Village of Shorewood HillsBoard of Trustees Special Meeting

Draft MinutesTuesday, July 26, 2016 7:00 p.m,

1. Call to Order Village President Mark Sundquist called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

2. Roll Call Members of the Board present were Mr. Sundquist and Trustees David Benforado,Anne Readel, John Imes, and Felice Borisy-Rudin. Mark Lederer and Fred Wade were excused.Also in attendance were Village Treasurer Sean Cote, Village Administrator Karl Frantz,Department of Public Works Chief John Mitmoen and Village Clerk Cokie Albrecht . One visitorwas in the audience.

3. Statement of Public Notice Mr. Frantz confirmed the meeting had been properly posted andnoticed.

4. Procedures Orientation There was none this evening.

5. Appearances and Communications There were none this evening.

6. Board MattersA. New Business Resolutions and Motionsi) Consider awarding bid for Oxford Road resurfacing projectVillage Engineer Brian Berquist recommended the award of the contract to the low bidder, WolfPaving and Excavating. Mr. Benforado moved and Ms. Borisy-Rudin seconded a motion to awardthe Oxford Road resurfacing contract, including the Base Bid plus the Supplemental Bid, to WolfPaving and Excavating. By Board consensus, the motion was amended to include a 10%contingency, at a cost of $5,088. Motion passed unanimously.

Closed Session At 7:05 p.m., Mr. Sundquist announced the Trustees would consider going intoClosed Session per §19.85(1)(g) to confer with legal counsel for the governmental body who isrendering oral or written advice concerning strategy to be adopted by the body with respect tolitigation in which it is or is likely to become involved and may reconvene to open session as perWisconsin State Statutes 19.85(2) to address any business that may be the result of thedeliberations made in closed session (concerning property tax litigation brought by WalgreenCo.). The roll call vote was: Mr. Sundquist - yes; Mr. Benforado - yes; Mr. Imes - yes; Mr.Wade - yes; and Ms. Readel- yes. Village Counsel Meg Vergeront of Stafford Rosenbaum, Mr.Cote, Mr. Frantz and Ms. Albrecht were asked to stay. The remaining attendee left the meeting.

While in closed session the Trustees discussed the status of Walgreen Co.'s assessment objectionswith Village Counsel.

Open Session At 8:24 p.m. Mr. Sundquist said the Board will reconvene to Open Session. Theroll call vote was: Mr. Sundquist - yes; Mr. Benforado - yes; Mr. Imes - yes; Mr. Wade - yes;and Ms. Readel- yes.

7. Adjourn Meeting adjourned at 8:24 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

(j;a.../ c /I ~ It tA ¥0/il 7;1'1Colleen Boyle Albrecht, Village Clerk

10fl

Village of Shorewood HillsBoard of Trustees Meeting

Draft MinutesMonday, July 18,2016 7:00 p.m,

1. Call to Order Village President Mark Sundquist called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

2. Roll Call Members of the Board present were Mr. Sundquist and Trustees David Benforado,Fred Wade, Anne Readel, John Imes, Mark Lederer and Felice Borisy-Rudin. Also in attendancewere Village Administrator Karl Frantz, Department of Public Works Chief John Mitmoen,Police Chief Dennis Pine and Emergency Services Coordinator David Sykes. Village Clerk CokieAlbrecht listened to a recording of the meeting later. Twelve visitors were in the audience.

3. Statement of Public Notice Mr. Frantz confirmed the meeting had been properly posted andnoticed.

4. Procedures Orientation There was none this evening.

5. Appearances and Communicationsi) Will Clifton: Dementia Friendly Community Project and September 21, 2016 communityinput session Will Clifton, 1218 University Bay Drive, would like to see Shorewood Hillsbecome proactive in assisting residents with dementia. He and Mr. Benforado have organized aninput session to discuss ways the Village community-including the government, residents andbusinesses--can make the area more accommodating to neighbors with dementia. All arewelcome to attend the meeting on September 21,2016 from 7:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at VillageHall.ii) Marilyn Townsend Municipal Judge Marilyn Townsend, who is running for Dane CountyCircuit Court Judge, said she felt it appropriate to inform the Trustees of the open records requestshe received regarding the Shorewood Hills Municipal Court. She distributed her response to therequest.

6. Board MattersD. New Business Resolutions and Motions (agenda items taken out of order)i) Consider approval of special exception permit for building height at 3630 Lake MendotaDriveii) Consider approval of conditional use permit for addition at 3630 Lake Mendota DriveMr. Sundquist said the Plan Commission recommended approval of both permits for the projectproposed by owners Cary and Aviva Shlimovitz for their property at 3630 Lake Mendota Drive.Mr. Benforado moved and Ms. Readel seconded a motion to approve both the special exceptionpermit for height and conditional use permit for the addition at 3630 Lake Mendota Drive.Motion passed unanimously.A. Payment of Bills Mr. Frantz said that Village Treasurer Sean Cote had reviewed the bills andrecommended their payment. Mr. Benforado moved and Mr. Wade seconded a motion to approvethe payment of the end of June bills in the amount of $69,735.2 I and $112,901.02 for Julyexpenses, for a total of $182,636.23. Motion passed unanimously.B. Consent Agendai) June 27, 2016 regular and closed session Board minutesii) Street Use Permit - Run for Refugees on September 18,2016iii) Block Party Permit - Wellesley Road on September 5, 2016iv) Class B Beer and Class C Wine License - First Unitarian Society

