07-12-07 samaan v zernik (sc087400) la superior court: transcript of attorney pasternak's ex parte...

8/14/2019 07-12-07 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) LA Superior Court: Transcript of Attorney Pasternak's Ex Parte Application i

1/28

Dr Z

Joseph H Zernik, DMD, PhDPO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; Fax: 801.998.0917; E-Mail: [email protected]

07-12-07 Ex parte proceeding by Atty David Pasternak at the Court of JudgePatricia Collins in

Santa Monica - Transcript *

Two ex parte proceedings were conducted in the morning of December 7, 2007, at therequest of Atty David Pasternak, in a row:

1) At the court of Judge Lisa Hart Cole at the Beverly Hills Courthouse

2) At the court of Judge Patricia Collins at the Santa Monica Courthouse

Such proceedings were seen as a high mark in alleged criminality: Atty David Pasternak didnot hesitate to file in court motions for order that were allegedly criminal on their faces:

1) Indemnity Agreement for future criminality for Mara Escrow ( a subsidiary of OldRepublic Title Insurance Holding Co.) to overcome refusal of escrow officer toparticipate in the scam.

2) Gag Order to prevent Defendant in pro se from Protected Speech in defense ofself, and to benefit to large financial institutions Mara Escrow and United Title Co.

3) Fraud Grant Deed Grant Deed were brought for purported court approval, whichwere later opined as Fraud by a highly decorated FBI veteran agent and FraudExpert.

4) Various abusive financial papers.

Enclosed is the Transcript of the first ex parte proceeding at the court of Judge Collins.

Of note

1) Judge Collins ignored a Disqualification for a Cause filed by Dr Joseph Zernik

2) Beyond Atty David Pasternak, who was present in person, Att MohammadKeshavarzi (Sheppard Mullin ) participated by phone.

3) A third attorney appeared and participated in the proceedings, but neither he, norAtty David Pasternak would divulge his name, or the name of his client! Much later itturned out to be Att Richard Ormond from (Buchalter Nemer) for Mara Escrow. Heattempted to participated in the proceedings incognito

Related papers that were posted online:

1) December 7, 2007 - Transcript from the court of Judge Lisa Hart-Cole.

2) December 7, 2007 moving papers by Atty David Pasternak

3) December 7, 2007 Peremptory Challenge papers filed by Dr Zernik against JudgeHart Cole.

__________* Another version of the transcript was also posted, which was presented by LA Sup Ct, deemed adulter

Digitally signed byJoseph H Zernik

DN: cn=Joseph H

Zernik, o, ou,email=jz12345@ear

thlink.net, c=USLocation: La Verne,

CaliforniaDate: 2010.01.24

02:36:54 -08'00'


2/28

Page 2/2 October 20, 2009

4) December 7, 2007 Disqualification for a Cause against Judge Collins filed by DrZernik.

5) December 7, 2007 Order signed by Judge Patricia Collins purportedly approvingAtty Pasternaks motion.

6) December 7, 2007 Grant Deed opinion letter of James Wedick of Fraud.

7) December 7, 2007 Minute Order by Judge Hart-Cole purporting to record herrecusal.

8) December 7, 2007 Minute Order by Judge Hart-Cole documenting secretdisposal of the Minute Order recording the recusal.

9) December 7, 2007 Minute Order by Judge Collins purporting to document theproceedings.

10) December 7, 2007 - Register of Actions showing false registration by JudgePatricia Collins secretly disposing of her actions on that day.

Generally the proceedings demonstrate the typical conduct of Enterprise Track cases double or triple records are created. Similar conduct was the characteristic of theproceedings for jailing of Atty Richard Fine on March 4, 2009.

The significance of such double records is by the fact that they are intended for presentationto review courts. Therefore, the party, who is denied access to such secret records may filea petition, or an appeal, protesting judicial actions that were in serious violation of the law.Amazingly the review court would not find any fault in the case. The reason the reviewcourt was presented with the false records in which the actions were disposed.Needless to say the party is never informed that such records were secretly filed with thereview court.


3/28

1234

]=A6

JJDNJ

LC11

'

RSFR

/C1L'rCP:JTN,I'

rHPN BDSKL

L"22

'J

t

O "2SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF C A L ~ F O R N I A

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS A N G E ~ E SHOl\J. PATRICIA L . C O ~ ~ H : S , JUDGE

6 PLI"\J:NTIFF,

HY;;:::Pl! Z E ~ ~ I K ,

l 1

] 31 41 I,

REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGSFRIDAY, DECEMBF,R 'i , (17

1 'IL

1

24

2E

rOP r-';;:::CE 1 ER:

BY: MOE YESHAVARZI, ESQ.

IN PROPRIA PERSONA

BY: RI Cl-LI"\PD P. OP1'10N n. F,SO.BY: DAVID .r. R,I"\STEP\['1['(, 1:';:;Q.

~ A U R E N B. JONES, CSF NO. 70OFFICIAL REPORTER

12

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALlFORNIAFOR THE COUNTY OF LOS A N G E ~ E S

4D E P A P T M F : N ~ g

6 PLl"\lNTIFF,

H):;EP1! Z E ~ ~ I K ,

1 1

] 31 41 I,

REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGSFR I DAY, DECEMBER ~ l (17

16 rrEARAKCES:1 'IL

i UI '

BY: MOE YESHAVARZI, ESQ.

IN PROPRIA PERSONA

rOP RE:CEI ER:

,L.

,24

Lt

BY: RIC1-LI"\P[! P. ORfv10Nl', ESO.BY: 0 AVI D ~ R1"\ STEP\ !-\1'( , E:;Q.

~ A ' J R E : J B. J m ~ E S , C S NO. 7 0 1 - ~OFFICIAL REPORTER


4/28

1

1VCJE

3NC,IJ=PENTE

-8 :fH

(TVENRET0K

1]

1:1

( 1JNANZR

L[V

TRD

CAR

2N(T

2n,0rLNLCC21

3ti

C.;;5::: NUMBER:

SANTA M ON=CA, CA

P ~ ~ P O R ' ; ' E R :

SC087400

fRIDAY, D E C E ~ 1 B E R 1 2 , 2 0 0 'HON. PATRICL'\ L. COLL:NS, JU[)C:;ELAUREN B. JONES, CSR NO. 720 7! '1.H. SESSION

1

A ~ P E A R A N C E S :i ? L ! Tt\IT rr N I \! I E SAMAAN, REPRESENTE::J B'{ \I] ClKESHAVARZT, FSQ.; RICHARD P. O R ~ O N D , FSQ.

1

1

A ~ DAVID PASTERNAK, ON BEHALF OF THERECEIVER; AND THE DEFENDANT JOSfPH ZERNIK~ PROPRIA PFRSONA.)

TEEZ[RNICX.

URT: GOOD IV[ORNINC. (',::>

LET HE GET A P P E A R A ~ C E S .~ j l R . OR[Vl0ND: RICHAPD ORMOND, ON BEHl'd,F OF

j ! ' ~ . Pi\STERNlI.Y: DAVID PASTEPNAK, RFCErVER AND

MR. KESHAVARZI: MOE KESHAVAPZI, AND APOLOCIZE FOP2 3 IJ T BEl NG II J THE COURTPO0M, YO 'J RHO NOR .

THE COUPT: THIS ~ ~ A T T E P WAS ASSIGNED TO25 CC2CE COLE, AND THE PARTIES ALL APPEARED THERE THISTH:::N I B:::LIEVE THE DEFENDANT FILED A 170 .6 IN

WH=CH I THINK THE CASE WAS TRANSFEPRED ~ E R E .~ R KESHAVARZI: THAT IS CORRECT, YOUP HONOR.

