TANTRI ENDARINIMinistry of Environment

1 Until 2007 There’s no national policy and regulation1. Until 2007, There s no national policy and regulation.2. Problem of MSW is not local issue, it’s become national and global

issue.3 MSW is source of conflict between local government and3. MSW is source of conflict between local government and

community as well as local government vs local government.4. Improper MSW management can cause deadly disaster.

W t h MSW t di5. We must change our MSW management paradigm.

This way bears some consequences:

1. Demand of landfill site is high, but the land become limited.

2 High operational cost2. High operational cost.

3. Environmental impact is getting worst.

4. Inefficient resources utilization.

5. Lack of access for community and business sector participation

Diangkut ke TPA Ditimbun Diolah

15%

Diangkut ke TPA Ditimbun

Diolah Dibakar

Dibuang ke sungai dll.

3%

Dibakar Dibuang ke sungai Tidak tertangani

40%

35%

15%

69%

10%

7%5%

6%

8%

35% 69%

2%

Sources: Statistic Centre Bureau 2001

Sources: MSW Statistic  2008, KLH‐JICA

Compostable

Organic

Matter

Paper

13% Wood,

bamboo

3%

Komposisi Rerata Timbulan Sampah (% Berat)

1.63%OrganikOrganic

% weight

65%3%

Rubber/

Leather

1%

Fabric

1%

32 22%3.48%

1.97%

0.47%

10.23%

Sisa Makanan

Kertas

Gelas/Botol kaca/kaca

Pl tik d l

Food residue

Paper

Glasses

Recyclable 

g

Plastic

11%

Metal

1%

32.22%

6.61%

4.36%Plastik daur ulang

Plastik bukan daur ulang

Logam / kaleng

Tekstil

yplastic

Unrecyclableplastic

Metal

Textile

Other

Glass

1%

Sand,

Ceramic,

ash

1% 19.79%10.10%3.65%

5.48%Karet

Sty rofoam

Sisa elektronik

L i l i

Rubber

Styrofoam

E‐waste

Reference: MSW from Bandung, LPPM ITB 2006Reference: Public Works Dept. 1989

3% Lain-lainOthers

Policy and Strategy TransformationLaw No. 18/2008 regarding waste management

Maximum recycling, Minimum Landfilling

Change of the paradigmChange of the paradigmFROM END OF PIPE APPROACH

TOREDUCE AT SOURCE & RESOURCES RECYCLE

MSW MANAGEMENT DIVISIONMINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT

6

MSW as resourceMSW as resource

Prevention and pollution control

T i l t th i i l dTo implement those principle we do :1. 3R – Reduce Reuse Recycle 2. Extended Producer’s Responsibility (EPR) approach

W ili i (i bi d bi )3. Waste utilization (i.e. biomass and biogas)4. Establish environmental friendly landfill

Those ways have advantages:1. Save resources2. Reduce pollution load 3. Create economic opportunities and jobs 4. Less demand of landfill site5. Prolong landfill usage timeg g

1. Public service principle

2. Scoping: Municipal solid waste;◦ Municipal solid waste;

◦ Consisting: Waste minimise/reduce and handling

3. Building incentives and disincentives mechanism

4. Sharing of role and responsibility

5. Funding scheme and compensation

6. Cooperation among local government and local government with private6. Cooperation among local government and local government with private sector

7. Extended Producers Responsibility

8 Public participation8. Public participation

9. Prohibition

Some consequences of The Law No. 18 /2008The local government should establish IMSWM Action Plan that consistThe local government should establish IMSWM Action Plan that consist of:

a. Building accurate baseline datab. Broader services areac. Decide waste minimisation target d Choose proper waste treatment technologyd. Choose proper waste treatment technologye. Close open dump site and establish environmental friendly

landfillf. Open access to public participation and private sector

involvement

/MoE have responsibility to develop government regulation under the law no. 18/2008 regarding waste management. There are three government regulation should develop i.e. government regulation regarding MSW reduction, MSW handling and specific MSW managementspecific MSW management.

MSW ReductionMSW ReductionThe scope of MSW reduction activities:

1. Minimization/Reduce

2. Recycle

3. Reuse

Establish MSW Reduction Policy and Strategy:

1. Aim of MSW reduction policy

2. MSW reduction strategy

3. MSW reduction targetg

4. MSW reduction priority

a. MSW reduction at source

b. Prevention use of product and/or package cause to MSW generate

c. Resources reuse

d Encourage role of business sector and community participationd. Encourage role of business sector and community participation

e. Producer shall to minimization MSW and use recyclable and biodegradable product and/or package

f Develop EPR implementation mechanismf. Develop EPR implementation mechanism

g. Environmental protection and reduction GHG

a. Increasing community knowledge and awareness through campaign and education.

b. Capacity building for local government, producer and community, exp: education and training, pilot project and study visit.

c. Increasing reuse of product and/or package, exp: g p p g p

increasing production and market of recycle product, mainly compost.