10/6

Mr. Benforado moved and seconded Mr. Imes seconded a motion to approve the items on theConsent Agenda. Motion passed 6-0-1 with Mr. Lederer abstaining since he was absent from theJune 27, 2016 Board meeting.D. New Business Resolutions and Motionsiii) Consider authorization to bring storage building plans to bid ready status (agenda itemtaken out of order) Village Engineer Brian Berquist described the plans for the DPW cold storagebuilding proposed for construction on Old Middleton Road. The cost estimate for the projectvaried from a low of approximately $540,000 to a high of $600,000. After discussion the Trusteesrejected various options that may have decreased the anticipated cost: the clerestory windowswere left in the plans since they will provide light year-round and warmth in winter months; therewas no support for removing the large oak tree to allow relocation of the building on the site; asteel frame, rather than a less expensive timber frame, building will have a longer life and providemore usable vertical space; and the building's footprint was not reduced-there was agreementthe proposed size will meet the Village's storage needs. The cost to amortize the debt payment forthe new building over 20 years will be approximately $9,000/year more than the Village's currentrent for storage space. The bid document will include a flexible timeline in expectation that thatwill be attractive to contractors and result in lower bids. The Trustees asked the FinanceCommittee to consider the best method to finance the project if it is approved. Ms. Borisy-Rudinmoved and Mr. Benforado seconded a motion to instruct staff to prepare the bid document basedon the design as presented. Motion passed unanimously.C. Ordinancesi) Consider tabled third reading of an Ordinance L-2015-11 amending section 7.08(5)Parking, Stopping and Standing Regulated (weekend two-hour parking restrictions onMarshall Court)ii) Consider tabled second and possible third reading of an Ordinance L-2016-2 amendingsection 17.07(10)(b) ofthe Municipal Code regarding vicious dogsThe Trustees agreed to leave discussion of both Ordinance L-20 IS-II and L-2016-2 on the table.iii) Consider third reading of an Ordinance L-2016-5 changing the zoning classification ofproperty located at 2725-2801 Marshall Court from C-3 Medical Office CommercialDistrict to a Planned Unit Development district Architect Randy Bruce of Knothe Brucereviewed the plans for the mixed use building proposed by Stone House Development for theproperties at 2725, 2727 and 280 I Marshall Court. He detailed the changes made by thedeveloper to address concerns expressed by the Plan Commission and Board of Trustees: thedesign was revised to minimize the shadows on the Shackleton Square condos; a front courtyardwas included on the north side of one building; and the fourth floor was stepped back to open theMarshall Court streetscape. Stone House has also worked with its commercial tenants to increasethe off-street parking available to apartment residents and their guests. Village consultants JeffHeld of Strand Associates , Inc. and planners Scott Harrington and Mike Slavney of Vandewalleand Associates , Inc. responded to Trustee questions about the anticipated traffic, parking,financial and zoning impacts of the project. Mr. Benforado distributed a memo outlining histhoughts on the project and reviewed them with the Board. He asked that the memo be appendedto the meeting minutes . Mr. Benforado moved and Mr. Imes seconded a motion to waive the thirdreading and approve Ordinance L-2016-5 changing the zoning classification of property locatedat 2725-2801 Marshall Court from C-3 Medical Office Commercial District to a Planned UnitDevelopment district. The roll call vote was: Mr. Sundquist - yes; Ms. Borisy-Rudin - yes; Mr.Imes - yes; Mr. Wade - yes; Mr. Lederer - yes; Mr. Benforado - yes and Ms. Readel- yes.

8. Reports of Officials and Committees (agenda item taken out of order)B. Village Administrator Mr. Frantz said he had been approached by Paul Lenhart, the ownerof700 and 800 University Bay Drive, regarding the possibility of building a parking structure onMarshall Court.

20/6

6. New Business Resolutions and Motionsiv) Consider sanitary sewer rate adjustment and Purchase Treatment Adjustment Clause(pTAC) The Finance Committee recommended that the Trustees increase Village sewer rates by19%. Village auditor Vicki Hellenbrand of Baker Tilly advised that the rate changes arenecessary in response to recent 3 to 6% annual increases in Madison Metropolitan SewageDistrict (MMSD) charges and to service the debt incurred with the replacement of sewer mains inthe Village . The Committee further recommended that the Trustees adopt a PTAC which wouldallow the Village to pass through future MMSD rate increases to sewer utility customers. TheCommittee felt the Trustees should hold a public hearing to discuss the proposed rate changes.Unlike water rates, sewer rates are not controlled by the Public Service Commission (PSC}-therates are set at the discretion of the sewer utility. The Trustees agreed to schedule the publichearing for the next Board meeting on August 15, 2016.v) Consider submittal of new water rate case concerning increase in Public Fire Protectioncosts The Finance Committee recommended the Trustees authorize the filing of a second waterrate case with the PSC, asking for a revision of the Public Fire Protection fees included in therecently approved water rates. Mr. Wade moved and Ms. Readel seconded a motion to authorizethe hiring of Baker Tilly to file a rate case to address the Public Fire Protection issue. Byconsensus, the motion was revised to include, "at a cost not to exceed $1,000". Motion passedunanimously.vi) Resolution R-2016-8 indicating support for US 30 Bike Route Mr. Benforado moved andMr. Wade seconded a motion to approve Resolution R-2016-8. Motion passed unanimously.vii) Set date for brief special meeting to approve Oxford Road resurfacing bid The Trusteesagreed to meet on Tuesday, July 26,2016 at 7:00 p.m. to take action on the bid.viii) Set date for Village facilities work session Staff will send a doodle poll to the Trustees toidentify the best date to meet during the last two weeks in September.ix) Authorize purchase of police file server Ms. Borisy-Rudin moved and Mr. Benforadoseconded a motion to approve the purchase of new file server for the Police Department. Motionpassed unanimously.E. Appointmentsi) Win Sager to Golf Committeeii) Erik West to Waterfront CommitteeMr. Sundquist moved and Ms. Readel seconded a motion to approve the appointment of the twocommittee members. Motion passed unanimously.