1

3ti

-:J

c.;::;::: NUMBER:

SANTA MON=CA, CA

P ~ ~ P O R ' ; ' E R :

SC087400SAMAAN VS. ZERN:KfRIDAY, D E C E ~ 1 B E R 12,200'HON. PATRJCr/-". L. COLL:NS, JU[i(:;ELAUREN B. JONES, CSR NO. 720-7!'1.H. SESSION

1

i :='L/\ j t\1 T rT IJ I \! I E SAMAAN, REP RES ENTE::J B-{ \I] ClVEC'HAVARZI, FSQ.; RICHARD P. ORVJOtJD, F,SQ.

1Ie.

/j

A ~ DAVID PASTERNAK, ON BEHALF OF THEFECEIVER; AND THE DEFENDANT JOSfPH ZFRNIK~ ~ R O P R I A PERSONA.)

TEEZERNJCX.

URT: GOOD IVJORNINC. (',::>

LET ME GET A P P E A R A ~ C E S .1 , ,, III R. Cl R [VI0 N [ i : RICHAPD OFMOND, ON BEHP,J.F OF

TfJTFRESTF:) Pi\R;Y, RECEIVER, AND M O V I N C ~ ?,l\PTY.Ij!R. Pi\STERN,lI.r: DAVID PASTERNAK, RFCErVER AND

l iP. KESH),\'';PIFZ I : IVjOE I


5/28

2

T"L

3U4Mc

6MM:OU

TYI

1IVaRCEFNAMTL11ZM1M

I1DIIAYIrM1m

2M

/

?

22T2THE COeRT: I UNDERSTAND, FROM THE CLERK, THAT THE

2 PARTIES WERE ORDERED TO COME HERE FORTHWITH, AND I WAS3 G I V ~ N THAT INFORMATION AT ABOUT 10 :35 .

SO DO YOU KNOW WHAT TIME YOU WERE ACTUALLYs T ~ f O R M E D THAT YOU NEEDED TO HEAD OVER HERE?

MR. PASTERNAK: AT APPROXIMATELY THAT TIME, YOUR~ O N O R . MY RECOLLECTION IS ABOUT 20 TO 11:00 OR SO.

THE COURT: OK)"\Y.MR. ORMOND: ~ H A T ' S MY RECOLLECTION, AS WELL.MR. PASTERNAK: AND, YOUR HONOR, WE WENT DOWN THE

I ] ~ LGV}'\"TOR WIT } l tvlR. ZERN I CK, THE 0EFF: lJ uf\ t ]T, [ [J! IlE r-, Ti\TLLY12 A ~ T E R THAT, AND HE WAS COMPLAINING TO ME THAT - - AS HE1 HAn ': Cife} PI ,1"1, I NED TOT HE coURT THi \T THERE \0]AS IfJ!PRO PER14 N TICE o f THE MOVE IN THE EX PARTE, AND r T LD HIM THAT

1Til) UL0 ? R0= EED ,l'dW HE BETTERG ET 0 VER HE r ; E r-\ I GHTAWAY.1 ( THE COURT: O]\.L\), AND DID YOU 20TH DFI'JE HERE

MR. PASTERNAK: YES.MR. ORMOND: YES.THE COJPT: AND YOU BOTH ARRIVED HERE A HALF AN

21 HOU F A l ~ O OR LONGER?MR. ORMOND: LONGER FOR ME. ABOUT 40 M I N U ~ E S AGO.MR. Pl\STERNP\I


6/28


7/28

4

l-

rR

41111M '"

AS

8OC1

1RNLNI

AN

LN1"1W

'O1,

1OT1!VNVM{I H ~ : v l S F : ~ . f FROfvl THE CI'\SE. HE DID SO IN RESPO[;SE TO IVJY~ F I ~ ~ N G OF DISQUALIFICATION PAPERS AGA INST E:M ON, ~ NCVEt1BEF 26TH, 2007 . UPON REVIEW, THE CLlUMS I N C ~ l I D E D ,27 IN SUCH PAPERS CONTAINED TO OTHER CLAIMS, E .G . ,2 8 CO J R1" 0 RDERSIN S PlJ\tl'\,1'\N VS . ZERN I K , ,l\.N 0 IT ' S 0 E t: [M ED"


8/28

5

1"2M

iNM

5

6I

:AATHMO

1OR

:N1S1i"

IEPSGDTESED

1STMTRUVDHC

'"lJ

NLNM'vEERLTUEL

3

MM

NN"


9/28

6

2jM4

INt"

8DN'1VOOlPPTNM1DDR

EP

1G1NO1AM1C0

"OMN:1UH

L

2/:N77MM

2122T0RD

6

R E ~ E = V E R L A ~ K I N G ANY R E F E R E N ~ E TO CODE S E ~ T I O N2 ST=PULATING THE AUTHORITY. NO S E ~ ~ I O N S A ~ BOCNDARIES

or r ~ O t : l O u C T OF A RECEIVER AS DEFINED B'l =-'J'.>V'J, CLAIMING IT4 AS A RECEIVER APPOINTED FOR ESCROW, BY FAILING TO

I LUDE IN THE APPOINTMENT ANY -- OR REAL ESTATE

"7 " I GP,'JE YOU NOTICE OF S U C ~ ANC OTHER~ . n O N ERNS WELL : : : ~ i'lDV);NCE OF YOUR APPOIN';'MEN':', );N[) : ALSO

T"5!< T H A ~ YOU REMOVE F R m ~ 'fOUR" "FROlV] TH=S POS:::TION,-o R i'lPPOINTfv1ENT. YOU REFCSED TO DC SO. DPjv lAGE :3

1: R ~ S U L T E D FROM YOUR CONDUCT ARE SOARING, AND BY FARII EXCEEJ THE $:0 ,000 YOU PROVIDE IN DISREGARD OF MY

1 4 " 11"1GA I N REQUEST THAT YOU H MF: ui ATE Y1':J p:::;r)'JT[lE FULL ,I"INC! COMPLETE INFORMATION OF ':'OUR16 P;:;;OF:;",SSIO!JJ'.,L LIABILITY INSURANCE N LATF:R THi'lN 5: 0(1 P. Iv1.1 7 TO u('I: ', FP ISAY, D[C E Iv'] BER 7 , 2 I) 0 / .

"SINCE I NEED TO R E ~ 1 0 R T CLr'\lMS AGI\lN T YOU: (1 T Hi TIG>I"ITE DAMAGES, I AGi'lIN REQUEST '['HAT YOC~ - ~ E C I A T E L Y REMOVE YOURSELF FROM ANY ASSOC:ATION WITH

S I " l ~ j j ) ; , I " I N VS. ZERNIK, JOSEPH Z E R N ~ K . "., -,

)4

Tr-:[ COURT: OKAY. HOLD ON ONE S:==COND.IS THIS f1R. ZE::\NIK?ALL RIGHT. COME FORWARD.

