1 15 years of re market transition in pl - boom, bust or both? european property institute (pl) ...
TRANSCRIPT
1
15 years of RE Market Transition in PL -boom, bust or both?
European Property Institute (PL)www.ein-epi.eu
15th Annual ERES Conference
Krakow, June 18-21, 2008
2
The European Property Institute (EPI)
Polish Foundation - an independent think tank;
Established 2006 with offices in Warsaw and Kraków
Mission - foster European East-West real property integration;
Modality - exchange of knowledge and experience in real estate;
Activities - promoting better market data, conducting research and trend analyses of
selected segments of the real estate sector;
Pan-European target - work towards creating a cohesive and accessible European system
of information and database covering real estate markets;
Key challenge - initiating and cooperating in activities supporting European integration in
property sector’s institutions building and policy making;
Recent projects - publishing best-selling professional books and manuals; enhancing the
skills of domestic real estate professions.
3
Macroeonomic Revolution Macroeonomic Revolution Shock therapy - biting the bullet
Stabilization - market prices would tell us the truth Free prices showed real shortages / surpluses (misallocations) Free trade helped reduce shortages and export surpluses Positive real interest rates stimulated savings Stable / exchangable currency allowed to transact in PLN
Restructuring - change the way of producing / allocating Reallocation of resources to improve production efficiency Self-financing of State owned enterprises Privatization and restitution - property rights system Financial / capital markets to facilitate competition for resources
Stimulation - produce more with less Taxation reforms - to encourage more economic activity Labor market reforms - to increase labor supply Inflation prevention by monetary policy
Biting the bullet worked - economy started growing 1993
4
Inherited Profound Land MisallocationsMarket prices revealed inefficiencies of urban land use
Spatial misallocations - urban dispersion and sprawl # Many „empty runs” of expensive infrastructure Excessive energy / environmental costs Very expensive for local governments to maintain
Functional misallocations - grossly wrong proportions Too much industrial and agricultural land allocations # Not enough commercial and residential land allocations
Locational misallocations - inverted density gradient # Valuable land used for low-density functions Inexpensive land used for high-density functions
User misallocations - inefficient users sit on valuable land Administrative land allocation based on merit, not competition No land-use succession and recycling for 50 years
Inefficient land use compromises urban productivity
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45 St. Petersburg
Moscow
Cracow
New York
Paris
Seoul
Curitiba
Hong Kong
Seattle
Share (%)of Industrial Land in Urban Areas
8
Mispricing of Real Estate Resources Free land and cheap housing utopia
Land had no value
Capital carried no interest
Energy price did not reflect true cost
Location did not matter in prices and rents
Housing was built and allocated as merit good
Resources were diverted to industry and housing
Taxation of inefficient land use did not exist
Massive reallocation requires active market repricing
9
Reform Directions and EffortsLearning to pay what it costs
Land is a capital and housing is a commodity - the Market Market needs clear / strong property rights Market needs efficient trading mechanism Market needs accessible / reliable information Market needs affordable credit system Market needs cost-recovery asset maintenance Market needs stable rules of the game Government needs to protect public interest Government needs market to produce the right product Government needs to help those who need it Enable the market + protect public interest = Big Challenge
10
Legal / Regulatory TransitionFundamentals of property rights
Constitution to recognize / protect private property rights
Civil Code to define real property rights Full ownership rights - freehold Polish Civil Code defines „assets” as ownership and other property
rights
The Real Estate Management Act of 21 August 1997 Real estate management
11
Legal / Regulatory TransitionAttaching / trading property rights
Preliminary contract – final contract
(down payment, earnest money deposit)
Notary public of 14 February 1991
Structure of land and mortgage registers of 6 July 1982
12
Legal / Regulatory TransitionReconciling public-private interests
Legacy of socialist urban planning and spot zoning: State (not local) deterministic monopoly over what is to be where Spot zoning with predetermined exact land use categories
Reforming spatial management during the transition: Planning Act of 1984 lasted till 1995 - new laws 1994, 2003, ??? New Study of conditions and directions of spatial development Old spot-zoning plans lasted till 2002/03 – new local plans on 20% of lands Planning permissions (WZ decisions) and building permits overly complex
Current thinking on planning and building permitting: Dilemma - fine tuning of existing law or revolutionary new law New gov’t effort to simplify planning and limit building permitting
Passive PPP through perpetual usufruct (land leaseholds) Active PPP through joint ventures and long-term leasing Harmonizing public and private interests remains suboptimal
13
Legal / Regulatory TransitionLicensing and taxing for the public interest
Regulating real estate professions Valuers / appraisers Property managers Brokers / agents
Taxing property to mobilize local revenues Recurrent property taxes Transfer taxes on real estate Gift and inheritance taxes
14
Transition of Residential MarketsFocus on demand support rather than on real supply forces
All successive governments in Poland focused on housing affordability: tax credits for purchase of new housing;
mortgage interest deduction from taxable income; and
housing finance skills and institutions to develop mortgage sector.
Supply of new housing has shrank because of hyperinflation, lack of financing and lack of developers …
… because – contrary to almost all other sectors of economy - here was nothing to be privatized in this sector !
Neglected supply side haunts policy makers today
15
Transition of Residential Markets Growth of indvidual investors and developers
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
units
co
mpl
eted
('0
00)
CO-OPS DEVELOPERS INDIVIDUALS OTHER
Źródło: GUS
16
Transition of Residential Markets Surprising first market downturn
0
50 000
100 000
150 000
200 000
250 000
300 000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
mie
szka
nia/
dom
y
Permits Starts Completions
Źródło: GUS
17
Transition of Residential MarketsMortgage-leveraged quantum leap
0
20
40
60
80
100
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
18
Transition of Residential MarketsMarket boom upon EU accession
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
7.000
8.000
9.000
10.000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 1Q 2007 2Q 2007 3Q 2007 4Q 2007
PLN/sqm
Trójmiasto
Kraków
Warszawa
Źródło: REAS
Transition of Residential MarketsDeclining cash-based affordability raises concerns
Index Affordability Index: Salary/Price per sqm.
0,30
0,50
0,70
0,90
1,10
0,89 0,86 0,80 0,81 0,79 0,55 0,45 0,39 0,40
Warsaw 0,92 0,89 0,91 0,88 0,76 0,63 0,49 0,43 0,44
Tri-City 1,05 1,01 1,03 1,08 0,97 0,8 0,52 0,48 0,44
0,85 0,88 0,89 0,81 0,84 0,6 0,37 0,35 0,39
0,89 0,89 0,83 0,82 0,57 0,54 0,44 0,42
Krakow 0,73 0,76 0,78 0,71 0,59 0,37 0,4 0,37 0,37
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 I kw. 2007 II kw. 2007 III kw. 2007
Źródło: REAS 19
20
Transition of Residential MarketsNeither boom nor bust - current market suspension
0
5.000
10.000
15.000
20.000
25.000
30.000
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Supply Demand
Źródło: REAS
22
Thank you for your keen attention
EUROPEAN PROPERTY INSTITUTE ul. Srebrna 16, 00-810 Warsaw, POLAND
tel. +48 (22) 620 45 84fax. +48 (22) 620 62 89
[email protected] www.ein-epi.eu