7. Reports of Officials and CommitteesA. Village President The Trustees agreed to discuss the inclusion of four affordable units in TheBoulevard apartment building at the next Board meeting.B. Village Administrator Mr. Frantz thanked resident Craig Weinhold who donated a hollowtree for the nature-based playground at Post Farm Park.e. Personnel Committee The Committee continues to consider employee compensationinformation with the goal of formulating recommendations for 2017 wages .E. Plan Commission Mr. Benforado expressed appreciation for the zoning laws passed severalyears ago controlling development on Lake Mendota Drive-they have made the PlanCommission 's consideration of conditional use permits there clearer. The Commission isconsidering the regulation of the storage of recreation vehicles , boats, etc., in front/side yards .G. Services Committee The Committee discussed the feasibility of renovating the DPWBuilding and the Community Center.H. Public Health and Safety Committee The Committee discussed the results of the PoliceCommunity Listening Session.

30/6

M. Pool Committee The Committee would like to move ahead with repairs to the building or anew facility; it has no interest in utilizing the Community Center space.The remaining Committee chairpersons had nothing further to report.

Closed Session The Trustees did feel it necessary to go into closed session.

8. Adjourn Meeting adjourned at 10:07 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

ri({j~/l~Cf ~!DrJ(ld"Colleen Boyle AlbrechtVillage Clerk

40/6

Dave's 7/18/16 thoughts on Arbor IIProposal

1) If this is built, this will in all probability be the last major redevelopment proposal theVillage reacts to for many years. The Board , Plan Commission, Village residents andVillage staff/consultants have been studying , analyzing, planning for and discussing addingapartments for many years. The Board and Plan Commission held a special joint meeting inthis room on April 28, 2015, to discuss this very matter; very well attended by residents; theoutcome was to stay the course.

2) Plan Commission recommendation: long process of consideration, many PC meetings,and the plans changed over the course of those meetings. Plan Commission recommendedit on 4/12/16 (6-1 vote).a) Two of the major issues were hgt and mass, both were scaled back, 4th fl tucked back

a bit (6-8 ft). I would have preferred that the final proposed hgt complied with the DoctorsPark Neighborhood Plan limits (46 ft.). However, I agree with the PC's finding based onScott Harrington/ Vandewalle's 2/29/16 letter that an exception (i.e. , allowing theadditional 2 ft. in hgt over the 46 ft limit) is merited because the developer submittedsubstantial proof that the economics for the bldgs only work at four stories. Also, theimpact of the additional 2 ft is small, as demonstrated by the shadow studies .

3) Responsive to both Village Comprehensive Plan and Doctors Park NeighborhoodPlan (see Mike SlavneyNandewalle letter dated 3/6/16 for detailed analysis):a) Good urban infill project. Increases density. An excellent location for apartments:

close to major employers (UW, UW Hospitals) ; near major thoroughfare, mass transitand bike path; close to grocery store, banks, retail commercial up and down Univ Ave.

b) Structured underground parking (replacing asphalt parking lots). Will improve thestormwater quality (Le. with existing surface parking lots, the stormwater collected all ofsurface contaminants that build up, e.g., dripping oil from vehicles, and conveys all ofthat to Lake Mendota vs. structured parking drains to sewer system where it is treated) .

c) Mixed use, retaining a long time Village business (Psychiatric Services), who is makinga substantial long-term commitment to staying in Village through a business condoarrangement with Stone House.

d) Increases the diversity of the Village's housing stock and options, addingapartments, townhomes; resulting in the Village population essentially returning to whereit was in 1960.

e) Based on our last two meetings, this project will include seven 3 BR affordableunits for 30 years (Le., attracting families to the Village), concluding our best efforts tohonor the VOSH/HUD reconciliation agreement.

f) Village infrastructure improvements:i) Allows the Village to complete the missing portion of east/west bike path .

Allows for readjustment of the lot line between Arbor II parcel and Univ Station parcelto improve/increase the parking on the east end of the Univ Station parking area.

ii) Allows the Village to complete Catafalque Dr. west and then north to connect withMarshall Ct.

iii) Allows the Village to continue the Marshall Ct. streetscape westward (consistentparking, sidewalks). Remember how dangerous Marshall Ct was for pedestriansbefore sidewalks!

iv) Allows the Village an additional financing method for a port ion of its contributionshare for upcoming planned Univ Ave reconstruction.

50/6

g) Increases the Village tax base six fold from $2.1M to $12.6M. (See ScottHarrington'Nandewalle's 7/15/16 memo to Board @ Table 1.)

h) Traffic and parking impacts studied (see Jeff Held/Strand's 3/1/16 letter which saysthat traffic impacts from all of the construction on Marshall Ct has fallen within the initialprojections): proposal parks itself; residential infill has less traffic impacts than retail orprofessional office space. And Stone House has fine-tuned its proposal to addressparking problems recently brought to our attention by residents (Le., adding guestparking in Arbor I and II).

i) Impact on Village services: past Village collected and observed data from otherapartment buildings in Village shows the impact will be nominal (see data collection1/1/14-12/31/14 and 1/1/15-6/25/15).

4) Developer financed TIF (DFTIF): Yet to be negotiated developer financed TIF . Or, in thealternative, DFTIF for Bldg #1 and Stone House expressed interest in applying for WHEDASec. 42 financing for Bldg #2 in 2017.