(MR. ZERNIK E N ~ E R S THE COURTROOM AT 11 :55 A.M.)26 THE DEFENJi'1NT: I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SAY I FILED A2 7 ~ 1 ':' I 0 FOR YOU ::\ II I F0 FU1AT ION . I F I .. ED WIT r. THE CLERK2 8 T . I S nc T ION ? 0 R YOU FOR 1 7 0 . 3 . SO, r.CCOR DING TOT HE

6

R E ~ E = V E R LACKING ANY REFERENCE TO CODE SECTION2 Sr=PULATING THE AUTHORITY. NO S E C ~ I O N S A ~ BOCNDARIES

Or r ~ O t : l D ~ J r : T OF A RECEIVER AS DEFINED S'l ~ p . J / ' J , CLAIMING IT4 AS A RECEIVER APPOINTED FOR ESCROW, BY FAILING TO

U;-: L TJuE IN THE APPOINTMENT ANY - - OR REAL ESTATE

"7 " I GP,'JE YOU NOTICE OF S U C ~ ANC OTHER~ ~ - : O N ERNS WELL = i'lDV);NCE OF YOUR APPOINC;"MENc::', );N[1 , ALSO

T'IS)< THAT YO U REMOVE F R m ~ '{OU R" "FROfVl T H ~ S POS:::TIOI\],YO R i'l P POI NT fv1 ENT. YOU P E F T SED TO Des 0 . DPjvj AGE: :3

1 RP, SULTED FRO fv1 YOU R CO N DUCTAR E SOAR I : G, MJ 0 8 Y Fp"R1 EXCEEJ THE $ :0 ,000 YO U PPOVIDE IN DISREGARD OF MY

P R C ! T E ~ ' ; p . > : ~ P, BOl\O FOR YOUP APPOINTfv1ENT.14 "rI"lGAIN PEQUEST THAT YOLl I r ' ~ f v 1 F : 1 ) I P . . T E ~ ' l '1 'j p ~ ( r J T rlE FULL ,I"IN[I COMPLETE INFOPfv1ATION OF ':'OUR16 P h ; O F : ; - , : : ~ S I O l 1 P . , L L=A8IL=TY INSURANCE N LATF:P THi'lN 5:0(1 p.r1.1 7 TO L) (\:', FP ISAY, DF: CH18 EP -7, 2 I) 0 / .

"SINCE I NEED TO R . E ~ 1 0 K T CLr'\lfv1S AGI\lN T YO U: ( 1 r r ; [ '1iTIG,I "ITS DAfv1AGES, I AGi'lIN H E Q U E ~ ~ T THAT YOe-, r,

/4

=- [,:F:I'U'ITELY REfv10VE YOURSELF F R m ~ .1"1I\]'( ,I"ISSOC=-ATIOl\l W=THS I " l ~ j j ) ; , I " I N "IS. ZERNIK, JOSEPH Z E P N ~ K . "

Tt-JF: COURT: OKAY. HOLD ON ONE S:==COND.=S THIS 11F. ZE::


10/28

7

123UHES4

M6789M11VO"lTC

-ON>T11].1MIT;0T::/2TA 12M 1212ISMM21 LAW, TEE WAY I UNDERSTAND IT , YOU HAVE TO STOP THE

2 CURRENT PROCEEDING AND DEAL WITH THAT ONE FIRST.

7

3 THE COURT : :[1)HERE I S I T ?4 THE DEFENDANT: I GAVE TO THE CLERK. IT IS THE

3 E S ~ I COULD DO WITH THE TIMELINESS.6 ~ R KESHAVARZI: YOUR HONOR, THIS IS MOE7 ~ E S H A V A R Z I , ON BEHALF OF PLA INTIFF , N IV IE SAMAAN. MAY I8 AJDRESS THE COURT VERY BRIEFLY?

THE COURT: NOT AT THE MOMEN:.10 ; 7 2 . 3

I A.M R E A D I N ( ~ THE

1 ] OKAY. I 'VE READ THE LlOCUMENT E N T I T L ~ [ J" ,1 i.: ~ ~ PUJ':;SUAt\T TJ C. C. P. 170 .3 rOP OTSQU/\LIFICl\TIJN

-.3 :JF JC]GE COLL:NS, DECLARATION BY JJSEPH ZERNII


11/28

8

1

3MO

S6J

ENPV

TR1DISNI

Tm1MU1ET]O

RN,(TJmDYPCECJULRY

2ESTE1TJN;

3TvN-W

.ZTVOAN

LC.2VRK

8

1 INQEMNIFrCATION AGREEMENT, AND MY FEAR IS ~ H A T WE HAVE AS H O P ~ TIME PERIOD IN WHICH TO CLOSE THIS ESCROW, AND IFTHE ~ E S T R A I N = N G OROSR THAT I HAVE REQUESTED DOES NOTISSUE, ~ E A T THERE WILL BE SIMILAR COMMUNICATIONS MADE TOTHE ~ I T L E C O M F A ~ Y AND TO THE BUYER'S ~ E N D E R , AND, AS

6 :,'JELL ,7'\S TO j\!J.7'\PA ESCROW THAT [ , ~ P . , Y DEL7'\'{ OR PREVENT ~ I SESCROW ;ROM CROSSING OR PREVENT fROM DOING WHAT I ' EBEEN ORDERED TO DO.

T HI'; C' URT : ALL RIGHT, MR. Z :: P t J 1 !< 10 THE DEfE]\;DANT: I MISSED THE BEGINNING Of THE11 PRYSF,NTfi,TION. SO I 'M NOT SURE I K\.JOW WHAT WAS S ) " d ~ 1 IN

THE COURT : HE \10 l'"S - - [el R. PAST t: !-


12/28

9

1LVO3M

}FNNNS5rHS,,RN8VEoHUTVMERVF11

T11SN-TT

TlNL

TIYNMN

PNO22NO2AO24ENVSRTAE'NMNN2V

I:2"

9

I THEV: IN ThE COURTROOM, YOUR HONOR.THE COURT: SO YOU'VE HAD ENOUGH T I ~ E TO READ IT .THE DEFENDANT: MOST THE TIME, WAS ACTUALLY,

);PPE]\::;l\NCE l\ J COURT, );ND AFTER THAT, I WA.S JRIVING. IT[J IS VERY DIFF=CULT TO DRIVE AND READ WHEN YOU JRTVE OR6 !"JHE: I ( (] U r; P PEAR BEFORE A e-JU DGE . SO I JON' T : HI Nh 11" S

R E ~ S O N A B L E TO EXPECT THAT I WOULD HAVE READ THAT IN THE

THe: COUPT: YOU' E HAD TIME C'ROfY! BETVJEEN 9: 00 AND18 10 :10 TO REAJ IT.11 THF, DEFENDi'\NT: NO. I APPEA?ED TN CURT.L THE COURT: AND TOOK YOU, FO? SOMe: PEASON,13 ALMOST - - AN HOUR TO GET HERE.1 L; THE ~ ) E r E N D A N T : BUT I W/'1S DR 1 lNC;.

T l! E CH; en : 1\LL RIGHT . ItJ ELL, I DO)]' T KNOW H(litJ O{ 0 Ui 6 DPI E, Rr:T IT DOESN'T TAKE )''1N HO'JR l\.ND 20 fVlINUTES TO GET1 rROfY1 BEVERLY HILLS TO SANTA fVl0NICA. YOU ,t;LSO r J [ E ~ N T I O N E D1 P THAT YOU GOT AN ORDER TO BE HERE.l YOU ARE WASTING YOUP TIME APGCING OVER THIS.: C) [', INT. T AM GOING TO GIVE YOU TIME TO ARGUE THE MOTION2l P I ~ : - j ~ NOW.22 THE DEfENDANT: THE FIPST ARGUMENT IN THE MOTION2 ) 1ST l-jAT T IJEVER RECE I VE0 AN 0 RDER TO r. EJ PEAR HER E . THE24 JJDGE IN BE'JERLY HILLS - - MR. P)"\STERNAK SERVED ME

IW'TICE. I ASKED HIM AGAIN IN THE ELEVATOR GOING DOWN,26 II PLEP,S;:: SERVE [VlE NOT I CE. II

I NEVEP PECEIVED NOTICE TO APPEAR HERE ATll:3C1. r.: 1 0 : 3 0 , I Wl\S SAPELY PECEIVING THIS, SCT I

9

1 T H E ~ IN ThE COURTROOM, YOUR HONOR.:HE COURT: SO YOU'VE HAD ENOUGH T I ~ E TO READ IT .:HE DEFENDANT: MOST THE TIME, WAS ACTUALLY,

APPE1\::;l\NCE \J COURT, l\ND AFTER THAT, 1 WA.S JR] VI NG. ITIS VERY D I ~ F = C U L T TO DRIVE AND READ WHEN YOU JR1VE OR

6 !"JHE(Of] l\PPEAR BEFORE A


13/28


14/28

1

C2Sv

TV4'0NHM0E0

AMpcWcEDTEE

HA{HUT

1NEJ=E1

'IvLXvA

1ETNv

1

1VNF-VN1C2M2DO1Y

,J

:41H)WMLCIT22

11

C=VIL RIGHTS AS F R E ~ SPEECH OR RIGHT ~ POSSESS =NEX PARTE APPLICATION.THi".T, I' "1 IN PEO PER.