Develop green procurement mechanism

Encourage role of central and local government to use recyclable and g g ybiodegradable product and/or package

Increasing market of recyclable and biodegradable product and/or package

d. Synergize (cooperative action) of MSW reduction program between ministries and y g ( p ) p ggovernment agencies.

e. Encourage role and responsibility of business sector and community, exp:

- Prevention use of unrecyclable and non biodegradable product and/or package

- Develop recyclable and biodegradable product and/or package.

- Develop and implementation of 3R principle in MSW management at source.

f. Encourage role and responsibility of central and local government, exp:

- Facilitating market of recycle and biodegradable product

- Facilitating implementation of environmental sound technologyFacilitating implementation of environmental sound technology.

- Facilitating implementation of eco label

- Facilitating reuse and recycle activities

g MSW minimization : reduce/substitute use of material product reduce/not useg. MSW minimization : reduce/substitute use of material product, reduce/not use package, recyclable and biodegradable product and/or package design

h. Develop incentive and disincentive mechanism

3. MSW reduction target3. MSW reduction target3. MSW reduction target3. MSW reduction targeta. Establish time base reduction waste generate target

b. Location priority : urban area

4. Establish MSW type reduction priority4. Establish MSW type reduction priority: organic waste, plastic paper metal and glassplastic, paper, metal and glass.

1. Community shall to minimize MSW generate

2. Producer shall to:

a. Utilize material product that produced minimum MSW

b. Produce recyclable and biodegradable product and package

c. Implementing MSW minimization programc. Implementing MSW minimization program

1. Community actively can participate MSW recycle.2. Producer shall MSW recycle and utilize recycle material.3. Central and local government shall to:- Financial support for build MSW recycle facilities.- Facilitating design improvement and pilot project for recycle facilities and

technologytechnology.- Facilitating market for recycle product.- Implementation and facilitating MSW recycle technology.- Encourage communication activity, information and education about MSW recycle

1 Community actively can participate MSW reuse1. Community actively can participate MSW reuse.

2. Producer shall to MSW reuse and utilize material product to make reuse product and/or package

MSW handling activity are:MSW handling activity are:

1. Segregation

2. Collection

3 Transportation3. Transportation

4. Treatment

5. Final waste processing

Establish MSW Handling Policy and Strategy:

1. Aim of MSW handling policy

2 MSW handling strategy2. MSW handling strategy

3. MSW handling target

a. MSW recycle activity

b. MSW reuse for alternative energy and material product, include composting

a. MSW reuse through 3R implementation

Develop and optimal effort of MSW handlingb. Develop and optimal effort of MSW handling

c. Capacity building and human resources

d. Useable Technology implementation

D l l tie. Develop regulations

f. Develop cooperation between local government and business sector

g. Law enforcement

h. Develop data and information center

i. Increasing budget allocation

Establish time base MSW handling priority: Establish time base MSW handling priority: Increasing MSW treatment and service area

MSW Segregation:MSW Segregation:g gg g1. Community shall segregate MSW properly

2. Local government shall segregate and provide MSW segregation facilities.

3. The management of settlement area, commercial area, industrial area, specific area, g , , , p ,public facility, social facility and other facilities shall provide MSW segregation facilities.

4. Segregation divide into five types of MSW: MSW contains hazardous and toxic material and hazardous and toxic waste ; Organic waste ; Plastic waste ; Paper waste ; others.

MSW CollectingMSW Collecting1. Local government shall collect MSW, provide the temporary collection MSW facilities

and can provide intermediate transfer stationand can provide intermediate transfer station.

2. The management of settlement area, commercial area, industrial area, specific area, public facility, social facility and other facilities shall provide the temporary collection MSW facilities.

TransportationTransportationppLocal government shall transporting MSW and provide MSW transportation

TreatmentTreatmentTreatmentTreatmentLocal government shall treatment MSW on city and/or area scale.

Treatment waste location at temporary collection site, intermediate transfer station d/ i t t d MSW t t t itand/or integrated MSW treatment site

Final MSW Treatment Final MSW Treatment Local government shall processing and provide final MSW processing site.