5) Stone House Development: a reputable developer who the Village has worked withpreviously and who has a positive track record in the Madison area. Stone Houserepresentatives have patiently worked with the Village and have addressed problems orconcerns where they could (e.g., they told us at our June Board meeting that in response toconcerns expressed by the Board that Arbor I lacked children area, that the common area ineach building could be used for children activities).

60/6

Village of Shorewood HillsNeighborhood Block Party Permit

Application Fee: $10.00

Permit No.:

l~ _3t-f

Event Organizer Information:

Name of Group: Contact Name : Gtt{[ )VlAA.....t facJ"\{c&Address : ~ -?-20 -CoepI ~ 1--R~ City/State/Zip : tvtacLI J@ VJ 2eYiVe(Home Phone : Cell Phone:£.,01- 2- \(, ""'±J '2cJ c;;-S-7c(;E-mail : {~?1A-t..sh. llt ( ) \tCf \It 00 . ( EJ-O:JEvent In formation:

Name of Event -fQ=-'(1~~~ -l' ( tW Wtl-'1' Bl iJ [t rzvr+Describe Event : --l?/ciLJL ~_Individual(s) in Charge of Event (must be present during entire event) / Phone # (cell # preferred) :1 PI. l <?- ~l V\.-- I to0 ()L: 2-l b r_'-( (2-0

~ C rl .P 2,-( vvv-e -r / 0() l' ~~2~~~ 8- '] t1c=

Location Re uested indicate street s) bein used below and on attached ma :

~f \A b icDl ~C ltv C4t==P-t\:b=lAJrt±-;Y=t'tr(; cl~_h. ;l=

O~\L WA~ ~ ~~e'~ g g''C--vk.-h~vJ l~

Date of Event:~ I l Oll It? Rain Date (if applicable):

Time of Event : Set-up : ' ) ;;> '. "3 <) Estimated Attendance: ...J.-~ _

Event Starts : q eEvent Ends : '7 Barricades r Cones Needed ? ,$f Yes D NoTake-down: '1 '· .72 'D -~ ~ .

Have the nearby residents been advised of this event? LI Yes prNo pt -t'CL<YL. ba..vy ~ LCl~Is there a plan to clean up the area after the event? 'KJ('Yes LI No CJ/VL> ( r.c ~b-( c.tic-«:

r LCL\t- 'j-C().~Th is perm it is subjec t to all ord inances, statutes and laws appro priate in addition to all rules and regulations detai led in this permit applicatio n instructions andguide lines. The person/group named in this appl icat ion will be respons ible for the con duct of the group and for the cond ition of the reser ved area. This permitis subje ct to all Municipal Ordin ances as defined by the Vill age of Shorew ood Hills. The applicant has attached all of the appropriate permit applications forthis even t.

CK. NO._--=~~ _DAlE__....;;.-L-I....L..:..l':::- _

o Approved 0 Denied

Print Form

Village Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Approved: SHPD: --l/b....<:Jloo~:::r--~~t.:..-- DPW:_+-J.~L-=",,~~~MrD: _

Denial recommended by: because -r'---- - - --- - - - --- --- -

Submitted to Village Board on: _

Signed: _

Gtt l e- QVlLUPrint Appl icant's Name

ICK. NO. ~.> l,DAlE '7 / {'1 / 20

Permit No.:

Village of Shorewood HillsNeighborhood Block Party Permit

AQl!lication Fee: $10.00

Event Organizer Information:

Name of Group: 5\j ' l\',Il Dr. nQ'/(\0[5 Contact Name:~~--=--+----=.....:..~~ _

Address : J til~ Fctqe\L'III Dr:Home Phone: ..j I\)A Cell Phone: --->-= --=-----'---'-"------'-''---"---- -

E-mail: V\ b'v\ cl\rcii-~ (0) C\tt", n-et'

I

Location Requested (indicate streetts) being used below and on attached map):

DateofEvent:~pl, ID - EtLt , Rain Date (ifapplicable): ' 'pl ll ~ 0Uf\ ·Time ofEvent: Set-up: 3 er-~~/\~ Estimated Attendance: _1.......·:...\0;(''-..' _- 50=--- _

Event Starts: ;q ~Vv\Event Ends: - tL"",M$",-,Vw.<\/4-' ---,-:- Barricades or Cones Needed? ~Yes D NoTake-down: D ~ ~ Cp ..;,..,JrV\'-'--__

Have the nearby residents been advised of this event?

Is there a plan to clean up the area after the event?

elYes CJ No

121 Yes CJ No

71J~ (}C/~I

Date

This permit is subject to all ordinances, statutes and laws appropriate in addition to all rules and regulations detailed in this permit application instructions andguidelines. The person/group named in this appl icat ion will be respons ible for theconduct of the group and for thecondition of the reserved area. This permitis subject to all Municipal Ordinances as defined by the Village of Shorewood Hills. The applicant hasattached all of the appropriate permit applications forthis event.

~{L\ lll"cH-,Print A plicant's Name

Approved: SHPD: ~'--i:lI'-'~~'r-L-....rr-=:'...L.>L.

Denial recommended by: _

Submitted to Village Board on: _

Signed: _

Village Clerk or Deputy Clerk

PHnt form

o Approved 0 Denied

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Village of Shorewood HillsSpecial Event Street Use Permit

Permit No.:

lfo-33 .