THAT'S E X T R E r ~ E L i UNUSUAL.SO TO DO ALL OF THAT, WHEN

BEYOl\JD

4 CE f E [J [! i\:J c:::' I SIN PRO l ER , I S O E FIN I TEL Y NOT FE.A. S 0 ABLE .BEYON:J THAT, I N O T T C F ~ J I 'M NOT ALLO:1JEO

C l \ iCESS TO ~ ! - : E COURT FILE FOR LONC-; TIME PER::OOS . ."".T ONEF ~ \ r , HlWTNC TO FILE A VERIFIED STATErJ ]ENT fROM LEGAL

S ~ F R TCES, D.S . LEGAL SERVICES, FROM JANl'.A.i\Y TO .A.UC;UST,THEY WE?E NOT ALLOWED EVER TO SEE MY ~ E. NEVER READ

1 (1 SO N()'lJ, .;;CAIN, I 'D L::f . ~ F R TCES, D.S . LEGAL SERVICES, tROM JANl'.Ai\Y TO AUC;UST,THE'l \AJE ~ . NOT A.LLOWE 0 EVER TO SEE MY "1 IE. !J F.VFR r, UqJ

1 C1 IIH=TE HDERS, NOTI-nIJG. SO ] \JO'N,I\CAIN, I 'D L=r


15/28

1

4

11TMN

3ENN

( 'HD _6,LOWKJ

HFRRnTE,E1RJ1TACR1NIECNEMI1HN

P

1ZS?

1MMA

-TO0l:JTSNrvND;ZRN2U;:U L

12

I GUESS HE CIDN'T LIKE THAT FACT, BUT iHEY DECIDED TO --2 ME UP ATTORNEYS, BUT NOT SHOW ME MINUTE ORDERS.

I FOUND SERIOUS STATEMENTS THAT WERE NOTE EN iRJE IN THE SAME MINUTE ORDER THAT HE IS STRIKING

') T ~ " { 1-:(1.3. HE SAYS THAT COUNTRYfiVIDE ::'5 NOT A PARTY TOG i l lTS ~ , T T T G ; ' \ . T T O U OR Hll.S ANYTHING TO DO \rVITH THIS

LITIGATION BEYOND BEING A WITNESS, BUT THE MAILING LISTAT THE ENJ OF iHE MINUTE ORDER, COJNTRYWICE IS LISTED AS

Cj I N T E R \ l E ~ 0 0 R . OF COURSE, AS USUAL, IN IT , 1i'JITHOCT THEf\l ;\[v1 F: . . ' . JUST LISTED I'lS "BRLZl..N CAVE," J \ T T O R N E : Y ~ ~ f ' ( )P

11 unT P{\" i I os .12 HE DOESN'T KNUN INHERE I\LL THS PLACES WHERE13 C TJT:::'R"(lrJIDE ~ E F T THEIR MARKS IN ORDER TO dIDE THEIRlL PR.ESEt'CE. IN T:-JE SM'lE, THESE GENTLEfV1AN, UNOER THF:1' , RAlJAK, I:\lDICATE TO BEVERLY HILLS --

THE ,jUDCE: CALLED ':'HE CASE, !\ND THFN THE TWOP RTTES APPEARED. WE GREETED THE JUDGE; THE JUDGF:

! 8 REETED r.s . i'lBOUT 30 SECONDS Ll'lTER, A MYSTERIOUS1 C) E:\lTLEf'LZl..fJ i \ P FEARE D AN0 STOO D BETWF?N US.o JUi)GE, " ( ~ M ] YOU PLEASE TELL fJ]E WHO THIS GEl'JTLEiJ],Zl.N IS ? "

S ~ REFUSEJ TO INTRODUCE HIM. I ASKED H:M, M Y S ~ [ R I O U Sz: p , r T ~ ) R N E Y FOR MAR,Zl.. ESeRQI."', BUT HE REFUSED;O GIVE [vIE HIS

CARD, REFUSED TO GIVE ME HIS INFORMATION.:/\) HZl..T !l E 's TEL LIN G ]'v] E .

:;: DON'T I JUST LISTED I'\S "BPLA.N CAVE," J \ T T O R N E : Y ~ ~ f'i)P11 ' ~ C ' L T [ J T P n ' J I D E .i2 HE DOESN'T KNOW WHERE ALLIHE PLACFS WHERF13 C T.I,:"'R"(lrJIDE ~ E f T THEIR MARKS IN ORDER TO d:OE THEIRiL PR.ESEt':CE. IN T:-JE SI


16/28

:

2vlTM45ZH6JM

IT

C

1J1L

LM1M1RZRHi1Z

(TT

,TMT

.3HI

-C

,L

2Z2

TO ~ N ~ E R T ~ COURTHOUSE ANO STAND IN ?RONT OF THE JUDGE'viTITHOJ7 BEING ADMITTED TO INTRODUCE?"

THEN I ASKED BY HIM, "DID YOC nAVE, ANY4 C ~ A N C E , A N EX PARTE COMMUNICATION WITH JUDGE LINDA HART5 C:JLE THAT I't-"lDE YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE TO JUfvlP =NTO ':'H"-"IT?"6 IT \rlJl"'"S NOT CLEAR WHA':' THE ANSWER W"-"IS TO HIM.

I ASK YOUR HONOR, WHAT =S THE STANDING OFT I I ~ S P E ~ S O N WHO - - I DON'T KNOW THIS PERSON STANDINGf ~ F R E 3E(A(] E I HAD LOAN EXPERIENCE WITH COUNTRYWIDE

1 r>J1 :

:,rlJHE?,t: :CCGE CONNOR SAID, "DOES IT BOTHER YOU?"I SAID, "IT DOES BOTHER ME. IT IS =N

1L I O ~ , l \ ' : ' I O N OF MY RIGHT." IF I LOOK A; THE MINU'I'l: ORDERSl IN THE FILE, YOU'LL SEE THAT SOMETIMES ATTORNEYS FOR111 ( = ~ ) U N ' ; ' F Y W I D l : SOIVETIMES LISTED AS PUUNTIFF ATTORNEY,1-" SO[vlET=IVES THEY'RE LISTED ,-"IS "MOVING PJI,RTY" ,-"ITTORNEYS,

BUT NE ER rviTITH A NAIvJE "COUNTRYWIDE" ASSOCI,-"ITED WITII T![Efv1"l I 1>J DRJER TO ,-"ILLDW JUDGE - - JUDGE S E G A ~ H"-"ID TD CLi; [ ~ J j THAT~ ~ H ~ Y WERE NOT INVOLVED IN THIS CASE.

~ E CDURT: TAKE A BREATH EVERY ~ D A ~ THEN SDTHE ~ D C R ~ REPDRTER WILL BE ABLE TO CATCH UP.

THE DEFENDANT: SO I WAS - - I 'M SDRRY.THIS IS ENTIRELY INAPPROPRIATE FOR

~ R E S P D N C E ~ T BECA0SEIT IS ENTIRELY INAPPRDPRIATE FDR EX PARTE

B E C A ~ S E I ' IN PRD PER, AND I NEVER GDT ~ O T I C E . THEo ~ ~ ~ NDc:::' ICE S I ~ P L Y NOTICE THAT I GOT WAS ABOUT A

~ HEARING =N BEVERLY HILLS, BUT I NEVER GDT A ~ NDT=CE FOR28 THIS HEARING, ALTHOUGH JUDGE LINDA HART CDLE

TO SN7ER T ~ COURTHOUSE ANO STAND IN tRONT OF THE JUDGE' v i / : : ~ H C J 7 BE1NG ADMITTED TO INTRODUCE?"

