to calculate the weighted a verage useful life of a ssets included inprojects funded by bond proceeds.

Asset Type

School Buildings

Building Improvements

Roofing

Flooring

Furnishing/ Equipment

TechnologyInfrastructure

Technology (instr/non-instr)

Buses

Col. 1

AverageUseful Lifeof Asset (in

Years)

40

30

20

10

10

10

5

6

Col. 2

Timebetween

Bonds IssueDate andPurchase

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Col. 3

UsefulLifeof Assetfrom Bond Issue Date

Col. 4

ExpenditureAmount

Col. 5

Allocation ofRelated

ProfessionalFees

Col. 6

TotalCosts(Incl.Related

Fees)

Col. 7

% of TotalCost

40 3,418,325 212,481 3,630,806 41.92%I

30

20

10

10

10

5

6

Total for purposes of determining weighted avg useful life

1,440,296 89,528

Col. 8

AverageUseful Lifeof

Assets (inyears)

16.77

1,529,824 17.66% 5.30I

708,400 44,033 752,433 8.69% 1.74

1 1 ,442

90,000

479,345

586,099

1,509,266

8,243,173

710

4,607

29,795_ -

12,152 0.14%!

94,607 1.09%

509,140

36,432 622,531

0

417,586

1,509,266

5.88%

7.19%

17.43%

8,660,759 | 100.00%

0.01

0.11

0.59

0.36

1.05

25.92

120% of average useful life of assets 31.11

1-23-11 brs state treasury bond app 2

Documents