(certificate of insurance and/or an Emergency Action Plan may be required)

City/State/Zip: fYlaJ15,[5'1"'\ ; W \53105")

Phone during day: it? 0 8 o· 2-b\{, - \ Lo \Phone during event: (.,o~~ !21b - 0 ~R \Phone during day: b Cl ~ - 20 Y. ~ \ '2.,0 \

Phone during event: to 0 g; -~ '4 ~ I~ ,Charitable Event? DYes !.i.No

Is Organizer/Sponsor a 501(c)3 non-profit agency? gyes

If Yes, provide State ofWI Tax Exempt Number: ---==-__Address: \ \ 0 5 Sic oee U.h c.d Nv& .Primary Contact: Pro I) £}obe..e-mail: a.. e.-\rlbe ® ~o..A~& t>i1 1 )<..\2.. \/\1 ~ . \) C,

Secondary Contact: N C1 elL0 e 'B. e .\ 111 a c \t\R .Le-mail : t\re....\...1.CL(~...hLC@J mo..O.lso l\ \ '6-\ 2. W iAnnual Event? IXlYes DNo • U~

If Yes, name of charity to receiv- donations: _

Estimated Attendance: JDG _.~~.i

Event Category

D RunlWalk D Festival DMusic/Concert JtOther: S e..-h 00 L.--.....£i"'9f-/~e.......I:1--l-tl-------

Location Requested (indicate street(s) / park being used on attached map)

Street Name(s): Shf)Y'€ ,,'-'dQc! 8 11/&)

Park Name(s): _

-This permit is subject to all ordinances, statutes and laws appropriate in addition to all rules and regulations detailed in this permit application instructions andguidelines. The person/group named in this application will be responsible for the conduct of the group and for the condition of the reserved area. This permitis subject to all Municipal Ordinances as defined by the Village of Shorewood Hills. The applicant has attached all of the appropriate permit applications forthis event.

Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature Date

_ ______ because

Approved 0 Denied

Village Clerk or Deputy Clerk FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Print Form

For Office Use:Application given by ~....,..---;­Received by Zoning AdministratorFee received by ClerkZoning CertifiedFiled with ClerkReferred for StaffReview

Date DateReferred to Plan Comm/BoardPublic Hearing setDate Notices MailedPublic Hearing PublishedPublic Hearing HeldFinal Action

VJ1IIIge ofShorewood Hills810 Shorewood BoulevardMadison, WI 53705-2115(608) 267-2680 phone(608) 267-5929 fax

Date ofPetition: ?- -/2- 2 0 / 0

APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(A non-refundable $350 fee must accompany this application upon filing)

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

Receipt # _

The undersigned, being all the owners of the real property covered by this conditional use request herebypetition the Village ofShorewood Hills as follows:

1. Name and address of each owner. (please attach additional pages as necessary)

dArk JL,UEg 3 fe 96 LAKe &ddethl JA-,-vf

2. Name andaddress ofapplicant ifnot an owner. Describe interest in site (iftenancy, attach copyofcurrent lease):

3. Address of site: 3co 9' LAir dI'lJQ.fA ]2r;~

4. Tax parcel number of site: 0709 -/703 .... t2 (>01- 95. Accurate legal description of site (state lot, block and recorded subdivision or metes and bounds description)

(Attach copy ofowner's deed): Sir..r~""2 oC>J.-----..L~CJ........t__JI/~__JlgioL,tiL!'o=ek:IL!L..JIJL-- _

6. Present zoning classification: _...loG.r:.·:.........:..../ _

7. 7e:d~mtiOoal use: ~W;~1:L~~ t~·_+/4 Z ~~~cc;~ ~! & :jA~~~~_Jdd!

( ~

updated: 2/18115

9. Brief description of present USjOf site and each structure on site:;.5 lx'/ C-e~ck}.e.d

10. Brief description ofany proposed change~ of structures if request for condi;tnTi~ted(includechange in number of employees on site): c iuye /N fk u g' 0 -h J.cJ1$.

11. The following Jements have been made for serving the site with municipal sewer and water:do AfT~ 5 CA..~~ Neclj?A£1

12. Name, address, and tax parcel number ofthe owners ofeach parcel immediately adjacent to the boundaries ofthe site and'rz: within 200 feet including street and ailey right-of-way ofeach exterior boundary ofthesite: 1lw1 , ~ &riA-I' J'i,2? Lttj~ /L--'h. ]Ko/ ottD9 -1'13-00/2 -(0

13. A scale map or survey map must be attached showing the following:

a Location, boundaries, dimensions, uses, and size ofthe site and structures and its relationship to adjoiningIands.

b. The approximate location of existing structures on the site, easements, streets, alleys, off street parking,loading areas and driveways, highway access and access restrictions, existing street, side andrear yards,proposed surface drainage, grade elevations.

14. State in detail, the evidence indicating proof that the proposed conditional use shall conform to each of thestandards tor con?itional uses set forth in section 10-1-108 ofthe Vili~eZoning Code.~w z, NO' ' . . - $; V. r.

WHEREFORE, the undersigned property owners hereby state that the foregoing informationand all attachmentsto this Petition are true and correct to the best of our knowledge.

Dated this roO day of~1A( Y > 20-4-. 1l!!.t~l1u'('M4.-1,6.r ... "'Vp""'~J '-'"ll"'~

Property owner

I certify that that I have reviewed this application for completeness.

Date: Zoning Administrator. _

Updated: 2// 8/15

MIA~'MUMCML

DEVRDNIENJ • EHVIRONMfNDU.2901 Intemalional LaneMadison, WI53704

608-242-7179 1-800-446-0679 Fax: llO8-242-0664web Address: www.msa-ps.cam

• 1IISA~s..w-."

PROJECT NO.

DRAWN BY

C1£CKEDBY

FILE:

SHEETNO.

17229000

KClBlT

FIELDBOQl( NO.