THEN I ASKED BY HIM, "DID YOC nAVE, ANY4 C ~ A N C E , ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATION WITH JUDGE LINDA HART5 COLE THAT I't-"lDE YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE TO JUfvlP :NTO ':'H"-"IT?"6 IT \rlJl"'"S NOT CLSAR WHA':" THE ANSWER W"-"IS TO HIM.

1 ASK YOUR HONOR, WHAT :S THE STANDING OF~ T I I ~ S PE:::;SONWHO -- I DON'T KNOW THIS PERSON STf"NDING

f ~ F R E 3E(A(] E I HAD LOAN EXPER1ENCE WITH COUNTRYWIDE1 ('JI

:,rlJHER,t: ~ T C G E CONNOR SAID , "DOES IT BOTHEF YOU?"! SALD, " IT DOES BOTHER ME. IT IS :N

L I ( ) ~ , l \ ' : ' ION OF MY RIGHT." IF I LOOK A : THE M I N u c ~ ' l : ORDEFS15 IN THE F :LE , YOU'LL SEE THAT SOMETIMES ATTORNEYS FORI 11 ( ~ ~ ) U N c : c F Y W : Dl: SOIVET IMES LISTED AS PUUNT I FF ATTORNEY,1 -" S 01v1' :' : IVE S THEY' FE L;: S TE 0 ,-"IS "MOVI NG Pp,RTY" PI.TTOFNEYS,1 r( BUT NE ER lvi/ITH A NAlvJE "COUNTFYWIDE" ASSOCl,-"ITED WITII TlIEM

1>J ClRJER TO ,-"ILLOW JUDGE -- JUDGE S E G A ~ H"-"ID TO C L j ; I ~ J j THAT~ - H ~ Y WFFF N C l ~ TNVClLVFQ IN THIS CASE.

~ E COURT: TAKE A BREATH EVERY ~ C l W A ~ THEN SO' r THE ~ O C F ~ REPOFTEF WILL BE ABLE TO CATCH UP.

THE DEFENDANT: SO I WAS -- I 'M SOFRY.THIS IS ENTIRELY INAPPFOPRLATE FCF

~ R E S P O N C E ~ T BECA0SE

IT IS E N T ~ F E L Y INAPPFOPFIATE FOF EX PARTEB F C A ~ S E I ' IN PRO PEF, AND I NEVER GOT ~ O T I C E . THEo ~ ~ ~ N0 ICE S I ~ P L Y NOTICE THAT T GOT WA S ABOUT A

'7 HEAFING =N BEVERLY HILLS, BUT I NEVER GOT A ~ N O T ~ C E FOR28 TH=S HEARING, ALTHOUGH JUDGE LINDA HART COLE


17/28

1

1

--

4'6'M,G

[:OD

1H]LTM1A10E1T11VLE0T10UHRROIDS2:1E2D2ED

UD2E2

?

14

SPECIFICALLY INSTRUCTED MR. PASTERNAK NOT TO PROVIDE ME2 I : O ~ I C E . THERE'S [10 NOTICE FOR THAT.

3EYONJ THAT, IF WE LOOK AT IT CLEARLY, THEN4 WE THAT SEE ACTUALLY THE WHOLE DOCUMENT OF MR. PASTERNAK

IS BASEJ ON TWO LEGS. IF HE IS ON A - - JUDGMENT BY6 JUDGF CON N 0 E , J1J\J 0 , TWO DOC U,JI EIn S 3 Y J UDGESE GJ'I"L , =' M

GOING TO - - THESE WERE DONE BY JUDGES WHICH WEREDISQU!\L=rIEC OUT OF AUTHORITY, ArJO BOTH OF THEM


18/28

1

1NOCHP0UN L

LrNN

6S

8N9

1T [v] ell"EY BECAUSE SHE DOE S NOT L IK E TO 1.ZI,KE TH r:: i'lJ ( j [J r:: lR ~ C A U S E ~ E RULE SAYS THAT SHE HAS TO DELIVER IT TWO

~ WEEKS AFTER SHE RECEIVES THE MONEY. SO SHE WOUL8 NOTG=VE ME AK E S T ~ M A T E ON PURPOSE. I GAVE H E OVERFAl ON

2 6 TH}\T TRi\NSCRIPT. STILL, I DON'T G2:T }'I,NY TRANSCRIPT FROI'v]2 ' THAT, AND I BELIEVE BECAUSE THE TRANSCRIPT DOES NOT

;::XIST. = DOES NOT EXIST BECAUSE THE E ENT I T S S ~ F NEVER

15

1 HEA?ING ON M ' ' { ~ MO T I ON FOR C. C. P. 128 . 7 , 0\7H I CH l\JEVERH A P ~ E : l : : : : : J BECZI,USE PURSUANT 10 THE L.ZI,W, IN 1 !J. 3 , I SERVED

3 hER W = T ~ A C I S Q U A L I ~ I C A T I O K PAPER A: THE F I ~ S T PRACTICAL0 ? F O R ~ U N I T l , WHICH IS AS SOON AS I WALKED INTO THE

c) ~ O ~ l R C : - H O U S E . SO, THEREFORE, THERE 'tJAS NO HEA"RING ,ZI,ND NO6 F r ~ : I ] l ; .

SHE TOOK OVER AN HOUR IK HER CHAMBER, ANDh ~ : ; H E CAMF: OCT OF THERE, P\I\!D SHE SAID I ~ OPEN COURT, "I1 J O \ J ' ~ I\DMI':' /\NY OF TEIS , BUT I \;I);:LL RECUSE MYSELF FROM

] c THE CP\SE," B ~ J T MOKTHS ~ P , T E R , WHEN I FINALLY G(JT TO SEE

], FRPdJDUL::::E [\1INUTE ORDER O ABOUT 10 P P \ ~ ~ F : ~ : ; , J E S C R ~ 8 I l \ ] G A

] RULED.l I 'VE BEEN ASKING REPEATEDLY FOR T2E~ ~ R A N S C R I P T CF T ~ A T HEARING BECAUSE !F IT REALLY

] H GR,JER, =C:-' SI\YS ' ~ H A T TRANSCRI PI v,IP,S TPd


19/28

1

1

M34REYHLTHUGNs6

\WCBTROFTEMNwRH

HNVa=

1L,AM

1N1

T.lCAC1G12

2O0)

[O'e

T2

02E

16

2 I'1R. PASTEFlJAK: NEVER HAPPEN2:D.3 THE ~ E F E N 0 A N T : SO THAT JUDGE WAS DISQUALIFIED4 A L R E A ~ Y ON JULY 12TH. THE JUDGE, CONNOR, WASc. ])1 SO',],Z\LTFI Fe THE FIRST TUllE ON JUL-! 12':"H BASED ON

C I S H O ~ : : S T Y ANJ FALSEHOODS AND M I S C O N D U C ~ , WILLFUL"'J 1::: ': : J D ~ T C T , OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE :"\ND OTHEP ' :IA,:MS OFNA.T r.r: P d ~ O U T Wf-LA,T SHE DID ~ H T H , - = O U ~ T R Y W I D E HJ T H ~ S CASE.

l-lE ALL 0 'J'J ED co . : [ TRY \tJ IDE WELL Be -ION 0 ANY P .1'\RTY W0 U ri Ev 1\R1 Ii E',::: );LLOltJFJ RY L A , \ ~ IN A CASE

1 ] ':'f-12: COURT: EXCUSE [V1E FOR THS [ v ~ O f ~ E N T . COUN':'PYWI DEL =5 ~ u t n OLVED IN THIS PA.RTICCLAR EX PARTE. :;0 I ,A,M13 GO::-NG TO c r E -'{OU A COUPLE MOPE MINlJTES TO ADORES THIS

':'HE DE?ENDANT: ANOTHER ISSUE IS YOU ARF TRYING TO, 6 ."..1' J r: :'=CAT E THIS EX PARTE WIT Ho UTA Y F I LE , : THO UTA NYl / P,;;CKGFOUI; F G F ~ IT , FOF SO]\JETHING T:-rAT TOOK AROUT 1(1018 PT\GES. HO\'I] J\RE YOU GOING TO AD,JUDTCJ'\TE IT ?