MoE have responsibility to develop regulation and guidelines under the Law No. 18/2008 regarding MSW management, i.e. g g g ,

1. Government Regulation (formulating) --- public consultation and ministries discussion.

2. 3R Mapping guideline

3. 3R Implementation guideline

4. Practical guidance for MSW separation (cooperation with JICA)g p ( p )

5. 3R National Policy and Strategy (Revise)

6. Others (exp. EPR implementation)

MoE had pilot project to implement MSW management, i.e:

1. Implementation medium scale composting at Jombang (East Java), Singaparna p p g g ( ) g p(West Java) and Magelang (Central Java), (2007)

- There were three composting site for each city

- Capacity of composting facilities is 36 m3/day.

2. Implementation medium scale composting at Ciroyom Bandung (2006).

- especially for composting organic waste from traditional market

Evaluation:

1. Lack of commitment to implementation the project

2. Limited human resources and knowledge about compostingg p g

3. Limited budget allocation for composting

4. Limited land space for composting area

5 Lack of integrated sustainable MSW management plan5. Lack of integrated sustainable MSW management plan

6. Lack of assistance and monitoring

Global Environment Facility for Western Java Environmental Management Project (GEF-WJEMP) Budget: compost subsidy to support local government on MSW ( ) g p y pp gmanagement.

WJEMP APL (Adoptable Program Loan) 1 2004-2006 ----- especially for West Java, DKI Jakarta and Banten

Trigger : 200 ton compost/day.

45 producer (big scale, middle scale and small scale) had assistance at that period.

Evaluation:1. Technical Aspecta. Most of the compost producers were facing shortage of raw materials, especially

when they are dependent on market wastes. In some cases, it was found that producers must pay to obtain market waste as raw materials.

b. Some producers had not built properly building for composting process.c Some producers have not prepared that site properly for composting processc. Some producers have not prepared that site properly for composting process.d. There are no or very few efforts in the arrangement of the plant layout. This may

raise social and environmental problems as the composting plant often looks like a waste dumping site, without proper and sound environmental management.

2. Marketing and Management Aspectg g p

a. The market for compost has not developed as quickly as the production of compost.

b. The lack of a marketing strategy and planning by the producers has caused them to only concentrate on selling the compost, rather than having a comprehensive and y g p , g psustainable plan. In fact, most of compost producers do not have a business plan, lack of innovation in marketing strategy, and lack of product diversification.

c. The marketing of compost was done separately by each of the producers. There was d t lit d t d ino product quality and standar price

d. The administration of the producers marketing was not well performed, therefore the monitoring of their marketing and sale of compost can not be easily and straightforwardly carried outstraightforwardly carried out

e. However, the problems are not uniform in all of the project area. In fact, some producers have access to markets and regular buyers. In some cases, they are struggling in keeping up with the demand. Thus, a market information system must gg g p g p , ybe established, provided that the producers are willing to cooperate one another.

3 Social Aspect3. Social Aspect

Transportation compost material made some nuisance for community.

Community perception about the composting plants were similar to waste dumping site without proper and sound environmental management This maydumping site, without proper and sound environmental management. This may stimulate public resistance towards the composting plant process.

Increasing concern towards the health and safety issues on composting plant workers.

ADIPURA Program is one of program priorities in the MoE the Republic of Indonesia. This program has been implemented since year 1986. During economic crisis in p g p y g1997-2001, this program was discontinued. ADIPURA Program starts to be implemented again in year 2002 with new mechanism.

ADIPURA Program activities are to evaluate local governments’ performances inADIPURA Program activities are to evaluate local governments performances in urban environmental management and to increase local government’s capacity in environmentally sustainable urban development.

The aim of ADIPURA Program is to enhance local government in urban environmental management, especially in cleanliness and greenery the city. One of activities this program is to monitor and evaluate each city on cleanliness and greenery management The award will be given by the President for the cities thatgreenery management. The award will be given by the President for the cities that are success in achieving the cleanliness and greenery management compare to other cities.

Adipura Program Monitoring involved MoE Regional Office, local government (Province Level), University and NGO.

ADIPURA

Management/Performance gDocument

Performance

Settlement area: medium, small and tidal

City Facilities:RoadTraditional Market

Commercial areaOffice areaSchool area

Institution Community Participation

Management

School areaHospitalGreen area

Transportation Facility AreaBus and train Station

PlanningActionControl

EducationMass MediaCommunity

InstitutionalRegulation

BudgetFacilities

Harbor

River area, lake area

Cleanness FacilityFinal Waste Treatment Site

FacilitiesWaste

Management

Final Waste Treatment SiteMSW SegregationMSW Processing : Compost

Beach area

MoE have activity to compost monitoring at 26 cities (Metropolitan City and Big City) for once a year to support Adipura Program. This monitoring start on 2010 and will y pp p g gcontinuing for next year.