PLAT OF SURVEY

t, KevIn C. Lord.Reglslered Land Surwyor So:Z 5•do hereby certi ly by lIle Older of Peter Brown . I haveSUMlyed and mopped the herein described propenyto the best 01rrrt knowledge and belief and lhat lhismapis a 1nIe and alI"J"ed represenlaIion thereof andIhat I haveCOIJ1lfied wiIh 'It'iscorS1 Adnrinistralive

CodeAE-7.

SHOREWOODSUBDNlSI0!i

LENG1lf37.10' (37.112&.33' (26.5')49.77' (501

LEGEND

9 FOUND'"1ROll PIPE

~ FO.N:l P!'fCHED P;I>E

o SET3M"BY1lI"IRONREIlARW£.QtI:(G 1 solBS lFT

(I RECORD INfOAMATION

1 ROCK RETAJ.WIG WALLE'ICROM:tES , 24' BEva«>PROI'£RlY LIE.

2 HQUSCCORNER ENCllCll'CHESC.3S BEYOND PROI'ERTY I.JI\E.

3 HOUSe CORHERENC:RO.'OES 0 14' ilEVONDPIlOl'ERIY UN;

.. PAVER SIOEW.A!..KENCJlQAC>ES 0 15' IlE'/ONl)I'Ra'BnY LINE

5 PAVERsmEWAI.KENCRQIOES 034"BEYONDPROPER1Y LINE.

CUENT:

PETER BROWN3696lAKE MENDOTA DRIVE

MADISON. WI53705

.' t .

-SURVEYOR'S SEAl'

BLACKHAWKCOUNTRY ClUB

\

\ lOT2.

\

\,\

\ PLAT.....c:~

\

\

BEARINGSBASEDONDANECQJHIY COORDP.lATE SVSTBI

o 2S s:rbrL-- !

.s:7ft

=__--..-1\~--...c&P

,

~~",0>

'" i<> ij""!"'! ~- -~ i:::J \g "

"JLOT 1 ~- ...

17.495 SF TO "lMEANDER UNE In

19.07tJ SF TOWATERS EDGE

EIlGEOFINA.,.,.

......-........"""-' rl&P ___

ROO<AET_-... _ ..L..-t::r'-

LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SHOREWOOD, VILLAGEOF SHOREWOOD HILLS, DANE COUNTY,WISCONSIN

Parcel Number - 181/0709-173-0001-9

Current

•Municipality Name

Parcel Description

Owner Name

Primary Address

Billing Address

Parc~1 ~~~rrt~1)'

; VILlAGE OF SHOREWOODHILLS

' SHOREWOOD LOT 1 BLOCK1

!TURNER REVTR

; 3696 LAKE MENDOTA DR

: 3696 LAKEMENDOTA DRMADISON WI 53705

Parcel Map

Assessment Year

Current Year Assessment2016

: Assessment Contact InformationFor questions or to schedule an appointment contact :

Sources: Esri. HERE, Delorme, lnterrnep,incr••

Current Year ~x'!.s.

Assessed Land Value ' Assessed Improvement Value

Valuation Classification

Assessment Acres

land Value

Improved Value

Total Value

AssessorPhoneEmail

G1

0.436

: $953.800.00

$607.200.00

$1.561,000.00

Assessment Contacts

ACCURATE APPRAISAL LlC920-749·8098INFO@ACCURATEASSESSOR.COM

5953,800.00

Taxes:

Lottery Credit(-):

; First Dollar Credit(-):

Specials(+):

Amount:

. $607,200.00

: Total Assessed Value

, $1,561,000.00

$34.109 .75

$126.86

$78.53

$0.00

, $33.904.36

ClerkPhoneEmail

COLLEEN ALBRECHT608-267-2680COKIE@SHOREWOOD·HILLS.ORG

Type

, REGULAR SCHOOL

TECHNICAL COLLEGE

State Code

3269

, 0400

Description

, MADISON METROSCHOOLDIST

. MADISONTECHCOLLEGE

METRO SEWERAGE ; 5150 SEWER

Open Book/Board Of Review Dates

Zoning InformationContact your local city or village office for municipal zoning information.

18

i Page

27423 36

16739

VolumeDoc. Type Date Recorded i Doc. Number-----' TRD 08/10/2015 517S156---- - -----WD 07110/2002 3512471

• \AID ; 03/2511997 2840225

' WD 05/1311994 2601020

WD 0911011991 2289905

Board Of ReviewBoard of Review dates have passed for

, theyear

Open Book- Open Book dates have passed for the

year

Generated on7/19/201610:59:45 AMfor ParcelNumber: 070917300019

TRUSTEE"S DEED

Peter H. Brown and Gretmen Ie. Brown, or their sua:essot"S Intrust, as trustees under tbe Petler and Gretl:hen Brown JointRevocable TnIst dated May 30, 2000

for a valuable consideration conveys without warrantyto Mark S.Tumer and Jayne M. TDml!rr as TI1ISb!es of the TurnerRevocable Trust dated June 7, 2012

the following described real estate In Dane County, Stateof WISCOnsin:

Lot One (1), Block One (1), Shorewood, in I.tIeVillage ofShorewood Hills, Dane County, W'1SCOI'ISIn.

TaxParcel No. 181/0709-173-0001-9

This is homestead property.

ft"'RmulnJoint Revocable Trust dated May 30, 2000

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTState of Wisconsin

ss:authenticated this 5eventlt day of August,2015TITLE: MEMBER STATE BAR OFWISCDNSIN(If not, authorized by (4,6) 706.06, Wis.Stats)

lHIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BYPeter H. Brown and Gretdlen K. Brown

(SlgnabJres may be authenticated oracknowledged. Bothare not necessary.)