THF r 0 UF T : [J]R.. ZERN I K, BE CAUSE \-0 U ARR I VED S 0L ; ; T ~ , 1T IS NOW ALtvl0ST 1: : ' :15 . I AM GOING TO GIVE YOU A

21 COUFLE: ]\;ORE MINUTES. SO I F I lJ1JAN':' '; '0 ADDRESS THE REAL)


20/28

1

T2RjCV4N56PNED

Y8v

HPNTRU11S1

,"LSJEN:1N

N

1INJP

1BO]PNTmT"KMD

"L

'S

2H.1A2A2

17

T ~ I N G S REQUESTE8 BY LAW. SO THE JUDGMENT WAS INVALID IN2 ~ H F:RST PLACE, BUT BEYOND THAT, PLAINTIFF DOES NOT

RE 0 N T ~ F THE JUDGMENT, BUT THE RECE=VER WASPRE:,IMINARILY APPOINTED, ACCORDING TO ThE JUDGMENT, BUTTHE; PEFJSED TO ENTER THE JUDGMENT AS FART OF HIS

6 AFFO:NTMENT ORDER.YOU HAVE HERE A - - COPIES OF THE

8 APPOTNTHENT ORDER. IF YOU CI\.N SHOipJ ME THE JUDGl'vlENT') hill =CHI:3 THE BAS I S FOR HIS 1\. PPO I NTMEN T THERE , I ' 11, BE

18 VF,F:( C ~ R A ' l ' L H 1 L . II,1 THE 5A[JlE VJJ\Y, IT WI\::; DESCR1F3ED ,1'\S IF11 liE IS A RECEIVER FOR EXECUTION OF A JUDGMENT, BCT

; ~ T H O U C H T JI,:::;f


21/28

1

1

23NLSK4M5M6

JVELN

D1S1EAlvJDN1Tv

5HEWUTUFUNRL]]IN

S,XTUvETNV'1

LUTD0C0N2L

2M"LS

18

1 ~ E ? U S E D TO DO THAT.2 BE10:JO THAT, IN COURT ON ~ H ~ A THEJ ~ 2 : ~ ; R I N G ON T ~ l \PPl l INTMENT OF fJ1P,. PASTER,Np.K -- T H j ~ T IS

NO ~ M B E R 9, 2007 -- I CONFRONTED ATTORNEY FOR~ R MOE KESHAVARZI AND ASKED HIM HOW COME S I ~ C E

6 AUGUST qTH, :HE DAY THAT JLDGE CONNOR S K T S R ~ C THEJUDGlv]ENT J'dJC UNTIL THIS VERY DAY, T H r ~ R E WERE ABOilT FOURD T ~ 7 F R ~ N T COCRT FTLINGS WHERE HE IS S U P P O S ~ D TO E ~ T E R

lC IT 'S SU?POSEo TO NOTICE ME OF THE ~ T ~ I C , G M E N T11 EY ORDER 0;:: THE COlJRT. HE NEVER DID T:-lAT, AN] THENI' " T H E R ~ 'v'JERE Ti-iESE l'\DDITIONAL D ( Y " : U t v l E ~ T S itJHICH HE I \ J O ~ f ' ~ D rni : TIIP 8R.r:':F 1T:::ELf, ATTACHED THl".T AS EI:HI8TT ,A, ,JUDC:;['v]ENT1 ..; y H r " 0 URT 0 F AU C; UST 9TH. WHEN YO II P[ N EX HTB=T A,:5 THERE'S NO JUDGMENT BY THE COURT OF AUGUST 9TH IN THERE.Leo '! II, P Dn UMENTS AR f PRESENT THE p,E, BU: NO J ~ DC; :'1 ElJT BY

I IN SHORT, FROM AUCUST 9TH TO NOVEMBER 9TH,;1 T;-;;::: T:::r'1E PEPJOD BEFORE MR. PASTERNAK' ~ P,P?OINTMENT AS A,( Hf I': 1 ER TOE XECJ TE THIS .JU:JGMEN T, PL]'I, =NTIfF \JEVER'1 A C K ~ O W ~ E D G ~ D OR NEVER ADMITTED THAT HE EVEN RECOGNIZES

L " ~ ~ T Y \ T T T J r ) C ~ i I j E ~ ; T . WHEN':: SAID THi".T IN OCRT, A T ' : ' O ~ N E Y fOF\23 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF RESPONDED AS FOLLOWS: NUMBER ONE,2 ~ ClA:::MEo THAT HE HAD NEVER SEEN THE JUDGMENT WHICH IS

JTLANDISH BECAUSE JUST TO MAKE SURE, A WEE( EARLIER, I~ HAND ~ E P V E D HIM WITH A JUDGMENT :::N COURT ABOUT

IT 'S NOTICE OF JUDGMENT BECAUSE IT WAS SO BIZARRE.FOR TWO MONTHS, HE DECIDED TO BECAUSE THE

18

j ~ E ? D S E D TO DO THAT.2 8E10:IO THAT, IN COURT ON ~ H ~ A THE-.! ;-: 2 : ~ ; R ] NG 0 N T E }\ P P II I NT MEN T 0 F fvJ P,. PAS T E R, NP. V - - T Hj TIS

iJC\F:MBER 9, 2iJ07 -- I CONfHOI\JTED ATTOHNE'{ r0K>m. ["10 EKE SHi \VARZ I AND l\ SKED HIM HOW CO fYI E SIT::: E

6 A U G G S ~ qTH, ~ H DAY THAT JLDGE CONNOR S K T ~ R ~ D THEJUDGIV1ENT J'dJL UNTIG THIS VERY DAY, T H r ~ R E WEHE ABorlT FOURI J T C " ~ T R F N T COCHT f I L INGS WHEHE HE I:=: c ;l1PPOSFIJ TO CnER

IC IT' S SU ? POSED TON 0 T IC E ME 0 F THE ~ ~ [',GMEN T11 BY ORDER OF THE COURT. HE NEVER DID T ~ A T , AN ] THEN

T H E R ~ 'v'JERE T;"';ESE i \DDITIONAL D ( Y ~ U t v 1 E ~ T S itJHICf-i HE I \ I O ~ F I ' Tfll ~ TIIF BR.I2:F ~ T : ' E L f , ATTACHED THJH AS El : r . I81T .A,JUDC:;j 'v]ENT1 ..; . ~ H r " 0 URT 0 F AUG UST 9 T H . WHEN YO [1 PEN EX HI B : T A,:s ~ H E P E ' S NO JUDGMENT BY THE COURT OF AUGUST 9TH IN THERE., C CL! II' P W)i-:UMENT S AH I PRE SENT THE P,E, BU NO J ~ DC;:'1 EllT BYI! ' ~ C H J F ' : .