The objectives of compost monitoring are to get information about sustainable j p g gcomposting process and to collect data, how much compost had produced by each cities.

Monitoring activity involved MoE Regional Office, BPPT, University and NGO.

Balikpapan

Bandung

Balikpapan (0.51%)Bandar LampungBanjarmasin 0 06% 0 53%

Bekasi

Depok

0.51%0 82%

j

Batam

Bogor1.40%

0 06%

0.03%

0.02%0.39%

0.06%

0.47%

0.53% Jakarta Barat

Jakarta Pusat (0.11%)Jakarta Selatan0

0.56%0.10%

0.05%

0.82%

Denpasar

Malang

1.46%

3 45%

0.06% Jakarta Selatan

Jakarta Timur

Jakarta Utara0.06%

0.03%0.13%0.56%0.12%

0.55% Padang

Pekanbaru

1.15%0.23%

0 11%

3.45%

Makassar (0.03%)

Medan

Samarinda

Surakarta

0.11%0.50% Palembang (0.39%)

Semarang

Yogyakarta Surabaya

Tangerang

- Title : Capacity Development of 3R and MSW Management SystemTitle : Capacity Development of 3R and MSW Management System

- Output :

1. Formulation of draft ministerial regulations

2 Preparation of guideline for the local governments to formulate the local2. Preparation of guideline for the local governments to formulate the local government regulations

3. Formulation of National Policy and Strategy

4. Establishment of National MSW Statistics System4. Establishment of National MSW Statistics System

5. Development of MSW Management and 3R models in accordance with the MSW Management law

- Duration : 5 years (tbc)y ( )

- Pilot Project Location : Palembang and Surabaya (tbc)

1. Lack of understanding about Law No. 18/20081. Lack of understanding about Law No. 18/2008

2. Developing regulation under the Law 18/2008 is still on process

3. Developing policy and strategy of MSW management is still on process

4 Lack of commitment on MSW management4. Lack of commitment on MSW management

5. Lack of plan of sustainable MSW management

6. Lack of HRD on MSW management

7 Lack of intensive coordination between central and local government7. Lack of intensive coordination between central and local government

8. Lack of technology innovation for MSW treatment

9. Lack of knowledge about MSW treatment and lack of community awareness to MSW reduce and separationMSW reduce and separation

10. Lack of cooperation between local government, business sector, university and community.

11 Budget allocation for MSW management still not enough11. Budget allocation for MSW management still not enough

Enhance strong commitment on MSW management especially composting implementation.

D l i t t d MSW t lDevelop integrated MSW management plan.

Intensive coordination is very important.

Develop sharing of role and responsibility.

Develop MSW management forum or 3R forum

Increasing capacity building and HRD for central government, local government, business sector and community

I i ti b t l l t b i t i it dIncreasing cooperation between local government, business sector, university and community.

Develop MSW treatment technology for big capacity

D l bl t h lDevelop useable technology

Increasing budget allocation for MSW management

Change community lifestyle through campaign and education

D l t d d d k t f i t tiDevelop standard and market for organic waste composting

Develop use of organic waste composting for agriculture activities

MINISTER

ORGANIZATION CHART

Inspectorat Bureau for General Affairs

Assistant Minister for Global Environmental

Affair and International Cooperation

Secretary to The Ministry Assistant Minister for Sustainable

Development and Technology

Assistant Minister for Law and Interelation Between Institutions

Assistant Minister for Cultural Social and

Partnership

Assistant Minister for Economy and Poverty

Line

Bureau for PlannBureau for Law & PR International Coo

Deputy VII Deputy for Capacity Building & Technical

Infrastructure Development

Deputy VI Deputy for Community

Empowerment & Environmental Communication

Deputy V Deputy for

Environmental Compliance

Deputy IV Deputy for Hazardous

Toxic Waste Management & Domestic Waste

Management

Deputy III Deputy for

Environmental Destruction Control &

Climate Change

Deputy II Deputy for Pollution

Control

Deputy I Deputy for Spatial

Environment Management

Management

Assistant Deputy for Waste Management

Ecoregional Center For Environmental Management • Sumatera • Jawa • Kalimantan

g

• Kalimantan • Bali-Nusa Tenggara • Sulawesi-Maluku-Papua

Assistant Deputy for Waste Management

Division of Waste Recycle and Reuse

Division of Waste Reduction

Sub Division of Program D l t

Sub Division of Program Development

S b Di i i fb f

Development

Development

Sub Division of Technical Assistant

Sub Division of Technical Assistant

Fungsional