Dane CountyPersonallycamebefore methis Seventh dayof August, 2015 the above named Peter H.Brown, Trustee and Gretchen Ie. Brown,TnJStee to meknown to be the person(s) who

executed the foregoing Instrument and

~==e~sa=me..:::=::s:\:=- _

AleNo.: 2665115

If « , \.2.. L.e.v.e-,

,jI..---:: - . !2~o : -... ..j

'= ====:=:;::-.,;;.

Jl)~1Jl-A- N~W T "r! 1\1 FlLo r...,

,";

i'F -- -=- - -

.

II

)g.\\;\::-,.JV\- '-'I

~1:,nN&) :

/

i. : I I

~L{ =

Plan Commission Conditional Use Permit Review Lake MendotaDrive Projects 3696 Lake Mendota Drive August 15, 2016

The Plan Commission shall forward its written advisory recommendation to the Village Boardwithin ninety (90) days after receipt of the application from the Zoning Administrator. The PlanCommission shall recommend approval, approval subject to specified conditions, or denial. Arecommendation for denial shall include the reasons, including which standards contained in thePlan Commission review are found not to be met.

A conditional use shall be approved under this paragraph only if the applicantdemonstrates by clear and convincing evidence the following:

1. Views of Lake Mendota from points off the lot on which the development or excavationproposed will not be adversely affected. There will be no adverse impact on views toLake Mendota

2. Erosion will not be increased. No increase

3. The flow of surface water will not be changed so as to adversely affect other lots, the lakeand other aspects of the natural environment. No adverse impact.

4. Infiltration of surface water into the ground will not be adversely effected. No adverseeffect.

5. Access to properties and structures by firefighters and other emergency personnel will notbe adversely effected: No adverse effect.

The Plan Commission shall review the application according to the standards below. Noapplication shall be recommended for approval by the Plan Commission unless it finds thatthe following conditions are met:

1. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional use will not bedetrimental to or endanger the public health, safety , morals , comfort or generalwelfare.

Finding: No detrimental effect.

2. That the uses, values and enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood forpurposes already permitted shall be in no foreseeable manner substantially impaired

1

or diminished by the establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional useand the proposed use is compatible with the use of adjacent land.

Finding: No substantial impairment or diminishment. The use is compatible with adjacentuses.

3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal andorderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for usespermitted in the district, and will not be contrary to an adopted comprehensive planofthe Village.

Finding: Will not impede the normal and orderly development ofsurrounding property.

4. That adequate utilities , access roads, drainage and other necessary siteimprovements have been, are being or will be provided.

Finding: Adequate.

5. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional use is unlikelyto increase the level of traffic congestion or reduce the level of safety at any pointon the public streets.

Finding: No increase in traffic or reduction in safety.

6. That the conditional use shall conform to all applicable regulations of the district inwhich it is located.

Finding: Conforms.

7. That the conditional use does not violate flood plain regulations governing the site.

Finding: Project is not in a flood plain.

2

8. That, when applying the above standards to any new construction of a building, oran addition to an existing building, the Plan Commission and Board shall bear inmind the statement ofpurpose for the zoning district such that the proposedbuilding or addition at its location does not defeat the purposes and objectives ofthe zoning district.

Finding: Does not defeat purposes and objectives ofzoning district.

The Plan Commission shall also evaluate the effect of the proposed conditional useupon:

• The maintenance of safe and healthful conditions.

Finding: Maintained.

The prevention and control of water pollution including sedimentation.

Finding: n/a

• Existing topographic and drainage features and vegetative cover on the site.

Finding: There should not be a detrimental effect.

• The location of the site with respect to floodplains and floodways of rivers andstreams.

Finding: Not applicable.

3

• The erosion potential of the site based upon degree and direction of slope, soil typeand vegetative cover.

Finding: Should not be an increase in erosion potential.

• The location of the site with respect to existing or future access roads .

Finding: Not applicable.

• The need of the proposed use for a shoreland location.

Finding: This is an aleration to a single family home that is a permitted use in this shorelandlocation.

• Its compatibility with uses on adjacent land.

Finding: This is a single family home adjacent to other single family homes.

• Any other requirements necessary to fulfill the purpose and intent of the ZoningCode of the Village of Shorewood Hills conditions required: Outside lighting shallcomply with dark sky ordinance, stormwater, erosion control ordinances andnoise regulations during construction.

4

"'_ ?1I,..= ::~

§~... ;:.-: =-

.- i '::.

•~oSQ)

~

PROPOSED ARBOR / PERGOLASTONE PIERS & RAILING

'--. SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION> SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

NEW EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES

PROPOSED ARBOR / PERGOLA

LJPROVIDE & iNSTAll NEWOVERHEAD DOOR

I

0::: SIDING MODIFICATIONSn , 0'- -~y- ADDITIONAL STONE WORK

~I / ./

~.~

~ ~ :---

~ ~~fEE8./"~ ~~"'-..,'./ ~~ ~

~rL:~ @~~ :-L- ~ ~ I~~ I' ~

REPLACEFRONT ENTRYDOOR & SIDELIGHTS

l--_ _ PROPOSED ARBOR / PERGOLASTONE PIERS & RAILING

--~-.......

l­I-

~

II ~

/

'llU

I'l

(6) PROPOSED~Il- I-

STONE PIERS l- I-I-

~AROUND EXISTING I~

IEDECK POSTS .-- -

I :::J~ A2

"1. ', :

./

nt= ~! ' 1= :=I f.:--f-

====

'~_-' 1 // WITH LARGER UNITS

IIillI~ uu ··~

"=--- - - - ~ --

NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION

- - ......