I

} (\

, I

iI'.] SHORT, FROM AUCTJST clTH TO GiOVEMBER. 9TH,T ~ T=ME PERIOD BEFOHE MR. P A S T E R N A K ' ~ AP?OINTMENT AS Ai I' i ~ , I E P T D EX ECJ T E THIS ,JU :JGMENT, P L,/"I, NT IFF \J EVE FA C K ~ Q W ~ E D G ~ D OR NEVEH ADMITTED THAT HE EVEN HECOGNIZESTY\ T TfJ r / : ; i I j E ~ ; T . WHEN .:: SAID THi".T II'! OCRI, A I ~ O R N E Y FOP,

:='3 COT)NSEL FOR FL ! dNT I F f RESPONDED ,A,S FOLLOWS: NUMBER ONE,~ ; . . . ; ~ CLA:MED THAT HE HAD NEVER SEEN THE JUDGMENT WHICH IS

C J ~ L A N D I S H BECAUSE JUST TO MAKE SURE, A WEE( EARLIEH, I~ HAND ~ E P V E D HIM WITH A JUDGMENT 1N COURT ABOUT

IT 'S NOTICE OF JUDGMENT BECAUSE IT WAS SO BIZARRE.FOR TWO MONTHS, HE DECIDED TO BECAUSE THE


22/28

A"L34VAc)M

BTEVEV0TTS

S'1NHlC

.ATLSLS1E01D;DSW1NVASWAN;1JAARTT

,E0NVHNH,JlOAR

ITXTM

1R2L1

:4R2M2AV2OEAT2AABSJRD ~ U L L Of A DEfENDANT WHO ?RESUMABLi LOST A CASE

2 A ~ IS SER ING PLAINTIff WITH A JUDGHENT BECAJSE-, FUUl:TIFr rAILED TO NOTICE JUDGG1ElJT. SO HE WAS HAND4 SERVED \ i J I ~ H THE JUDGMENT l \ \!\IEEK EJ'I"RLI::::P. STILL ON5 NOVEHBER 9TH, HE CLAIMED HE HAD NEVER SEEN THE J U ~ C M E N T ,

BUT HE r r r.r . HE NOTICED [JIE Of A MOTION FOR Si\NCTIONSFO? D:SOBEYINC JUDGMENT.

SO THERE ARE fOUR MOT;ONS ~ I K E ~ H A T AND~ ER. t:NTE?EJ THE JUDGfv1ENT AS RRIEf. BE(OND THiH, HE

i c ;;TD TH!"T :-rE DOES NOT R E C O C ~ N I Z E TH:: JUlJC!VJENT BECAUSE HE.J;; I D - - AND T ii1',T W'I,S TOTAL SURPRISE TO !VJE . '-IE S!\ 1 jJ HE12 HAD AN UNDERSTANDING. I - - "AGATN, HE HAD l',

r=:\LOGUE" - - THAT'S A QUOTE D I A ~ O G U E WITH JUDG::::1J ':ONNOR. T [IV,;;S NO: ['ART 0 r THE DIALOGUE, l\N [1 I HAD l\N

U'WERSVI,NDTNG.1 c 1 WAS NOT PART Of THE UNDERSTANDING WITHl I i DGE CONNOR, WHICH EXACTLY THE - - OF WHAT IS IN ~ H

I::: TAI LS 0 F THE J UDc:; ~ J ENT BY THE COURT RECAU SE r) Ij TEt: COUPT: I 'M GOING TO STOP YOU HERE - - OK Y

21 HECAUSE YOU'RE GOING BACK TO TRYING TO ATTACK THE;' 2 J U [JG[J tJ .

~ ! 1 ~ , DEFENDANT: NO.THE COURT: AND YOU'RE TRYING TO A:TACK THE

25 ?E ~ I V E P , BUT AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED, THERE ~ A VALID26 APPOINTING T H RECEIVER. SO I HAVE HEAPD YOU NOW FOR

OVER 20 MINUTES, AND SO I CAN'T SPEND ANY MORE T I ~ E .28 YOU ~ A V E ANY RESPONSE?

DO

ABSJRG ~ U L L Of A DEfENDANT WHO ?RESUMABLi LOST A CASE2 A ~ IS SER ING PLAINTIfF WITH A JUDGHENT B ~ C A J S E-, FUU [;T I Fr rAI LED TO NOT ICE JUDGG1ElJT. SO HE WP",S HAND4 SERVED 'iJI'::'H THE JUDGMENT l \ \!\IEEK E } ' I ~ R L I ; : : : R . STILL ONS NOVEHBER 9TH, HE CLAIMED HE HAD NEVER SEEN THE J U ~ G M E N T ,

BUT HE FIff::]. HE NOTICED [JIE Of A ]\J]OTION FOR ::Jf\NCTIONSF ~ D:SOBEYING JUDGMENT.

SO THERE ARE FOUR MOT;ONS ~ l K E '::'HAT AND~ E \ E R t:NTE?EJ THE JUDGfv1ENT AS RRIEf. BE(OND THJU, HE

1US' ; I D TH r" T :-r E DOF S NOT REC0 C;NI Z E TH J UjJ G:vI ENT B ECAl! SE HE. ] .I'd D - - AN [\ T ii 1',T W}'I, S TOT AL SUR PRI SET 0 :viE . :-I E S!\ 1 D HEI HAD AN UNDERSTANDING. I - - "AGA IN , HE HAIJ ~

r=/\IOGUE" - - THAT'S A QUOTE11 ':JNNOR. 1 [IV,;S NO: rART 0 f THE DIALOGUE, l\N [1 I HAD l\N" C, J

Ie

U'WERSTM\jDING.WAS NOT PART Of THl U N D E R S T A ~ D I N G WITH

i DGE CONNOR, WHICH EXACTLY THE - - Of WHAT 15 IN ~ H

I::: TAJ L S C) F THE J UDG ~ J ENT BY THE COURT BECAU SE :;-) Ij TEt: COUPT: I'M GOING TO STOP YOU H E R ~ - - O y

~ HECAUSE YOU'RE GOING BACK TO TRYING TO ATTACK :HE::'2 J U [ J G [ J ~ t J ~ .

1 ! 1 ~ , DEfENDANT: NO.THE COUPT: AND YOU'RE TRYING ~ A:TACK THE

2 DE ElVER, BUT AS FAR AS I'fv1 CONCERNED, THERE ~ A VALID26 A P P C I ~ T I N G T ~ RECEIVER. SO I HAVE HEARD YOU NOW FOR

OVER 20 M T N U ~ E S , AND SO I CAN'T SPEND ANY MORE r l ~ E .~ YOU ~ A V E ANY RESPONSE?

DO


23/28

2

1S2

4NB

N

lHlE1i1NN

JNCCRSTE1AHV1wCSSOUVL!EK

0HY0DS[lVY

ITD

;M2'/

2:

TQH=OT L

20

[v1R. Pi\STERNAK: I JUST WANT TO RESPOND BRIEFLY TO2 TW0 ITEMS. ONE WAS NOTICE. WHAT I WAS ORDERED BY THE3 ~ C J G E TO CO WAS GIVE N01ICE THAT SHE GRANTED THE 170 .64 FILED BY MR. ZERNIK AND HAD ORDERED AND THAT IT WAS

BEING TRANSFERRED TO DEPARTMENT J , ALTHOUGH SHE ORALLYTOLD ,IS TO COME HERE TO THIS DEPA.RTMEIJT FOR THIS Hf


24/28

2

1CLN

-VLV'"McD

RFDK

'rYF1OeEGR11

1OG1R1RO1CFTTKEE0GN1AR

RB

,FSDR1:R

2:2X2;1 RECEIVER AG0 Y O ~ R HONOR ENJOIN MR. ZERNIK FROM CA?PING

=ERT;;TN - -MR. ZEPNIK RAISED SOME CONCERNS A B O U ~ THE

L F I R S ~ AMENDMENT, THAT THEY'VE ORDERED THAT RECEIVER SEEKr, FRm,; YOUR HONOR IS VERY SIMILPIR, I F [lOT IDENTIC;;L, TO ANE ORJER THAT COCNTRYWIDE SOUGH: ANQ OBTAINED FROM JJDGE

C IrJ :=' ?EQC=:RING MR. ZERNIK TO C O N T N : - ~ ~ ONLY 1'HTOR:0[YS

C r: F' , '{ FEe; o F 0 UNTRYWIDE . THEl ' CAIv1 E Pol] D GOT M.] o ROE R1 c: r.! ~ H J lJDr E CON NOR .11 T H ~ R D ISSUE WAS THAT THE RECE:VERSHfP WAS1: ~ H P , L L E N C ; E J BY MK. ZERNIK, M\JD THF: COURT OF APPFAI,1 Fr'OND Ar'P:=::LU\TE DISTRICT P.CREED, DENIED MR. Z E R N : ~ Y \ ' S

P F T - ~ = O N FOR WRIT OF MANDATE. SO WE'RE BEFORE YOU.l THFRE =:S AN URGENCY AS THE RECEIVER NOTED, AS

IV!R. t ~ T \ : : : ; T E R N , ; ; K , NOTED, BEFORE YOU IllID 1', JUDGMEIlT S:::lJCE1 U J S 9TH OF THIS YEAR, YOUR HONOR.

