1. 2 contents aim: why this work? probabilistic design some results conclusions
TRANSCRIPT
1
2
Contents
• Aim: why this work?
• Probabilistic design
• Some results
• Conclusions
3
Why this work? (1)
Cost [ct/kWh] Wind Conventional
Generation 4-7 4
External (environment)
0 2-7
TOTAL 4-7 6-11
4
Why this work? (2)
Cost [ct/kWh] Wind Conventional
Generation 4-7 4
External (environment)
0 2-7
Financing (economic life)
3-6(10 years)
0(40 years)
TOTAL 7-13 6-11
5
Why this work (3)
• For wind to make a breakthrough (?):• Generation cost must be brought down• Financing cost must be brought down, one way is to
reduce uncertainty
• So:• Wind turbines should be exactly as heavy as necessary,
but no heavier• The failure probability must be known
6
Objectives
1. Given target failure rate, find a set of optimal partial safety factors, giving minimum weight safe design. Factors may be for:1. loads2. modelling3. material properties
2. Better insight in uncertainties in calculation methods1. improved risk assessment2. most important uncertainty
3. Because of time constraints, work is limited to fatigue of the structure, ultimate loads are not considered.
7
Minimum weight design
• How large γf and γm must be is determined by probabilistic considerations: which failure probability is allowed?
SR
fm
8
Which failure probability is allowed?
• Failure is not an option.• Gene Kranz, during the rescue of the Apollo 13, 1969.
• Failure is an option, we just don’t want it to happen very often.• Dick Veldkamp, 2006.
• How often may be set by public safety considerations or by economic optimisation.
9
Economically optimal safety factor
10
Probabilistic design: example
• Tower
• For simplicity, think of two stochastic parameters:• Wind load• Tower strength
• Monte Carlo-method
11
Tower failure
12
Experiment: 100.000 times
1. Build a turbine
2. Measure wind loadand tower strength
3. Result (failure yes/no)
Failure probability
2. Simulate wind load and tower strength by
Monte Carlo analysis‘throwing dice’
1. Design a turbine
13
Monte Carlo analysis: draw from distributions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Fai
lure
pro
bab
ilit
y [%
]
Strength R
Load S
X
XY
Y
14
Tower failure probability
0.E+00
2.E-05
4.E-05
6.E-05
8.E-05
1.E-04
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Life [year]
Cu
mu
lati
ve
fa
liu
re p
orb
ab
ilit
y [
-]
U=8.0 m/s U=8.5 m/s U=9.0 m/s U=8.5 m/s, COV_U doubled
15
Back to the real life problem
• We have designed a turbine, but it is not known exactly in which conditions it can hold, because of:• Aerodynamic model uncertainty • Errors in FEM• Variation in fatigue strength• …
• When the turbine is put up there are more uncertainties:• The actual conditions (wind speed, turbulence, inflow
angle, wind shear, wake effects, …)• The actual turbine (eigenfrequencies, geometry, …)• Fatigue life under variable loading (Palmgren-Miner sum)• …
• Establish distributions, and find the failure probability
16
Back to the real life problem
• We have designed a turbine, but it is not known exactly in which conditions it can hold, because of:• Aerodynamic model uncertainty• Errors in FEM• Variation in fatigue strength• …
• When the turbine is put up there are more uncertainties:• The actual conditions (wind speed, turbulence, inflow
angle, wind shear, wake effects, …)• The actual turbine (eigenfrequencies, geometry, …)• Fatigue life under variable loading (Palmgren-Miner sum)• …
• Establish distributions, and find the failure probability
17
Fatigue strength & life prediction
VA
18
Base case
• IEC class 2 design, IEC class 2 site
• U_design = U_site = 8.5 m/s at hub height
• TI_design=18%, TI_site=16% + 2% for windfarm wakes
• Wind spectrum: G_design=3.9 (Kaimal), G_site=3
19
Annual failure probability
20
Probabilistic design: variation in Z(x) = R(x) – S(x)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Resistance Load Z = R - S
R
S
Z=R-S
21
Distribution of variation in limit state function Z(x)
22
Economically optimal safety factors
Component Blade Hub Nacelle Tower
StandardSafety factor
1.50 1.38 1.38 1.27
Standard cost(turbine)
1.00 1.01 1.06 1.32
Cost optimal safety factor
1.29 1.72 1.99 1.86
New cost(turbine)
1.00 1.00 1.01 1.02
23
Conclusions & to do
1. Based on best available knowledge, safety factors smaller for blades, larger for hub, nacelle, tower (but there is hidden safety!)
2. Greatest uncertainty in fatigue strength and fatigue life prediction, so more research necessary on turbine specific materials
3. Extend the method to ultimate loads
4. Fix target failure probability and use this for design
24
Questions?