§1-

§

== --

•

s-,.,

A3

I- --

I

I= -=

m

m- . .~~... ..~. . ;.~iIJJIDI: : - ' ·

EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION ~~-_ . _;~ - . ' .- _ . -- ~ -~-

SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-0"

--

~==

•'--

PROPOSED ARBOR / PERGOLA

__/ SCALE: 1/4" 1'-0"

:1,.•. , ;.

~

~-,:--:-- l!:- ~ ~

r

~-:--S i:.- -- x...- " '"- ::...-....- s~'r: -- ;- ,

S LC-e-- :::

'-' -;..

.. c

";... E ~

~ if.'-'

'",- s- :-.1 c

y. .::- -:.:;

•"'00

SCl)

0::;

Cl)C,)

~Cl) ~

"'0 ~~

.~ ;;taCl) ~

0::; ~

~~

~r-

~ ~-'I~ <::l

~--.... ", " ..~ C'J

::;; ~

0:::

~ ::::

':';:0

~.5-

'".,.. ::

~ ~E~ ::J-

:;C:ae; "/2· • ••..n·

3h~i

A5

- -=---

o

----...

/ 2" SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION5 / SCALE: 1/2" =1'-0"

~F --. -=-

I~

ALL TIMBER MEMBERS ARE TO BESELECT CEDAR WHICH IS TO REMAIN UNFINISHED

.

IP CAP

U~) "

-a"

/- 2'-0"--/

... -' -~

- -:=- :::'-

II

"

== f----------~

-

I- -

.-=--

I---,jf- --l l-- H...---ll- ! H

- CEDAR ax12 WITH DECORATIVE END CUTS

~ CEDAR LINTELg-'" -

3 FRONT ENTRY PERGOLA 1ARBOR PLAN5./ SCALE: 1/2" =1'-0"

1 FRONT ENTRY PERGOLA 1ARBOR WEST ELEVATION5 SCALE: 1/2" =1'-0"

- ~ _ :...; ..

~~ " ...

. - 0]CONCRETE PIER CAPSWITH BEVEL

--=

I :I--- - - - - - - - - - - ---j

,/-- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - 22'-10" - -

- ---------------26'-1l "-------------- ---/

i!l....-...-

/- 2'-0" --/

- WELDED STEEL RAILING (TYP.)1-112" x 1-112" TOPAND BOTTOM RAILSWITH 1"x1" BALUSTERS

~..-

·-tl19'-0"- ...

o LINE OF ROOF OVERHANGz / - 21' 51"« - 4 -- CEDAR 2x4 LEDGER WITH ALUMIN UM DR:I: "= N LINE OF ROOF OVERHANG . - - (BEVEL TOP OF LEDGER TO SHED Me STa:: cow ;;,f) ..= '" EXISTING BRICK PAVER WALK"?u.. Co

'. 0 , , I "-, ,;. 0 ,CEDAR 2x6 ~ 16"~_C.

I IIa:: .,I I , , .u, ,

"0 I

W -, J:::zL U~L " L /Lzb Z

--' - . - _ !;-- ,__ ~-._ I ~ . __._ ___ _ _ ' __' I ~

~-'

' ~_~il----- -' - , -' - §: $==- L!-~-r----'c:::r- ('II - -/

,/ .t _ " l~ : ' - .: . , : - - - - , - - - - - _ . - -' ,

-

-e-vc- ::.

J,

:':'-,:... ~- J- l!:..- -e-

~~

.- ~ ~- x:... '" :::- ~c,

~- >.~:I:.-- .~I

0 .::, . ~'-' -;... "

~~ '",.. .:> ~

~ tr: ..- ~......~ E :'J

v: ~

•roo.-u

SQ)=~

~

Q)C,)

~Q) ~

r-roo ~cOO

.~ ,.,u:Q) rii

0:=-e~

:;;:

~ lD-:;

~1"-

z~-',o '

~~~~ OJ

.... -0

::c~::::

"",-=::-

~....:

"-to ::

~~ ::~..c:;

~:..

~ ...o1

., 2C 20"J4

'5e:1e /t" • ~'-J'

~~er

A6

EAST EXTERiOR ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"

27

- - - ---;....--1- - - -L-J1

PERGOLA LATTiCE MEiviBERS TO BECEDAR 2x4's RIPPED IN HALF ANDINSTALLED WITH 1-3 /4" DIM. BEINGVERTiCAL. SPACE APPROX . i 6" o.c

ALL TIMBER MEMBERS ARE TO BESELECT CEDAR WHICH IS TO REMAIN UNFINISHED

--- CEDAR 8x10 WITH DECORATIVE END CUTS

SIDE ENTRY PERGOLA / ARBOR PLANSCALE: 1/2" =1'-0"

~,

- CEDAR BRACKETS NOTCHED INTO 8x8 CEDAR POSTS

~===!_i==H-CEDAR LATTICE PANELS (6"x6" O.C. SLAT SPACING)

,CEDAR 2x6,~ 16" O,C.

--------'-- ---

r----·----'--------~: - ~~---' _ ' ~_ __J ._ --"- ~

i

,~ - ----"-

/ '--- - 5'-111" -- ----~ 2'-10" - -/

/ 9'-6" / ---:3=----=~~~.:....:....:-..:....:---:......::::..:--.::....::.....=..=-::...:......:-=-.:=-~~-=-.::......:-A 7~

7 ,

----

1 SIDE ENTRY PERGOLA / ARBOR SOUTH ELEVATION7 SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"

CEDAR LINTEL

._---

- -.- - --