REFEREE THAT IS APPOINTED TO OVERSEE CER?AIN PORTIONS OFl WAS RETIRED JUDGE O'BRIEN AND BErAUSE

20 OF MR. Z E P N I ~ ' S PROBLEM, BUT NOT T ~ ENTIRE A.D.P.21 SERVI ~ O R G A ~ I Z A T I O N , REFUSING THEMSELVES 7POM HELPING22 :JS ENFORCE THIS JUDGI'v:ENT, fv"JE'RE VEKY CLOSE TO CLOSING~ ESCROW, Y UP H O I ~ O R , AND WE NEED THIS ~ I N A l GReER FROM24 YOUR HONOR TO BE ABLE TO CLOSE ESC?OW AND GET TO THE25 FIlIISf-: ~ I N E , AND, THEREFORE, ~ \ ) E I\SK YOUR HOl\OR TO GRANT2 ~ [ H E EX PARTE APPLICATION.27 ~ H JEfENDANT: MR. KESHAVAPZI RAISES A WEOLESF?IES. VERY BRIEFLY TO ADDRESS THE POINTS THAT HE

1 RECEIVER AG2 YOCR HONOR ENJOIN MR. ZERNIK FROM CAPPING

MR. ZEPNIK RAISED SOME C O N C E R ~ S A B O U ~ THEL F I R S ~ AMENDMENT, THAT THEY'VE ORDERED THAT RECEIVER SEEK'" f ROf'; '{ 0URHO NOR I S VERY S IMILD,R, I F [lOT IDENTIC l\ L, TO AN

ORJER THAT COCNTRYWIDE SOUGHT ANQ OBTAINED FROM JJDGE' : j lrJ :=' ? E Q C ~ R I N G MR. ZERNIK TO C O N T N : - ~ ~ ONLY ATTOR:0EYS

h FJ P (' ( j U[n RY'VV IDE BECAUSE MR. ZERN = F Vi I < Hl\ ? 1\ ~ ~ I NG r: E:RTAH,]C t F ' , 'yT F ,:; Ci F 0UNTRY WID E . THE Y CAv1 E PJ] G c: CJ T M.] ()ROE R

1c: r ! ~ H J 1J r f E CON NOR .1 1 T H ~ R D ISSUE WAS THAT THE RECE:VERSHrp WAS1. ~ H P , ~ L E N C ; E J BY MK. ZEFNIK, M,ID THE COUFT Of APPEAr,l ' SE"OND A r ' P : : : : ~ L / \ T E DISTRICT P.CREED, DENIED MR. ZERN=y,' S

P F T - ~ = O N FOR WRIT OF MANDATE. SO WE'RE BEFORE YOU.I ' THERE:S AN URGENCY AS THE RECEIVER NOTED, ASI '\. JII!R. t ~ T \ : : : ; T E R N A K , NOTED, BEFORE YOU l l ! ~ D P. J U D G M E ~ l T :;=1JCE1 ..1 U J S 9TH OF THIS YEAR, YOUR HONOR.1 FEFEREE THAT IS APPOINTED TO O V E R S ~ E CER7AIN PORTIONS OF

I : WAS RETIRED J U D G ~ O'BRIEN AND BErAUSE.20 OF fvlF. :::[P[ll("5 PROBLEM, BUT NOT T:-lE ENTIRE "D,.G.P.2J S E K V l r ~ S O R G A ~ I Z A T I O N , REFUSING THEMSELVES 7POM HELPING.2 2 ;J SEN F( !Rc: E THIS J U0Gtv: ENT, fv"JE ' REV EKY CL05 E TO CLOS 1NG~ ESCROW, Y UP H O I ~ O R , AND WE NEED THIS ~ l N A l GReER FROM24 YOUR HONOR TO BE ABLE TO CLOSE ESC?OW AND GET TO THE.25 FIlIlSf-: ~ I N E , AND, THEREFORE, ~ \ ) E I\,SK YOUR HOl\OR TO GRANT2 ~ [ H E ~ PARTE APPLICATION.27 ~ H JEFENDANT: MR. KESHAVAPZI RAISES A WEOLE

SE?IES. VERY BRIEFLY TO ADDRESS THE POINTS THAT HE


25/28


26/28

2

DXM3OLO'WESGSV6

ASTLGAN

1FRN

LEBENNN

1NE]LVN

vEANNODADJB

1iAH, ;RUJERE

vTCU,M

.EE

NN

2KM

7

23

R E ~ E A T E D REQUESTS, AGAIK, THEY DID NO: SERVE ME. ITDCES NO':' EXIS7. SIMPLY DOES ~ O EXIST.

3 THEN MR. KESHAVARZI MENTIONED IN T H L APPEALS=OURT - - WHAT THE APPEALS COURT SAID IS VERY') IW"ERESTING. THE APPEP.LS COURT SP.IO THP\T fILED [\lYG APPEAL WRIT OF MANDATE BASED ON THE JUDGMENT. THF

HE IS R.IGHT ABOUTT IU'\.T, B\J':' THE A? PEAL CO \JRT SlU 0 I s H0 J L 0 :Jo I T

G _ E D l A T E ~ ' 1 ' ON rrHF BASIS O E THE RECEIVE?SHI?-APP I N T M ~ N T

1 THE INA.y' leN 0 ERSTOO 0 I T IS SIN CE THE ISS Ut:L: 0 r T f-' E TIT 0G[II;ENT S QUE ~ T IONABLE BEC1\ ~ SE J U0 r:; E ,. 0 NNOR DI [)

J ~ 1 C ; j J F , N T . BECAUSE OF THAT, THEY 0 :0 NOT WANT ME TO] , T --lEy' ';"0 L [) j ] E TO REPL-( THROUGH THE l; PPOr NTMFNTOR J ER OF.i, c [\/1. F1


27/28

2

:

34

J

eM6

,\

8E:N

RSCH

111]]HRUTEFNAH15FEEBYRHTcN17HTTENEHUUSVE

rO1M

o'

"LD2:22r

2LO

N

25

2SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF C A L I ~ O R N I A

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES3 HON. PATRICIA L. C O ~ L I N S , JUDGE

NIVIE SAMAAN,PLAINTIFF,

\ IS.J C :=; E P H ZERIi K ,

:JEFE tJD),\NT .

1 ]12

[\JO. SC087400

REPORTER'SCERT I FICATF:

13 " LAURSN B. JONES, OFFICIAL REPORTER OF THE14 S:H ERiO R COURT 0 F THE STATE 0 F CAL. FOR I ' ':A, FOR THF:15 r: IN'I'Y OF LOS ANGELES, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I l[Dc6 O::


28/28

SOA2

DZ J111

?

\

C

DN1111R

07-12-07 samaan v zernik (sc087400) la superior court: transcript of attorney pasternak's ex parte...

Documents